Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Tandem Cycling
Reload this Page >

Track Cogs

Search
Notices
Tandem Cycling A bicycle built for two. Want to find out more about this wonderful world of tandems? Check out this forum to talk with other tandem enthusiasts. Captains and stokers welcome!

Track Cogs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-13, 04:46 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Track Cogs

Having been through a fair bit of gear failure on our road tandem, we eventually got it right, and dont have major dramas any more. (thanks to Chris king hubs, and a gates Belt). But the Fun is restarting again with our track bike. Im reaching out for help with Track Cogs, and anyones experiences so far.
We are generally using 100inch gear (48x13) but up to 112inch is common. The problem is keeping all 13 teeth on the rear!
The cogs that we have damaged so far are
Shimano 7600
Gebhardt 7075 Alu
Titanium CBC machined

Using both KMC Kool chain and Izumi SuperV chains.

Do I need to run much bigger chainrings and a 14 or 15 tooth cog?
At what point will the chainrings start to fail? (I am a big Gebhardt fan, and would be surprised if they failed)
Is there a better cog option that isnt likley to fail??

Thanks for sharing your experiences
GCBikefit is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 06:23 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
mkane77g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 712
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Bigger is better.
mkane77g is offline  
Old 07-19-13, 01:11 PM
  #3  
Nigel
 
nfmisso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,991

Bikes: 1980s and 1990s steel: CyclePro, Nishiki, Schwinn, SR, Trek........

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 384 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
the more teeth, the less stress on the cog; 1st order it is proportional to the number of teeth, until you get past something around 30 teeth (beyond concern here).

The downside is increased weight.

If you continue breaking cogs, get some made of heat treated 4130 or 4140.
nfmisso is offline  
Old 07-19-13, 05:51 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times in 153 Posts
Get a bigger chainring. 100"+ is a big gear to push on the track isn't it? That is more than any of the single bikes use and although I don't know anything about your team I wouldn't of thought you would be faster than the fast solo riders.
Dean V is offline  
Old 07-21-13, 06:01 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Middle East, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 63
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 4 Posts
More teeth do equal less stress. However I suspect that it will get increasingly difficult to find big enough chainrings. Some quick maths makes me think that with a 15T cog you'd be looking at between 56T for 100" and up to 62T for the 112".

Actually for this team who are no slouches I think they'd be disappointed with only being as fast as a fast solo rider. I think that the aero advantage of a tandem would be best highlighted by track TT events so I'd expect their 4km time to be somewhere between a fast individual and a fast team.


Cheers,

Cameron
ironhanglider is offline  
Old 07-22-13, 03:06 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dean V
Get a bigger chainring. 100"+ is a big gear to push on the track isn't it? That is more than any of the single bikes use and although I don't know anything about your team I wouldn't of thought you would be faster than the fast solo riders.
It has little to do with straight line speed, but the torque of moving double the mass from the start. If you look up The Orange Tandem on Facebook, you can see some photos of what used to be cogs...
GCBikefit is offline  
Old 07-22-13, 03:11 AM
  #7  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thank you for your responses, Particularly on the Material suggestions. We have a Titanium set of cogs, that have been offerd to us for testing, and GarsidePedeler Fabrications have machined us some pretty special Chainrings to be able to use 13 and 14 cogs dominantly. If need be we can move to a 15, but not likley at this point.
Now we are having Crank issues!!! We just rounded a square taper on the crank side (stoker NDS) and have moved to a FSA Road Crank for the bigger axle attatchment. We are joking about starting a thread about "what part did you break today"...
GCBikefit is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Banzai
Bicycle Mechanics
18
01-15-17 05:35 PM
FIFOFREAK
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
6
11-29-15 07:44 PM
kingston
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
40
01-01-15 06:39 AM
venturi95
Classic & Vintage
5
10-25-13 07:16 PM
Shortsocks
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
54
05-25-10 12:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.