Shimano Di2 XTR 3X with Mechanical Disc Brakes
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Shimano Di2 XTR 3X with Mechanical Disc Brakes
Wanting to upgrade my C'dale tandem to electronic shifting. Want to use Shimano Road Brifters (Brake/Shifters) and need to keep front 3X shifting and can do 10 or 11 speed rear cassette. Want to keep mechanical disc brakes but might consider hydraulic.
Please respond if you have first hand knowledge of this set up.
Thanks!
Please respond if you have first hand knowledge of this set up.
Thanks!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Mountain Brook. AL
Posts: 4,002
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 303 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 136 Times
in
104 Posts
No first hand knowledge, but apparently Santana has experimented with 11spd road brifters for Di2 and XTR Di2 FD/RD and finds that the FD will swing a triple. Since XTR assumes a bit smaller CW than road, my informant says it works with upto 50-52t CW, and of course honking big rear cassettes upto 36t or so. This is not Shimano's intended use, just a discovery by trial and error by Santana, and my understanding is this will be offered shortly by Santana on their tandems.
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Thanks for the info on Santana's set up! I'm using FSA SL-K crank (52/39/30) so it sounds like this set up may work. Do you know if the Shimano Di2 brifters Santana is using are mechanical brakes? Sounds promising! Hope to hear from others.
Last edited by Gtmather313; 09-22-15 at 07:06 PM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Anchorage, Ak
Posts: 620
Bikes: 2015 Calfee Tetra tandem,2016 Calfee Tetra Adventure Tandem, Ventana ECDM 26 mtn tandem, Ventana ECDM 29r full suspension Mtn tandem ,Ventana Fat tire tandem, Calfee Dragon Fly, Santa Cruz Carbon 5010, 907 Whiteout fat tire
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
you can get either kind of shifters in the road version and it doesn't matter if they are 10 or 11 speed as they are just switches as far as the derailleurs are concerned. I have used both the mechanical and hydraulic versions and they both work just fine. You can get the same range with a double easily now with the large rear cassettes as we are now using an 11-40 for mountain riding with a 50/34 double The wolf components road link makes it easy with Ultegra or Dura ace..
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Do you know if I need to do any special programming to use the Dura Ace Brifters with the 3X XTR Di2 FD? Lennard Zinn wrote about a year ago that the road brifters didn't accept/respond to a 3 clicks/shifts. Anyone have any more insight to this set up? Thanks!
#6
Clipless in Coeur d'Alene
Can you provide a link to that Zinn post?
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Here's Lennard's comment "But you can forget about having “a true electronic 3×11 (or 10),” because there is no road Di2 lever with three clicks. So you would have to go to a 2X system. And skip to the next question below for details about making it 2 X 11 or 2 X 10.
And the link to his column: Technical FAQ: Di2 XTR opens up gear options for road bikes - VeloNews.com
And the link to his column: Technical FAQ: Di2 XTR opens up gear options for road bikes - VeloNews.com
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Anchorage, Ak
Posts: 620
Bikes: 2015 Calfee Tetra tandem,2016 Calfee Tetra Adventure Tandem, Ventana ECDM 26 mtn tandem, Ventana ECDM 29r full suspension Mtn tandem ,Ventana Fat tire tandem, Calfee Dragon Fly, Santa Cruz Carbon 5010, 907 Whiteout fat tire
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
My guess with 3+ years experience with road Di2 you have to at least make sure all firmware is up to date for each component. I recently put the XTR display into my road system and it would not recognize it until I did a firmware update on all the components. Same with hydro shifters from mechanical. BTW the etub e software no longer the has auto update feature as I had to download and reinstall the latest version.
#9
Clipless in Coeur d'Alene
Here's Lennard's comment "But you can forget about having “a true electronic 3×11 (or 10),” because there is no road Di2 lever with three clicks. So you would have to go to a 2X system. And skip to the next question below for details about making it 2 X 11 or 2 X 10.
And the link to his column: Technical FAQ: Di2 XTR opens up gear options for road bikes - VeloNews.com
And the link to his column: Technical FAQ: Di2 XTR opens up gear options for road bikes - VeloNews.com
you can forget about having “a true electronic 3×11 (or 10),” because there is no road Di2 lever with three clicks. So you would have to go to a 2X system.
1) no Di2 road shifter has 2 clicks as a 2x1(n) setup only needs 1-click to shift the FD in either direction. Then why would a triple ring setup need "3-clicks"? One would surmise a triple ring should need just 2 taps.
2) I believe that at the time of his post in 2014, Lennard had not actually tested the Di2 road shifters with XTR Di2 derailleurs, and to my knowledge (fwiw) he has yet to do so or at least post those results.
#10
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 235
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
That was wrong read his next post on Jun. 10 2014.
Technical FAQ: Biopace chainrings and other gearing questions - VeloNews.com
Technical FAQ: Biopace chainrings and other gearing questions - VeloNews.com
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Good find! Glad to see Lennard clarify his compatibility comment. It looks like the Dura Ace brifters will work with the XTR Di2 Deraillers but the unknown seems to be if the 3X Di2 FD will work with the 52 teeth big chainring.
#12
Likes to Ride Far
I recently setup a bike with the inverse at the shop where I work: Road Di2 derailleurs with MTB Di2 shifters on a flat bar road bike build. Once I'd used Shimano's software to do all of the updates, then everything played nicely together.
I agree that chainring size should be the only issue, and on some bikes the fact that there is no XTR Di2 FD that will fit to a road braze-on mount will also be an issue, but if you can use a clamp-on FD then it's not a problem.
I agree that chainring size should be the only issue, and on some bikes the fact that there is no XTR Di2 FD that will fit to a road braze-on mount will also be an issue, but if you can use a clamp-on FD then it's not a problem.
#13
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,302
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 724 Times
in
371 Posts
Shimano Di2 XTR 3X with Mechanical Disc Brakes
One question is whether you really need to stay with a triple.
With 11 speed cassettes you can cover a wide range with reasonable spacing.
We're running durace di2 with the k edge conversion with 52/36 upfront and 11-36 cassette. Shifts beautifully and gives 1 to 1 gearing. Could go to 50/34 11-40 if needed.
With 11 speed cassettes you can cover a wide range with reasonable spacing.
We're running durace di2 with the k edge conversion with 52/36 upfront and 11-36 cassette. Shifts beautifully and gives 1 to 1 gearing. Could go to 50/34 11-40 if needed.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#14
Senior Member
One question is whether you really need to stay with a triple.
With 11 speed cassettes you can cover a wide range with reasonable spacing.
We're running durace di2 with the k edge conversion with 52/36 upfront and 11-36 cassette. Shifts beautifully and gives 1 to 1 gearing. Could go to 50/34 11-40 if needed.
With 11 speed cassettes you can cover a wide range with reasonable spacing.
We're running durace di2 with the k edge conversion with 52/36 upfront and 11-36 cassette. Shifts beautifully and gives 1 to 1 gearing. Could go to 50/34 11-40 if needed.
With all the wide range cassettes coming out and 11 sp, I am beginning to wonder if the triple will become a thing of the past? Or maybe just relegated to low end components?
It will be interesting to watch it all play out.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 1,971
Bikes: Custom 650B tandem by Bob Brown, 650B tandem converted from Santana Arriva, Santana Noventa, Boulder Bicycle 700C, Gunnar Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
It is interesting to hear more and more people say that the 11 sp cassettes have reasonable spacing. Coming from a mountain bike background, I have never really noticed the larger jumps in the cassette. I have certainly never owned a super tight "corn cob" cassette that has very small jumps.
With all the wide range cassettes coming out and 11 sp, I am beginning to wonder if the triple will become a thing of the past? Or maybe just relegated to low end components?
It will be interesting to watch it all play out.
With all the wide range cassettes coming out and 11 sp, I am beginning to wonder if the triple will become a thing of the past? Or maybe just relegated to low end components?
It will be interesting to watch it all play out.
Opinion: The importance of respecting sponsors | Cyclingnews.com
Triples will go the way of well fitting frame sizes and shoes.
#16
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 420
Bikes: 2022 Calfee Tetra, 2023 Giant TCR
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
We use Di2 (2x11) and don't miss a triple because the gearing is low enough. I don't think that ratio spacing should be a concern unless the team likes to stick within a narrow cadence.
Through my training with a local ride group, I've learned that it's possible and desirable to vary cadence from 60 to 120 rpm. We use low cadence and high effort (eg. 60 rpm @ 100% threshold) to build strength, and short bursts of 110-120 to build leg speed. Although we prefer to ride at 85-90 rpm, we can vary our cadence to deal with terrain changes or to stay in a paceline.
During a recent tandem rally, we were surprised to see some teams riding at a really low cadence, or have trouble varying cadence for terrain changes.
if you're willing to splurge on Di2, it's easier to learn to ride at slightly difference cadence rather than stick with a triple (heavier and less reliable shifting).
Through my training with a local ride group, I've learned that it's possible and desirable to vary cadence from 60 to 120 rpm. We use low cadence and high effort (eg. 60 rpm @ 100% threshold) to build strength, and short bursts of 110-120 to build leg speed. Although we prefer to ride at 85-90 rpm, we can vary our cadence to deal with terrain changes or to stay in a paceline.
During a recent tandem rally, we were surprised to see some teams riding at a really low cadence, or have trouble varying cadence for terrain changes.
if you're willing to splurge on Di2, it's easier to learn to ride at slightly difference cadence rather than stick with a triple (heavier and less reliable shifting).
#17
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Great comments on how double and triple cranks relate to gear range, gear spacing and cadence. From a pure athletic performance standpoint one cannot simply learn to turn a lower cadence and get higher watts over a long time period. In fact the goal is exactly the opposite....learn to turn a higher cadence while maintaining the same pedal force. In Bradley Wiggin's recent book he talked extensively about how in order to win the Olympic TT he studied his competitors' watts and AT and concluded that he had to "learn" to put out the same watts at 8 RPMs higher cadence. This wasn't easy as it took him six months of specific power/cadence training.
So I know the trend of 1x and 2x cranks has mechanical advantages of simplicity, reliability and weight saving, (and I have bikes with 1x, 2x and 3x drive trains) but if the main goal is maximizing speed over a long distance with elevation changes then cycling exercise physiologists will prioritize gear range and gear spacing....at the expense of mechanical weight and reliability every time.
That said, let me know if you have any first had experience or knowledge of using Dura Ace Di2 Brifters with XTR Di2 FD and RDs.... Cheers!
So I know the trend of 1x and 2x cranks has mechanical advantages of simplicity, reliability and weight saving, (and I have bikes with 1x, 2x and 3x drive trains) but if the main goal is maximizing speed over a long distance with elevation changes then cycling exercise physiologists will prioritize gear range and gear spacing....at the expense of mechanical weight and reliability every time.
That said, let me know if you have any first had experience or knowledge of using Dura Ace Di2 Brifters with XTR Di2 FD and RDs.... Cheers!
Last edited by Gtmather313; 10-03-15 at 05:24 PM.
#18
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 420
Bikes: 2022 Calfee Tetra, 2023 Giant TCR
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
It's harder for me to understand why physiologists would recommend a triple crankset (eg. 53-39-30) with close-ratio cassette (eg 23T or 25T) over a double crankset (53-29 or 50-34) with a 25T or 28T cassette for speed. I'm not aware of any racer (incl Wiggins) using a triple Di2 setup for the mountain stages in the Tour De France. However, I've heard of racers using a 50-34 with a 28T cassette for really tough mountain stages. [FONT=arial]
As an average recreational rider, I've done my share of century rides or Gran Fondo (100 miles+ with elevation gain of 6,000+). I can't recall anyone in these events using a triple crankset (mechanical or electronic), especially among the fast, ranked riders who can finish these events in about 3.5 hours.
As for the XTR Di2, all the reviews that I've read have used the 2X drivetrain configuration. It will be rare to encounter a XTR Di2 with triple rings because the double or single crankset work so well for the vast majority of recreational riders and racers.
We're really happy with 11sp Di2 on our tandem after using it for two seasons. We don't miss our triple crankset even though we do extended climbs of 6 to 8%.
#19
I'd rather be riding
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Denver NC
Posts: 173
Bikes: Santana Team Ti 700 S&S, Trek Madone 6, Omega Ti,Klein Palamino, Trek 510
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
you can get either kind of shifters in the road version and it doesn't matter if they are 10 or 11 speed as they are just switches as far as the derailleurs are concerned. I have used both the mechanical and hydraulic versions and they both work just fine. You can get the same range with a double easily now with the large rear cassettes as we are now using an 11-40 for mountain riding with a 50/34 double The wolf components road link makes it easy with Ultegra or Dura ace..
#20
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,529
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3886 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
The difference one sees in the pro ranks is that they can turn small cassettes which of course already have very close ratios. Those of us who might want an 11-40 cassette are in a whole 'nother world. I'm inclined to credit the Wiggens' experience. We have a 10 rpm gap between our rear cogs on a 12-34 cassette. Like mtseymour, we prefer to ride with a cadence between 85 and 90. Over a 10 or so hour day, riding at slightly unfavorable cadences does wear on one. I would not look forward to larger gaps.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#21
Likes to Ride Far
The Wolf Roadlink is working great on our tandem with an Ultegra Di2 11-speed rear derailleur (long cage) and XT 11-40 cassette. I was worried about the distance between the guide pulley and the smaller cogs, but in practice it hasn't had any troubles and has always made the shifts. I didn't do anything special, so I don't know what to suggest for you to try. Maybe the difference between our long cage Ultegra RD and your short cage Dura Ace is important, but I wouldn't expect that to affect the 11-12 tooth shift. Our 11-40 cassette actually has 11-13 as the first two cogs, so they may be shaped quite differently, which may also help.
#22
Clipless in Coeur d'Alene
The Wolf Roadlink is working great on our tandem with an Ultegra Di2 11-speed rear derailleur (long cage) and XT 11-40 cassette. I was worried about the distance between the guide pulley and the smaller cogs, but in practice it hasn't had any troubles and has always made the shifts. I didn't do anything special, so I don't know what to suggest for you to try. Maybe the difference between our long cage Ultegra RD and your short cage Dura Ace is important, but I wouldn't expect that to affect the 11-12 tooth shift. Our 11-40 cassette actually has 11-13 as the first two cogs, so they may be shaped quite differently, which may also help.
I like the idea that this adapter simply drops the RD down which provides needed clearances for larger cogs, rather than moving the top jockey wheel rearward like the expensive K-edge solution which also voids the Shimano warranty. Having experimented with maxing out a reversed B-screw (moving the top jockey rearward) I found that setup reduced chainwrap to the point where it skipped under load on a 10spd 34 tooth cog. I can't see this issue occurring with this Roadlink adapter, but possibly less precise shifting on the smallest cogs especially if using a slightly worn chain.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 233
Bikes: Paketa V2r di2, C-Dale MT 3000, Teesdale, 1963 Huffy Daisey
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Indeed it works. I just completed a gravel tandem project with XTR Di2 RD on 10x42 11 spd SRAM cassette, works well. Yes, the 10x44 high gear works well for us, and the intended ultra-distance bike packing, back country races will take advantage of the low 22x42. Crazy.
XTR Di2 FD on 22, 34, 44 chain rings, shifts fine but oh so close to not working. I think the the FD is intended for a mountain style 74mm bottom bracket. On a road bike bottom bracket 68mm wide the FD is set at its very inner most limit both with mechanical and programmed limits. Also only just clears the inside face of the tight Lightning crank Q factor without striking the FD cage. The wide range of rings serves our need, and one might agree with santana that my 22 tooth range in the chain rings could be duplicated in a 30-52 tooth rings. The chain wrap far exceed the rear derailleur spec'd capacity, but with the sychro-shifting and a bit of adjusting the program to shift out of the large ring early, you are prevented from sever cross chaining.
Road bike shift brake levers are Ultegra 6770 coupled with a the XTR display.
I'll post more about the build of this bike in a new "gravel tandem project" posting.
XTR Di2 FD on 22, 34, 44 chain rings, shifts fine but oh so close to not working. I think the the FD is intended for a mountain style 74mm bottom bracket. On a road bike bottom bracket 68mm wide the FD is set at its very inner most limit both with mechanical and programmed limits. Also only just clears the inside face of the tight Lightning crank Q factor without striking the FD cage. The wide range of rings serves our need, and one might agree with santana that my 22 tooth range in the chain rings could be duplicated in a 30-52 tooth rings. The chain wrap far exceed the rear derailleur spec'd capacity, but with the sychro-shifting and a bit of adjusting the program to shift out of the large ring early, you are prevented from sever cross chaining.
Road bike shift brake levers are Ultegra 6770 coupled with a the XTR display.
I'll post more about the build of this bike in a new "gravel tandem project" posting.
Likes For Turbotandem:
#24
Likes to Ride Far
Turbotandem: It would be interesting to know what the limits are for the XTR Di2 front derailleur. Could you measure the chainline of your small and large rings? Obviously, knowing the small ring chainline would be most important for knowing how easy it might be to get the XTR Di2 FD to work with road cranks, and which combinations are most likely to work best. Thanks.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 233
Bikes: Paketa V2r di2, C-Dale MT 3000, Teesdale, 1963 Huffy Daisey
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Turbotandem: It would be interesting to know what the limits are for the XTR Di2 front derailleur. Could you measure the chainline of your small and large rings? Obviously, knowing the small ring chainline would be most important for knowing how easy it might be to get the XTR Di2 FD to work with road cranks, and which combinations are most likely to work best. Thanks.
Last edited by Turbotandem; 11-18-15 at 09:22 AM.
Likes For Turbotandem: