Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Pants are for suckaz HandsomeRyan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Mt. Airy, MD
    My Bikes
    Hardtail MTB, Fixed gear, and Commuter bike
    Posts
    2,579
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Why such large chainrings for timing chain?

    I know there must be some reason that tandems use such large chainrings for the timing chain (or belt), I just don't know what it is? I guess maybe the traditional standard BDC spiders allow for swapping out chainrings without some expensive proprietary system but wouldn't using smaller cogs (around 18 teeth) allow for a slight weight reduction, higher ground clearance, and a shorter chain?

    Does anyone here know why tandems use [relatively] large chainrings on the timing chain side?

  2. #2
    Senior Member Retro Grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    St Peters, Missouri
    My Bikes
    Rans Enduro Sport, Hase Kettweisel Tandem, Merin Bear Valley beater bike
    Posts
    23,830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reduces tension on the timing chain and extends the life of the timing sprockets?

  3. #3
    hors category TandemGeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    7,152
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Retro Grouch View Post
    Reduces tension on the timing chain and extends the life of the timing sprockets?
    Pretty much, but this is a worthwhile read: http://www.sheldonbrown.com/synchain.html#chainring

  4. #4
    Charles Ramsey
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Retro Grouch View Post
    Reduces tension on the timing chain and extends the life of the timing sprockets?
    Cog life and chain life is the cube of the difference between the cogs. 40 teeth timing chains and cogs will last 8 times as long as 20 teeth timing chains.

  5. #5
    Member 508Jaguar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Aachen, Germany
    My Bikes
    '99 Litespeed Classic, 2008 Pinarello Tandem
    Posts
    29
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I thought it was because they had less carbs. ;-)

    Or was it MORE carbs..... I can't remember these things.
    Last edited by 508Jaguar; 01-13-10 at 05:10 PM.

  6. #6
    Senior Member rdtompki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Hollister, CA
    My Bikes
    Volagi, daVinci Joint Venture
    Posts
    3,934
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's a good thing I never use my 12-11 combination, my drive train would explode in nanoseconds
    Rick T
    --------
    Volagi - Triple"ized" and Tubeless
    daVinci Joint Venture

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Handsomeryan thats an interesting rack on the front of your single speed, who makes it?

  8. #8
    Senior Member zonatandem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    My Bikes
    ariZona carbon fiber tandem & single
    Posts
    9,996
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Back in the '70s we used 28T timing chain rings on our Assenmacher. Worked fine.
    Currently using 38T on our Zona.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    917
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Our old Bob Jackson has 32T timing chain rings and they have lasted for a long time. As for the extra chain tension loading the frame etc, maybe in theory, but I haven't noticed any detrimental effect and the BJ is a very flexi steel 531 frame.

  10. #10
    Pants are for suckaz HandsomeRyan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Mt. Airy, MD
    My Bikes
    Hardtail MTB, Fixed gear, and Commuter bike
    Posts
    2,579
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by chichi View Post
    Handsomeryan thats an interesting rack on the front of your single speed, who makes it?
    [off topic] I welded it up myself. I posted a thread about it here. It works really well to do only one thing- transport 6 bottles of your favorite glass-bottled beverage. It's as much a styling element as a real "utility" accessory but I've been pretty happy with it. In the summer I plan to make a different, more CETMA-esque, flat rack for that bike and maybe put the six-pack rack on a different bike. Rigth now I take the bottles out and throw my heavy chain and lock in the carboard six pack holder while I ride.



    [/off topic]

  11. #11
    pan y agua merlinextraligh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Jacksonville
    My Bikes
    Wilier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Co-Motion Robusta; Schwinn Paramount; Motobecane Phantom Cross; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er
    Posts
    27,306
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    At least in theory, smaller rings are going to be less efficient as well. And it would not take much efficiency loss to quickly trump the small weight advantage.

    Besides, Gates doesn't make a belt to fit with smaller rings.
    You could fall off a cliff and die.
    You could get lost and die.
    You could hit a tree and die.
    OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •