Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Tandem Cycling A bicycle built for two. Want to find out more about this wonderful world of tandems? Check out this forum to talk with other tandem enthusiasts. Captains and stokers welcome!

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-29-05, 12:03 AM   #1
rlong
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Stoker seat posts and seats

My wife is really short and when I dropped a suspension seat post on our Burley, it was too high for her.
I'm vexed. The bike is close to being too big for her in the first place ( she can stand over it with only the barest of clearance). I'm now considering perhaps a carbon seat post with a Brooks B-67 or something like that. We really need to put on a few miles before we go nuts buying stuff. Sorry, I'm ranting, but we've both been off our bikes for a while and are excited about our first tandem. I've read all the previous posts on the subject and feel even more confused now

Thanks for any input.
rlong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-05, 04:05 AM   #2
SDS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Grand Prairie, TX
Bikes:
Posts: 702
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My advice is not to worry about it much--unless she does. You don't HAVE to have a suspension seatpost on the back of a tandem, many stokers prefer not to have one, and prior to the early '90's suspension seatposts were either nonexistent or very scarce. Make sure you call out the bumps.

If you are only a little bit too high, there might be things you can do:

1) Not all saddles are of the same height between the rails and the top of the saddle. Get one lower than you have, and you might be low enough.

2) Not all suspension seatposts require the same amount of space between the top of the seat tube, and the saddle rails. Look for one that requires less (vertical) space. Don't be turned off by cheap posts (which also often do not have much travel and are therefore perhaps what you need). I haven't tried one of the parallelogram posts (Thudbuster), or spoken at length to somebody who has, but of the straight-up-and-down posts, one of my favorites is a cheap Taiwan post, marketed under several names, including (shudder) Nashbar. Disassembly of this post found a spring and an elastomer and a preload adjusting nut, pretty much what you'd get on any post. It also has the typical low-end single-bolt-with-serrations seat rail clamp. This post requires no less than 3-5/8" between the top of the seat tube and the saddle rails.

The only problem I had with the post, was that we thought we could not get the preload up high enough for spirited riding with a 140-lb stoker. The elastomer seemed a little mushy, and it seemed like we couldn't increase the preload enough by turning in the nut, so we removed the elastomer and replaced it with a stack of (!) pennies. Aha, adjustable, high preload (more than with any off-the-rack suspension post I have tried). One of these days I've got to go back and replace the pennies with something lighter.

Have you done a curb stop yet? Curbside pedal up, unclip on that side, ride next to the curb and stop, and put a foot down on the curb, which is a lot higher than where the bottom of the tires are....good deal for the petite.
SDS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-05, 02:01 PM   #3
K&M
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Central California
Bikes:
Posts: 153
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
We had been riding Treks equipped with suspension seatposts for the stoker before we got our Burley, which came without a suspension seatpost. In spite of the lack of suspension, my stoker says the Burley is more comfortable. She hasn't found the bumps to be any big deal (even though I'm not always great about calling them out). Having a saddle that works for your stoker and having the saddle, bars and cleats properly adjusted is probably far more important to stoker comfort than suspension. I'd give it a try without the suspension and see how she feels about it.
K&M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-05, 02:55 PM   #4
cornucopia72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 842
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I am very surprised to read that some stokers do not find the suspension post necessary. Maybe the explanation is that our ridding is a little more aggressive and/or our roads are not as smooth as in other regions. We ride in pace lines with strong single riders and come down hill fast on narrow winding roads. Also my eyesight is not what it used to be and in some instances I do not have time to brace myself leave alone calling: Bump!
cornucopia72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-05, 04:27 PM   #5
K&M
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Central California
Bikes:
Posts: 153
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
.... well a lot of our roads are pretty bad and, like you, we like to go fast, join in the local racing team's paceline and all that. We also like to go long (usually over 120 miles each Sunday), but she says she's fine. Maybe a stoker with enough of her weight on the pedals, where it belongs, won't have so many issues with the seat.
K&M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-05, 07:57 PM   #6
rlong
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks everyone; We went for our first ride today and everything fits just fine.
rlong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-05, 08:15 PM   #7
zonatandem
Senior Member
 
zonatandem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Bikes: Custom Zona c/f tandem + Scott Plasma single
Posts: 10,858
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
A suspension seatpost is not a 'MUST', but many stokers like them.
Having said that, Kay has been riding as stoker for 30+ and does not use a suspension seatpost. Short stoker? Kay is 4' 10 3/4" tall! We do ride a custom tandem for proper fit for her.
An alternative would be spring saddle that soaks up some of the rough stuff.

Pedal Oon TWOgether!
Rudy and Kay/Zonatandem
zonatandem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-05, 10:37 PM   #8
DocF
Older Than Dirt
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Reidsville, NC
Bikes:
Posts: 376
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by zonatandem
A suspension seatpost is not a 'MUST', but many stokers like them.
Having said that, Kay has been riding as stoker for 30+ and does not use a suspension seatpost. Short stoker? Kay is 4' 10 3/4" tall! We do ride a custom tandem for proper fit for her.
An alternative would be spring saddle that soaks up some of the rough stuff.

Pedal Oon TWOgether!
Rudy and Kay/Zonatandem
My wife is also 4' 10" tall and she is much happier since I got her a Brooks B67S seat with springs. I like Brooks sprung saddles also and have a B67 for me on our tandem.
DocF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-05, 06:24 PM   #9
rlong
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DocF
My wife is also 4' 10" tall and she is much happier since I got her a Brooks B67S seat with springs. I like Brooks sprung saddles also and have a B67 for me on our tandem.
I have a fairly new Brooks B17, Champion Special on my road bike and love it! I bought it in the winter and spent about a month keeping it buttered up with a variety of potions before I road it. It is breaking in great and was very comfortable the first time out. I'm buying a B17 for the tandem and have been trying to get my wife to try one. I even agreed to break it in for her! Unfortunatly, like most folks she looks at mine and simply cannot believe that it is comfortable, but I think she will change her mind with time. I suppose the best plan would be to buy her one and just break it in myself. Then if she likes it, great, if not, then I can continue to use it.
rlong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-05, 08:30 PM   #10
zonatandem
Senior Member
 
zonatandem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Bikes: Custom Zona c/f tandem + Scott Plasma single
Posts: 10,858
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Back in the 70s-early 80s Kay rode a Brooks B-72. She loved it and put 30,000+ miles on it until . . . .on a century ride she broke the rails on the sadde. With 30 miles to go her solution was simple:"Find a rock and jam it between my saddle and the carrier" . . . she literally rode a saddle 'as hard as a rock!'
zonatandem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-05, 01:07 AM   #11
stapfam
Time for a change.
 
stapfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Posts: 19,915
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
A carbon seat post will rely on having some room to flex. If your wife is that short that the post has to be fully in the frame, it will not be able to flex and give some comfort. Two things to look at, possibly a shorter crankset . This means that the legs will not be as extended, so will allow the saddle height to be raised, and with short legs may be better for the rider in any case. The other is a very well sprung saddle.
stapfam is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:28 PM.