Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Tandem Cycling A bicycle built for two. Want to find out more about this wonderful world of tandems? Check out this forum to talk with other tandem enthusiasts. Captains and stokers welcome!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-06-13, 08:07 AM   #51
Bornco
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Bikes:
Posts: 62
Tandemgeek, you are correct, for a variety of reasons we did not buy the Rivazza.

To answer the questions you posed:

We are a team that weighs between 300 to 305lbs.

We ride 28mm Gatorskins, no idea what the pressure is (gauge broke) but we pump them up to just below the point where I can't flex them with my thumb. I'm guessing this is pretty close to 120. I did just buy a set of 32mm Gatorskins because we are going on vacation to a place where the roads can be pretty bumpy, but flat!! Most of our vacations lately are to places where the roads are flat, my wife's had two knee surgeries and flat roads don't bother her knees, but hills do a little. You may remember we had to go to 130mm cranks for her to ride pain free, she's got a 30.5 inseam, so these are pretty short.

The feature I value most in a wheel is reliability. I hate to stop in the middle of a ride to fix a flat or mess with anything else.

We don't have a drum brake on the wheels, but that wheel weight did include the freewheel. I hadn't thought about the fact that wheelsets are generally weighed without them. The hubs are Edco Competition, I never see mention of them here on the forum so I don't know anything about them. Maybe the hubs are really heavy, but not the spokes and rims? Anyway they say they are Swiss made on them. Total bike weight is around 42lbs.

I really want a new tandem, my wife wants home improvements done. She loves riding, but never rode before we got married (8 years ago) and likes our tandem just fine. Much discussion here about the merits of both, she's winning so far.

I've got about 1,000 dollars set aside towards a new tandem, looks like it will be between one to two more years before I have enough for a another new/used tandem. I'm not committed to the 160mm spacing, but I do love how stable our bike is. It also seems pretty maneuverable to me, but then again I have no experience with other tandems. I saw the Spinergy's were about 1,000 and thought "hmm, maybe I should just buy those?" but of course then I'd have to start over again towards getting to a new tandem. Decisions, decisions.

Thanks for saying we're not slow. We just always seem to come in towards the tail end of the organized rides we do. We're a 111 year old team. I'm 50 and my wife's 61, so any speed improvements will probably have to come from equipment improvements!!

Thanks again for all the input here, I've ridden singles since the late 70's, but all my tandem knowledge comes from this board.

Jack

Bornco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-13, 12:06 PM   #52
Sprout97 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Orange Park, FL
Bikes: 2004 Co-Motion Speedster
Posts: 168
Back to the OP's question. We mounted the 20/24 Spinerys back at the beginning of April. These are replacing our 40h Velocity Dyads (which will remain our training wheelset). Ancedotal impression without actually getting out a scale was weight-wise, the Spins are about half that of the Dyads. We've only ridden 3 times since mounting the Spins (my stoker-wife had a bad equestrian fall in Jan. & we'd been off the bike for 10 weeks). All of that said, our first "real" ride (and our longest ride this year) was this past weekend -- a 38 mile flat course -- and we'd still managed a 16.1 mph average. Most definitely, the new rims helped. The Hadley hubs are a definite improvement over the DT Swiss on our Dyads. Just guesstimating, but the Spinergys are probably worth about 1.5-2 mph speed advantage.
__________________
Jeff

Learn from other people's mistakes. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself.

2004 Co-Motion Speedster
2010 (Specialized) Carmel comfort (my neighborhood bike)
2008 Raleigh comfort (wife's neighborhood bike)
Sprout97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-13, 10:21 PM   #53
Bornco
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Bikes:
Posts: 62
Thanks a lot!! That's the kind of info I was hoping to see.
Bornco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-13, 10:47 AM   #54
Carbonfiberboy 
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Posts: 10,993
A quick trip to Kreuzotter says that, assuming a good cruise at 250 team watts, the additional speed amounts to another 50 watts, i.e. saying that the Dyads absorb 25 watts/ea. more power than the Spins. My guess would be 5 watts. Going to a pair of Zipp 808s might net a 20 watt/ea. improvement over the Dyads at 30 mph. Inertial resistance is such a small factor that it gets lost in tire inflation data noise in the power equation. Not to rain on anyone's parade or anything.
Carbonfiberboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-13, 11:24 PM   #55
Dean V
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 1,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bornco View Post
Thanks a lot!! That's the kind of info I was hoping to see.
As Carbonfibreboy has pointed out, there is no way you will get that much of a gain with wheels.
Dean V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-13, 09:16 AM   #56
Sprout97 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Orange Park, FL
Bikes: 2004 Co-Motion Speedster
Posts: 168
Perhaps I'm a tad optimistic. A few years back, I switched out the original Shimano rims that came with our then-Specialized Roubaix & Ruby singles w/ Specialized' Fusee (probably misspelled). My wife & I rode the same 18.5 mile loop under similar conditions -- same tires/pressure, traffic, temp., & zero wind -- and our overall average went from 17.0 to 18.1. It was from that experience that I'd estimated our improvement switching to the Spins on our Speedster. I had a brief chat w/ Mark at this past weekend's Georgia Tandem Rally about this and the conclusion is that Spinergy's (& the Fusees for matter) were effectively extending our speed endurance over distance before fatigue sets in. And in any case, the Spins are definitely quicker off the line and are easier to climb with. At GTR, we still managed average 15.4 (on the 41 mile route) & 15.0 (on the 47 miler) in the hills of central GA.
__________________
Jeff

Learn from other people's mistakes. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself.

2004 Co-Motion Speedster
2010 (Specialized) Carmel comfort (my neighborhood bike)
2008 Raleigh comfort (wife's neighborhood bike)

Last edited by Sprout97; 05-20-13 at 09:20 AM.
Sprout97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:48 AM.