Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Tandem Cycling A bicycle built for two. Want to find out more about this wonderful world of tandems? Check out this forum to talk with other tandem enthusiasts. Captains and stokers welcome!

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-26-12, 10:52 AM   #1
rdtompki
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rdtompki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hollister, CA
Bikes: Volagi, daVinci Joint Venture
Posts: 3,962
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Crank length cadence adjustment

My wife/stoker and I don't have a great deal of overlap in our cadence comfort zones and I know many have correctly suggested exercises to increase stokers cadence. We may yet work on that, but I considered shorter stoker cranks. My LBS thought that given my wife's relatively long legs (and my relatively long legs) we might try longer captain's cranks.

I switched from 175mm to 180mm not quite knowing what to expect, but it's really made a big difference, dropping my range by 4 rpm or so. I would say prior to the change I didn't want to go much below 87 when working on the flats with a top of 95 or 96. I'm finding now that I'm comfortable working down to 83 with out getting into the "grunt" zone.

I'm absolutely comfortable with the slightly longer cranks, but everyone's mileage may vary as they say. Biggest surprise, as suggested above, was the disproportionate decrease in cadence compared to crank length, but then thinking about the geometry there is no reason to expect things to be linear.
rdtompki is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:23 AM.