Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Cyclist storckm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    My Bikes
    Yuba Mundo; Early 70's Free Spirit (Reynolds 531) fixie; 80's Shogun 500; Mid 90's Iron Horse tandem; trailer and tag-a-long; Schwinn Range for commuting, with lights and front and rear racks.
    Posts
    551
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Brooks saddle with springs?

    Right now I have a brooks b17 on my touring bike, and no complaints. I happened to notice claims that in former days, most saddles were sprung, and got to wondering whether I should try the similar brooks model with springs, since the specialized seat on my tandem isn't comfortable for longer distances. Should I try a model with springs, or is there no need with adequately wide tires (700Cx35 touring and 26"x1.5" tandem)? Has anyone tried a sprung brooks, and does it make much difference?

  2. #2
    Tandem Vincitur Ritterview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northern California
    My Bikes
    BMC Pro Machine SLC01, Specialized Globe, Burley Rock 'N Roll tandem, Calfee Dragonfly tandem.
    Posts
    3,225
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So, like this?




    Quote Originally Posted by Brooks
    Flyer Special

    Length: 275mm
    Width: 175mm
    Height:87mm
    Weight: 890g

    The Flyer and its ladies model Flyer S are classically sprung saddles for long distance trekking and touring. It is directly descending from the B66 Champion, first featured in the 1927 catalogue. Sharing the same leather tops of the B17 models, they combine the comfort of these popular models with the extra suspension granted by two rear springs. Both are available with tubular steel rivets or with hand


    I wonder how this would compare in terms of comfort with the conventional stoker solution of a Thudbuster seatpost, which weighs about 600 grams?
    Last edited by Ritterview; 08-05-10 at 12:02 PM.

  3. #3
    Cyclist storckm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    My Bikes
    Yuba Mundo; Early 70's Free Spirit (Reynolds 531) fixie; 80's Shogun 500; Mid 90's Iron Horse tandem; trailer and tag-a-long; Schwinn Range for commuting, with lights and front and rear racks.
    Posts
    551
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That's exactly what I have in mind. I don't know what the weight is, but don't really care either. Harris Cyclery claims that an advantage to springs vis-a-vis a suspension seatpost is the lack of moving parts to wear out or require maintenance.

  4. #4
    Tandem Vincitur Ritterview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northern California
    My Bikes
    BMC Pro Machine SLC01, Specialized Globe, Burley Rock 'N Roll tandem, Calfee Dragonfly tandem.
    Posts
    3,225
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here's a fine example, more Brooks-laden tandem pics can be found here.


  5. #5
    Senior Member WebsterBikeMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Just outside Kitchener, Ontario
    My Bikes
    Nishiki Continental, Bilenky custom travel tinker, home built winter bike based on Nashbar cross frrame
    Posts
    622
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The weight comparison should be based on the sprung Brooks vs the unsprung Brooks equivalent + Thudbuster. Not the sprung Brooks vs the Thudbuster.

    That said, this, like all saddle discussions is (sadly) very much a personal preference sort of thing. The vast majority of folks who have Brooks saddles love them. The remainder are on their way to getting rid of them, as they really don't work for them. It will be a similar story with the springs vs the Thudbuster. The springs will not have the same amount of travel as the Thudbuster. I think I saw a comparison on Tandem@Hobbes just the other day, in which the sprung saddle was described as relatively "bouncy". Whether this is your experience will depend on a number of things, probably the most significant being rider weight.

    One thing about the Thudbuster is that it does come with multiple elastomers allowing for some adjustment for rider weight. And a pre-tensioning screw. Whereas a sprung saddle just is what it is.

    But it might work for you...

  6. #6
    Senior Member LucianTheOne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Suceava - Romania
    Posts
    57
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I put a Brooks whit springs on my new tandem. 1000 km until now, and I am happy. Not perfect but its good.

  7. #7
    Tandem Vincitur Ritterview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northern California
    My Bikes
    BMC Pro Machine SLC01, Specialized Globe, Burley Rock 'N Roll tandem, Calfee Dragonfly tandem.
    Posts
    3,225
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    WillJL's fine 1984 Follis has two Brooks, and the stoker enjoys a sprung Flyer S Special.


