how much does your touring bike weigh?
#176
Senior Member
But when you start adding camping gear etc... the advantages of a light weight bike have to be weighed against the ability to handle the load. In my mind, if I am already pushing 40+lb's down the road I would rather push 45 and know my bike won't fold in half than try to save 5lb's and worry all the time.
Those who don't want to go that minimal may still be able to get to 20 pounds or so of gear. You really don't need to sacrifice comfort to do so, at least that has been my experience.
#177
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,313 Times
in
706 Posts
Well, that is one end of a spectrum, which I can't knock as long as one has what they need to reasonably complete their tour, but if we do a google search of "loaded touring bikes" it would appear most of the world is carrying at least more bulk, if not more weight.
It's a mish mash mix of geographic locale, willingness to incur cost, desire to be self sufficient and personal ideas of comfort. And some other stuff like what you get a kick out of. I can totally see that, if one enjoyed seeing where they could save weight and wanted to invest in those areas, that going lightweight in gear and bike would fall naturally into place. I like messing around with bikes and so prefer older, cheaper templates to work on. I also have three competing expensive hobbies (videography, saltwater aquariums, diving) so I have to watch my expenditures. Better video lights I need, carbon fiber anything I don't.
No one's right and no one's wrong. I mostly travel alone so as long as I'm willing to peddle my choices it's all good. I would be a little cheesed if I made plans with someone and they either had to bail right away because they were ill prepared or were incredibly slow because they were grossly over weighted. In fact though, that's why I prefer to travel alone. I hate the feeling when I'm on a holiday that I'm beholding to someone else's schedule or expectations.
It's a mish mash mix of geographic locale, willingness to incur cost, desire to be self sufficient and personal ideas of comfort. And some other stuff like what you get a kick out of. I can totally see that, if one enjoyed seeing where they could save weight and wanted to invest in those areas, that going lightweight in gear and bike would fall naturally into place. I like messing around with bikes and so prefer older, cheaper templates to work on. I also have three competing expensive hobbies (videography, saltwater aquariums, diving) so I have to watch my expenditures. Better video lights I need, carbon fiber anything I don't.
No one's right and no one's wrong. I mostly travel alone so as long as I'm willing to peddle my choices it's all good. I would be a little cheesed if I made plans with someone and they either had to bail right away because they were ill prepared or were incredibly slow because they were grossly over weighted. In fact though, that's why I prefer to travel alone. I hate the feeling when I'm on a holiday that I'm beholding to someone else's schedule or expectations.
Last edited by Happy Feet; 10-02-15 at 08:39 AM.
#178
Senior Member
When I tour basically every other tourist I meet is surprised that I have a CF bike and just a handlebar bag and a saddlebag and have everything I need to camp and cook. They tend to have heavy touring bikes with 4x panniers etc (probably because that's how they've always done it or if they are new because thats how Google told them to do it). I'm an old fat guy, but end up climbing faster than stronger and younger riders because I have less weight to push up the hills.
You don't need to spend a lot of money to go lightweight. A steel or Al road bike is fine and packing sensibly rather than buying a lot of high tech gear can quickly reduce what and how much you carry. Clothing is a prime example where people just pack far too much.
Last edited by nun; 10-02-15 at 09:00 AM.
#180
Senior Member
#181
Senior Member
People Google "loaded touring" and come up with the set ups you describe and think that's how you have to tour. It's self reinforcing.
When I tour basically every other tourist I meet is surprised that I have a CF bike and just a handlebar bag and a saddlebag and have everything I need to camp and cook. They tend to have heavy touring bikes with 4x panniers etc (probably because that's how they've always done it or if they are new because thats how Google told them to do it). I'm an old fat guy, but end up climbing faster than stronger and younger riders because I have less weight to push up the hills.
You don't need to spend a lot of money to go lightweight. A steel or Al road bike is fine and packing sensibly rather than buying a lot of high tech gear can quickly reduce what and how much you carry. Clothing is a prime example where people just pack far too much.
