Rim Questions
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Wind Tunnels of Cheyenne
Posts: 361
Bikes: Burley Duet [of some unknown year] (the guinea pig); 2001 Ventana ECDM (the project); And always one less than I think I really need.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Rim Questions
I've been shopping around for rims for custom builds and have come across a couple questions I hope some of you wheel builders could answer:
1. For one group of rims I've been looking at, and I've only found it for this manufacturer, there are ratings along the lines of "max spoke tension (>300kgs) maximal strength (>100kgs) and torsional strength (50kgs) [and I assume "kgs" is kilograms]. I can't seem to find any other rim manufacturers who advertise these ratings. Do these ratings indicate possible suitability for tandem use? The manufacturer lists similar ratings for their smallest dish wheel (24mm), but the smallest rim does have a 90kg max rider weight.
Second, what is the structural difference between tubular and clincher rims? The rim weights seem to be significantly different (the tubulars often being over 100g lighter than similarly sized clinchers)?
Thanks,
LKW
.
1. For one group of rims I've been looking at, and I've only found it for this manufacturer, there are ratings along the lines of "max spoke tension (>300kgs) maximal strength (>100kgs) and torsional strength (50kgs) [and I assume "kgs" is kilograms]. I can't seem to find any other rim manufacturers who advertise these ratings. Do these ratings indicate possible suitability for tandem use? The manufacturer lists similar ratings for their smallest dish wheel (24mm), but the smallest rim does have a 90kg max rider weight.
Second, what is the structural difference between tubular and clincher rims? The rim weights seem to be significantly different (the tubulars often being over 100g lighter than similarly sized clinchers)?
Thanks,
LKW
.
#2
What??? Only 2 wheels?
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston-ish, MA
Posts: 13,452
Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10
Mentioned: 189 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1222 Post(s)
Liked 645 Times
in
232 Posts
1. For one group of rims I've been looking at, and I've only found it for this manufacturer, there are ratings along the lines of "max spoke tension (>300kgs) maximal strength (>100kgs) and torsional strength (50kgs) [and I assume "kgs" is kilograms]...
Second, what is the structural difference between tubular and clincher rims? The rim weights seem to be significantly different (the tubulars often being over 100g lighter than similarly sized clinchers)?
Second, what is the structural difference between tubular and clincher rims? The rim weights seem to be significantly different (the tubulars often being over 100g lighter than similarly sized clinchers)?
Clincher vs. tubular? That describes what kind of tire it should have. A tubular tire, a.k.a. sew-up tire, is very different from the "regular" tire we all know. Sew-ups are the original high-performance racing tire (and if you go back to before Michelin invented the clincher a long time ago, they are the original tire at all). Sew-ups must be glued on to the rim, a moderately tedious task. You cannot use the incorrect tire for each type, though I've heard of people mounting a sew-up on a clincher rim as an emergency flat repair. Some may disagree here but IMHO you do not want to consider tubulars for a tandem without good reason such as racing. Yes, tubular rims may be lighter, and model for model a tubular tire is lighter too. (Look up the Vittoria Corsa SC vs. the Vittoria Open Corsa SC.) But they are not for the faint of heart, or the light of wallet.
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Wind Tunnels of Cheyenne
Posts: 361
Bikes: Burley Duet [of some unknown year] (the guinea pig); 2001 Ventana ECDM (the project); And always one less than I think I really need.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I knew there was a difference between clincher and tubular tires, and that the rims were designed differently, I am just curious about the rim weight differences. My thoughts are to always use clinchers for tours and everyday riding, the new rims being researched are "wishfull daydreaming" for sportier riding and racing (especially TTs). Emails to manufacturers have not yet resolved the "kgs" ratings are tandem suitable or how they (the ratings) compare to other rims.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 376
Bikes: Comotion Supremo, Trek T1000, Comotion Supremo Triple
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I knew there was a difference between clincher and tubular tires, and that the rims were designed differently, I am just curious about the rim weight differences. My thoughts are to always use clinchers for tours and everyday riding, the new rims being researched are "wishfull daydreaming" for sportier riding and racing (especially TTs). Emails to manufacturers have not yet resolved the "kgs" ratings are tandem suitable or how they (the ratings) compare to other rims.
if you look at a cross section of a tubular rim vs clincher you will see all the metal(or carbon ) that is needed.
#6
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,486
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3866 Post(s)
Liked 1,911 Times
in
1,362 Posts
Spoke tensions are usually given in "kgf," meaning kilogram-force as opposed to kilogram-weight. It's a technical difference only, but it does indicate someone who understands the nomenclature of wheel building. I build most of our tandem wheels. I use 100-110 kgf on the front and 110-120 kgf on our almost symmetrical rear, both depending on rim. Most rim manufacturers give a maximum spoke tension of ~130 kgf. These spoke tensions are plenty to stretch a 14-15 DB spoke enough so that it can never go close to slack, and are plenty for tandem use. I've found that the deeper the rim, the truer the wheel stays. This is probably because the spoke tensions vary less during use on a deep rim which spreads loads out among more spokes.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 1,971
Bikes: Custom 650B tandem by Bob Brown, 650B tandem converted from Santana Arriva, Santana Noventa, Boulder Bicycle 700C, Gunnar Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Spoke tensions are usually given in "kgf," meaning kilogram-force as opposed to kilogram-weight. It's a technical difference only, but it does indicate someone who understands the nomenclature of wheel building. I build most of our tandem wheels. I use 100-110 kgf on the front and 110-120 kgf on our almost symmetrical rear, both depending on rim. Most rim manufacturers give a maximum spoke tension of ~130 kgf. These spoke tensions are plenty to stretch a 14-15 DB spoke enough so that it can never go close to slack, and are plenty for tandem use. I've found that the deeper the rim, the truer the wheel stays. This is probably because the spoke tensions vary less during use on a deep rim which spreads loads out among more spokes.
What number of spokes do you prefer with a stiff rim like a Velocity Deep V and what with a somewhat less stiff rim similar to a Velocity Dyad?
For Reference what is you team weight?
#8
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,486
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3866 Post(s)
Liked 1,911 Times
in
1,362 Posts
I prefer to lace rims on the hubs I have, which happen to be CK 36H. Others who've tried various spoke counts would know more. Even 36H wasn't enough with a light rim like a Open Pro or Velocity Aerohead - they didn't stay true on our rough roads. ~300 lb. team weight, 145 rear spacing.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Wind Tunnels of Cheyenne
Posts: 361
Bikes: Burley Duet [of some unknown year] (the guinea pig); 2001 Ventana ECDM (the project); And always one less than I think I really need.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Sorry, blind as a bat in a snow storm, but I understand and will take your word for it.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Wind Tunnels of Cheyenne
Posts: 361
Bikes: Burley Duet [of some unknown year] (the guinea pig); 2001 Ventana ECDM (the project); And always one less than I think I really need.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
#12
WillFam-Clovis,CA
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 176
Bikes: Triplet, Trek T200, 5200 USPS, 660, Y-frame MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Wheel building
If you are going to build your own, make sure to get or barrow a spoke tension measuring tool, even if it's a cheap one. It is well worth the additional safety of the precious cargo and will help the wheel stay true.
IMHO - Spoke tensions stay even in the long term, more on a basis of how well the wheel is built, less on the what the rim is made of. Even steel rims can be torqued in or out of alignment pretty easily. I recently trued a steel rim for a friend, telling him that I did not think the rim could ever be straight. I did not take the time to untension the spokes and start from scratch because the wheel wasn't worth the extra time, but I was amazed that the wheel ended up pretty decent. It would be smart to re-check every once in awhile, but it did get a Dad riding with his boy again!
Last edited by WillFam-Reno; 03-07-14 at 06:42 PM. Reason: Spelling
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Wind Tunnels of Cheyenne
Posts: 361
Bikes: Burley Duet [of some unknown year] (the guinea pig); 2001 Ventana ECDM (the project); And always one less than I think I really need.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Do you tension the spokes with a tire mounted and inflated to ride pressure or without the tire installed? I have read about and can feel a noticeable difference in spoke tension on my wheels between inflated and deflated tires.
#14
The Rabbi
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,125
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Tension is measured during the build process without a tire on the rim. Your tension will drop when a tire is installed and brought up to pressure, which is fine provided the wheel was tensioned enough during the build. We build all of our rims to 120kgf.
#15
The Rabbi
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,125
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
My belief, after building about 9 wheels, 4 for tandems, is that the rim is important, but less so than than the quality of the build process and the load that you anticipate. I am glad I went strong when I built my triplet with Dyad Deep V 48 hole - tensioned around 110 kgf. Tensioning evenly is very important to a strong wheel that stays true.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
matthias39682
Bicycle Mechanics
11
08-15-16 03:02 PM
lostarchitect
Classic & Vintage
9
10-25-14 02:41 PM