Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 106
  1. #76
    Senior Member Bent In El Paso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    El Paso, TX
    My Bikes
    Co-Motion Speedster Co-Pilot
    Posts
    187
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by twocicle View Post
    We had one super gritty, wet ride where maybe every moving part on the bike started making ugly noises, so I can't say if the belt was contributing or not.

    Maybe a belt treatment spray would help... silicone or something. Call Gates support and ask, then report back here.
    I'm happy with the performance of our belt drive system, no need to call Gates.

    Once I figured out how to properly tension the belt so it will remain centered on the pulleys, it has worked fine. It is interesting though that the belt tension seems critical on some setups and not on others. We have friends who ride with the same setup and the tension seems much less critical for them. Our bike was delivered from Co-Motion with the belt drive so I know it is not a design problem. The pulleys are in perfect alignment with the eccentric centered in the bottom bracket. I think it has more to do with the belt/pulley interface.

    The bike shop that built our tandem did put the stoker's pulley on backwards. We rode the bike that way for probably 2K miles before I discovered (through this forum) that it was installed incorrectly. Co-Motion replaced the belt (at Gate's recommendation) but would not replace the pulleys. I wonder if running that pulley backwards for 2K miles may have worn it in a way that makes our system more sensitive to belt tension? If and when I upgrade, I will most likely go with the new center-track system so I will probably never know for sure.
    Fred

    Behind every good captain is a great stoker!

    Co-Motion Speedster Co-Pilot

  2. #77
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    58
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    First of all, yes, Gates is coming out with a 66T CenterTrack tandem (8 mm pitch) sprocket in June of this year. Second, it's not necessarily just for Calfee and Cannondale, as we could get them, too, if we wanted. Which brings me to my third point, that being I don't think we'll want to design a new frame just for an additional 12 mm (1/2") of boom tube length, so 29" instead of 28.5" (approx.). That's right: the 66T sprockets only increase the boom tube length by one half of an inch; not worth the effort, IMO.

    It's likely that the 66T sprockets are in response to a particular OEM application where they have enough volume to justify tooling up another (at this point unique) size sprocket. C'dale is the likely suspect, IMO. But why would they bother with 29" boom tube instead of the informal tandem standard (for belt drive, anyway) of 28.5"?

    Quote Originally Posted by TandemGeek View Post
    Doh! I forgot the tandem CarbonDrive / sync drive system and the regular Gates CarbonDrive / drive-side systems use belts and sprockets that have a different pitch: 8mm for the tandem application and 11mm for the drive-side.

    However, timing is everything -- no pun intended -- and it turns out Gates was already working to bring a 66t sprocket system to market this summer for Calfee & Cannondale that will work with a 30" boom tube dimension. So, I'll have to cool my jets until June when they become available via Gates or Calfee.

  3. #78
    Clipless in Coeur d'Alene twocicle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
    My Bikes
    Calfee Tetra Tandem, Specialized Tarmac SL4 S-Works, other misc Road & MTB singles
    Posts
    1,170
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bent In El Paso View Post
    I'm happy with the performance of our belt drive system, no need to call Gates.

    Once I figured out how to properly tension the belt so it will remain centered on the pulleys, it has worked fine. It is interesting though that the belt tension seems critical on some setups and not on others. We have friends who ride with the same setup and the tension seems much less critical for them. Our bike was delivered from Co-Motion with the belt drive so I know it is not a design problem. The pulleys are in perfect alignment with the eccentric centered in the bottom bracket. I think it has more to do with the belt/pulley interface.

    The bike shop that built our tandem did put the stoker's pulley on backwards. We rode the bike that way for probably 2K miles before I discovered (through this forum) that it was installed incorrectly. Co-Motion replaced the belt (at Gate's recommendation) but would not replace the pulleys. I wonder if running that pulley backwards for 2K miles may have worn it in a way that makes our system more sensitive to belt tension? If and when I upgrade, I will most likely go with the new center-track system so I will probably never know for sure.
    Do you have the older CDC belt system and not the newer CDX (CenterTrack)? The latter is a piece of cake to setup as the center track keeps the belt from wandering off to the side.

    The CDC system is more particular to alignment and belt tension. You should note that with the CDC rings (or CDX for that matter) it does not matter which way you mount them. Retaining ring in, ring out, whatever... no diff. In fact, in some cases people prefer to mix the ring orientation... one ring in, one ring out for various reasons.

    If you continue to have issues with the CDC setup, the CenterTrack system should alleviate problems you may have had with the old system.

  4. #79
    Tandem Vincitur Ritterview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northern California
    My Bikes
    BMC Pro Machine SLC01, Specialized Globe, Burley Rock 'N Roll tandem, Calfee Dragonfly tandem.
    Posts
    3,232
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sixtiescycles View Post
    But why would they bother with 29" boom tube instead of the informal tandem standard (for belt drive, anyway) of 28.5"?
    Well, duh... like you haven't heard of the growing popularity of 29ers?


    Surge in 29er Sales Points to Market Shift

  5. #80
    Senior Member Bent In El Paso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    El Paso, TX
    My Bikes
    Co-Motion Speedster Co-Pilot
    Posts
    187
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by twocicle View Post
    Do you have the older CDC belt system and not the newer CDX (CenterTrack)? The latter is a piece of cake to setup as the center track keeps the belt from wandering off to the side.

    The CDC system is more particular to alignment and belt tension. You should note that with the CDC rings (or CDX for that matter) it does not matter which way you mount them. Retaining ring in, ring out, whatever... no diff. In fact, in some cases people prefer to mix the ring orientation... one ring in, one ring out for various reasons.

    If you continue to have issues with the CDC setup, the CenterTrack system should alleviate problems you may have had with the old system.
    Actually I have a CDX system on the way.

    When I spoke to Gates a couple of years ago about the CDC stoker sprocket installed backwards, they told me that it would cause the belt and sprockets to wear improperly. Since we had a couple thousand miles on the components, their recommendation was to replace the belt and both sprockets. Co-Motion agreed to replace the belt but did not want to replace the sprockets.

    We have put over 10K miles on the CDC system. I'm ready to move on to what is hopefully a better system.
    Last edited by Bent In El Paso; 04-10-13 at 09:30 AM.
    Fred

    Behind every good captain is a great stoker!

    Co-Motion Speedster Co-Pilot

  6. #81
    hors category TandemGeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    7,162
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sixtiescycles View Post
    First of all, yes, Gates is coming out with a 66T CenterTrack tandem (8 mm pitch) sprocket in June of this year.... so 29" instead of 28.5" (approx.).
    Just getting back on line after being incommunicado for a few days.

    I agree on the net length supported by the 66t sprockets being closer to 29" not 30" and believe Steve at Gates simply gave me some incorrect info on belt compatibility. It's a simple calculation that I'd already ran and that yielded a need for a 60t sprocket... not 66t. My only error was not remembering that the standard drive systems used 11 pitch instead of 8 pitch, noting there was an 11-pitch 60t sprocket.

    Not sure why I chose to ignore the math and assumed there was some fairy dust floating around that would "solve" the math gap. It sort of dawned on me while as we were riding our motorcycles to Key West on Monday. This was the first chance that I had to log-on other than a quick visit to address a private message yesterday. I've also sent off a note to Steve P. at Gates just to follow-up.

    Our friend Bob Thompson could provide a 60t solution using some custom sprockets that would use the Gates 250t/2000mm belt and that would bolt-up to our daVinci cranks so I may mull that over a bit.
    Last edited by TandemGeek; 04-10-13 at 09:06 AM.

  7. #82
    Clipless in Coeur d'Alene twocicle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
    My Bikes
    Calfee Tetra Tandem, Specialized Tarmac SL4 S-Works, other misc Road & MTB singles
    Posts
    1,170
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bent In El Paso View Post
    When I spoke to Gates a couple of years ago about the CDC stoker sprocket installed backwards, they told me that it would cause the belt and sprockets to wear improperly. Since we had a couple thousand miles on the components, their recommendation was to replace the belt and both sprockets. Co-Motion agreed to replace the belt but did not want to replace the sprockets.
    Yea, understood what you said the first time. Still, whoever told you that you couldn't mount the CDC rings "backward" did not know what they were talking about... even if it was somebody from Gates.

  8. #83
    Clipless in Coeur d'Alene twocicle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
    My Bikes
    Calfee Tetra Tandem, Specialized Tarmac SL4 S-Works, other misc Road & MTB singles
    Posts
    1,170
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ritterview View Post
    Well, duh... like you haven't heard of the growing popularity of 29ers?


    Surge in 29er Sales Points to Market Shift
    Great article. It really clarifies what has been confusing to me about the reasons for using either 29er or 26er. "Trail riders want 29er trail bikes. For us, it’s an up valley trail rider or down valley hardtail customer”. WTF? I must be lingo challenged
    Last edited by twocicle; 04-10-13 at 10:24 AM.

  9. #84
    Senior Member Bent In El Paso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    El Paso, TX
    My Bikes
    Co-Motion Speedster Co-Pilot
    Posts
    187
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by twocicle View Post
    Yea, understood what you said the first time. Still, whoever told you that you couldn't mount the CDC rings "backward" did not know what they were talking about... even if it was somebody from Gates.
    Thanks.

    It's good to know someone out there has all of the answers.
    Fred

    Behind every good captain is a great stoker!

    Co-Motion Speedster Co-Pilot

  10. #85
    Clipless in Coeur d'Alene twocicle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
    My Bikes
    Calfee Tetra Tandem, Specialized Tarmac SL4 S-Works, other misc Road & MTB singles
    Posts
    1,170
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bent In El Paso View Post
    Thanks.

    It's good to know someone out there has all of the answers.
    Was that a snipe or a joke?

    You have a collection of people on this forum that have gathered information and some that have used this product more or less successfully for years. Conversely, larger companies such as Gates have people who have never used their own product. I do know for fact that when I have called them, the support/tech person has never ridden a tandem let alone used a gates belt-timing ring setup.

  11. #86
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    787
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Is there a CDX system that fits the original 71 tooth chain rings?
    I believe that is what fits our Calfee.
    I don't see anybody selling Tandem CDX parts online, where do you buy them?

  12. #87
    Senior Member Bent In El Paso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    El Paso, TX
    My Bikes
    Co-Motion Speedster Co-Pilot
    Posts
    187
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jnbrown View Post
    Is there a CDX system that fits the original 71 tooth chain rings?
    I believe that is what fits our Calfee.
    I don't see anybody selling Tandem CDX parts online, where do you buy them?
    Gates website shows a 69T and a 74T centertrack pulley for tandems. Some discussions earlier in this thread indicate a 66T will be available this summer.

    I think most of the tandem shops either stock or can get the CDX system. I purchased a 69T system for our CoMo from House of Tandems earlier this week. Tandems East and Precision Tandems also advertise the system.

    Before purchasing from HoT, I did a google search for Gates Tandem CDX. The "shopping" results showed several belts and pulleys that were advertised to be CDX but the pictures did not look like CDX components.

    One example is this pulley from bikepartsexpress.com. It shows the CDX label on the side but it does not look like a CDX pulley. It looks more like the pulley for the CDC belt drive system that we have on our bike now. I decided to play it safe and purchase my system from one of the reputable tandem shops.


    CR8038.jpg
    Last edited by Bent In El Paso; 04-10-13 at 03:33 PM.
    Fred

    Behind every good captain is a great stoker!

    Co-Motion Speedster Co-Pilot

  13. #88
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Central Illinois
    My Bikes
    Trek Speed Concept 9.9, 2011 Calfee Tetra Tandem
    Posts
    913
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jnbrown View Post
    Is there a CDX system that fits the original 71 tooth chain rings?
    I believe that is what fits our Calfee.
    I don't see anybody selling Tandem CDX parts online, where do you buy them?
    If the center to center distance between your bottom brackets is 28.5 inches you will be able to use the new 69 tooth rings and the 250 tooth belt. The kit is available directly from Gates and I believe most of the tandem speciality shops such as Tanems East, House of Tandems, Precision Tandems etc. I bought ours directly from Gates and have had it installed since early October of 2012, it has around 2,500 miles on it with no problems, no wear that I can see, quiet and clean.

    Wayne

  14. #89
    Clipless in Coeur d'Alene twocicle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
    My Bikes
    Calfee Tetra Tandem, Specialized Tarmac SL4 S-Works, other misc Road & MTB singles
    Posts
    1,170
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jnbrown View Post
    Is there a CDX system that fits the original 71 tooth chain rings?
    I believe that is what fits our Calfee.
    I don't see anybody selling Tandem CDX parts online, where do you buy them?
    "71 tooth chain rings" is something of a misnomer, since there is no chain involved with the CDX setup.

    71T CDC rings were made and you may be lucky to still find some laying around. Check with Calfee direct.

    As far as CDX 71T rings, you can't. At least not from Gates and presently no 3rd party either. I had inquired last year because our 2007 Calfee was in the same boat - it would need 71T rings due to the BB spacing. Gates stated they will not produce any 71T CenterTrack rings, ever. From 2008 onward, Calfee tweeked the BB spacing which then conformed to the Gates belt requirement and from then onward uses the 69T rings on their standard sized frames.

    Maybe the same people that will be producing the 66T CDX could be persuaded to make a 71T too. That would let a bunch of people into the game, but something of a deadend as those frames needing a 71T ring are no longer made.
    Last edited by twocicle; 04-10-13 at 03:47 PM.

  15. #90
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Anchorage, Ak
    My Bikes
    Calfee Tetra tandem, Ventana ECDM 26, Ventana ECDM 29r, Orbea Orca, Santa Cruz Carbon 5010
    Posts
    320
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    We have been using the CDC belt system for at least 10k miles without issues. However when we first sent our frame to have it installed along with painting we wanted done Calfee had issues with it walking off. they investigated the problem and found that when our bike was jigged intially somehow our bottom brackets were not parallel by about 2 degrees. They redid one of them and actually made a tool at that time the assured all other tandem BB's would be absolutely parallel. We can run our belt well below the recommended tension with out problems. So the lack of parallelism may be the cause of many of the belt problems. We were early belt drive adopters and paid the high initial price. At this point I see no reason to go to the CDX system

  16. #91
    Tandem Mountain Climber
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    San Mateo, CA
    My Bikes
    Calfee Tandem, Custom CAAD9 BB30, 90 Santana Arriva Tandem, 02 CAAD4 errand bike, 87 Cannondale "Black Lightning"
    Posts
    4,090
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by akexpress View Post
    Calfee ..... found that when our bike was jigged intially somehow our bottom brackets were not parallel by about 2 degrees. They redid one of them and actually made a tool at that time the assured all other tandem BB's would be absolutely parallel.
    I love Calfees, but that is totally lame. Imagine if you have ordered with a chain drive, they may have not discovered this. My front water bottle mounts are crooked. One day I will bring the frame back to fix it.... but still that kind of stuff should not happen.

  17. #92
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Gates Tension and Alignment Challenges !

    Hi Folks,
    I'm new on the list, and have read a lot!
    I'm trying to update our 2009 Cdale. Co-Motion has/had a sale to close out the Gates CDC system. I thought, "what the heck" and purchased. Now I am having some difficulties with install...of course I'm hoping someone will set me straight.
    Equipment:
    FSA Gossamar cranks
    FSA MegaExo BB.
    Cannondale dual-wedge ECC

    First question: I am using the iPhone app for tension. I tested with the cranks in various positions to see what the range is and expect some differential in tension. I am getting a 15hz variation i.e 50hz in one position vs. 65 in another. That seems significant to me especially since the Gates App indicates a 5hz variation between "lightweight" and "big and powerful" for tandems.
    I have repositioned the front pulley on the spider to see if it changed, it didn't have a noticeable impact.
    What kind of hz ranges are others getting with this App?

    Second question: Alignment. If I can rotate the cranks forward and backwards without the belt walking off, is that considered aligned? I believe I can hear the belt rubbing against the flange of the pulley but I currently have the system "aligned" such that the belt will not walk off while on the stand but have not ridden it.
    I ask this question after investing a significant amount of time trying to attain alignment. I am using the ECC to attain aligment though I do have some option with shims. Once I get the alignment set I have to rotate (using a pin spanner) the ECC for tension, the ECC "walks" in the BB which throws off the alignment. If I'm lucky and get the tension acceptable (see above) and the alignment is still good, I have the challenge of tightening the ECC which again may cause the alignment to shift ever so slightly...and the belt will wander.
    Am I the only one pulling my hair out? - technically not my 3rd question...
    Any insight appreciated!

  18. #93
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Anchorage, Ak
    My Bikes
    Calfee Tetra tandem, Ventana ECDM 26, Ventana ECDM 29r, Orbea Orca, Santa Cruz Carbon 5010
    Posts
    320
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My experience over 4+ years on a CDC system is you can run it with much lower tension than specs recommend if the alignment is good. I no longer use the app or the kricket but just do it by feel. I can actually put it on be sliding it on from the inside without moving the eccentric. YRMV but I would try riding it a much lower tension and see if it walks. My experience if it stays on pedaling backwards on the stand it will ride just fine. We recently climbed many ascents in New Zealand with grades up to 17% without skipping at the low tension.

  19. #94
    Clipless in Coeur d'Alene twocicle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
    My Bikes
    Calfee Tetra Tandem, Specialized Tarmac SL4 S-Works, other misc Road & MTB singles
    Posts
    1,170
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkr8 View Post
    Hi Folks,
    First question: I am using the iPhone app for tension. I tested with the cranks in various positions to see what the range is and expect some differential in tension. I am getting a 15hz variation i.e 50hz in one position vs. 65 in another. That seems significant to me especially since the Gates App indicates a 5hz variation between "lightweight" and "big and powerful" for tandems. I have repositioned the front pulley on the spider to see if it changed, it didn't have a noticeable impact.
    You are correct that ring positioning on the spider is key to obtaining a consistent tension. That said, it is doubtful you will get it perfect. At least the CDC rings have a crank bolt head recess which should help you with the ring positioning.

    Our belt tension varies somewhat depending on the crank positions, but as it is neither binding nor terribly loose, it appears to otherwise run fine. I do not use the app. I gave our CDX ring positioning my "best effort" and then left it at that without fretting too much. With the CDX rings it is best to rely on the sleaves of the crank nuts to provide the best concentric position.

    Quote Originally Posted by sinkr8 View Post
    Second question: Alignment. If I can rotate the cranks forward and backwards without the belt walking off, is that considered aligned? I believe I can hear the belt rubbing against the flange of the pulley but I currently have the system "aligned" such that the belt will not walk off while on the stand but have not ridden it.
    I ask this question after investing a significant amount of time trying to attain alignment. I am using the ECC to attain aligment though I do have some option with shims. Once I get the alignment set I have to rotate (using a pin spanner) the ECC for tension, the ECC "walks" in the BB which throws off the alignment. If I'm lucky and get the tension acceptable (see above) and the alignment is still good, I have the challenge of tightening the ECC which again may cause the alignment to shift ever so slightly...and the belt will wander.
    If your ECC insists on centering itself, then perhaps you should resort to using chain ring spacers (aka washers) instead. Likely you can use 1-2mm without any issue, but more may require longer chainring bolts/nuts (which can be surprisingly expensive, especially if you need 10 of them. Problem Solvers packets of 5 at ~$16/ea).
    Last edited by twocicle; 04-18-13 at 10:08 AM.

  20. #95
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Central Illinois
    My Bikes
    Trek Speed Concept 9.9, 2011 Calfee Tetra Tandem
    Posts
    913
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkr8 View Post
    Hi Folks,
    I'm new on the list, and have read a lot!
    I'm trying to update our 2009 Cdale. Co-Motion has/had a sale to close out the Gates CDC system. I thought, "what the heck" and purchased. Now I am having some difficulties with install...of course I'm hoping someone will set me straight.
    Equipment:
    FSA Gossamar cranks
    FSA MegaExo BB.
    Cannondale dual-wedge ECC

    First question: I am using the iPhone app for tension. I tested with the cranks in various positions to see what the range is and expect some differential in tension. I am getting a 15hz variation i.e 50hz in one position vs. 65 in another. That seems significant to me especially since the Gates App indicates a 5hz variation between "lightweight" and "big and powerful" for tandems.
    I have repositioned the front pulley on the spider to see if it changed, it didn't have a noticeable impact.
    What kind of hz ranges are others getting with this App?

    Second question: Alignment. If I can rotate the cranks forward and backwards without the belt walking off, is that considered aligned? I believe I can hear the belt rubbing against the flange of the pulley but I currently have the system "aligned" such that the belt will not walk off while on the stand but have not ridden it.
    I ask this question after investing a significant amount of time trying to attain alignment. I am using the ECC to attain aligment though I do have some option with shims. Once I get the alignment set I have to rotate (using a pin spanner) the ECC for tension, the ECC "walks" in the BB which throws off the alignment. If I'm lucky and get the tension acceptable (see above) and the alignment is still good, I have the challenge of tightening the ECC which again may cause the alignment to shift ever so slightly...and the belt will wander.
    Am I the only one pulling my hair out? - technically not my 3rd question...
    Any insight appreciated!
    I chose to wait for the CDX system so that I would not have any of the issues that you are describing. I hope that you saved a lot of money. I would pack the whole thing up and send it back and spend the extra money for the redesigned system. Engineers redesign for a reason.

    Wayne, retired engineer!

  21. #96
    Clipless in Coeur d'Alene twocicle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
    My Bikes
    Calfee Tetra Tandem, Specialized Tarmac SL4 S-Works, other misc Road & MTB singles
    Posts
    1,170
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you subscribe to the school of Dilbert, you would know it is marketing that drives product development

    I'm just glad this kit now costs less than half of what people originally paid (>$500) for the CDC setup.

  22. #97
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by twocicle View Post
    If you subscribe to the school of Dilbert, you would know it is marketing that drives product development

    I'm just glad this kit now costs less than half of what people originally paid (>$500) for the CDC setup.
    Amen. Just because they designed a new system that will stay on the pulleys doesn't mean they addressed alignment issues specific to the frame and cranks! That's the beauty of chain drive, its very tolerant!

  23. #98
    Senior Member Turbotandem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    My Bikes
    Paketa V2r di2, C-Dale MT 3000, Teesdale, 1963 Huffy Daisey
    Posts
    165
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkr8 View Post
    I am getting a 15hz variation i.e 50hz in one position vs. 65 in another. That seems significant to me especially since the Gates App indicates a 5hz variation between "lightweight" and "big and powerful" for tandems.
    I have repositioned the front pulley on the spider to see if it changed, it didn't have a noticeable impact.
    What kind of hz ranges are others getting with this App?
    I agree with those saying tension can vary. I'd set it to proper tension at the point the belt feels tightest, such that it is a bit less tension at certain points in the rotation. IMHO I would not slack it all the way down below spec.

    Quote Originally Posted by sinkr8 View Post
    Second question: Alignment. If I can rotate the cranks forward and backwards without the belt walking off, is that considered aligned? I believe I can hear the belt rubbing against the flange of the pulley but I currently have the system "aligned" such that the belt will not walk off while on the stand but have not ridden it. Any insight appreciated!
    I think you are trying too hard. In my experience, the belt will ride against or rub the inside flange of one of the CDC sprockets, and that's OK. It won't catch and run off. But that's why the CDC has a flange is so the belt can't walk off. If it means one sprocket is a couple mm outbord of the other that's OK too. That is, if when riding under load, which is the importnant metric, and the belt tends to walk off to the inside under the stoker, you can move the captains sprocket out a mm. In an ideal world the bottom tube, cranks, spiders, axles all have so little flex that aligmnet in the bike stand is the same as on the road. But short of that ideal, it takes a bit of nuance to set up alignment, especially on a retrofit tandem. Thus the release of the CDX to solve this problem.
    I would also say that back pedaling may lead to differnt results; if it walks off while pedaling backwards, don't pedal backwards. I've seen belts walk over if you pedal backwards a whole bunch. But why would you? If you pedal backwards just to get the stokers cleats in and your own, a couple pedal strokes is not going to throw the belt.
    Andy
    Boulder Colorado

