Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 12 of 14 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 LastLast
Results 276 to 300 of 331
  1. #276
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris_W View Post
    Personally, knowing about this issue and that TRP are not doing anything about it, I wouldn't recommend the carbon-armed version to anyone, regardless of their weight.
    You missed the memo, TRP is recalling all brakes, carbon and aluminum arms, they will have replacements in a month or so.

    I still have not had a single problem with the Spyre on my tandem nor on my unis, great brakes overall.

    I am suprrised that TRP decided to redesign all of the Spyre brakes after a single carbon arm brake failure, that demonstrates a very progressive attitude and suggests a strong commitment to the consumer.

    Good vibes to TRP/TEktro!

    TRP is Tektro, and my experience with Tektro, though not with every product they make has always led me to consider them second tier.
    Tektro is second tier, TRP is first tier. You'll find the same sort of thing when you buy a car, same make, high and low level products.
    Last edited by nurse ben; 12-23-13 at 08:12 AM.

  2. #277
    Clipless in Coeur d'Alene twocicle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
    My Bikes
    Calfee Tetra Tandem, Specialized Tarmac SL4 S-Works, other misc Road & MTB singles
    Posts
    1,051
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by nurse ben View Post
    You missed the memo, TRP is recalling all brakes, carbon and aluminum arms, they will have replacements in a month or so.

    I still have not had a single problem with the Spyre on my tandem nor on my unis, great brakes overall.

    I am suprrised that TRP decided to redesign all of the Spyre brakes after a single carbon arm brake failure, that demonstrates a very progressive attitude and suggests a strong commitment to the consumer.

    Good vibes to TRP/TEktro!

    Tektro is second tier, TRP is first tier. You'll find the same sort of thing when you buy a car, same make, high and low level products.
    FYI, the published recall has nothing to do with the one carbon arm failure reported in this thread and TRP has not acknowledged there is a design problem with that version (a few of us have discussed this directly with TRP tech support). We can only hope that TRP would take the opportunity to mod the carbon arm, but there is no word on that actually being considered.

  3. #278
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    FYI, the published recall has nothing to do with the one carbon arm failure reported in this thread and TRP has not acknowledged there is a design problem with that version (a few of us have discussed this directly with TRP tech support). We can only hope that TRP would take the opportunity to mod the carbon arm, but there is no word on that actually being considered.
    I have also talked with the guys at TRP, both in person at the Ogden werehouse and by phone. I having been using these brakes for as long or longer than anyone on this forum, so I am quite familiar with them.

    The guy who ran the carbon arm SL Spyre was "living on the edge", not only was he using a product not tandem rated, he was using a lighter weight version of a brake that was untested. His failure has more to do with decision making than the product design. He has even admitted that much. Don't bag on a mfg because their product failed due to the users poor judgement, it is bad form and it harms the mfg.

    TRP will not say there is a design problem when the failure was due the product being used way outside it's design envelope. If you go on the cyclocross forum you will not find another failure. It may be that the Spyre SL brake is perfectly fine on a normal cyclosross race bike, in which case there is not a design failure. You can't demand an mfg create a product to suit your needs, tandem riders are a minority, so we take what we can get and we pass off the failures as lessons learned.

    Brakes are not a place to play around, a failure can be life threatening.

  4. #279
    Clipless in Coeur d'Alene twocicle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
    My Bikes
    Calfee Tetra Tandem, Specialized Tarmac SL4 S-Works, other misc Road & MTB singles
    Posts
    1,051
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by nurse ben View Post
    I have also talked with the guys at TRP, both in person at the Ogden werehouse and by phone. I having been using these brakes for as long or longer than anyone on this forum, so I am quite familiar with them.

    The guy who ran the carbon arm SL Spyre was "living on the edge", not only was he using a product not tandem rated, he was using a lighter weight version of a brake that was untested. His failure has more to do with decision making than the product design. He has even admitted that much. Don't bag on a mfg because their product failed due to the users poor judgement, it is bad form and it harms the mfg.

    TRP will not say there is a design problem when the failure was due the product being used way outside it's design envelope. If you go on the cyclocross forum you will not find another failure. It may be that the Spyre SL brake is perfectly fine on a normal cyclosross race bike, in which case there is not a design failure. You can't demand an mfg create a product to suit your needs, tandem riders are a minority, so we take what we can get and we pass off the failures as lessons learned.

