Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Tandem Cycling
Reload this Page >

The carbon fibre fork, good or bad

Search
Notices
Tandem Cycling A bicycle built for two. Want to find out more about this wonderful world of tandems? Check out this forum to talk with other tandem enthusiasts. Captains and stokers welcome!

The carbon fibre fork, good or bad

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-12, 02:32 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
waynesulak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 1,971

Bikes: Custom 650B tandem by Bob Brown, 650B tandem converted from Santana Arriva, Santana Noventa, Boulder Bicycle 700C, Gunnar Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Ritterview
Bike Rumor has a factory tour at Enve Composites, which I think is interesting, informative, and confidence inspiring as to the safety and reliability of carbon fiber in general, and Enve's products in particular.

ENVE COMPOSITES FACTORY TOUR – INSIDE LOOK AT COMPANY & CARBON FIBER MANUFACTURING

An example is Enve's impact test on their carbon wheels. A 50 lb. weight is dropped from increasing heights until the rim fails.


Interesting test. I wonder what the tire was inflation was. Also it is interesting to see the failure mode. I would love to see a side by side test with a popular light weight aluminum rim with the same tire inflated at the same pressure. It would be nice to have a frame of reference and compare failure modes.

Anybody out their want to compute the speed of the 50lb weight when it hits the tire after falling 16 inches?

Last edited by waynesulak; 06-01-12 at 02:58 PM.
waynesulak is offline  
Old 06-01-12, 03:18 PM
  #27  
Tandem Vincitur
 
Ritterview's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,317

Bikes: BMC Pro Machine SLC01, Specialized Globe, Burley Rock 'N Roll tandem, Calfee Dragonfly tandem.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by waynesulak
I would love to see a side by side test with a popular light weight aluminum rim with the same tire inflated at the same pressure. It would be nice to have a frame of reference and compare failure modes.
Another way to look at the reliability of materials is what cycling teams are using in a race with a lot of impact, like the infamous Paris-Roubaix. The teams have the expertise, the equipment, and the motivation to choose what is optimal. Carbon forks have long been used, and it doesn't appear anyone switches out anymore to aluminum forks. Lately it has been carbon rims as well.

Originally Posted by VeloNews
The tires, wheels and pressures of Paris-Roubaix

COMPIEGNE, France (VN) — Every year, pro teams lining up for the most brutal road race of the calendar, Paris-Roubaix, search for ways to decrease the likelihood of punctures without limiting performance. It turns out there are a lot of ways to skin a cat. Wheel and tire selection, tire pressure, and the use of sealant are all hotly debated amongst riders, mechanics and manufacturer staff. Some approaches to selecting Roubaix equipment are pure science, others are based on tradition and experience. The most successful teams appear to mix the two methods.

Wheels
The era of the carbon wheel at Paris-Roubaix has arrived. Fewer and fewer riders are relying on tradition when deciding on a set of wheels for the “Hell of the North.” Instead, teams visit the pavé secteurs to perform tests using accelerometer telemetry and power meters. And while the carbon wheels used for Roubaix are vertically stiffer than box-section aluminum rims, the use of larger tires and bicycle frames and forks tuned for the cobbles allows riders to cover the cobbled sections with less effort.
The most famous fork failure in professional racing was George Hincapie, at Roubaix 2006. The aluminum steerer failed.

Ritterview is offline  
Old 06-01-12, 03:39 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
waynesulak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 1,971

Bikes: Custom 650B tandem by Bob Brown, 650B tandem converted from Santana Arriva, Santana Noventa, Boulder Bicycle 700C, Gunnar Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Ritterview
Another way to look at the reliability of materials is what cycling teams are using in a race with a lot of impact, like the infamous Paris-Roubaix. The teams have the expertise, the equipment, and the motivation to choose what is optimal. Carbon forks have long been used, and it doesn't appear anyone switches out anymore to aluminum forks. Lately it has been carbon rims as well.
That is the way a lot of people look at it. Ride what the pros ride. That is why manufacturers spend so much money on the teams. I agree with you when the team uses a non-sponsor product. When it is a sponsor's product I'm not so sure.
waynesulak is offline  
Old 06-01-12, 04:17 PM
  #29  
PMK
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
PMK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Royal Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,236

Bikes: 2006 Co-Motion Roadster (Flat Bars, Discs, Carbon Fork), Some 1/2 bikes and a couple of KTM's

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
The link to the paper is located here.

https://www.thetandemlink.com/MfgDefects_Forks.pdf

PK
PMK is offline  
Old 06-01-12, 07:41 PM
  #30  
Charles Ramsey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Actually I'm all for a titanium fork I have worked for a company that made seemed tubing from 6Al 4V it comes out of the welder looking like a banana the weld shrinks then is straightened so I know it can be bent into a fork without failure. Most of the titanium failures in bicycles have been caused by oxygen in the welds. You should also know the viscount first came out with a solid aluminum fork those failed. Schwinn decided to chrome plate some paramounts those failed from hydrogen embrittlement this information was common knowledge from from platers at the time and could have been prevented by heat treating the frames. It is now illegal to braze 4130 aircraft frames they must be TIG welded. All this information is available what is not available is fiber construction these are all closely guarded trade secrets.
Originally Posted by PMK
FWIW, I DO work with carbon fibre everyday. Actually, "hands on" at an aerospace level of quality.

It appears from your reply that you have involvement with carbon fibres or graphite fibres, I'd guess possibly nano fibre enhanced matrix products also. So if as you state, carbon is a poor material for a fork, and from your reply it sounds like titanium is prone to failure from the swaging, which in theory could carry over to low quality titanium welds. Aluminum has neat modulous numbers but is crack prone or notch sensitive in some of the preferred high end bicycle alloys. Plus again requires many operations besides welding to have strength and longevity. Steel is proven and often simpler to work with, however once internal corrosion goes unnoticed it can be just as crazy in a failure mode as any other material.

I started this topic to bring awareness to those of us that run carbon fibre forks. Once the actual report data is in hand, if not copyrighted I'll see if it is possible to share it.

I'd really enjoy hearing your best fork material for a tandem bicycle that is ridden by an average team of say 300 pounds and will occasionally push the speeds close to 45 / 50 mph.

Awesome reply you posted, excited to hear more.

PK
 
Old 06-01-12, 10:20 PM
  #31  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The valley of heart’s delight
Posts: 414

Bikes: 2005 Trek T2000; 2005 Co-motion Speedster Co-pilot; various non-tandem road and mountain bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 102 Post(s)
Liked 55 Times in 39 Posts
Originally Posted by Dean V
What did you learn in those classes that made you ask the question? All I can see you getting from a disc brake fork is an uneven (one leg only) bending and torsional load from the caliper. I would of thought a rigid fork could handle such things better than a suspension fork.
Suspension forks have a very stiff column to which the caliper of a disc brake can be attached, so the bending due to the caliper load is negligible. Compliance to bumps and other road variation is handled by a separate mechanism housed inside the stiff column. In contrast, "rigid" forks need to bend to provide some small amount of suspension, and they need to do this in the same general rea but in opposition to the force a caliper exerts when braking. Kind of like being kicked in the left shin while running on a trail. Perhaps the compromises required have been worked out adequately to make this effect a non-issue in real world experience. Nonetheless, compromises are certainly required.
reburns is offline  
Old 06-03-12, 12:13 PM
  #32  
PMK
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
PMK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Royal Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,236

Bikes: 2006 Co-Motion Roadster (Flat Bars, Discs, Carbon Fork), Some 1/2 bikes and a couple of KTM's

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Charles Ramsey
Actually I'm all for a titanium fork I have worked for a company that made seemed tubing from 6Al 4V it comes out of the welder looking like a banana the weld shrinks then is straightened so I know it can be bent into a fork without failure. Most of the titanium failures in bicycles have been caused by oxygen in the welds. You should also know the viscount first came out with a solid aluminum fork those failed. Schwinn decided to chrome plate some paramounts those failed from hydrogen embrittlement this information was common knowledge from from platers at the time and could have been prevented by heat treating the frames. It is now illegal to braze 4130 aircraft frames they must be TIG welded. All this information is available what is not available is fiber construction these are all closely guarded trade secrets.
Whatever cowboy, run whatever makes you feel safe and comfy. FWIW, EVERYTHING can be made to fail at some point. You must be a bundle of joy to sit beside on an airliner.

PK
PMK is offline  
Old 06-03-12, 02:18 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Homeyba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central Coast, California
Posts: 3,370

Bikes: Colnago C-50, Calfee Dragonfly Tandem, Specialized Allez Pro, Peugeot Competition Light

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles Ramsey
... It is now illegal to braze 4130 aircraft frames they must be TIG welded. All this information is available what is not available is fiber construction these are all closely guarded trade secrets.
You should ride what you are comfortable with first and foremost. Beyond that, this is a bit of a chicken little thing. You are correct that these are proprietary engineered materials but that doesn't mean that there is no quality control or reliability engineering happening. Most companies are responsible enough to not want to put out a product that they know is going to fail and the track record for reliable manufacturers is pretty strong.
Homeyba is offline  
Old 06-03-12, 08:02 PM
  #34  
Full Member
 
diabloridr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Central Coast, California, USA
Posts: 434

Bikes: Co-Motion Macchiato, Calfee Dragonfly, Ancient Sun Fixie, Trek 5900

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 11 Posts
Here's a failure for everyone to chew on:

Yesterday while putzing along ~ 16 MPH on a residential street the captain's seatpost on the Speedster failed, leaving beloved stoker holding a useless stoker handlebar while I'll had to pull myself forward to get my hands on the brakes (good thing I had both hands on the bar). Stoker was super-smooth at keeping her balance, we got the bike stopped safely.

Specifics: Post is a Zoom aluminum post (no longer in biz, AFAIK). Failure was at the point where the post enters the frame (a natural stress concentrator). Approximately a 3/4" long fatigue crack at the front of the post, the remainder of the post cross-section failed in brittle fracture (textbook failure for aluminum). Post is 13 years old, has about 25,000 miles on it. It would have received a cursory visual check sometime in the last year.

I got Mel @ Tandems East on the phone to run through options for replacement posts. I need a setback post to get my position right, so a Thomson is off the table.

Mel had a couple of Ritchey's on the shelf which I pulled the trigger on.

Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Broken Zoom Seatpost.jpg (54.9 KB, 37 views)
diabloridr is offline  
Old 06-03-12, 08:33 PM
  #35  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 198
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 13 Posts
Thomson makes setback posts -- see here: https://bikethomson.com/seatposts/elite/ hit the Sizes tab and scroll to the bottom.
WheelsNT is offline  
Old 06-03-12, 09:52 PM
  #36  
Full Member
 
diabloridr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Central Coast, California, USA
Posts: 434

Bikes: Co-Motion Macchiato, Calfee Dragonfly, Ancient Sun Fixie, Trek 5900

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by WheelsNT
Thomson makes setback posts -- see here: https://bikethomson.com/seatposts/elite/ hit the Sizes tab and scroll to the bottom.
Not in 29.8mm.

Other potential issues since Thomson achieves the setback by placing a bend in the shaft, not by incorporating the setback into the head:

1) Our stoker bar has to clamp to the captain's seatpost right where that bend is.

2) Stoker's seatpost in our case doesn't have sufficient post length exposed to allow use of the bent shaft.

Thomson's is an interesting approach, but it has some real limitations, especially for tandems.
diabloridr is offline  
Old 06-04-12, 07:44 AM
  #37  
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles Ramsey
Actually I'm all for a titanium fork I have worked for a company that made seemed tubing from 6Al 4V it comes out of the welder looking like a banana the weld shrinks then is straightened so I know it can be bent into a fork without failure. Most of the titanium failures in bicycles have been caused by oxygen in the welds.
Titanium as a material for a bicycle fork is questionable at best for singles........for a tandem............the tubing would have to be over sized (to increase stiffness) well beyond what has been done to date. There is no point.

Many titanium frames also failed due to improper finishing of machined parts. Titanium peels (breaks) faster than anything I experienced with steel or aluminum. Merlin had problems with cage bosses and Litespeed had problems with machined bullet stay ends.

Back to our carbon wound up duo.

I too wanted to switch to front disc so we could bomb down (relative) switchbacks without fear of a front tire blowout. The Avid disc was ok but the switch to Shimano ICE disc has worked very well. On a recent trip to France we (I) enjoyed one finger braking during a 15 mile descent. Well, one corner did require all fingers to action as I screwed up and entered a turn too fast. Of note, one could feel the heat coming of the disc but the al spider was not nearly as warm.

PS, we had Wound Up anodize our al fork drop outs and caliper mount black.

Last edited by sine; 06-04-12 at 07:51 AM.
sine is offline  
Old 06-04-12, 08:28 AM
  #38  
hors category
 
TandemGeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,231
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by diabloridr
Here's a failure for everyone to chew on: Zoom aluminum post (no longer in biz, AFAIK). Failure was at the point where the post enters the frame (a natural stress concentrator). Approximately a 3/4" long fatigue crack at the front of the post, the remainder of the post cross-section failed in brittle fracture (textbook failure for aluminum). Post is 13 years old, has about 25,000 miles on it. It would have received a cursory visual check sometime in the last year.
Wow, that one lasted a long time. Most Zoom failures I've seen or heard about happened with far fewer miles.

One of our friends had one fail on their Cappucino about 20 miles from the end of a century: all of a sudden she was holding the bars and her captain's saddle. They raised her stem to free up some of the remaining seatpost mast (he was really tall, so it had a lot of exposed mast) and finished the ride with his saddle about 5" too low... still pulling a line of wheel suckers.

Anyone with those Zoom seatposts would do well to keep an eye on them or, at this point... to replace them if the tandem they were installed on was ridden very much. It seems like it's more about when, not if.
TandemGeek is offline  
Old 06-04-12, 08:52 AM
  #39  
Full Member
 
diabloridr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Central Coast, California, USA
Posts: 434

Bikes: Co-Motion Macchiato, Calfee Dragonfly, Ancient Sun Fixie, Trek 5900

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by TandemGeek
One of our friends had one fail on their Cappucino about 20 miles from the end of a century: all of a sudden she was holding the bars and her captain's saddle. They raised her stem to free up some of the remaining seatpost mast (he was really tall, so it had a lot of exposed mast) and finished the ride
I take it their failure did not occur at the frame insertion point since it sounds like they were able to easily remove the portion of the post inside the frame?

Since our post sheered even with the top of the seat tube I couldn't get a good grip on the post to remove it with any of my tools.

My solution was to drill a 5/32" hole in the post where the seat tube is slotted to clamp the post. Then I inserted a some coat hanger wire, and made a loop to give me something to pull with. The post then slide out easily.

Originally Posted by TandemGeek
Anyone with those Zoom seatposts would do well to keep an eye on them or, at this point... to replace them if the tandem they were installed on was ridden very much. It seems like it's more about when, not if.
One of the not so good properties about aluminum is that it does not possess a "fatigue limit".

For steel, Ti, and CF - if you reduce the fatigue loading low enough (how much depends on the material) eventually you hit a limit where fatigue failure will NEVER occur (CF in particular seems resistant to fatigue failure unless damaged initially by impact loading. Maybe one of the resident CF experts can expound/correct me on this).

Aluminum does not process this limit, as stresses go lower the life gets longer, but it is still finite. I suppose even a Thomson post could fail due to fatigue, though it might take longer than the riders' lifetime.

What this means to me is that I'm also shopping for several handlebars to replace aluminum bars which may be past their "freshness date".
diabloridr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hansgregorius
General Cycling Discussion
0
05-23-18 12:29 AM
American Euchre
Road Cycling
25
04-30-16 09:48 PM
Winblows
Bicycle Mechanics
42
06-09-15 08:52 AM
ClarkinHawaii
Bicycle Mechanics
9
03-02-14 07:34 PM
Veloh
Classic & Vintage
5
10-07-11 12:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.