  24. #99
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Turbotandem View Post
    I agree with those saying tension can vary. I'd set it to proper tension at the point the belt feels tightest, such that it is a bit less tension at certain points in the rotation. IMHO I would not slack it all the way down below spec.


    I think you are trying too hard. In my experience, the belt will ride against or rub the inside flange of one of the CDC sprockets, and that's OK. It won't catch and run off. But that's why the CDC has a flange is so the belt can't walk off. If it means one sprocket is a couple mm outbord of the other that's OK too. That is, if when riding under load, which is the importnant metric, and the belt tends to walk off to the inside under the stoker, you can move the captains sprocket out a mm. In an ideal world the bottom tube, cranks, spiders, axles all have so little flex that aligmnet in the bike stand is the same as on the road. But short of that ideal, it takes a bit of nuance to set up alignment, especially on a retrofit tandem. Thus the release of the CDX to solve this problem.
    I would also say that back pedaling may lead to differnt results; if it walks off while pedaling backwards, don't pedal backwards. I've seen belts walk over if you pedal backwards a whole bunch. But why would you? If you pedal backwards just to get the stokers cleats in and your own, a couple pedal strokes is not going to throw the belt.
    Thanks Turbo,
    That is what I needed to hear.
    On a couple occasions I did manage to get it aligned perfectly such that it was not rubbing on either flange at which time it was very quiet and smooth! Alas, the alignment was not quite right and it would walk off the stokers pulley. On this CDale there is only about 2mm clearance between the stoker pulley and the chain stay so it really cannot walk off but is can rub if misaligned. My back pedaling comment was driven off of what i read on the Co-Motion FAQ's page and another comment I read which indicated a perfect alignment would allow both forward and back rotation but maybe that is pie in the sky...
    As an additional comment on the tension challenge, I find it amazing the either the belt or the pulleys cannot be manufactured (economically?) to a higher tolerance such that the variation is minimized.
    I will get things aligned and tensioned and give a report back.
    Thanks again.

  25. #100
    Senior Member Krenovian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Park City, UT
    My Bikes
    Hers: Kestrel 200 SCI, Niner Jet9 RDO, Ellsworth Truth. His: Kestrel 200 EMS, Niner Jet9, Psyclewerks Wild Hare. Ours: Paketa V2
    Posts
    74
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkr8 View Post
    As an additional comment on the tension challenge, I find it amazing the either the belt or the pulleys cannot be manufactured (economically?) to a higher tolerance such that the variation is minimized.
    I will get things aligned and tensioned and give a report back.
    Thanks again.
    For those of you that are finding the tension on the Gates Belt changes as you rotate the cranks you might try the following. After setting the initial tension on the belt, back off the chainring bolts holding the Gates sprockets on both timing side spyders so they are still snug but not tight. Now rotate the captain's crankset through several full rotations then re-torque the chain ring bolts. If the sprockets were not concentric with the bottom bracket axle initially, causing variable tension as the cranks are rotated, this may improve the concentricity.

    After initially installing the Gates CDX system on our bike equipped with a DaVinci crankset I found quite a bit of variation in tension as the cranks went through one full rotation. After I had carried out the above procedure I couldn't detect that difference any longer. This should apply to bikes equipped with the CDC system as well. Regarding the tensioning of the CDX belt, I found quite a bit or rotational resistance when the belt was tensioned near the recommended level. When I backed this tension off there seemed to be a lot less resistance, as a result I now run the belt with relatively low tension.

    Curtis

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •