Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Fuji touring bike for $700, but found touring bikes that cost over twice as much?

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Fuji touring bike for $700, but found touring bikes that cost over twice as much?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-15, 01:11 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 172

Bikes: Trek 7000, Specialized Allez & Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Fuji touring bike for $700, but found touring bikes that cost over twice as much?

I found a Fuji touring bike at Performance Bike for $700.00, and I've heard good things about it. It has standard brakes though, but it's only $700. There's the Novara Randonee that I saw at REI for $1,200.

But I found a Trek 520, and the Surly Long Haul Trucker, which is apparently the bee's knees. They come with standard brakes, with the option for disc brakes for $100 to $200 more. I found a local shop that sells the Long Haul Trucker with disc brake for $1,550. What's so special about the Long Haul Trucker, that sets it apart from the others?

I'd have a $700 Fuji touring bike in my hands in only a couple months. A $1,550 Long Haul Trucker would take awhile longer. I plan on putting thousands of miles on the bike, so I want a bike that will hold up. Do the expensive touring bikes make a big difference? What about the disc brakes option?
Kertrek is offline  
Old 08-25-15, 01:28 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,868
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1251 Post(s)
Liked 754 Times in 560 Posts
Personally I like the Fuji better than the LHT. I'd suggest trying both to see which one you like. Disc brakes are OK, but not necessary. Especially if money is tight at all I wouldn't hesitate to choose the Fuji out of all the bikes you listed.

If you plan to load it super heavy the LHT might start to shine a bit more.

BTW "thousands of miles" doesn't really equate to high mileage. It may equate to one long or maybe long-ish tour. Any decent bike ought to last at least tens of thousands of miles if not hundreds of thousands.
staehpj1 is offline  
Old 08-25-15, 01:57 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Southern Mo
Posts: 56

Bikes: Trek Stache 6, Surly Disc Trucker, Fuji Sportif 1.1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I got my Disc Trucker on black Friday of last year for $950.00. I do like the looks of the Fuji and it is 3-4 lbs lighter than the surly. Ride both.
gandrimp is offline  
Old 08-25-15, 01:59 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times in 2,079 Posts
The fuji touring is a fine bike and a very solid deal.
bikemig is offline  
Old 08-25-15, 02:03 PM
  #5  
Climbing: Ropes or Wheels
 
PiLigand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Unied States, Maine
Posts: 384

Bikes: 2012 Scott Foil 30, Homebrew Windsor Fens Build, 2015 Fuji Touring, 1980 Univega

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I did the same thing. I have recently bought the Fuji. I haven't taken it out for it's first tour yet - starting in about a week - but I liked it enough on paper to buy it. And it looks pretty good so far.
PiLigand is offline  
Old 08-25-15, 02:27 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
RedandBlack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 133

Bikes: '14 Surly LHT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
https://bicycletouringpro.com/blog/fuji-touring-review/

Surly Long Haul Trucker - Touring Bicycle Review - Surly LHT

The LHT seems better suited for heavier touring (which is needed for long-distance, solo traveling) where-as the Fuji seems perfectly suited for light-medium loads. The LHT has a cult following for a reason, but I saw some good reviews for the Fuji. $1,550 seems a little steep for a LHT to me. A few months ago I got 10% off ($1,200) by getting last years model in a color that wouldn't have been my first choice. Then again, $700 for a Fuji is a damn good deal.
RedandBlack is offline  
Old 08-25-15, 02:28 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
RedandBlack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 133

Bikes: '14 Surly LHT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Fuji Touring Bicycle Review | Bicycle Touring Pro

Surly Long Haul Trucker - Touring Bicycle Review - Surly LHT

The LHT seems better suited for heavier touring (which is needed for long-distance, solo traveling) where-as the Fuji seems perfectly suited for light-medium loads. The LHT has a cult following for a reason, but I saw some good reviews for the Fuji. $1,550 seems a little steep for a LHT to me. A few months ago I got 10% off ($1,200) by getting last years model in a color that wouldn't have been my first choice. Then again, $700 for a Fuji is a damn good deal.
RedandBlack is offline  
Old 08-25-15, 02:36 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 172

Bikes: Trek 7000, Specialized Allez & Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What would be considered a heavy-load compared to a medium-load?
Kertrek is offline  
Old 08-25-15, 02:48 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,206

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3460 Post(s)
Liked 1,466 Times in 1,144 Posts
I occasionally ride my niece's bike when I visit, it has disc. But my bikes are rim brake and I see no advantage to disc.
Tourist in MSN is offline  
Old 08-25-15, 03:13 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
RedandBlack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 133

Bikes: '14 Surly LHT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kertrek
What would be considered a heavy-load compared to a medium-load?
And so the debate begins...

Everyone has their own definition of light vs heavy loads. Some people base it on items/style while others base it on weight. In terms of items/style, light would be credit card/supported touring. You are carrying the basic essentials such as extra clothes, toiletries, a patch kit/multi tool, water and snacks. This style assumes you're sleeping in motels and eating your main meals in restaurants or you have a support van carrying the rest of your gear. Heavy is a solo/self-supported tour. You bring everything you will need for various weather, road, maintenance, and entertainment condition you may encounter for the foreseeable future. Medium is somewhere in between. Usually sorter tours or ones with multiple people so that heavier/communal items , such as tents and spare parts, aren't on a single bike. It also depends on the road conditions.
RedandBlack is offline  
Old 08-25-15, 03:28 PM
  #11  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 470
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 106 Post(s)
Liked 38 Times in 25 Posts
Go for the Fuji - you won't be sorry and at that price you almost have to buy it.
gerryl is offline  
Old 08-25-15, 03:36 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 172

Bikes: Trek 7000, Specialized Allez & Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm totally convinced on the Fuji. And looking at pics of people's loaded Fuji's, it's more than capable of handling a self supported tour.
Kertrek is offline  
Old 08-25-15, 04:52 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,868
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1251 Post(s)
Liked 754 Times in 560 Posts
Originally Posted by RedandBlack
The LHT seems better suited for heavier touring (which is needed for long-distance, solo traveling) where-as the Fuji seems perfectly suited for light-medium loads.
I have to disagree that heavier touring is "needed for long-distance, solo traveling". I have gone coast to coast with both medium heavy and ultralight setups and was quite happy and comfortable in both cases. I carried the same stuff I would have packed for a short trip in both cases.

When it comes down to it I really do not find that the length of a trip has much or really even any impact on how much stuff I pack.
staehpj1 is offline  
Old 08-25-15, 04:53 PM
  #14  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,362

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6219 Post(s)
Liked 4,218 Times in 2,365 Posts
The Fuji Touring is okay but they have a frame change over previous models that isn't necessarily to the good. The current model has 440mm stays which are on the very short side. Short stays cause two problems which can be annoying or even unnerving.

On the annoying side, short stays mean you can hit your bags with your heel with even moderate sized feet. If you have larger feet, expect to clip your bags on every crank revolution. It gets old very fast.

You can move the load further back but the bike already puts the load further back. This puts more of the load behind the axle which can have a pretty severe effect on the steering. It can make "the tail wag the dog", especially on curvy downhills. The "free" rack is a good rack but it's not likely to be that stiff. Most aluminum strut racks aren't. That further exacerbates the tail wag. This can be fixed by going to a rack like a Tubus but you are still stuck with the short stays.

The LHT has 460mm stays which puts more of the load over the axle and moves them back away from your feet. With a 460mm stay, you can have "herring boxes without topses" for shoes and never worry about clipping even the largest of rear bags. The handling of the bike will also be more stable.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 08-25-15, 05:05 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times in 2,079 Posts
I started a thread on this a while ago. The REI randonee is pretty nicely spec'd for the price and REI is a really solid company to deal with which stands behind its product. Honestly if I were looking for a new touring bike, that's what I would get. Nothing against Surly or Soma but the randonee ticks all my boxes for less dough. It has well thought out gearing, good quality wheels (I really like the mavic touring rims), good quality tires (schwalbe marathon), and generally good quality well thought out parts. Heck I even like the saddle and I think the flat fork crown looks pretty sweet.

Wait, I think I may have just talked myself into adding a new bike to my stable . . . .
bikemig is offline  
Old 08-26-15, 10:24 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,904

Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,933 Times in 1,213 Posts
I've ridden a Fuji touring bike over 25,000 miles so far -- twice as far as I rode the original frame before it broke and was replaced under warranty. Both are/were older models with threaded stems.

Fuji makes a good bike and is an excellent value. It's my go-to commuting and weekend rides bike.

The only problem with the as-delivered bike is the wheels, which is common to most mass production bikes. Unless you're very light and carry little to no load, you'll want to tension and stress-relieve the wheels.

You may want to replace the OEM brake pads with salmon Kool-Stops when they wear out. The stock brakes stop fine, but the pads tend to trap stuff and you'll need to dig the gravel out of the pads before it scores the rims.

I've also got a Randonee. It carries heavier loads a little better than the Fuji. FWIW, my common definition of a heavy load is 25 miles home from the orchard with a bushel of apples -- if it's only half a bushel, the Fuji is fine. And yes, I'm looking forward to Labor Day when the orchard is open weekends!
pdlamb is offline  
Old 08-26-15, 11:10 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: North Shore, MA
Posts: 206

Bikes: Jamis Aurora, Rivendell Sam Hillborne, Surly ECR, Serotta CSI

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by cyccommute
The Fuji Touring is okay but they have a frame change over previous models that isn't necessarily to the good. The current model has 440mm stays which are on the very short side. Short stays cause two problems which can be annoying or even unnerving.

On the annoying side, short stays mean you can hit your bags with your heel with even moderate sized feet. If you have larger feet, expect to clip your bags on every crank revolution. It gets old very fast.

You can move the load further back but the bike already puts the load further back. This puts more of the load behind the axle which can have a pretty severe effect on the steering. It can make "the tail wag the dog", especially on curvy downhills. The "free" rack is a good rack but it's not likely to be that stiff. Most aluminum strut racks aren't. That further exacerbates the tail wag. This can be fixed by going to a rack like a Tubus but you are still stuck with the short stays.

The LHT has 460mm stays which puts more of the load over the axle and moves them back away from your feet. With a 460mm stay, you can have "herring boxes without topses" for shoes and never worry about clipping even the largest of rear bags. The handling of the bike will also be more stable.

I commute w/ panniers on a bike w/ 440mm chainstays and I have size 12 dogs.

With a cheap non-adjustable pannier, heel clipping was a problem. I've since upgraded to Ortliebs and 1200 miles later, have had zero issues with heel strike.

Last edited by Marc40a; 08-26-15 at 11:18 AM.
Marc40a is offline  
Old 08-26-15, 11:17 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: North Shore, MA
Posts: 206

Bikes: Jamis Aurora, Rivendell Sam Hillborne, Surly ECR, Serotta CSI

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Kertrek
I found a Fuji touring bike at Performance Bike for $700.00, and I've heard good things about it. It has standard brakes though, but it's only $700. There's the Novara Randonee that I saw at REI for $1,200.

But I found a Trek 520, and the Surly Long Haul Trucker, which is apparently the bee's knees. They come with standard brakes, with the option for disc brakes for $100 to $200 more. I found a local shop that sells the Long Haul Trucker with disc brake for $1,550. What's so special about the Long Haul Trucker, that sets it apart from the others?

I'd have a $700 Fuji touring bike in my hands in only a couple months. A $1,550 Long Haul Trucker would take awhile longer. I plan on putting thousands of miles on the bike, so I want a bike that will hold up. Do the expensive touring bikes make a big difference? What about the disc brakes option?

I came across the Fuji as well this past week, while looking for a bike for a family member. It does look like a tremendous deal for a sport-tourer/commuter/utility/med-duty touring bike.

I wouldn't sweat the lack of disk brakes for a second. Millions of collective miles have been logged over the past few decades on bikes without disk brakes - a heck of a lot more than have been logged with disc brakes.
Marc40a is offline  
Old 08-26-15, 11:53 AM
  #19  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Frame + parts = Bike ... NB: you can change anything you want with something you like better .

Last edited by fietsbob; 08-26-15 at 11:58 AM.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 08-26-15, 12:22 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
robow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,872
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 598 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times in 194 Posts
The Fuji is an excellent touring bike value and maybe one of the two or three best for the money. Fuji has been making a touring model for decades and I personally wouldn't hesitate to take it anywhere. For $700 it's a steel.
robow is offline  
Old 08-26-15, 01:18 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 172

Bikes: Trek 7000, Specialized Allez & Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by robow
For $700 it's a steel.
No pun intended?
Kertrek is offline  
Old 08-26-15, 03:14 PM
  #22  
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times in 4,189 Posts
Originally Posted by cyccommute
The Fuji Touring is okay but they have a frame change over previous models that isn't necessarily to the good. The current model has 440mm stays which are on the very short side. Short stays cause two problems which can be annoying or even unnerving.

On the annoying side, short stays mean you can hit your bags with your heel with even moderate sized feet. If you have larger feet, expect to clip your bags on every crank revolution. It gets old very fast.

You can move the load further back but the bike already puts the load further back. This puts more of the load behind the axle which can have a pretty severe effect on the steering. It can make "the tail wag the dog", especially on curvy downhills. The "free" rack is a good rack but it's not likely to be that stiff. Most aluminum strut racks aren't. That further exacerbates the tail wag. This can be fixed by going to a rack like a Tubus but you are still stuck with the short stays.

The LHT has 460mm stays which puts more of the load over the axle and moves them back away from your feet. With a 460mm stay, you can have "herring boxes without topses" for shoes and never worry about clipping even the largest of rear bags. The handling of the bike will also be more stable.

I wear 14s. My current bike that gets loaded panniers is an old Schwinn 11.8 that is basically a sport-tourer. It has 44cm chainstays. I have to set my bags back to not clip them, but I have yet to come across a time when I felt it was unsafe or unstable. Admittedly, I haven't done it while flying down a switchbacking mountain decent.
I can get out of my saddle and pedal. I can spin. I can mash to catch up. The bike feels just fine with loaded bags(and other stuff) on it, even with the bags pushed far back and on short chainstays.

2mm is bout 3/4 of an inch, or the difference between size 12 and size 14 feet. But only 3/4 of a foot's length affects if heel strike will happen or not. Mathematically speaking, ((14 x 3/4) / 3/4) + 44*y = for many applications of touring, 44cm chainstays will work for people smaller than Sasquatch.
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 08-26-15, 03:20 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,868
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1251 Post(s)
Liked 754 Times in 560 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
2mm is bout 3/4 of an inch, or the difference between size 12 and size 14 feet.
You meant 20 mm (or 2 cm) is about 3/4" right?

I agree that 440 mm stays can work fine for most people, especially if they aren't using huge panniers. I found them fine with room to spare with my size 12 feet.
staehpj1 is offline  
Old 08-26-15, 07:23 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
robow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,872
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 598 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times in 194 Posts
Originally Posted by Kertrek
No pun intended?
Gee, "I don't get no respect"

and as to the chain length thingy, though I wear a size 10, even shorter 430mm have never given me any problems
robow is offline  
Old 08-26-15, 08:57 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Texas
Posts: 277

Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Ogre, Steamroller

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I was looking at the Fuji about a year ago, in the end I decided on the DT. (built it myself) The thing that worried me was the wheel set. I'd heard a couple of stories about broken spokes. I looked at what it would cost to put a good wheel set on the Fuji and it brought it to the price of a DT.
jargo432 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.