Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    787
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Bottom bracket size / chain line

    I am upgarding the crankset on my Santana Sovereign.
    The rear crankset requires 73x127 BB.
    I would like to use 68x109 on the front.
    Will the chain line from front to back be OK?
    I could use 68x118.5 but they are harder to find and more expensive.

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Saranac Lake, NY, USA
    Posts
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You can use a shorter bottom bracket on the front with no functional chainline issues.

    However, you do need to use a bottom bracket made for a 73mm shell on the Santana.

    So, a 73x109 or a 73 by 118.5 (using your two examples)

    BTW, before going to the 109, I'd eyeballt the current clearance between the crank and the eccentric to make sure there is over 1cm of clearance on each side, or else the crank will tighten touching the frame
    Rich Shapiro Gear-To-Go Tandems
    1 Dahinda Rd, Saranac Lake, NY 518-891-1869

    http://www.gtgtandems.com
    Rich@gtgtandems.com

    Saranac Lake Tandem Rally June 14 - June 16, 2013
    http://www.gtgtandems.com/sltr.html

    Tandem Tours:
    http://www.gtgtandems.com/tours2012.html

    Santana, Calfee, Co-Motion, test rides by appointment

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    My Bikes
    Trek T200 plus enough others to fill a large shed
    Posts
    562
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Difference will be (127-109)/2 = 8.5mm. Most likely this would work fine since the chain angle will be small in comparison to the angle which the rear chain routinely makes. Disadvantage is that the chain is slightly more likely to come off since there is no guide. You could shim the front chainring out a few mm to minimise the difference. Best to avoid over doing it and catching the crank in the chain. This normally leads to a crash. Unless the tandem is something you are building from scratch on a very tight budget I would recommend buying parts to give the correct chainline from the outset since the cost difference is minor compared with the niggly feeling that the bike isn't quite right wears off.

    Second question is why you are thinking about using b/bs designed for 73mm and 68mm shells on the same bike? This seems a bit odd to me - I would have expected the bike to have either one or the other.

    ...beaten by Tandems!

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    My Bikes
    Colnago C40 HP, Aegis Trident, Cannondale tandem
    Posts
    491
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If yer trying to get a better "Q" I suggest you reserve that fine distinction for your racing bikes, not a tandem. Stick with the factory standard BB. Try pedals with adjustable Q if you must.

  5. #5
    hors category TandemGeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    7,162
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jnbrown
    I am upgarding the crankset on my Santana Sovereign. The rear crankset requires 73x127 BB. I would like to use 68x109 on the front.
    Why the new cranks and why the narrow bottom bracket? What are you trying to accomplish?

  6. #6
    hors category TandemGeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    7,162
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mrfish
    I would have expected the bike to have either one or the other.
    It is one... 73mm front & back.

    The only two tandems I know of that use bottom bracket shells with different front and rear widths are the Ventana El Conquistador de Montanas and perhaps the Ventana ECdM-derived Ellsworth Witness full suspension off-road tandems, which use a 73mm shell in the back to accommodate the more robust bottom brackets developed for their rear-suspension systems. The front end of these bikes use a 68mm bottom bracket for compatibility with the Bushnell eccentric and associated front bottom bracket eccentric shell.
    Last edited by TandemGeek; 11-29-06 at 11:54 AM.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    787
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well I don't why I thought it was 68 in front. I talked with somebody at Santana and they said 73x130 for both front and rear at $80 each compared to $30 for a standard 68X109. No such thing as a 73x118 that I can find. That is one thing I don't like about tandems and Santana in particular, high priced non-standard parts. I do like my Santana though.

    Thanks - Joel

  8. #8
    WATERFORD22
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    My Bikes
    Bilenky, Co-Motion, 1969 Paramount, Waterford Adventure Cycle, Waterford rs 22, 1980 Davidson etc.
    Posts
    509
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Joel,

    I agree with you about non-standard parts $$ for tandems, but a similar frustration exists for finding bottom brackets for older single bikes with what I consider superior older cransets. For this reason I have rebuildable bottom brackets on most of my bikes. Just new bearings in most cases and you are back in business. Yes there is sticker shock to begin with. I have also found that with tandem it pays to have better bracket installed in the first place.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •