Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 21 of 21
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    787
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Triple FD for Campy?

    What front derailleur is best to use with Campy shifters?
    I only one I can find is 2008 Comp Triple Derailleur.
    Will this work with the newer Centaur Ultra Shift levers?
    What clamp size would fit a Calfee 32mm, 35mm or braze on?
    Will it work with 52/39/28 rings?

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Senior Member VaultGuru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Fair Oaks,CA
    My Bikes
    Kestrel RT1000 & Calfee Tandem
    Posts
    704
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Front Derailleur - Campy Record 10 with a four" cage. Completely adjustable to accommodate your triple. Should work fine with your shifters. You have to get a clamp-on front derrailleur, unless you specified a front braze-on. (I don't think Craig recommends braze-on.) Size is 35mm.
    Yes, the setup will work perfect with a 52/39/28. However, having said that, you must prepare to drop from the 39 to the 28 way before you need it. Do it by being in your biggest rear cog (29 on mine) and spinning slowly under no pressure. It generally takes me about four clicks on my Record 10 shift levers to drop to the 28. You can then pick the appropriate rear cog for your terrain. If you try to shift under pressure, and you are in position 7-9 on your cassette, either you will not be able to shift to your 28, or you will throw the chain too far. It will end up between your bottom bracket and your 28.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    787
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That sounds less than ideal.
    I will have an 11-28 on the back.
    Would like to shift down from the 39 to the 28 while on the top 3 or 4 cogs in the back.
    I will have a jump stop to prevent the chain from coming off.
    I am going to start with a 30 on the front since that is what comes with the crankset.
    If 30/28 isn't low enough then I will try 28/28

  4. #4
    Senior Member VaultGuru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Fair Oaks,CA
    My Bikes
    Kestrel RT1000 & Calfee Tandem
    Posts
    704
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When I tell you to shift before you need the 28, do so before you are on the hill. When you shift from your 52 to your 39, to climb a small hill, you are still rolling 13-18 mph. You won't scrub speed off as quickly. However, when you need to go to your 28, you are generally either going into a major hill transition, or the hill you are on begins to get steeper. Therefore, can't hold your speed in your 39 and are forced to downshift to your 28. Either way, you are more than likely to already be in your 28, and can therefore keep on rolling and do not even come close to a stop. Just common sense that you won't put undue stress on your equipment.
    We ride mostly hills up to 16º with a 28/29. We tried the 30, but changed to a 28 because it wasn't enough for us to climb big hills.
    Good luck
    Last edited by VaultGuru; 10-10-09 at 04:34 PM.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kent, WA
    My Bikes
    2005 S-Works SR Equipped,1978 Tom Ritchie Road bike, Kuwahara Tandem
    Posts
    494
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I use a Record Triple front derailleur. I have used a 55-42-28 but currently use a 53-42-28. My cassette is a 12-25 and we live on a hill that is 14 degrees. We have used a 11-28 but I find I like the closer range of the 12-25. The front derailleur would not shift to the 28 if we are under a large load without some unloading of the chain. Other than that we have no issues. We do use a chain watcher and we have had no chain dropping issues since installing it.

  6. #6
    Tandem Vincitur Ritterview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northern California
    My Bikes
    BMC Pro Machine SLC01, Specialized Globe, Burley Rock 'N Roll tandem, Calfee Dragonfly tandem.
    Posts
    3,159
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I tried this question on the Weight Weenie forum, and I'm not sure I learned much besides that the non-Quick Shift (QS) 2006 Record FD should work with the 2009 QS shifters. My bike just got back to Calfee, where this can be looked into some more.


    Quote Originally Posted by Ritterview at WW's
    The tandem I've built has a triple and Super Record.

    Surprisingly, the 11 spd RD shifts fine, (a triple usually would require a medium cage RD, which Campy no longer offers).

    Things aren't working so well with the FD, which is 2006 Record (the last year of a Record triple).

    2006 Record Triple FD:



    In 2007 Campy introduced Quick Shift (QS), and the 2006 FD doesn't like the 2009 11spd QS. According to Campy:

    QS Ergopower controls with the non-QS front derailleurs could require a higher force to effect shifting
    Since 2007, Campy has offered the QS COMP TRIPLE™ front derailleur, which aspires to Centaur level, and has plated steel rather than an aluminum cage. It would solve my FD shifting woes, but would appear out of place on my otherwise SR equipped tandem. At 98 grams (vs. 72 for SR, and 89 for 2006 Record) it isn't particularly light either (this is WW).

    2009 COMP Triple FD:


    I've thought of possible solutions, but I do not know their feasibility. Maybe WW could help me out.

    * Just use a new COMP TRIPLE™ (simplest option!)
    * Modernize the 2006 Record FD with whatever internal bits make it QS.
    * Tune the COMP TRIPLE™ FD with bits from the 2006 Record (e.g. the aluminum cage).
    * Put the 2006 Triple Record cage on a 2010 SR FD [image below](if it will fit, and if the throw on the double SR FD can be made sufficient).

    2009 Super Record FD:

  7. #7
    cs1
    cs1 is offline
    Senior Member cs1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Clev Oh
    My Bikes
    Specialized, Schwinn
    Posts
    6,130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ritterview View Post
    Since 2007, Campy has offered the QS COMP TRIPLE™ front derailleur, which aspires to Centaur level, and has plated steel rather than an aluminum cage. It would solve my FD shifting woes, but would appear out of place on my otherwise SR equipped tandem. At 98 grams (vs. 72 for SR, and 89 for 2006 Record) it isn't particularly light either (this is WW).
    You're riding a tandem and you're worried about 26 grams. That's less than one ounce.
    1999 Waterford RSE-11, 1995 Waterford 1200, 1989 Specialized Rockhopper Comp
    1989 Raleigh Technium, 1989 Schwinn Traveler, 1986 Specialized Rockhopper
    1984 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Specialized Stumpjumper and just way too many projects to list.

  8. #8
    Tandem Vincitur Ritterview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northern California
    My Bikes
    BMC Pro Machine SLC01, Specialized Globe, Burley Rock 'N Roll tandem, Calfee Dragonfly tandem.
    Posts
    3,159
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cs1 View Post
    You're riding a tandem and you're worried about 26 grams. That's less than one ounce.
    Context is so important. This was posted on the Weight Weenie forum, where saving 26 grams is more a cause to rejoice than to ridicule.

    [Sigh] I'll try to explain. If you substitute a 72 gram component for one of 98 grams, you save 27% on that piece. If you save 27% on every component on your bike, your 30 lb. tandem now weighs 21.9 lbs, and no one is laughing then.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    787
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I will be fine with the 98g derailleur just as long as it works right.

  10. #10
    Oldie, just not here! Onegun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Shady Hills, Fl.
    My Bikes
    2005 Trek T2000 tandem, 2003 Burly Tosa Tandem, 6 singles including 2 fixies
    Posts
    975
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cs1 View Post
    You're riding a tandem and you're worried about 26 grams. That's less than one ounce.
    You don't even own a tandem and you're in here ridiculing people that do??!! That's less than intelligent.
    BICYCLE - [bahy-si-kuhl] - Noun :> A medical device used to correct the common geriatric condition of OFS, (Old, Fat & Slow), in a manner that does not induce brain-decaying boredom like walking or running.

    2005 Trek T2000 Tandem, 2003 Burley Tosa Tandem, Pacific Dualie beater tandem, and 6 singles including 2 fixies.

    TampaBayCycling.com - A LOCAL Cycling Forum
    The Florida Panthers Tandem Club

  11. #11
    shut up and ride
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    noho
    My Bikes
    supersix hi-mod,burley duet tandem,woodrup track,cannondale cross,specialized road
    Posts
    1,942
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ritterview View Post
    Context is so important. This was posted on the Weight Weenie forum, where saving 26 grams is more a cause to rejoice than to ridicule.

    [Sigh] I'll try to explain. If you substitute a 72 gram component for one of 98 grams, you save 27% on that piece. If you save 27% on every component on your bike, your 30 lb. tandem now weighs 21.9 lbs, and no one is laughing then.
    poor logic.
    the design constraints of say a fd versus a frame or wheels is very different, it's doubtful that you easily remove 27% of the weight of a well designed and constructed frame or wheel without risking failure

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kent, WA
    My Bikes
    2005 S-Works SR Equipped,1978 Tom Ritchie Road bike, Kuwahara Tandem
    Posts
    494
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by zzzwillzzz View Post
    poor logic.
    the design constraints of say a fd versus a frame or wheels is very different, it's doubtful that you easily remove 27% of the weight of a well designed and constructed frame or wheel without risking failure
    I started with a 47lb tandem and after a total rebuild is now at 35lbs. It can be done. But I did not start with some mega dollar tandem.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    569
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by zzzwillzzz View Post
    poor logic.
    the design constraints of say a fd versus a frame or wheels is very different, it's doubtful that you easily remove 27% of the weight of a well designed and constructed frame or wheel without risking failure
    One way to do it with a frame is to use a different type of carbon fiber. The Calfee Dragonfly is significantly lighter that a Tetra.

  14. #14
    Tandem Vincitur Ritterview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northern California
    My Bikes
    BMC Pro Machine SLC01, Specialized Globe, Burley Rock 'N Roll tandem, Calfee Dragonfly tandem.
    Posts
    3,159
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by zzzwillzzz View Post
    poor logic.
    the design constraints of say a fd versus a frame or wheels is very different, it's doubtful that you easily remove 27% of the weight of a well designed and constructed frame or wheel without risking failure
    This isn't about removing weight from a component, but selecting amongst well-designed components of varying weights. There is plenty of variation in weight in both frames and wheels.

    For example, WheresWaldo's Rugamer carbon frame in large weighed 5.91 lbs. A Habanero titanium tandem frame in medium weighs 7.7 lbs. Figure a large weighs 7.9 lbs. 5.91/7.9 = 75%, or a 25% difference. So, you can 'remove' nearly 27% of the weight of a well designed and constructed frame by selecting a frame that is lighter. Better PM Whereswaldo, to warn him he is risking frame failure.

    Same goes for wheels. Topolina tandem wheels weigh 1480 grams (although aerodynamically they are bricks). A Shimano Velocity DYAD tandem rear wheel weighs 1328 grams, and a front wheel 1065 grams, for a total of 2393 grams. 1480/2393 = .62, or 38% weight savings.

    So, logic schmogic. Only by attention to detail on each component to the point to bring on uninformed ridicule, weight savings can add up so that the end result is a very light tandem.


    Quote Originally Posted by rmac View Post
    One way to do it with a frame is to use a different type of carbon fiber. The Calfee Dragonfly is significantly lighter that a Tetra.
    Anyone know the weight of a Tetra? My unpainted Dragonfly in L/M weighed 2930 grams (6.46 lbs).
    Last edited by Ritterview; 10-11-09 at 08:18 PM.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    569
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ritterview View Post
    Anyone know the weight of a Tetra? My unpainted Dragonfly in L/M weighed 2930 grams (6.46 lbs).
    Well, my custom (close to a M/S) weighs 4793 g. However, it has couplers -- about 1000 g total for four.
    Last edited by rmac; 10-11-09 at 08:42 PM.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    787
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ritterview View Post
    Anyone know the weight of a Tetra? My unpainted Dragonfly in L/M weighed 2930 grams (6.46 lbs).
    Calfee told me 6.75 lbs for a Tetra size small.

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    569
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jnbrown View Post
    Calfee told me 6.75 lbs for a Tetra size small.
    My weight of 4793 g must be way off if this is true.

  18. #18
    Tandem Vincitur Ritterview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northern California
    My Bikes
    BMC Pro Machine SLC01, Specialized Globe, Burley Rock 'N Roll tandem, Calfee Dragonfly tandem.
    Posts
    3,159
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Geez, this thread has veered a bit off topic. Well, here's more contribution to that.

    Quote Originally Posted by jnbrown View Post
    Calfee told me 6.75 lbs for a Tetra size small.
    What a frame manufacturers tell you might tend towards the optimistic.

    Quote Originally Posted by Calfee website
    With a frame weight of less than 6 pounds, the Dragonfly Tandem weighs in as the world's lightest tandem!
    The Dragonfly frame is neither less than 6 pounds, nor is it the world's lightest tandem. My large/medium Dragonfly frame weighed 6.45 lbs unpainted, and (more relevant) 7.07 lbs. painted. Both Rugamer carbon frames, and Paketa magnesium frames weigh less.

    If we find an actual weight on a Tetra, it will likely be more than 6.75 pounds in size small.

  19. #19
    Senior Member WebsterBikeMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Just outside Kitchener, Ontario
    My Bikes
    Nishiki Continental, Bilenky custom travel tinker, home built winter bike based on Nashbar cross frrame
    Posts
    622
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jnbrown View Post
    What front derailleur is best to use with Campy shifters?
    I only one I can find is 2008 Comp Triple Derailleur.
    Will this work with the newer Centaur Ultra Shift levers?
    What clamp size would fit a Calfee 32mm, 35mm or braze on?
    Will it work with 52/39/28 rings?

    Thanks
    Because you're talking front, you are not limited to Campy. I've Campy shifters and Shimano XT front triple der. Find whatever works well with the size rings you want, whether it's Campy or Shimano. Unless you are really looking for pure Campy, which does limit your choices of rings, since they don't do mountain bike gearing, and many non-mountain tandems use mountain gearing.

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    787
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I had thought Shimano could work but not sure if the pull ratio is compatible with Campy.
    Unless there is a problem with the Campy triple der I would prefer to use it.

  21. #21
    Senior Member WebsterBikeMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Just outside Kitchener, Ontario
    My Bikes
    Nishiki Continental, Bilenky custom travel tinker, home built winter bike based on Nashbar cross frrame
    Posts
    622
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jnbrown View Post
    I had thought Shimano could work but not sure if the pull ratio is compatible with Campy.
    Unless there is a problem with the Campy triple der I would prefer to use it.
    Works fine in the front (many of us use that combo). For the back, you need a JTek shiftmate (or don't mix). The great thing about the Campy brifters for the front is that it's (if I recall correctly) three clicks from chainring to chainring, so you get to use the other two for trim.

    I don't know that there is a problem - I'm running 24-36-48 on the front, and am told that the Campy front will not support that. Yours is less extreme. The Campagnolo website has the specs on their derailleurs, in terms of the number of teeth difference between rings - although it may be harder to find anything more than a year old that way.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •