Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Touring Bike Weights

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Touring Bike Weights

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-31-17, 09:26 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sioux Falls SD
Posts: 20

Bikes: Trek 500, Citrocycle Bamboo #1 & #2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Touring Bike Weights

I've recently built a bamboo touring style bicycle and am wondering if I'm in line with where I should be with the unloaded weight. Currently (as pictured) it weighs about 31 lbs. unloaded (14 kg), and from what I've read this seems to be about right but personally it seems to be quite heavy.

Where do your touring bikes weigh in at and what have you done to reduce the weight, or am I making a mountain out of a molehill?

img_1183.jpg

Thanks!
citrocycle is offline  
Old 03-31-17, 09:53 AM
  #2  
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times in 4,181 Posts
Is that a rear caliper only braking bike? I think I see 4 cables, but I dont see a front caliper.

Anyways, I would consider that heavy for a bike without racks or even bottle cages.
At the same time, oh well- its a few # more than many other bikes.

Typically, road touring bikes are 22-32# depending on size, frame material, spec quality, and rack materials. Its a massive range.
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 03-31-17, 10:29 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 7,579

Bikes: Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
citrocycle, Neat bike!

Brad
bradtx is offline  
Old 03-31-17, 10:31 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sioux Falls SD
Posts: 20

Bikes: Trek 500, Citrocycle Bamboo #1 & #2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
Is that a rear caliper only braking bike? I think I see 4 cables, but I dont see a front caliper.
I guess it was a bit misleading, since the shown photo I've added bottle cages and front Cantilever brakes (cyclocrss/mtb fork) since the caliper brakes didn't have enough reach. The front brake and cages are included in the weight.

Originally Posted by mstateglfr
Anyways, I would consider that heavy for a bike without racks or even bottle cages.
The frame, before adding components, was about 4 lbs (1.8 kg), is this where the "heaviness" of this setup is coming from or would it be the components?
citrocycle is offline  
Old 03-31-17, 10:32 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sioux Falls SD
Posts: 20

Bikes: Trek 500, Citrocycle Bamboo #1 & #2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bradtx
citrocycle, Neat bike!
Thanks Bradtx! If only they didn't take me so long to make! (1.5-2 mo after work & weekends)
citrocycle is offline  
Old 03-31-17, 10:39 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,214
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18397 Post(s)
Liked 15,493 Times in 7,316 Posts
bicycle weight?


Weight: Bike Fully Loaded -Water -Rider


Loaded bike weight - 75 lbs vs 60 lbs
indyfabz is offline  
Old 03-31-17, 10:50 AM
  #7  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sioux Falls SD
Posts: 20

Bikes: Trek 500, Citrocycle Bamboo #1 & #2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by indyfabz
bikeforums.net/touring/1095379-bicycle-weight.html
bikeforums.net/touring/1099426-weight-bike-fully-loaded-water-rider.html
bikeforums.net/touring/1099323-loaded-bike-weight-75-lbs-vs-60-lbs.html
Perfect thank you, I don't know why I wasn't able to find these when I was looking for related posts?
citrocycle is offline  
Old 03-31-17, 10:56 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,214
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18397 Post(s)
Liked 15,493 Times in 7,316 Posts
Originally Posted by citrocycle
Perfect thank you, I don't know why I wasn't able to find these when I was looking for related posts?
Click "Search" and select "Advanced Search." There, you can search thread titles in specific forums like Touring.
indyfabz is offline  
Old 03-31-17, 11:03 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 7,579

Bikes: Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by citrocycle
Thanks Bradtx! If only they didn't take me so long to make! (1.5-2 mo after work & weekends)
I have even more admiration. My frame-only weight for my 23" Cannondale touring bike(s) is right around 4 lb. or perhaps just a bit lighter. I didn't write it down, but maybe it's in an old post.(?) Your built bike is ~3.5 lb. heavier than mine and a rack may bump that up 1-2 lb.

One thing I've learned is that a little extra weight doesn't hurt when distance cycling or touring. We all want our equipment to be as light as practical, but I learned that my touring bike worked just as well as my distance roadie on long distance rides in spite of weighing 6.5 lb. more.

Brad
bradtx is offline  
Old 03-31-17, 11:05 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
jefnvk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207

Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama

Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by citrocycle
Perfect thank you, I don't know why I wasn't able to find these when I was looking for related posts?
The search here is not good. I just use google, and add "site:bikeforums.net" on the end of my search to only search this site. Works much better than the built in search.

Sweet bike, though, comes in right around the weight of my Miyata.
jefnvk is offline  
Old 03-31-17, 11:58 AM
  #11  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sioux Falls SD
Posts: 20

Bikes: Trek 500, Citrocycle Bamboo #1 & #2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bradtx
I have even more admiration. My frame-only weight for my 23" Cannondale touring bike(s) is right around 4 lb. or perhaps just a bit lighter. I didn't write it down, but maybe it's in an old post.(?) Your built bike is ~3.5 lb. heavier than mine and a rack may bump that up 1-2 lb.
Is your Cannondale aluminum? I've thought about switching to Aluminum but haven't yet. The pictured bike is made from heavy 1/16" mild steel since thats what was accessible at the time. I'm currently building one out of 1/32" 4130 chromoly so we'll see how that affects the weight.

Originally Posted by bradtx
One thing I've learned is that a little extra weight doesn't hurt when distance cycling or touring. We all want our equipment to be as light as practical, but I learned that my touring bike worked just as well as my distance roadie on long distance rides in spite of weighing 6.5 lb. more.
Good point although I'm going to be making one for Cyclocross riding and would like the weight to be "competitive" at least!

Thanks for the info.
citrocycle is offline  
Old 03-31-17, 11:59 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
More $$$ you are willing to spend along the way, the less you have to carry.

On The Pacific Coast , summer cycle touring season sees all sorts of bikes..

some are road bikes , towing a bike trailer.





....

Last edited by fietsbob; 03-31-17 at 12:04 PM.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 03-31-17, 12:00 PM
  #13  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sioux Falls SD
Posts: 20

Bikes: Trek 500, Citrocycle Bamboo #1 & #2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jefnvk
The search here is not good. I just use google, and add "site:bikeforums.net" on the end of my search to only search this site. Works much better than the built in search.
Originally Posted by indyfabz
Click "Search" and select "Advanced Search." There, you can search thread titles in specific forums like Touring.
Thanks for the useful tips guys, will definitely use these in the future before posting.
citrocycle is offline  
Old 03-31-17, 12:02 PM
  #14  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sioux Falls SD
Posts: 20

Bikes: Trek 500, Citrocycle Bamboo #1 & #2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fietsbob
More $$$ you are willing to spend along the way, the less you have to carry.
Whats the best "bang for the buck" when trying to lighten things up outside of the frame? I would suspect rims but am not confident in that guess.
citrocycle is offline  
Old 03-31-17, 12:46 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
"nothing weighs less than a part not installed"



fietsbob is offline  
Old 03-31-17, 01:08 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,895

Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2599 Post(s)
Liked 1,924 Times in 1,208 Posts
Originally Posted by citrocycle
Whats the best "bang for the buck" when trying to lighten things up outside of the frame? I would suspect rims but am not confident in that guess.
Most of the things that weigh more on a touring bike are there for extra reliability, although there are some things that cost less.

Rims: A god rim won't dent or break with a hard knock (tree limb, pothole, etc.) You can probably get a lighter rim; do you want to?

Saddle: Not clear what saddle you're riding from the picture, but you can save a pound on a plastic saddle over a Brooks leather saddle. OTOH, there's a reason 1/2 - 2/3 touring cyclists ride Brooks IME, and it's butt comfort. How much do you want to lighten the load?

Seatpost: Unless you've got an expensive seatpost, you can probably buy a lighter one. It might resist bending or breaking as well as the cheaper model, or at least well enough to get you through your tour safely.

Derailers: A good place to save a few ounces, but it's going to cost you! Cassette: ditto.

Overall, my bikes come in right around 32 pounds. When I lose a third of my body weight, then I'll think about getting a bike that weighs 1/3 less, too.
pdlamb is offline  
Old 03-31-17, 01:22 PM
  #17  
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times in 4,181 Posts
Originally Posted by citrocycle
Whats the best "bang for the buck" when trying to lighten things up outside of the frame? I would suspect rims but am not confident in that guess.
Im guessing the DeepV rims arent lightweight. And what are all the connection points made of? No idea what the drivetrain is as the pic you took is from the non-drive side.

Originally Posted by citrocycle
The frame, before adding components, was about 4 lbs (1.8 kg), is this where the "heaviness" of this setup is coming from or would it be the components?
Yeah, that isnt terribly heavy for a frame. Im guessing there is extra weight in the fork and components.
With that said…meh…oh well. My touring bike is no lightweight. It isnt a land whale, but itll never be mistaken for a waifish model.

Its really cool that you built a bike- that, in my mind, far outweighs the weight being a few # more than what I would consider typical.



Looking around, this is apparently more of a 1st/2nd crack at a product to sell? Where does the rear rack attach? I see 2 mount points at the dropouts, but nothing up on the seatstays. Also, no ability to traditionally mount a front rack? That could really limit usability.
https://www.citrocycle.com/
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 03-31-17, 06:21 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 7,579

Bikes: Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
[QUOTE=citrocycle;19480606]Is your Cannondale aluminum?

Yes.

Brad
bradtx is offline  
Old 03-31-17, 09:06 PM
  #19  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sioux Falls SD
Posts: 20

Bikes: Trek 500, Citrocycle Bamboo #1 & #2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pdlamb
Rims: A god rim won't dent or break with a hard knock (tree limb, pothole, etc.) You can probably get a lighter rim; do you want to?

Saddle: Not clear what saddle you're riding from the picture, but you can save a pound on a plastic saddle over a Brooks leather saddle. OTOH, there's a reason 1/2 - 2/3 touring cyclists ride Brooks IME, and it's butt comfort. How much do you want to lighten the load?

Seatpost: Unless you've got an expensive seatpost, you can probably buy a lighter one. It might resist bending or breaking as well as the cheaper model, or at least well enough to get you through your tour safely.

Derailers: A good place to save a few ounces, but it's going to cost you! Cassette: ditto.

Overall, my bikes come in right around 32 pounds. When I lose a third of my body weight, then I'll think about getting a bike that weighs 1/3 less, too.
Good information, goes along with what @fietsbob said earlier about just spending more money to get lighter parts.

Thanks for the overview, I'm personally fine with the weight, but have talked to people who were interested in a bike like it but also were interested in having a lighter bike and I was wondering where I could shave weight off at. I'll just pass along the cost if they want lighter!
citrocycle is offline  
Old 03-31-17, 09:33 PM
  #20  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sioux Falls SD
Posts: 20

Bikes: Trek 500, Citrocycle Bamboo #1 & #2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
Im guessing the DeepV rims arent lightweight. And what are all the connection points made of? No idea what the drivetrain is as the pic you took is from the non-drive side.
On this bike and the one pictured in my "coming soon" site the connection points are all 1/16" mild steel - heavy and readily accessible. The drivetrain is Tiagra, 105's may be coming soon.

Originally Posted by mstateglfr
Looking around, this is apparently more of a 1st/2nd crack at a product to sell? Where does the rear rack attach? I see 2 mount points at the dropouts, but nothing up on the seat stays. Also, no ability to traditionally mount a front rack? That could really limit usability.
Your exactly right, this is the 2nd bike I've made, currently working on the 4th with lightweight chromo and more rack attachments. This bike has been my "dummy" bike with modifications out the wazoo, I may grind away the paint and weld on some rear mounts for a back rack. I have a seat post rear bike rack (example image below) that I'm currently using, but limits the weight of the pannier bags.

Originally Posted by mstateglfr
Also, no ability to traditionally mount a front rack? That could really limit usability.
Lastly, this would just be a matter of using a different fork with the correct mounting holes, correct?

I really appreciate your input, its great having a fresh pair of eyes to point out the things that I've overlooked.
Attached Images
citrocycle is offline  
Old 04-01-17, 06:00 AM
  #21  
 
BigAura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chapin, SC
Posts: 3,423

Bikes: all steel stable: surly world troller, paris sport fixed, fuji ss

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 623 Post(s)
Liked 55 Times in 33 Posts
Pretty cool bike! But it does seem on heavy side, considering bamboo is not a heavy building material. As you've point out those steel connectors seem to be rather large and therefore heavy. But IMO there's nothing wrong with an overbuilt touring-bike. By way of reference, my overbuilt all-steel touring-bicycle with a sturdy wheelset comes in at about 30 pounds. Kitted out with racks, cages, fenders, and 2-inch touring tires it weighs in at 33 pounds.
BigAura is offline  
Old 04-01-17, 12:13 PM
  #22  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sioux Falls SD
Posts: 20

Bikes: Trek 500, Citrocycle Bamboo #1 & #2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BigAura
By way of reference, my overbuilt all-steel touring-bicycle with a sturdy wheelset comes in at about 30 pounds. Kitted out with racks, cages, fenders, and 2-inch touring tires it weighs in at 33 pounds.
I'm hoping to be able to knock down the weight by a pound or two by using thinner Chromo but we will see how it ends up working out.
I imagine that the overall size plays into it also, this is a "large" frame for someone 6'+.

I'll have to reference this one against the "small" frame I'm currently building!

Thanks for the input.
citrocycle is offline  
Old 04-01-17, 03:03 PM
  #23  
djb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Montreal Canada
Posts: 13,210
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2735 Post(s)
Liked 969 Times in 792 Posts
this weight is pretty close to what my touring bikes have been.

oh, and I have always found the search function on this site to be extraordinarily frustrating, dont even try using it anymore.
djb is offline  
Old 04-01-17, 04:58 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,056

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4195 Post(s)
Liked 3,837 Times in 2,295 Posts
This bike is 27.5 lbs with out the Tubus rear rack but with all the other accessories including the Arkel handle bar bag mounts. I read, today in Bike Rag, of the Surley Disk trucker at 34 lbs with no accessories. Andy
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_1413.jpg (98.9 KB, 163 views)
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Old 04-01-17, 10:09 PM
  #25  
Clark W. Griswold
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,465

Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4332 Post(s)
Liked 3,957 Times in 2,645 Posts
Originally Posted by Andrew R Stewart
This bike is 27.5 lbs with out the Tubus rear rack but with all the other accessories including the Arkel handle bar bag mounts. I read, today in Bike Rag, of the Surley Disk trucker at 34 lbs with no accessories. Andy
My DT was 34 with cages, tubus racks and probably my Road Morph pump as well as a few minor upgrades that weren't a whole lot lighter. My Co-Motion is 28 pounds without the pump but slightly heavier cages.
veganbikes is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.