Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Tandem Cycling
Reload this Page >

Is a "travel agent" really necessary?

Search
Notices
Tandem Cycling A bicycle built for two. Want to find out more about this wonderful world of tandems? Check out this forum to talk with other tandem enthusiasts. Captains and stokers welcome!

Is a "travel agent" really necessary?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-09, 02:24 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Is a "travel agent" really necessary?

Has anybody any experience (good or bad) of using a normal V-brake and drop drop STI/Ergo brifters without a travel agent (or similar device) to change the mechanical advantage?! The accepted wisdom is of course that you must. However, I am doing an experiment on this myself, just for the front brake. I can't say I really had a problem with the travel agent, but it is a little fiddly to set up and I wondered if I could make the braking more powerful by not using it.

I am using a Campag Ergo lever with an LX V-brake. To increase the lever travel I can use I am leaving the quick release button on the lever in. In fact I am also continuing to use the travel agent, but now just as a friction reducing pulley.

My theory is this:

I do now need twice as much lever travel to close the brake pads to the rim, but have compensated somewhat for this by using the ergo lever quick release.

I can cope with the greater reach to the brake lever with the quick release button in, especially since I'll mostly be braking from the brake hoods.

I'm not losing much travel through cable stretch since a) I've now reduced the cable tension I need for the same brake pad force, and b) this is just the front brake.

The travel agent used simply as a pulley should be more efficient than a "noodle".

I won't have a problem with frayed cables (as has occasionally been reported with travel agents apparently).

Hoped for advantage: I'll be able to brake harder for the same hand strength and stop the tandem very quickly in an emergency.

Possible disadvantages: I might run out of lever travel and not be able to brake hard. I might have to set the pads so close to the rim that they rub. I might not be able to easily remove the wheel since I'm using my quick release already.

Comments welcomed!
dds11 is offline  
Old 01-27-09, 05:04 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 364 Posts
Originally Posted by dds11
I won't have a problem with frayed cables (as has occasionally been reported with travel agents apparently).

Hoped for advantage: I'll be able to brake harder for the same hand strength and stop the tandem very quickly in an emergency.

Possible disadvantages: I might run out of lever travel and not be able to brake hard. I might have to set the pads so close to the rim that they rub. I might not be able to easily remove the wheel since I'm using my quick release already.
I can't think of any disadvantages other than the ones that you have mentioned. If you're getting enough travel and cable pull using the Ergo levers and don't have difficulty removing your wheels, I'd sure give it a try.

Incidentally, I haven't found the cable fraying thing to be a real issue. Keep in mind that the kink where the cable goes from one pulley to the other doesn't move.
Retro Grouch is offline  
Old 01-27-09, 07:36 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SFBay
Posts: 2,334

Bikes: n, I would like n+1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 133 Times in 108 Posts
I'm using old road levers (formerly hooked to road caliper brakes) with long pull linear pull brakes (front) without problems. I don't have a lot of tire clearance, but right now it's working fine. I do find that I have to readjust the cable length a bit more often so that I don't bottom out the lever. However, even when the lever does bottom out I still stop very well. Modulation is slightly more difficult, but nothing I couldn't adapt to.
jccaclimber is offline  
Old 01-27-09, 08:05 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I just tried this on my Burley Rhumba. So far it works pretty well in the front, but not so well in the back. It can be a bit of a challenge to get the front wheel off and it is possible to bottom the lever out, but even when you do, the stopping power is amazing because of the increased mechanical advantage.
filmxj is offline  
Old 01-27-09, 08:09 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 4 Posts
We don't use travel agents with our rear v-brake / ultegra 9speed sti. Braking performance is very good. Key points for us:
-Rolf wheels that are very straight
-brakes pads very close to the rims
-cable length set very carefully to allow use of the adjustment and the quick release together for wheel removal
We carry an allen wrench in case of a rim or spoke issue (none yet)
born2pdl is offline  
Old 01-28-09, 12:30 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
rishardh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: North Texas
Posts: 429

Bikes: Kestrel Talon; Giant NRS Air; Litespeed Tuscany; Burley Rivazza; Cerverlo RS; BMC SLX01; Litespeed C1r, Merckx Corsa 01, Schwinn Traveller, Brompton M6L

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I've tried Shimano STI with and without Travel Agents and I liked the feel of the V-brakes with the Travel Agent. Was able to stop the tandem both ways but modulating the brakes were much easier with it.

Without it I had to pull the lever a long ways for the brake to engage without much feel and with it I could just just give it a few taps to slow down and was able to come to a complete stop faster. There is no going back for me
rishardh is offline  
Old 01-28-09, 06:31 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 563

Bikes: Trek T200 plus enough others to fill a large shed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Another alternative is to slightly cut down the vee brake arms, replace the noodle attachment and retap the pinch bolt to get vee brake arms about 2/3 of the length of standard.
mrfish is offline  
Old 01-28-09, 07:44 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SFBay
Posts: 2,334

Bikes: n, I would like n+1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 133 Times in 108 Posts
Originally Posted by mrfish
Another alternative is to slightly cut down the vee brake arms, replace the noodle attachment and retap the pinch bolt to get vee brake arms about 2/3 of the length of standard.
Or buy the ones from Tektro that are already shortened for use with road levers.
jccaclimber is offline  
Old 01-28-09, 11:01 AM
  #9  
shut up and ride
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: noho
Posts: 1,947

Bikes: supersix hi-mod,burley duet tandem,woodrup track,cannondale cross,specialized road

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrfish
Another alternative is to slightly cut down the vee brake arms, replace the noodle attachment and retap the pinch bolt to get vee brake arms about 2/3 of the length of standard.
or just buy the tektro mini V's.

but don't do it, those brakes are completely worthless. they came on my burley tandem and couldn't even stop the tandem on a small hill. the levers went straight to the bar and barely slowed us down and we sailed straight through the stop sign at the bottom, luckily there were no cars coming. and as well as that they required that the pads be set less than a mm from the rim that required the rim to be perfectly true.

i use the travel agents along with avid brakes and have much greater stopping power and have no problem with fraying cables
zzzwillzzz is offline  
Old 01-28-09, 11:19 AM
  #10  
PMK
Senior Member
 
PMK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Royal Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,236

Bikes: 2006 Co-Motion Roadster (Flat Bars, Discs, Carbon Fork), Some 1/2 bikes and a couple of KTM's

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
When we bought our Co-Motion Speedster, the previous owner or shop had used the travel agents in the pulley only setting. While the brakes did work and were powerful, for me they lacked feel and good modulation.

When I set the bike up for us, I converted it to flat bars basically building a hot rod hybrid tandem.

We recently bought another Co-Motion, only because the first was to small. So in converting the Speedster back to drop bars and STI, I utilized the Travel Agent. This time they were installed using the rate change setup. Other than being a little challenging to set initially, they seem fine.

About one change I would add if I were keeping this setup is to either get the type with a cable adjuster, or find some inline adjusters like they use on disc brakes.

If QBP is listening, they might consider adding a rig pin hole that allows holding the pulley @ 2:00 while your other hands wind the cable.

PK
PMK is offline  
Old 01-31-09, 07:21 PM
  #11  
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zzzwillzzz
or just buy the tektro mini V's.

but don't do it...
Agreed. We had Tektro Mini-Vs and Shimano STI brifters on our Burley. I also found the stopping power was wretched and the tire changing was a serious pain. We moved to Avid Single-Digit-Sevens and Travel Agents and have never looked back.
ken_sturrock is offline  
Old 04-25-14, 01:30 AM
  #12  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I was about to address this concern, but I now see that there were so many better responses. I am still glad that I have found this forum.
AndersonSmith is offline  
Old 04-25-14, 11:02 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
waynesulak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 1,971

Bikes: Custom 650B tandem by Bob Brown, 650B tandem converted from Santana Arriva, Santana Noventa, Boulder Bicycle 700C, Gunnar Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Tire clearance was mentioned above and since I like wide tires this is a big issue for me. I also love being able to use the Campy releases to get a little more room to unhook the noodle. Also the Campy quick releases can be used if a wheel is out of true to avoid rubbing and still have a good operating brake.

All advantages are lost if the Campy quick releases are left open in use. On my last tandem I choose canti brakes over V-Brakes to avoid travel agents but with V-Brakes I use them.
waynesulak is offline  
Old 04-26-14, 05:05 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
zonatandem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 11,016

Bikes: Custom Zona c/f tandem + Scott Plasma single

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times in 11 Posts
We utilize Tektro Mini-V on rear of our tandem and Dura Ace caliper on front. We use barend shifters and standard road brake levers for the past 30,000+ miles.
No problems . . . and we do live in Arizona with lots of hills/mountains.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
_DSC3332.jpg (105.7 KB, 9 views)
zonatandem is offline  
Old 05-03-14, 10:47 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Wind Tunnels of Cheyenne
Posts: 361

Bikes: Burley Duet [of some unknown year] (the guinea pig); 2001 Ventana ECDM (the project); And always one less than I think I really need.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by zonatandem
We utilize Tektro Mini-V on rear of our tandem and Dura Ace caliper on front. We use barend shifters and standard road brake levers for the past 30,000+ miles.
No problems . . . and we do live in Arizona with lots of hills/mountains.

Just out of curiosity, why not the DAs front and rear? Mixing designs just seems that one or the other is not as good as the other or the one... Which is the compromise, and more important to me, why not use the brakes the levers are designed for, i.e. DA or Ultegra for STI levers. My tandem has had only mini-Vs or XTRs w/agents, but I'm considering trying DAs.
LastKraftWagen is offline  
Old 05-04-14, 12:22 PM
  #16  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Central Oregon
Posts: 457

Bikes: Redline Conquest Pro, Kona Cinder Cone, Trek Fuel EX8(RIP) Pivot Mach 5 frankenbike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
As an alternative, has anybody tried using Retroshift levers? Since they cater to the CX market you can get them in a long pull version to work with V-brakes and MTB disks as well as a road brake model.
SlowJoeCrow is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Arthur Peabody
Bicycle Mechanics
11
07-21-19 02:04 PM
bobbygllh
Bicycle Mechanics
9
06-19-18 10:09 AM
rms13
Bicycle Mechanics
6
09-19-13 05:40 PM
jb_alphamale
Bicycle Mechanics
2
07-30-10 01:34 PM
Schwinn_Guy
Bicycle Mechanics
2
05-29-10 07:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.