  8. #8
    Wrench rosiewoodboat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Somerville, MA
    My Bikes
    A Moser, a Colnago, a Miyata 1000 LT, 'couple Fujis, a Ryan Vanguard, a Raleigh Sports, 1992 Trek 990 with a Fox F80 (!), and a 1994 Burley Duet, among others.
    Posts
    36
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Both saddles on our Burley Duet are Brooks; Captain's is a Team Pro and the Stoker's is a Flyer Special. The Stoker reports that her switch from a B17 (unsprung) to the Flyer (sprung) is way more comfortable. We would have tried a Thudbuster, but the seat post of this generation Duet is 26.6....

  9. #9
    Long Distance Cyclist Machka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    I ride where the thylacine roamed!
    My Bikes
    Lots
    Posts
    38,889
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by storckm View Post
    Right now I have a brooks b17 on my touring bike, and no complaints. I happened to notice claims that in former days, most saddles were sprung, and got to wondering whether I should try the similar brooks model with springs, since the specialized seat on my tandem isn't comfortable for longer distances. Should I try a model with springs, or is there no need with adequately wide tires (700Cx35 touring and 26"x1.5" tandem)? Has anyone tried a sprung brooks, and does it make much difference?
    Why not try an ordinary B17, without springs? You say you've got no complaints with it on your touring bicycle, so it may work for you on the tandem.

    The tandem we're borrowing came with some sort of saddle (not sure what brand) which was killing me, so we put my Brooks B17 (which is pretty much broken in) on and I've been comfortable since. I don't think I'd need a saddle with springs.

  10. #10
    Senior Member chas58's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,028
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have the b17 for the front seat, but I know the springs would be a lot more comfortable for my wife in the rear. She just gets pounded over the bumps without some kind of suspension (currently just using a $50 seat post with elastomer shock absorption).

    So, the next step for me would either be the sprung brooks, or the thudbuster. Given her weight (~125) I don't think the brooks would be too bouncy - I can't get her to spin faster anyway.

  11. #11
    Senior Member swc7916's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Machias, WA
    My Bikes
    Rodriguez Toucan tandem, Rodriguez Rainer Lite sport/touring
    Posts
    712
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you elect to go with a Brooks saddle may I suggest that you get it from Wallingford Bicycle Parts (www.wallbike.com). They have a 6-month unconditional satisfaction guarantee on new Brooks saddles. Return your new saddle at any time within six-months of the ship date for a full refund of the price of the saddle. Shipping will not be refunded unless there is a manufacturing defect that would make the return a factory warranty issue.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    My Bikes
    Serotta Legend Ti, Santa Cruz Heckler, Santana Visa TAndem
    Posts
    198
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just reading this gives me the sweats! I know that saddles are a very personel choice. I suffered for many years with a Brooks B-17, it really spoiled my earliest riding. Back in the 60's there weren't many choices. I can't even guess how much neetsfoot oil I soaked into this saddle through the years, but it never worked for me. It wasn't until the '80's, when gel saddles came out did I find any comfort. After this, I rode for many years, in great comfort on a Flite (go figure!). I eventually was bothered by numbness in the perineum and a prostate infection and went to a Selle Aristeed (I think that is the spelling), with a space down the middle. I still have buddies that ride the most modern bikes, but cling to their old Brooks torture instruments! I ride the Selle on my single and my tandem (captain) and have never found any need for any kind of suspension. Maybe, you need to try something else. Sometimes, especially in the earlier days of cycling, we had expectations of a certain degree of suffering.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    My Bikes
    Serotta Legend Ti, Santa Cruz Heckler, Santana Visa TAndem
    Posts
    198
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hey I just assumed that you were talking about the seat on the front of the tandem. If you are the stoker, my apologies, I would personally need suspension with any seat on the back! It doesn't take a whole lot of travel to make a difference back there. The sprung saddle might be just the ticket.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •