Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Double Secret Probation R900's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Eastern Indiana
    My Bikes
    Madone 6 series SSL, Cannondale CX9, Trek TTX, Trek 970, Trek T2000
    Posts
    2,579
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Carbon fork - Worth an upgrade?

    So every single road bike we have has a carbon fork, now the new Trek T-2000 has a carbon fork. Is there much advantage to upgrading to a carbon fork? We don't use a front rack, so that's not a factor. Mainly wondering if it smooths out the ride, weight not a big concern either. So does a carbon fork smooth out the road any better then a steel fork?
    Time to Ride...

  2. #2
    Cyclist- Bike 'n a half
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    My Bikes
    Custom S & S Bushnell Tandem, Eddy Merckx Ti
    Posts
    256
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My take;

    If your comforatable with your current bike, there's no substantial cost /effect benefit to upgrade to a carbon fork.

    If you're buying or building a new bike, the cost of the carbon fork upgrade is minimal compared to the total cost of the bike. There would have to be some other compelling factor like a neccesity for threaded fork attachment pannier mounts to talk me out of this relatively inexpensive upgrade.

  3. #3
    Making a kilometer blurry waterrockets's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin (near TX)
    My Bikes
    rkwaki's porn collection
    Posts
    25,598
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    +1, a carbon fork is not likely to dramatically change the ride of the bike. Nothing wrong with them, and without going full carbon (crown, steerer), you can keep the cost down.

    On road bikes, marketing is largely the reason for ubiquity in carbon forks. Most of the stock original equipment carbon forks aren't any lighter than aluminum, and they aren't carefully engineered to provide a better feel. But, they are carbon fiber, so they are perceived to be better. Nothing really wrong with them, but nothing compelling.

  4. #4
    Senior Member zonatandem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    My Bikes
    ariZona carbon fiber tandem & single
    Posts
    9,830
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you got the extra $$ and want to upgrade, it will improve/lessen road vibration in the cockpit area of the tandem.
    Have been using an Alpha Q c/f fork on our custom tandem for 13,000+ miles.

  5. #5
    Time for a change. stapfam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
    My Bikes
    Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
    Posts
    19,915
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by waterrockets
    +1, a carbon fork is not likely to dramatically change the ride of the bike. Nothing wrong with them, and without going full carbon (crown, steerer), you can keep the cost down.

    On road bikes, marketing is largely the reason for ubiquity in carbon forks. Most of the stock original equipment carbon forks aren't any lighter than aluminum, and they aren't carefully engineered to provide a better feel. But, they are carbon fiber, so they are perceived to be better. Nothing really wrong with them, but nothing compelling.

    If you are going CF then make certain that you stay away from the lightest that are around, are built for performance or are not from a big name manufacturer that will warranty the fork for Tandem use. CF is the new wonder product and it is very easy to make a good looking product that is not made very well. And thgere are enough people around that will not pay out for the Best units made and will always go for something cheaper. Not only the Customer- some retailers do it aswell.
    How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


    Spike Milligan

  6. #6
    Senior Member wsurfn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    79
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I really like mine. Worth the money...er..um....

    I upgraded our Burley Tosa with the Burley Alpha-Q. Feels better. Rake is different from stock CroMo fork.

    I like the placebo effect (pure indulgence). It looks cool. I really don't regret spending the cash, and would do it again. I cannot universally recommend it to others, especially for the money.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Lafayette, Colorado
    My Bikes
    1998 Co-Motion Co-Pilot
    Posts
    577
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Worth it? How often do we make a value judgement on something we "want"? (Still running the Co-Motion steel fork).

  8. #8
    Co-Mo mojo
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Davis, CA
    My Bikes
    06/07 Co-Mo Speedster, Cannondale Synapse, SR 800, Specialized Hard Rock
    Posts
    170
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by oldacura
    (Still running the Co-Motion steel fork).
    I like the placebo effect of a Co-Motion steel fork! Back to my day job....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •