Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-21-05, 01:39 PM   #1
tadelbridge
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Sport touring vs. (other) touring?

I'm interested in starting touring and have been looking at buying bikes (used if possible) and I see a lot of bikes that are called sport touring. What is it about these bikes that makes them not suitable for carrying full loads? what kind of terminology should I be looking for in a bike for loaded touring? Also, any recommendations for finding a used bike other than the LBS? I'm tall and they are not easy to find where I am.

Thank you
tadelbridge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-05, 12:16 AM   #2
Rowan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Bikes:
Posts: 14,935
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 247 Post(s)
Usually their frame are of a lighter tubeset, and there is a compromise in frame flex if they are loaded. They are intended for those who ride (a) randonnees or (b) credit-card touring where the load in each case is usually just a trunk bag.

For serious touring cyclists, the investment in a bike is a long-term one. Someone mentions in another thread a Jamis Aurora on ebay. Ebay probably is your best bet, but is fraught with the old fit danger.
Rowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-05, 05:08 AM   #3
MichaelW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Bikes:
Posts: 12,927
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Mounting a heavily loaded set of panniers off the rear stays or the fork requires tubing with a thicker sidewall than is found on most racing/sport bikes.
A loaded tourer is optimised to ride with a full load, so you have longer chainstays, more stable touring, more braze-ons, lower gears etc etc.
Check out Bruce Gordon for a good rant on sport bikes vs load-carriers, and Beckman Sakkit bikes for the ultimate loaded tourer.
MichaelW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-05, 09:29 AM   #4
digger
Senior Member
 
digger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Bikes: 2010 Cervelo RS. Marinoni touring bike. Kona Tanuki MTB. Specialized Hardrock (commuter). Raleigh (early 80s) Super Gran Prix.
Posts: 2,156
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 170 Post(s)
I have a Sport/touring bike and as well as thinner framesets, higher gears and shorter chainstays, sport/touring generally have lighter wheels (24-28 spoke) and dual pivot brakes. Where as for loaded touring it would be wise to have a beefier set of wheels (36 spoke) and better brakes for the heavier load (cantis or V brakes).

My sport/touring bike was custom made (Marinoni) and has a triple chainring but with a 52T large ring. The rear cassette is 11-25T. Although I have the braze-ons for front and rear racks I would not be able to carry a huge amount of weight due to the wheel set and brakes, plus the gearing doesn't make it easy for steep hills for loaded touring.

Sport/touring bikes are for lightweight loads/credit card tours, day tours, sag supported tours, fast/long distances (brevets). Can be used for racing if you want, but will have to comprimise on the gearing.

Digger
digger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:29 AM.