Tire Width for Touring
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 626
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
90% road?
38mm slick, which is 1.5"
Why get a heavier and slower tire that's wider?
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00EQY..._i=mobile&th=0
They can be found cheaper. Good tire though.
38mm slick, which is 1.5"
Why get a heavier and slower tire that's wider?
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00EQY..._i=mobile&th=0
They can be found cheaper. Good tire though.
#27
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times
in
4,189 Posts
I have found that too wide a tire starts to float for me, when at a lower pressure.
This is 90% road riding- something wide enough for comfort while still holding road tire characteristics would be, in my view, the best balance. I just don't find something wider that 1.5" to be needed on pavement.
#28
Senior Member
If you can't get enough traction to safely ride on a road with 38s, something is off.
I have found that too wide a tire starts to float for me, when at a lower pressure.
This is 90% road riding- something wide enough for comfort while still holding road tire characteristics would be, in my view, the best balance. I just don't find something wider that 1.5" to be needed on pavement.
I have found that too wide a tire starts to float for me, when at a lower pressure.
This is 90% road riding- something wide enough for comfort while still holding road tire characteristics would be, in my view, the best balance. I just don't find something wider that 1.5" to be needed on pavement.
#29
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times
in
4,189 Posts
Right- the OP said 90% pavement, so I based my suggestion on that. Had the OP said most touring would involve dirt, grave, and crappy New England roads and sometimes singletrack, then sure I would have suggested something wider. But they said 90% pavement.
#30
Senior Member
I've ridden a lot on 26x1.5 slicks and 1.5 regular marathons. I've also ridden on 2 in marathon Supremes and I would say that for regular roads, 1.5s are the best mix of pretty good width and cushion, vs speed and how much drag you are dealing with.
I've found 1.5 to work well on gravel dirt roads, and would only go wider for truly horrible roads.
Marathon plus tires are really heavy and stiff, the regular marathons I have regularly ridden on work very well, can be had at a good price, and have a good ride.
Check out my post about a great price on regular marathons through Amazon.ca. $60 for two, delivered. This is a good price for a good tire.
I've found 1.5 to work well on gravel dirt roads, and would only go wider for truly horrible roads.
Marathon plus tires are really heavy and stiff, the regular marathons I have regularly ridden on work very well, can be had at a good price, and have a good ride.
Check out my post about a great price on regular marathons through Amazon.ca. $60 for two, delivered. This is a good price for a good tire.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,489
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1182 Post(s)
Liked 833 Times
in
435 Posts
........................ I found I had 15% better trip time than even my best past averages, and an average speed over 2 mph faster. The next day a took another trip in a different direction and came up with similar results. 'Guess I'll be ordering another pair of the Conti Top Contact II tires in 37mm for myself soon. (though I'm also considering the plain Scwalbe Marathon in a 35. Thoughts on that anyone?)
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,150
Bikes: 2013 Surly Disc Trucker, 2004 Novara Randonee , old fixie , etc
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 671 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times
in
43 Posts
I've been using 700cx42mm Conti Top Contact II tires. They've been bomb proof and incredibly stable even at high speeds going down the big hills & rough roads here in the Catskills. However I feared the rolling resistance and weight of a 42mm tire might add up on a long trip like the 600 mile trip I'm planning to my daughter's next summer. So I tried an experiment. Since my wife really needed new tires on her hybrid anyway, I bought a pair of the same tire in a 37mm for her, but first, put them on my touring bike in place of the 42s. I then took a 25 mile ride that I have well established metrics for. I found I had 15% better trip time than even my best past averages, and an average speed over 2 mph faster. The next day a took another trip in a different direction and came up with similar results. 'Guess I'll be ordering another pair of the Conti Top Contact II tires in 37mm for myself soon. (though I'm also considering the plain Scwalbe Marathon in a 35. Thoughts on that anyone?)
#33
Senior Member
Continental top Contact 26 x 1.9 or Vittoria Randonneur 26 x 1.5 would work well.
I have run them both in the 700 x 37, 700 x 35 size and really like the ride, traction, flat resistance and longevity.
Never tried Schwalbe but they seem heavy.
I have run them both in the 700 x 37, 700 x 35 size and really like the ride, traction, flat resistance and longevity.
Never tried Schwalbe but they seem heavy.
#34
Senior Member
Schwalbe marathons are heavy, but they also give a nice carefree ride. You just don't have to worry about the road surface at all because the tread is so thick and under the tread you have a few mm of puncture protection as well as a really sturdy sidewall.
I've tried a bunch of various tires from slicks to heavier stuff to MTB stuff and I currently have a set of vittoria voyager hypers waiting for better weather. Only the Schwalbe marathon line is able to give me the carefreeness to ride over broken glass with no worries. With the voyagers I'd worry about riding slightly rockier gravel, because the sidewall is really, really thin and the tread isn't all that thick either. Even with MTB knobbies I sometimes get a bit anxious if there's anything sharp on the road since even though the knobbies are thick, the tread under them isn't.
It's a good thing I don't care about bike weight, a few lbs here or there for total carefree is completely fine for me.
I've tried a bunch of various tires from slicks to heavier stuff to MTB stuff and I currently have a set of vittoria voyager hypers waiting for better weather. Only the Schwalbe marathon line is able to give me the carefreeness to ride over broken glass with no worries. With the voyagers I'd worry about riding slightly rockier gravel, because the sidewall is really, really thin and the tread isn't all that thick either. Even with MTB knobbies I sometimes get a bit anxious if there's anything sharp on the road since even though the knobbies are thick, the tread under them isn't.
It's a good thing I don't care about bike weight, a few lbs here or there for total carefree is completely fine for me.
#35
Senior Member
26x1.5 marathon plus 870g (model 440)
26x1.5 regular marathon 730g (model 420)
26x1.6 supreme 440gg (model 382)
26x2 supreme 565gg (model 382)
But the costs vary widely for the regular original marathon, the plus and the supreme.
Supreme can be 75 to 90 each
Originals can be had at about 30 to 50 each
Pluses,not sure
All that said, I've toured a lot on 700x28 and 32 tires, and ridden a lot on 26x1.5 {38mm). On good roads narrower and lighter needs less effort, but the 1.5s are not bad and will be easier on dirt to an extent and more comfortable on rough roads.
1.25 s I guess could be a middle ground.
26x1.5 regular marathon 730g (model 420)
26x1.6 supreme 440gg (model 382)
26x2 supreme 565gg (model 382)
But the costs vary widely for the regular original marathon, the plus and the supreme.
Supreme can be 75 to 90 each
Originals can be had at about 30 to 50 each
Pluses,not sure
All that said, I've toured a lot on 700x28 and 32 tires, and ridden a lot on 26x1.5 {38mm). On good roads narrower and lighter needs less effort, but the 1.5s are not bad and will be easier on dirt to an extent and more comfortable on rough roads.
1.25 s I guess could be a middle ground.
#36
Senior Member
Schwalbe marathons are heavy, but they also give a nice carefree ride. You just don't have to worry about the road surface at all because the tread is so thick and under the tread you have a few mm of puncture protection as well as a really sturdy sidewall.
I've tried a bunch of various tires from slicks to heavier stuff to MTB stuff and I currently have a set of vittoria voyager hypers waiting for better weather. Only the Schwalbe marathon line is able to give me the carefreeness to ride over broken glass with no worries. With the voyagers I'd worry about riding slightly rockier gravel, because the sidewall is really, really thin and the tread isn't all that thick either. Even with MTB knobbies I sometimes get a bit anxious if there's anything sharp on the road since even though the knobbies are thick, the tread under them isn't.
It's a good thing I don't care about bike weight, a few lbs here or there for total carefree is completely fine for me.
I've tried a bunch of various tires from slicks to heavier stuff to MTB stuff and I currently have a set of vittoria voyager hypers waiting for better weather. Only the Schwalbe marathon line is able to give me the carefreeness to ride over broken glass with no worries. With the voyagers I'd worry about riding slightly rockier gravel, because the sidewall is really, really thin and the tread isn't all that thick either. Even with MTB knobbies I sometimes get a bit anxious if there's anything sharp on the road since even though the knobbies are thick, the tread under them isn't.
It's a good thing I don't care about bike weight, a few lbs here or there for total carefree is completely fine for me.
lots and lots of variables and lots and lots of views of what is acceptable. For someone riding to work everyday, in the dark, in the rain, having a tire that is waaaaay more protected against flats can make sense, you just dont want to deal with a flat when time is at hand. Touring through areas where road debris is really bad, glass, thorns or whatever, a marathon plus type tire can make sense also.
That said, in all the touring I have done, N America rural roads, European towns and rural roads, and a bit in Latin America (rural roads) the debris situation was perfectly acceptable and over the years, going back about 25 years, I never had a flat on tour (touch wood) so the good tires I had (in good shape, and with a certain amount of flat protection, kevlar layer with the early ones) did a perfectly good job for me--for where I rode.
I commute in the city all the time, and usually get about a flat per year, usually riding about 4-5000km per season. Yes there is glass sometimes, but I try as best as I can to always look out for stuff, and if I ride through glass by mistake, I stop and take 1 min to clear both tires, rubbing a glove over the surface in case a bit of glass has gotten picked up.
Having ridden stiff tires before, I do find a more supple tire to be nicer to ride on, yet all in all, there are a lot of good tires with good flat protection that are not super stiff in the sidewall and carcass, or at least have a good balance of this.
*I have never ridden in areas with thorns that are a problem, so I completely understand how that is a diff matter.
I still think a lot of flat avoidance is down to keeping an eye out for debris and not running over it. Riding through a country where there is a ton of broken glass and or really rough, sharp stuff is always going to be a real factor (and or perhaps being really isolated, but then a spare tire is going to be a good idea for that also).
A friend of mine has a touring bike with 700x32 (probably) Marathon Plus tires, and boy does it feel heavy and slow steering compared to my bike with 28 slicks on it. Of course, you add a bunch of stuff on a bike and these diff are felt less, but as I am not a strong guy, I have always looked at how many small things add up to more effect (load weight, tires, etc) and have always strived to make my touring bike as efficient as possible through my gear choices.
#37
Did I catch a niner?
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: a van down by the river
Posts: 542
Bikes: Vassago Fisticuff/Surly Ogre/Surly Pugsley/Surly Pugsley 29+
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
https://janheine.wordpress.com/2015/...corner-better/
No sure if this was posted but a nice read about tire widths.
I believe Nick Carmen or maybe it was Cass Gilbert said the wider the better. I know these two mainly do off road touring but they still do plenty of it.
No sure if this was posted but a nice read about tire widths.
I believe Nick Carmen or maybe it was Cass Gilbert said the wider the better. I know these two mainly do off road touring but they still do plenty of it.
#39
Senior Member
I'd love some help deciding what width tires to purchase for my "new" touring bike (It's an old bike but new to me - a 1993 KHS Montana Comp I'm converting). Currently it has 26 x 1.62 slicks from Kenda (model unknown) which performed quite well on a loaded-up 200km-ish test run, but these aren't what I want for the 8000km tour I'm planning for the summer. I'll be riding about 90% on paved roads and 10% on gravel/dirt, carrying 50-60lb of gear divided between front and rear racks. Combined with my weight and the weight of the bike, I estimate the total will be around 200-220lb. I have lots of space for tires and fenders. I'm leaning toward the usual Schwalbe Marathon Plus tires but don't know which width would be best. Any advice/experience to share would be great! Thanks!
Like I said, the main advantage to the 1.5s (ish) vs 1.25 is simply that you can run lower pressures, and so if the road is rough, with lots of joint cracks, or just regular sharp joints and or potholes, a wider tire is going to give you and your bike an easier ride--but my experience with 2in tires is that they are a bit of an overkill for N American roads that we usually ride on (yes, a generalization, but you get the drift).
you are planning this trip for next summer, so you have lots of time to look at bike tires in stores and jot down prices.
I brought up that great deal on a pair of original marathons for $60ca delivered simply because I feel its a very good price/for what you get set of tires.
I personally wouldnt go less than 1.5 for any loaded dirt riding, Ive ridden my 1.5s on dirt loaded and they work fine--but of course, there is "dirt" and there is "dirt"--a huge range of how a dirt road can be, but Ive never had problems with 1.5s on what I have ridden, but then I havent been riding down muddy dirt roads either, which is always going to be a challenge for non mtn bike tires.
#40
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 898
Bikes: Surly LHT 26in 52cm 2008
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'd love some help deciding what width tires to purchase for my "new" touring bike (It's an old bike but new to me - a 1993 KHS Montana Comp I'm converting). Currently it has 26 x 1.62 slicks from Kenda (model unknown) which performed quite well on a loaded-up 200km-ish test run, but these aren't what I want for the 8000km tour I'm planning for the summer. I'll be riding about 90% on paved roads and 10% on gravel/dirt, carrying 50-60lb of gear divided between front and rear racks. Combined with my weight and the weight of the bike, I estimate the total will be around 200-220lb. I have lots of space for tires and fenders. I'm leaning toward the usual Schwalbe Marathon Plus tires but don't know which width would be best. Any advice/experience to share would be great! Thanks!
I start my Bike Touring trip in NY, PA, NJ in 6/2016 I am going to use Continental touring plus
26x1.75in 44x559mm only $26.99 at Bikeman Continental Touring Plus 26 x 1.75 Black Reflex
#41
buy my bikes
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,800
Bikes: my very own customized GUNNAR CrossHairs
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 428 Times
in
249 Posts
a vote for Conti Touring Plus
Been riding on them since early spring - commuting a couple times a month, 5 day / 380 mile pave tour, short dirt road campouts, lots of dirt road coffee shop runs - no flats, and good times.
Been riding on them since early spring - commuting a couple times a month, 5 day / 380 mile pave tour, short dirt road campouts, lots of dirt road coffee shop runs - no flats, and good times.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,150
Bikes: 2013 Surly Disc Trucker, 2004 Novara Randonee , old fixie , etc
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 671 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times
in
43 Posts
Rode the Conti Touring for a couple of years, 1 flat. Schwalbe Marathons for 2 years, no flats. Current 1.4 Tom Slicks got a flat in 1st week, installed tire liner & no flats in >1 yr. To me it seems worthwhile to push the envelope a bit in going for lighter weight. Tires are one of the few spots on production touring bikes where one can cut weight w/o $$ or big problems.
#43
Senior Member
the conti touring plus tires, or at least the ones I have put on wheels, or friends have, are the stiffest sidewall tires I have ever seen. It is just ridiculous how rigid the sidewall is, and this was certainly reflected in getting it on and off rims--granted, I know that tire/rim difficulties often are due to the specific rim. A friend of mine had a slow leak on a cont touring plus, we got it off to check everything, but holy kajeepers, to get it back on it was very lucky that they had a super super strong set of Pedros plastic extra wide tire levers. If not, my good old levers would have busted and I dont know how we would have got it on--the old trick of tightenig or pushing the tire into the rim and working your way around to gain a few mm just didnt work, Im convinced because of how fricken stiff the sidewalls were.
I did however put one of these on a family bike, and with the rims on that bike, it was not an ordeal, so does show how rim specific it can be.
I did however put one of these on a family bike, and with the rims on that bike, it was not an ordeal, so does show how rim specific it can be.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,489
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1182 Post(s)
Liked 833 Times
in
435 Posts
the conti touring plus tires, or at least the ones I have put on wheels, or friends have, are the stiffest sidewall tires I have ever seen. It is just ridiculous how rigid the sidewall is, and this was certainly reflected in getting it on and off rims--granted, I know that tire/rim difficulties often are due to the specific rim. A friend of mine had a slow leak on a cont touring plus, we got it off to check everything, but holy kajeepers, to get it back on it was very lucky that they had a super super strong set of Pedros plastic extra wide tire levers. If not, my good old levers would have busted and I dont know how we would have got it on--the old trick of tightenig or pushing the tire into the rim and working your way around to gain a few mm just didnt work, Im convinced because of how fricken stiff the sidewalls were.
I did however put one of these on a family bike, and with the rims on that bike, it was not an ordeal, so does show how rim specific it can be.
I did however put one of these on a family bike, and with the rims on that bike, it was not an ordeal, so does show how rim specific it can be.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Harhir
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
6
09-17-15 10:40 AM