When I tour basically every other tourist I meet is surprised that I have a CF bike and just a handlebar bag and a saddlebag and have everything I need to camp and cook. They tend to have heavy touring bikes with 4x panniers etc (probably because that's how they've always done it or if they are new because thats how Google told them to do it). I'm an old fat guy, but end up climbing faster than stronger and younger riders because I have less weight to push up the hills.
You don't need to spend a lot of money to go lightweight. A steel or Al road bike is fine and packing sensibly rather than buying a lot of high tech gear can quickly reduce what and how much you carry. Clothing is a prime example where people just pack far too much.
I have toured with four panniers. The trouble was, I had trouble filling them in most cases. I realised I could pare that back to two panniers and a tent on top of the rack, plus a handlebar bag.
One of my plans is to acquire a Nelson Camper Carradice bag and to modify the fly of one of my tents (the inner is falling apart) with a floor; we went exploring at a "tip shop" (recycled goods outlet attached to a rubbish dump), and found people just throw away tents that have great fabric still).
I also know I can reduce my Trangia cookware to just the essentials, and I already have a lightweight down bag and sleep pad. I'd probably opt to go with my Shogun 400 fixie and try a weekend or two away with that set-up.
I totally agree about the clothing. The essentials for me are waterproof jacket (Ground Effects in this case), polypro base, T-shirt (no pockets, lightweight material), lightweight polarfleece jacket, spandex undies (not bikeshorts), synthetic shorts, long synthetic pants, woollen socks and bandana, plus long and short-fingered gloves. I had several sets of that everday wear when we toured Europe and the UK for over three months several years ago, and it served me well. I even had a down jacket thrown in there (and it was particularly useful in the French Alps and Scotland!).
Bulk ends up being as much as enemy as weight in packing. Hence substituting two or three pairs of undies for two pairs of bike shorts (no chamois), and tech Ts for jerseys because they don't have pockets and extended backs.
Where I tour, the weather can be marginal, so I like to have wind and cold protection, but even that doesn't have to be bulky to be functional. The Ground Effects StormTrooper jacket is an example.
The tent can be another bulky item. I have a bivvy tent, but that hasn't been used, because I tour with Machka and we need the bigger tent space. The fly I talked about above is from an old Mountain Designs 2p tent that we both have squeezed into, and by removing the liner, we open up a bit more usable space.
To get down to a particular light target weight for me would not cost any more than a new Carradice Nelson Camper. And all said and done, I could try to fit everything into the Nelson Longflap that I already have.
Hmmmm... this could be an interesting challenge.
Last edited by Rowan; 10-02-15 at 04:18 PM.
#182
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 92
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just wondering how long those who do ultralight stay on the road before returning home? More than a few months? Many of those who do RTW attempts have a relatively fully loaded setup, so at what point does the extra gear become more necessary or common? Is it easier to tour ultralight in some areas of the world than others?
Some of those who ride fully loaded, their bike is their home, and having no home to come back to, ultralight isn't as feasible. In the end, what does it matter, do whatever works for you. Nothing wrong with taking lots of gear if that's what makes you happy right?
As for the topic, I haven't weighed by bike, it weighs what it weighs... I do look out for overpacking of gear and buying too much food which can add up fast...
Some of those who ride fully loaded, their bike is their home, and having no home to come back to, ultralight isn't as feasible. In the end, what does it matter, do whatever works for you. Nothing wrong with taking lots of gear if that's what makes you happy right?
As for the topic, I haven't weighed by bike, it weighs what it weighs... I do look out for overpacking of gear and buying too much food which can add up fast...
#183
Senior Member
One of my plans is to acquire a Nelson Camper Carradice bag and to modify the fly of one of my tents (the inner is falling apart) with a floor; we went exploring at a "tip shop" (recycled goods outlet attached to a rubbish dump), and found people just throw away tents that have great fabric still).
#184
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,860
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 595 Post(s)
Liked 278 Times
in
189 Posts
I found this to be true as well and often make use of only two rear panniers but they are full and I don't have a lot of extra space in case I see something I want to bring back.
#185
Senior Member
Just wondering how long those who do ultralight stay on the road before returning home? More than a few months? Many of those who do RTW attempts have a relatively fully loaded setup, so at what point does the extra gear become more necessary or common? Is it easier to tour ultralight in some areas of the world than others?
Some of those who ride fully loaded, their bike is their home, and having no home to come back to, ultralight isn't as feasible. In the end, what does it matter, do whatever works for you. Nothing wrong with taking lots of gear if that's what makes you happy right?
As for the topic, I haven't weighed by bike, it weighs what it weighs... I do look out for overpacking of gear and buying too much food which can add up fast...
Some of those who ride fully loaded, their bike is their home, and having no home to come back to, ultralight isn't as feasible. In the end, what does it matter, do whatever works for you. Nothing wrong with taking lots of gear if that's what makes you happy right?
As for the topic, I haven't weighed by bike, it weighs what it weighs... I do look out for overpacking of gear and buying too much food which can add up fast...
#186
Senior Member
I bring back photos and memories mostly. The only two things I brought back from my last trip was an enamel pin of the "Going to the Sun Road" and an SS Badger fridge magnet.
#187
Senior Member
Just a note, Carradice makes a Nelson saddlebag and the larger Camper saddlebag, both also come in a "longflap" version which is useful as it gives the option to greatly expand the volume if you need to carry something extra. I use a Camper Longflap and will often deploy the longflap to carry food/beer from a market to a campsite.
#188
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,313 Times
in
706 Posts
It's an interesting conspiracy theory to consider that most of the people touring have been duped into their gear selections by the mind melding powers of the google Borg collective.. and equally attractive to be one of the few who are "in on the secret" about how it should really be done. Otherwise it might just be that most people, most of the time, have different priorities than going as light as possible for the sake of going as light as possible. I'm not knocking your choices, they are as valid as mine, but I suspect they represent the minority opinion in regards to overall touring.
There is a tipping point at which worrying about weight becomes a concern of diminishing returns. That point is whether you can achieve your touring goal in relative comfort. I suspect most people find that tipping point using conventional means and that is why there is no real push to further strip away what is already, for many, spartan resources. I like being self sufficient and don't want to call a taxi or hitch hike or sit around waiting for someone else to fix what I could fix because I wanted to save some weight and not bring enough tools. I don't like cooking, but some do, and they would probably enjoy doing that on their vacation rather than eating canned food from a pot with a spork. I can't relate, but I have even heard of some people packing spices!
The same applies to bikes. The law of diminishing returns suggests that people need a dependable platform they can trust and ride in order to complete a tour. That is what they seek(and why Ortleib panniers are so popular). For most that is a mid grade bike made of conventional materials. Once you can achieve your goal, you look to other sub goals within the tour itself. For some that is blogging, photography, site seeing, meeting locals, cooking... and for a few it is seeing how much additional weight they can drop from their kit. But that is a subgoal unrelated to the main goal which many people aren't that attracted to because they can already achieve their main goal with the weight they have. It's a valid sub goal, and for some forms of touring it may play a part in the main goal. But not usually to a large degree.
And few (I want to say no one but will err on the side of caution) is doing 3 month unsupported tours with 10lb's of gear in climates like Canada without resorting to restaurants and motels...
There is a tipping point at which worrying about weight becomes a concern of diminishing returns. That point is whether you can achieve your touring goal in relative comfort. I suspect most people find that tipping point using conventional means and that is why there is no real push to further strip away what is already, for many, spartan resources. I like being self sufficient and don't want to call a taxi or hitch hike or sit around waiting for someone else to fix what I could fix because I wanted to save some weight and not bring enough tools. I don't like cooking, but some do, and they would probably enjoy doing that on their vacation rather than eating canned food from a pot with a spork. I can't relate, but I have even heard of some people packing spices!
The same applies to bikes. The law of diminishing returns suggests that people need a dependable platform they can trust and ride in order to complete a tour. That is what they seek(and why Ortleib panniers are so popular). For most that is a mid grade bike made of conventional materials. Once you can achieve your goal, you look to other sub goals within the tour itself. For some that is blogging, photography, site seeing, meeting locals, cooking... and for a few it is seeing how much additional weight they can drop from their kit. But that is a subgoal unrelated to the main goal which many people aren't that attracted to because they can already achieve their main goal with the weight they have. It's a valid sub goal, and for some forms of touring it may play a part in the main goal. But not usually to a large degree.
And few (I want to say no one but will err on the side of caution) is doing 3 month unsupported tours with 10lb's of gear in climates like Canada without resorting to restaurants and motels...
Last edited by Happy Feet; 10-02-15 at 06:28 PM.
#189
Senior Member
Just wondering how long those who do ultralight stay on the road before returning home? More than a few months? Many of those who do RTW attempts have a relatively fully loaded setup, so at what point does the extra gear become more necessary or common? Is it easier to tour ultralight in some areas of the world than others?
Some of those who ride fully loaded, their bike is their home, and having no home to come back to, ultralight isn't as feasible. In the end, what does it matter, do whatever works for you. Nothing wrong with taking lots of gear if that's what makes you happy right?
As for the topic, I haven't weighed by bike, it weighs what it weighs... I do look out for overpacking of gear and buying too much food which can add up fast...
Some of those who ride fully loaded, their bike is their home, and having no home to come back to, ultralight isn't as feasible. In the end, what does it matter, do whatever works for you. Nothing wrong with taking lots of gear if that's what makes you happy right?
As for the topic, I haven't weighed by bike, it weighs what it weighs... I do look out for overpacking of gear and buying too much food which can add up fast...
Often you can pick up fine woollen garments that weren't meant for cycling, but are sure useful in certain conditions. Pulllovers, for example, or cotton T-shirts in really hot weather. You don't feel so guilty disposing of a garment after you've spend a couple of dollars, rather than tens of dollars or more when you've got no further use for it.
I spent a bit of time travelling by bike around Australia, in Canada and then back in Australia looking for work in country locations. I had a base inventory of cycling gear that stayed with me throughout. But when it came to work gear, I went to op-shops and bought what I needed, even down to boots. It was the one time when having four panniers worked with a full work wardrobe, as I had to move from orchard to orchard until I settled on one full-time job.
I learned in that particular phase that if I needed to travel light and cheap, I could keep myself warm, dry, and reasonably comfortable as I needed to.
Having said all that, though... it is nice to have cycling-specific gear that does what it is meant to, such as the aforementioned Ground Effects StormTrooper jacket, and shoes. And one of my favourite adventure wear fabrics is Capilene.
#190
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,923
Bikes: Nature Boy 853 Disc, Pugsley SS
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 251 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Just wondering how long those who do ultralight stay on the road before returning home? More than a few months? Many of those who do RTW attempts have a relatively fully loaded setup, so at what point does the extra gear become more necessary or common? Is it easier to tour ultralight in some areas of the world than others?
Some of those who ride fully loaded, their bike is their home, and having no home to come back to, ultralight isn't as feasible. In the end, what does it matter, do whatever works for you. Nothing wrong with taking lots of gear if that's what makes you happy right?
As for the topic, I haven't weighed by bike, it weighs what it weighs... I do look out for overpacking of gear and buying too much food which can add up fast...
Some of those who ride fully loaded, their bike is their home, and having no home to come back to, ultralight isn't as feasible. In the end, what does it matter, do whatever works for you. Nothing wrong with taking lots of gear if that's what makes you happy right?
As for the topic, I haven't weighed by bike, it weighs what it weighs... I do look out for overpacking of gear and buying too much food which can add up fast...
Kurt from Bike Grease and Coffee made it from Alaska to the southern terminus of South America, and by the end of the trip, hardly had anything. Having more stuff does not necessarily equate being more/less prepared. The brain matters much more. He did a bottom bracket rebuild with a pie tin, some gasoline, a screwdriver, and some other MacGuyver tricks.
#191
Senior Member
It's an interesting conspiracy theory to consider that most of the people touring have been duped into their gear selections by the mind melding powers of the google Borg collective.. and equally attractive to be one of the few who are "in on the secret" about how it should really be done. Otherwise it might just be that most people, most of the time, have different priorities than going as light as possible for the sake of going as light as possible. I'm not knocking your choices, they are as valid as mine, but I suspect they represent the minority opinion in regards to overall touring.
There is a tipping point at which worrying about weight becomes a concern of diminishing returns. That point is whether you can achieve your touring goal in relative comfort. I suspect most people find that tipping point using conventional means and that is why there is no real push to further strip away what is already, for many, spartan resources. I like being self sufficient and don't want to call a taxi or hitch hike or sit around waiting for someone else to fix what I could fix because I wanted to save some weight and not bring enough tools. I don't like cooking, but some do, and they would probably enjoy doing that on their vacation rather than eating canned food from a pot with a spork. I can't relate, but I have even heard of some people packing spices!
The same applies to bikes. The law of diminishing returns suggests that people need a dependable platform they can trust and ride in order to complete a tour. That is what they seek(and why Ortleib panniers are so popular). For most that is a mid grade bike made of conventional materials. Once you can achieve your goal, you look to other sub goals within the tour itself. For some that is blogging, photography, site seeing, meeting locals, cooking... and for a few it is seeing how much additional weight they can drop from their kit. But that is a subgoal unrelated to the main goal which many people aren't that attracted to because they can already achieve their main goal with the weight they have. It's a valid sub goal, and for some forms of touring it may play a part in the main goal. But not usually to a large degree.
There is a tipping point at which worrying about weight becomes a concern of diminishing returns. That point is whether you can achieve your touring goal in relative comfort. I suspect most people find that tipping point using conventional means and that is why there is no real push to further strip away what is already, for many, spartan resources. I like being self sufficient and don't want to call a taxi or hitch hike or sit around waiting for someone else to fix what I could fix because I wanted to save some weight and not bring enough tools. I don't like cooking, but some do, and they would probably enjoy doing that on their vacation rather than eating canned food from a pot with a spork. I can't relate, but I have even heard of some people packing spices!
The same applies to bikes. The law of diminishing returns suggests that people need a dependable platform they can trust and ride in order to complete a tour. That is what they seek(and why Ortleib panniers are so popular). For most that is a mid grade bike made of conventional materials. Once you can achieve your goal, you look to other sub goals within the tour itself. For some that is blogging, photography, site seeing, meeting locals, cooking... and for a few it is seeing how much additional weight they can drop from their kit. But that is a subgoal unrelated to the main goal which many people aren't that attracted to because they can already achieve their main goal with the weight they have. It's a valid sub goal, and for some forms of touring it may play a part in the main goal. But not usually to a large degree.
There was a guy I used to tour with in a group that always amazed everyone by the fact he had only two small panniers and a bar bag on his bike. IIRC, he had a steel-framed touring bicycle, but I can't remember the brand. He was comfortable in camp (and cooked), fast on the road, but a real gentleman who waited up for the regroups. Now, this is a decade or more ago, and I thought at the time... Wow.
Over a period of time, and with various experiences, people do decide whether what they take on a bicycle tour is actually worth the weight and bulk. Heck, I used to take a folding camp stool with me; now, if I need to, I take a small square of closed cell sleeping pad. My tool kit is now a Topeak Hexus folding tool and maybe a shifter cable, tube patch kit, and not much else; I used to have a crescent wrench in there along with FibreFix spoke, BB tool and other stuff.
There is one other little point. The more stuff you have, the more likelihood there is of misplacing or losing something along the way. Keeping it to the basics really does help avoid that.
#192
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,313 Times
in
706 Posts
I was hoping the first para might be more amusing than anything. I have deliberately made attempts to say that other peoples choices are as valid as mine are. I certainly don't think I hold all the answers.
I also make some of the choices you are suggesting. For me, on the last trip, it was realizing I really don't need my cooking gear. I don't like cooking on the road, can put up with cold beans or bagels and hate washing pots of sticky stuff. Coffee I can buy on the road. So that eliminates (or frees up) a lot of space that probably means less pannier.
OTOH, I don't like to skimp on clothing. I really only bring two riding sets (I wash one in the shower with me and let it dry while wearing the other) but I do want rain gear and a warm warm top layer (plus mittens and a toque). Being cold wet and miserable is the shortest way to a bail I know of.
I also dislike clutter and am probably more anal than most about using something and putting it back where it belongs.
In many ways I suspect most of us share more values in common than apart and only really disagree in terms of degrees. Which, of course, on the internet get blown out of proportion. IRL, I never have discussions about how much a bike weighs other than general interest in an unusual design feature like a recumbent.
I also make some of the choices you are suggesting. For me, on the last trip, it was realizing I really don't need my cooking gear. I don't like cooking on the road, can put up with cold beans or bagels and hate washing pots of sticky stuff. Coffee I can buy on the road. So that eliminates (or frees up) a lot of space that probably means less pannier.
OTOH, I don't like to skimp on clothing. I really only bring two riding sets (I wash one in the shower with me and let it dry while wearing the other) but I do want rain gear and a warm warm top layer (plus mittens and a toque). Being cold wet and miserable is the shortest way to a bail I know of.
I also dislike clutter and am probably more anal than most about using something and putting it back where it belongs.
In many ways I suspect most of us share more values in common than apart and only really disagree in terms of degrees. Which, of course, on the internet get blown out of proportion. IRL, I never have discussions about how much a bike weighs other than general interest in an unusual design feature like a recumbent.
#193
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,313 Times
in
706 Posts
Kurt from Bike Grease and Coffee made it from Alaska to the southern terminus of South America, and by the end of the trip, hardly had anything. Having more stuff does not necessarily equate being more/less prepared. The brain matters much more. He did a bottom bracket rebuild with a pie tin, some gasoline, a screwdriver, and some other MacGuyver tricks.
I had an army buddy who did the West Coast Trail in the nude, about as light weight as you can go. I would not suggest that equipment list to others.
Last edited by Happy Feet; 10-02-15 at 07:23 PM.
#194
Senior Member
I was hoping the first para might be more amusing than anything. I have deliberately made attempts to say that other peoples choices are as valid as mine are. I certainly don't think I hold all the answers.
I also make some of the choices you are suggesting. For me, on the last trip, it was realizing I really don't need my cooking gear. I don't like cooking on the road, can put up with cold beans or bagels and hate washing pots of sticky stuff. Coffee I can buy on the road. So that eliminates (or frees up) a lot of space that probably means less pannier.
OTOH, I don't like to skimp on clothing. I really only bring two riding sets (I wash one in the shower with me and let it dry while wearing the other) but I do want rain gear and a warm warm top layer (plus mittens and a toque). Being cold wet and miserable is the shortest way to a bail I know of.
I also dislike clutter and am probably more anal than most about using something and putting it back where it belongs.
In many ways I suspect most of us share more values in common than apart and only really disagree in terms of degrees. Which, of course, on the internet get blown out of proportion. IRL, I never have discussions about how much a bike weighs other than general interest in an unusual design feature like a recumbent.
I also make some of the choices you are suggesting. For me, on the last trip, it was realizing I really don't need my cooking gear. I don't like cooking on the road, can put up with cold beans or bagels and hate washing pots of sticky stuff. Coffee I can buy on the road. So that eliminates (or frees up) a lot of space that probably means less pannier.
OTOH, I don't like to skimp on clothing. I really only bring two riding sets (I wash one in the shower with me and let it dry while wearing the other) but I do want rain gear and a warm warm top layer (plus mittens and a toque). Being cold wet and miserable is the shortest way to a bail I know of.
I also dislike clutter and am probably more anal than most about using something and putting it back where it belongs.
In many ways I suspect most of us share more values in common than apart and only really disagree in terms of degrees. Which, of course, on the internet get blown out of proportion. IRL, I never have discussions about how much a bike weighs other than general interest in an unusual design feature like a recumbent.
#196
Senior Member
#197
Senior Member
Yes, but if you took all the stuff off his bike it would still fill two traditional panniers; it's just distributed all over the place. There is also something to be said for the difference between what someone with a lot of experience does compared to once or twice in a while tourers. There is also something to be said for what one starts off with compared to what one ends with. Is that the load he started out with early in the year in Alaska?
I had an army buddy who did the West Coast Trail in the nude, about as light weight as you can go. I would not suggest that equipment list to others.
I had an army buddy who did the West Coast Trail in the nude, about as light weight as you can go. I would not suggest that equipment list to others.
And from the photo, I am fascinated as to exactly what sort of butt issues the guy has, what with the funny saddle and suspension seatpost, all on a fat bike.
#198
Senior Member
I tend to like to go no less than 9 days and not much more than 10-12 weeks, but that has nothing to do with my going ultralight. I am just ready to go home after a couple months. I could just as well go indefinitely with what I carry, but have no desire to do so.
Isn't that called being homeless, not bike touring?
Last edited by staehpj1; 10-03-15 at 08:31 AM.
#199
Senior Member
Rowan, I'm pretty certain it's a regular seat post, what looks like the suspension part appears to be the big Velcro part of his seat post bag. I guess he just like those nose less seats, it must be weird not to be able to correct with your inner leg on the nose of a seat. But if it works for him, what the heck. Yes though, a fat bike must be very cushy. I've yet to try one.
#200
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,484
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1182 Post(s)
Liked 830 Times
in
433 Posts
Bike touring as a whole evolved since the first person put a load on a bike, and will continue evolving as new equipment becomes available. In my experience individual touring preferences also evolve as we gain experience, and more closely align with our touring needs and style.
What I find humorous is that when we "discover" something new to us, we believe that the only reason others don't jump on the bandwagon is due to lack of enlightenment or even ignorance. We sometimes also seem to believe that what we advocate is a new concept. At least that is what I take away from some of the posts.
I think what some folks don’t realize is that a lot of older riders have “been there and done that”. I know, we also used to walk 3 miles barefoot in the snow to school when we were kids too. Some of the more seasoned bike tourers’ styles have evolved from heavier to lighter loads as their preferences got sorted out. However, some of us have done just the opposite, going from 20 pound loads on a 20 pound bike to something a little more moderate. That is all you could carry and we rode what we had. I was ecstatic when I got a bike with a triple. I was even more excited when “real” touring bikes with low gears and adequate braze-ons for racks and fenders became available.
It is good to try different approaches, but there is no one size that fits everyone or all situations. I think it is good for people new to touring to hear about the different options, but most of us who have been at it for a while have a pretty good idea of what we want and why we want it. We are also pretty good at selecting the right tools for the anticipated situation.
Bottom line: there is no right or wrong way to bike tour, and that is the way it should be.
What I find humorous is that when we "discover" something new to us, we believe that the only reason others don't jump on the bandwagon is due to lack of enlightenment or even ignorance. We sometimes also seem to believe that what we advocate is a new concept. At least that is what I take away from some of the posts.
I think what some folks don’t realize is that a lot of older riders have “been there and done that”. I know, we also used to walk 3 miles barefoot in the snow to school when we were kids too. Some of the more seasoned bike tourers’ styles have evolved from heavier to lighter loads as their preferences got sorted out. However, some of us have done just the opposite, going from 20 pound loads on a 20 pound bike to something a little more moderate. That is all you could carry and we rode what we had. I was ecstatic when I got a bike with a triple. I was even more excited when “real” touring bikes with low gears and adequate braze-ons for racks and fenders became available.
It is good to try different approaches, but there is no one size that fits everyone or all situations. I think it is good for people new to touring to hear about the different options, but most of us who have been at it for a while have a pretty good idea of what we want and why we want it. We are also pretty good at selecting the right tools for the anticipated situation.
Bottom line: there is no right or wrong way to bike tour, and that is the way it should be.
Last edited by Doug64; 10-03-15 at 09:45 AM.