    Brakes are not a place to play around, a failure can be life threatening.
    No bagging of TRP, just stating the facts. My response intended to point out a correction needed* to your comment:

    Quote Originally Posted by nurse ben View Post
    I am suprrised that TRP decided to redesign all of the Spyre brakes after a single carbon arm brake failure,
    * TRP has never mentioned redesigning anything concerning the carbon arm failure.

    I also stand behind my earlier comment in this thread, that blaming the SLC arm failure on "tandem usage" is IMO a complete cop-out. There are 3 components in play here, brake lever, cable, caliper. Tandem does not come into the equation other than to suggest heavier load usage. Most likely the same failure could be reproduced on any single bike ridden by a clydesdale.

    On a brighter note, I just received notice that my replacement Spyre (AL) has been shipped from TRP, much sooner than expected
    Last edited by twocicle; 12-23-13 at 12:00 PM.

  5. #280
    Senior Member Turbotandem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    My Bikes
    Paketa V2r di2, C-Dale MT 3000, Teesdale, 1963 Huffy Daisey
    Posts
    165
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    TRP notified me today that the replacement TRP Syre is being shipped to me. I'd returned the brake on recall a week or two ago. So the revised ball bearing and ramps are done. Sweet!
    Andy
    Boulder Colorado

  6. #281
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    40,043
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I gathered the issue came up when the pad wear was about done, so pick up a spare set of brake pads ..

    <guess> The aftermarket pads may be longer wearing than what they ship with the Brake.

  7. #282
    Tandem Vincitur Ritterview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northern California
    My Bikes
    BMC Pro Machine SLC01, Specialized Globe, Burley Rock 'N Roll tandem, Calfee Dragonfly tandem.
    Posts
    3,214
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by twocicle View Post
    * TRP has never mentioned redesigning anything concerning the carbon arm failure.
    I wonder if those returning the carbon-armed Spyre SLC on recall are going to get Spyre SLC's back, or whether this one recall will just happen to provide cover for the discontinuation of the SLC Spyre.

    Info on the TRP FB

    Quote Originally Posted by TRP
    It is easy to ID the NEW version....Simply look for laser etching on the pad adjust bolt! If your brake doesn't have the etching, give us a call to replace it...
    SPYRE UPDATE: We have the first round of replacement Spyre's in stock and ready to ship! Give us a call to make arrangements to get you on the latest version!


    Edit:

    It is nice that the pad adjustment is now a hex wrench rather than torx. Smaller multitools such as the Lezyne V5 will have hex but not torx. It was no fun looking down at a 10% grade on Page Mill, finding my now worn pads needed to be adjusted, but that I did not have a torx wrench. Luckily a guy climbing did have a torx wrench. Whew!
    Last edited by Ritterview; 12-24-13 at 10:37 PM.

  8. #283
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    40,043
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There are Torx folding sets , no bigger (fwiw).. + torx wont round out..
    Eklund ,, sold At the auto parts store [it's NAPA affiliated , here].

    though a non Early adopter, which seemed prudent with this product.

    Now.. , I might try the Spyres..
    Last edited by fietsbob; 12-25-13 at 11:21 AM.

  9. #284
    Senior Member Werkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Pipe Creek, Texas
    Posts
    416
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ritterview View Post
    ...It is nice that the pad adjustment is now a hex wrench rather than torx...
    The original pad adjustment screw was also a 3mm hex, it was located within the center of the outboard arm's torx fastener.

  10. #285
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Campbell, CA
    My Bikes
    Co-Motion Speedster, Calfee Tetra, Specialized Crux Disc, Serotta Nova Special, Bianchi Pista Concept, Bianchi Pista
    Posts
    44
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Werkin View Post
    The original pad adjustment screw was also a 3mm hex, it was located within the center of the outboard arm's torx fastener.
    The cable clamp on the SLC is/was a torx while on the standard Spyre that bolt is/was a standard hex bolt. I believe the pad adjust screw, hidden inside the larger torx fastener, was a 3mm hex on both versions.

  11. #286
    Clipless in Coeur d'Alene twocicle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
    My Bikes
    Calfee Tetra Tandem, Specialized Tarmac SL4 S-Works, other misc Road & MTB singles
    Posts
    1,051
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I received the replacement Spyre as shown on the right photo in post no.282 above, with new pads installed. TRP also included a free brake cable wire & a length of very stiff "Disc Connect" casing, plus a short piece of flex casing for use at the levers-handlebar-bend location if desired.

    Quick review: Other than the 3mm adjustment screws, visually the caliper looks the same (from memory). The caliper arm / spring actuation also feels the same. No chance to go ride with it for awhile, so no road test info to share.
    Last edited by twocicle; 12-27-13 at 08:57 AM.

  12. #287
    Senior Member Werkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Pipe Creek, Texas
    Posts
    416
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    FYI, there have been a few changes since the early version of the Hy/Rd caliper. For 2014 a set-screw has been added to the plunger rod to discourage user manipulation, reservoir volume has increased via extra depth, the gasket/diaphragm is different, and steel rings surround the pistons. The steel rings allow the pistons to glide smoothly in their bores, lever feel is very slick.

  13. #288
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Wind Tunnels of Cheyenne
    My Bikes
    Burley Duet [of some unknown year]; And always one less than I think I really need.
    Posts
    159
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Werkin View Post
    FYI, there have been a few changes since the early version of the Hy/Rd caliper. For 2014 a set-screw has been added to the plunger rod to discourage user manipulation, reservoir volume has increased via extra depth, the gasket/diaphragm is different, and steel rings surround the pistons. The steel rings allow the pistons to glide smoothly in their bores, lever feel is very slick.
    Wondering if the revisions address the complaints about the "weak" spring that effected pad adjustment.

    LKW

  14. #289
    Senior Member dwmckee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    Co-Motion Cappuccino Tandem, Jamis Xenith Race,'88 Bob Jackson Touring Bike (I love this one best), Co-Motion Cascadia Touring Bike, Salsa Fargo, Burley TAB
    Posts
    708
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I wish they would recall my original Hy/Rd calipers. They were great new but never adjusted for wear and there is no manual option to adjust. Really an expensive bummer...

  15. #290
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Anchorage, Ak
    My Bikes
    Calfee Tetra tandem, Ventana ECDM 26, Ventana ECDM 29r, Orbea Orca, Maverick ML8
    Posts
    291
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dwmckee View Post
    I wish they would recall my original Hy/Rd calipers. They were great new but never adjusted for wear and there is no manual option to adjust. Really an expensive bummer...
    My opinion also as I don't think the new gasket is going to change self adjusting for pad wear

  16. #291
    Senior Member Werkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Pipe Creek, Texas
    Posts
    416
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Make sure the lock-out screw can be screwed down, pad gap can not self-adjust if the piston cylinder can not refill. This top-off procedure is helpful: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0i4aQ8S34w

  17. #292
    PMK
    PMK is offline
    Senior Member PMK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Royal Palm Beach, Florida
    My Bikes
    2006 Co-Motion Roadster (Flat Bars, Discs, Carbon Fork), Some 1/2 bikes and a couple of KTM's
    Posts
    1,083
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This is now a very long topic. From excitement to concern about the recall to back on track. Where has it settled.

    Is the TRP caliper "the one". Have the other brands and models held their own? Not that we need a brake upgrade, but...

    PK
    2006 Co-Motion Roadster, flat bars, discs and carbon fibre fork, size 22 / 19
    2006 Ventana ECDM full suspension mountain tandem
    Some single bikes and a couple of KTM's
    And most important, someone special that enjoys them with me (except the KTM's)

  18. #293
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    40,043
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Seems that TRP has introduced a longer pull V-Mountain Lever pull version.. at Taipei trade show..

    Gallery: Taiwanese companies flex their component manufacturing muscle Review - BikeRadar

  19. #294
    Rod & Judy gracehowler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Montrose, CO
    My Bikes
    Specialized S-works e-5, Davinci joint venture, Specialized Vienna Commuter
    Posts
    402
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ah!, Something new to watch, we are surely waiting on what really works BETTER!
    R&J

  20. #295
    Clipless in Coeur d'Alene twocicle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
    My Bikes
    Calfee Tetra Tandem, Specialized Tarmac SL4 S-Works, other misc Road & MTB singles
    Posts
    1,051
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by PMK View Post
    This is now a very long topic. From excitement to concern about the recall to back on track. Where has it settled.

    Is the TRP caliper "the one". Have the other brands and models held their own? Not that we need a brake upgrade, but...

    PK
    This thread has been repeatedly highjacked for Hy/Rd discussion (now has it's own thread), so quite messy.

    My impression of the Spyre (v2) with stock pads and Shimano ICE 203mm rotor is that it has a more vague lever feel than the Avid BB7 with stock pads, and not as much grab on the rotor. With the Avid I could just about lock up the rear if I wanted, but the Spyre is still exhibiting the performance of a wet rim brake IMO. I had cleaned the rotor before install and wiped it down again, but no gain.

    Caliper arm spring seems adequate, about on par with the BB7... just enough to uptake cable slack and still have immediate actuation response with the slightest of lever (brifter) movement.

  21. #296
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Wind Tunnels of Cheyenne
    My Bikes
    Burley Duet [of some unknown year]; And always one less than I think I really need.
    Posts
    159
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just read on roadbikerider.com a notice for a Spyre recall...Anyone know if this the same recall as before (and RBR is just late in announcing), or have the calipers been recalled again?

  22. #297
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Campbell, CA
    My Bikes
    Co-Motion Speedster, Calfee Tetra, Specialized Crux Disc, Serotta Nova Special, Bianchi Pista Concept, Bianchi Pista
    Posts
    44
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by LastKraftWagen View Post
    Just read on roadbikerider.com a notice for a Spyre recall...Anyone know if this the same recall as before (and RBR is just late in announcing), or have the calipers been recalled again?
    That looks like the original recall. The replacements have been available since the beginning of the year.

  23. #298
    I'd rather be riding DKMcK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Charlotte NC
    My Bikes
    Santana Sovereign S&S, Trek Madone 6, Klein Palamino, Trek 510
    Posts
    71
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by twocicle View Post
    This thread has been repeatedly highjacked for Hy/Rd discussion (now has it's own thread), so quite messy.

    My impression of the Spyre (v2) with stock pads and Shimano ICE 203mm rotor is that it has a more vague lever feel than the Avid BB7 with stock pads, and not as much grab on the rotor. With the Avid I could just about lock up the rear if I wanted, but the Spyre is still exhibiting the performance of a wet rim brake IMO. I had cleaned the rotor before install and wiped it down again, but no gain.

    Caliper arm spring seems adequate, about on par with the BB7... just enough to uptake cable slack and still have immediate actuation response with the slightest of lever (brifter) movement.
    Interesting enough, my experience has been quite the opposite. I have the Spyre(v2) with Icetech 203 rotor and have found its braking is much stronger than the Avid. However, neither will lock the wheel. The new Spyre did come with cable housing and cables that I used. These may have less compression than the Jagwire housing I had. I was not happy at all with the braking with the Avids.

  24. #299
    Clipless in Coeur d'Alene twocicle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
    My Bikes
    Calfee Tetra Tandem, Specialized Tarmac SL4 S-Works, other misc Road & MTB singles
    Posts
    1,051
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DKMcK View Post
    Interesting enough, my experience has been quite the opposite. I have the Spyre(v2) with Icetech 203 rotor and have found its braking is much stronger than the Avid. However, neither will lock the wheel. The new Spyre did come with cable housing and cables that I used. These may have less compression than the Jagwire housing I had. I was not happy at all with the braking with the Avids.
    I also used the TRP casing + that really good Superslick Jagwire brake wire for the rear segment. Di2 casing & wire for the front (I typically did use Jagwire "Racer" casing and Superslick, so that has changed with this latest install). Oh, another change... using 6770 Di2 brake levers instead of 6703 brifter levers... maybe a change in pull ratio.

    There is plenty of power transfer (cable tension) through to the caliper, just not as much grab as I was used to with the Avid. I'm fairly certain it's the pads (received installed with the recall/replacement). I haven't removed the pads to clean them or sand.
    Last edited by twocicle; 03-14-14 at 04:12 PM.

  25. #300
    I'd rather be riding DKMcK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Charlotte NC
    My Bikes
    Santana Sovereign S&S, Trek Madone 6, Klein Palamino, Trek 510
    Posts
    71
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DKMcK View Post
    Interesting enough, my experience has been quite the opposite. I have the Spyre(v2) with Icetech 203 rotor and have found its braking is much stronger than the Avid. However, neither will lock the wheel. The new Spyre did come with cable housing and cables that I used. These may have less compression than the Jagwire housing I had. I was not happy at all with the braking with the Avids.
    It seems I was impatient in waiting for the pads to conform to the rotor. After a few more rides, my braking is excellent now and will definitely lock the back wheel.

Page 12 of 14 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •