Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Touring Bike Build

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Touring Bike Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-17, 11:52 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 99

Bikes: Jones Plus, Tern Verge Tour

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jefnvk
In that case, go for the Ortliebs, assuming you go rack and bags over bikepacking. The attachment system is MUCH better, and the bags themselves just stand out as a much higher quality. Especially so, if you foresee using them again in the future.
If you're planning to road tour, Ortliebs or Arkel panniers are a good investment. On gravel or off-road, bikepacking bags are great. And the good brands easily match Ortlieb/Arkel in quality. Bikepacking bags are very stable. They're designed for much rougher surfaces than asphalt.

Also, re: Ortliebs vs Arkel, I think the Arkel is more durable. Ortliebs uses plastic in their attachment system, while Arkel uses aluminum. I've seen broken Ortliebs on rough roads, I haven't seen broken Arkels. YMMV, that's simply my experience.

Edit: and good god, mre's suck. There are better options.

Last edited by Mtroup; 07-18-17 at 11:58 AM.
Mtroup is offline  
Old 07-18-17, 12:15 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,895

Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2601 Post(s)
Liked 1,925 Times in 1,208 Posts
For a one-off, I think going with what you have plus a couple bags would be the way to go. Strap compression bags or stuff sacks with clothes, toiletries, electronics and food to your saddle, frame, and/or bars. Take the Silver Comet to Cedartown, get a motel; get back on the rail-trail to Piedmont, then take 278 over to Gadsden, another motel, then down U.S. 11 (or backroads) into Birmingham. $150 for motels is going to be cheaper than the top-dollar racks plus panniers we all recommend for dedicated tourists, and way cheaper than building a new bike. If you're lightly loaded, you can make the hills on 278 with minimal problems, and 11 with minimal stops. No need to re-gear for a weekend!


Now, if you want to extend it to the Natchez Trace and into Nashville, it might be time to gear up. Or if you want to ride to Knoxville, there's some mountains up that way.
pdlamb is offline  
Old 07-18-17, 12:46 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: The Dirty South
Posts: 106

Bikes: 1986 Bianichi Sport SX (Orchid), 1988 Bianchi Super Leggera (Celeste), 1989 Bianchi Giro (stripped of paint and waiting for a refurb), 1996 Cannondale F500 (Red), 2010 Cannondale SystemSix (Red/Black)

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pdlamb
For a one-off, I think going with what you have plus a couple bags would be the way to go. Strap compression bags or stuff sacks with clothes, toiletries, electronics and food to your saddle, frame, and/or bars. Take the Silver Comet to Cedartown, get a motel; get back on the rail-trail to Piedmont, then take 278 over to Gadsden, another motel, then down U.S. 11 (or backroads) into Birmingham. $150 for motels is going to be cheaper than the top-dollar racks plus panniers we all recommend for dedicated tourists, and way cheaper than building a new bike. If you're lightly loaded, you can make the hills on 278 with minimal problems, and 11 with minimal stops. No need to re-gear for a weekend!


Now, if you want to extend it to the Natchez Trace and into Nashville, it might be time to gear up. Or if you want to ride to Knoxville, there's some mountains up that way.
I like the way you're thinking here...
Zerokreap is offline  
Old 07-18-17, 01:51 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 720

Bikes: Road, mountain and track bikes and tandems.

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 282 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 18 Times in 15 Posts
Building up a whole bike for a two of three day tour trip? Anyone see something wrong with this picture??? You are likely to spend more time and money on the effort putting together a bike, than time actually riding it. If you see a future in touring that is a whole different matter. You could just borrow a trailer to "test the waters on this (short) trip, to see if you like touring.
Brian25 is offline  
Old 07-18-17, 02:25 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
jefnvk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207

Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama

Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian25
Building up a whole bike for a two of three day tour trip? Anyone see something wrong with this picture???
I thought n+1 was religious gospel around here, and he was just looking for any excuse
jefnvk is offline  
Old 07-18-17, 02:26 PM
  #31  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Stratford, New Zealand
Posts: 318

Bikes: 1990 Paul Dye Hand Built 7 Speed, 1965 Raleigh Sport, Folding 26" Tourer

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Liked 43 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Zerokreap

- I prefer drops, but I am thinking I might want flat bar setup...or maybe a mustache or butterfly bar?

- My handlebar setup will determine my shifter setup. I imagine if I go with a flat or riser bar, I'll just use some Campy Veloce flat bar shifters I have laying around...they'll work with a triple, which is a bonus. I suppose this might also be the choice if I go with a butterfly bars as well. Otherwise, with drops or the mustache bars will get standard road shifters.
I use moustache bars exclusively. and would recommend them. One downside is that bikepacking type handlebar bag setups don't suit them all that well.
tspoon is offline  
Old 07-18-17, 02:49 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: The Dirty South
Posts: 106

Bikes: 1986 Bianichi Sport SX (Orchid), 1988 Bianchi Super Leggera (Celeste), 1989 Bianchi Giro (stripped of paint and waiting for a refurb), 1996 Cannondale F500 (Red), 2010 Cannondale SystemSix (Red/Black)

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jefnvk
I thought n+1 was religious gospel around here, and he was just looking for any excuse
You are correct, sir!
Zerokreap is offline  
Old 07-18-17, 03:01 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: The Dirty South
Posts: 106

Bikes: 1986 Bianichi Sport SX (Orchid), 1988 Bianchi Super Leggera (Celeste), 1989 Bianchi Giro (stripped of paint and waiting for a refurb), 1996 Cannondale F500 (Red), 2010 Cannondale SystemSix (Red/Black)

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian25
Building up a whole bike for a two of three day tour trip? Anyone see something wrong with this picture??? You are likely to spend more time and money on the effort putting together a bike, than time actually riding it. If you see a future in touring that is a whole different matter. You could just borrow a trailer to "test the waters on this (short) trip, to see if you like touring.
I've probably ridden about 30k miles on my bike, so I don't think testing the waters is necessary. I have a good idea what this trip will be like. Also, I don't like to borrow things from folks...not a fan of owing anyone anything....perhaps it's a personality flaw, but I'm ok with that.

As I may have mentioned, I was planning to build up a new bike anyway (something in vintage steel), and this trip was just an excuse to think about it a bit more. It's something I enjoy doing and like most hobbies, it's not done for practical reasons....to the dismay of my wife. So, while you're correct that building the bike will take longer than the ride itself, that's not too much of a concern for me. Of course, I am concerned that what makes for a great racing bike might differ substantially from a touring bike. So I thought I would ask for everyone's thoughts. I suppose the ideal would be a bike that I can convert to a racer after this trip. However, I will probably just try and set up this Bianchi Sport SX I have laying around, which I was going to sell anyway. It has eyelets for fenders/racks, so why not throw one on there, change a few bits of the drivetrain, and take in on a little trip? I was never going to use it for group rides anyway. That's a fairly cheap option in my eyes....it's like I'm going to campy this thing out.
Zerokreap is offline  
Old 07-18-17, 06:54 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 720

Bikes: Road, mountain and track bikes and tandems.

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 282 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 18 Times in 15 Posts
Sounds like you have a pretty good direction you are thinking in regards to the bike. As far as what to take, I suggest that you break it up int a few possible categories that will have you covered. A)Clothing: on the bike, off the bike and night wear. Assuming you don't sleep in the buff. B) spare tubes, tools/ tire boot. C)Hygiene kit D) Start food, utensils (not sure if you plan to cook, or eat out?)
Brian25 is offline  
Old 07-18-17, 08:38 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,478

Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 318 Times in 245 Posts
How about a pic of what you have? I would just ride the Bianchi, put a rack on. A swept back bar is best for me too. Need a triple for 8% ??? Pffft. For 2 nights/ 3 days, just book a motel and ride.

Last edited by GamblerGORD53; 07-19-17 at 08:11 AM.
GamblerGORD53 is offline  
Old 07-19-17, 02:02 AM
  #36  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,077
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 760 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
May I suggest test riding a triple first. In case you don't like it. It's not about manhood. It's about if your okay with the way it shifts.
Squeezebox is offline  
Old 07-19-17, 07:09 AM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
jefnvk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207

Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama

Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by Squeezebox
May I suggest test riding a triple first. In case you don't like it. It's not about manhood. It's about if your okay with the way it shifts.
Is there something special about triples that affects shifting? Half my bikes are doubles, half are triples, I don't really notice any difference beyond the obvious having an extra chainring to shift into.
jefnvk is offline  
Old 07-19-17, 09:43 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 7,579

Bikes: Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
@Zerokreap, I have been riding roadies for a few decades and have toured for only about six years, mostly rides like what you are planning. I do have a couple of touring bikes I really like and they do make for versatile mounts. A tour like yours can be accomplished with a roadie, but there are some points to be ironed out.

1. Camping or no camping. This will greatly affect what you will need to carry.
2. Wheels. The more durable (rugged) the better because weight lashed to your bike can't unweight itself prior to a bump or a hole in the road.
3. Gearing. There are just days when you'll need lower than average GI, sometimes just for the last hill at the end of the day.

A couple of summers ago I experimented with using my distance roadie as a light touring bike carrying <20 lb. It worked fine using essentially a large handle bar bag. That bike is limited to 25 mm tires, has a GI range of ~32-100 GI, and a light(ish) set of wheels. Any more weight than that and I'll chose a touring bike.

Brad
bradtx is offline  
Old 07-19-17, 08:11 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: The Dirty South
Posts: 106

Bikes: 1986 Bianichi Sport SX (Orchid), 1988 Bianchi Super Leggera (Celeste), 1989 Bianchi Giro (stripped of paint and waiting for a refurb), 1996 Cannondale F500 (Red), 2010 Cannondale SystemSix (Red/Black)

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GamblerGORD53
How about a pic of what you have? I would just ride the Bianchi, put a rack on. A swept back bar is best for me too. Need a triple for 8% ??? Pffft. For 2 nights/ 3 days, just book a motel and ride.
It's nothing special...Japanese made Bianchi from 1986, cromoly frame...currently set up with all original equipment. I bought it to use as a beater commuter bike. And I say it's nothing special, but then again, it is an all original bike, down to the tires, that's in great shape and a somewhat rare color. Of course, I'm not running a museum and I ride my SL a lot more than than this one...

If I decide to go with the Bianchi, the only thing I will be using is the frame...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_20160820_144845493.jpg (103.0 KB, 83 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20160820_145055861.jpg (53.0 KB, 82 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20160820_145030064.jpg (104.5 KB, 81 views)
Zerokreap is offline  
Old 07-19-17, 08:24 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: The Dirty South
Posts: 106

Bikes: 1986 Bianichi Sport SX (Orchid), 1988 Bianchi Super Leggera (Celeste), 1989 Bianchi Giro (stripped of paint and waiting for a refurb), 1996 Cannondale F500 (Red), 2010 Cannondale SystemSix (Red/Black)

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bradtx
@Zerokreap, I have been riding roadies for a few decades and have toured for only about six years, mostly rides like what you are planning. I do have a couple of touring bikes I really like and they do make for versatile mounts. A tour like yours can be accomplished with a roadie, but there are some points to be ironed out.

1. Camping or no camping. This will greatly affect what you will need to carry.
2. Wheels. The more durable (rugged) the better because weight lashed to your bike can't unweight itself prior to a bump or a hole in the road.
3. Gearing. There are just days when you'll need lower than average GI, sometimes just for the last hill at the end of the day.

A couple of summers ago I experimented with using my distance roadie as a light touring bike carrying <20 lb. It worked fine using essentially a large handle bar bag. That bike is limited to 25 mm tires, has a GI range of ~32-100 GI, and a light(ish) set of wheels. Any more weight than that and I'll chose a touring bike.

Brad
Brad, thanks for sharing your experiences and advice. I'll spend some time hammering out the route this weekend or next and that will help me make a lot of the other decisions.

In terms of the wheels, I was just thinking some older alloy wheels?
Zerokreap is offline  
Old 07-19-17, 08:35 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,478

Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 318 Times in 245 Posts
Pretty nice bike alright, and it's not green. ha
It will certainly work for a short trip like I said. It's still a good idea to load it up as is before to test the frame size and practicality. Gearing is the least of worries. IMO I'm now an IGH Rohloff guy myself.
GamblerGORD53 is offline  
Old 07-19-17, 10:24 PM
  #42  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,077
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 760 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by jefnvk
Is there something special about triples that affects shifting? Half my bikes are doubles, half are triples, I don't really notice any difference beyond the obvious having an extra chainring to shift into.
Yes
Squeezebox is offline  
Old 07-19-17, 11:45 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,264
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1974 Post(s)
Liked 1,298 Times in 630 Posts
Originally Posted by jefnvk
Is there something special about triples that affects shifting? Half my bikes are doubles, half are triples, I don't really notice any difference beyond the obvious having an extra chainring to shift into.
Every time triples are brought up, Squeezebox insists that they don't shift well.

In my experience, modern triples built with compatible parts if anything shift better than doubles, since the jumps between cogs are smaller. Modern doubles shift very consistently as well, but on wide cranksets the shifts take more time to complete because the chain needs to ramp into position.

The triple on my 1991 RB-T is probably my favorite front shifting in my stable, it's so quick and light-action that it's almost like rear shifting. It can even shift between the large and small rings very rapidly, not that I ever have much reason to do that on the road:

HTupolev is offline  
Old 07-20-17, 01:27 AM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Happy Feet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times in 707 Posts
Originally Posted by HTupolev
Every time triples are brought up, Squeezebox insists that they don't shift well.

In my experience, modern triples built with compatible parts if anything shift better than doubles, since the jumps between cogs are smaller. Modern doubles shift very consistently as well, but on wide cranksets the shifts take more time to complete because the chain needs to ramp into position.

The triple on my 1991 RB-T is probably my favorite front shifting in my stable, it's so quick and light-action that it's almost like rear shifting. It can even shift between the large and small rings very rapidly, not that I ever have much reason to do that on the road:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4asmektmMts
Very nice.
They say a picture is worth a thousand words and a video is worth a thousand pictures.
Happy Feet is offline  
Old 07-20-17, 01:52 AM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
elcruxio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Turku, Finland, Europe
Posts: 2,495

Bikes: 2011 Specialized crux comp, 2013 Specialized Rockhopper Pro

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 862 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times in 223 Posts
I wonder why squeezy hasn't gone towards the 1x11 direction? That way you eliminate the front mech completely. No more sloppy shifting.
elcruxio is online now  
Old 07-20-17, 06:51 AM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
jefnvk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207

Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama

Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 51 Posts
@Zerokreap - SEXY! Love the color!

Originally Posted by HTupolev
Every time triples are brought up, Squeezebox insists that they don't shift well.

In my experience, modern triples built with compatible parts if anything shift better than doubles, since the jumps between cogs are smaller. Modern doubles shift very consistently as well, but on wide cranksets the shifts take more time to complete because the chain needs to ramp into position.
Ah gotcha. Yeah, no issues on my end whatsoever with my two triples, one an old Acera connected to triggers and the other an old Suntour BL connected to Suntour ratchet bar ends, which is actually the smoothest shifting front I own.

Last edited by jefnvk; 07-20-17 at 06:54 AM.
jefnvk is offline  
Old 07-20-17, 07:49 AM
  #47  
djb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Montreal Canada
Posts: 13,212
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2736 Post(s)
Liked 970 Times in 793 Posts
as someone mentioned, but seeing the photo probably confirms it, the short chainstays will mean that a rack will need to be one that sets back a good amount to avoid possible heel strike on bags.
Given that you may end up only using hotels, you wont have that much weight in the panniers, so the rack wont be all that important for sturdiness, ie any middling rack with longer horizontal bits/supports that go from rack to the frame will do. * you will have to use p clamps to attach these bits to the frame, no biggee as they dont take much weight, the bolts at the eyelets do.

there are light bags made by Arkel called Dry Lites, very light, look them up, about $100 Can. a pair, no matter what panniers you use, remember that you can always sell good panniers used fairly easily afterwards.

same with a handlebar bag or whatever, not hard to sell.
or frame bags.

example, recently I have bought nearly new Ortlieb panniers and an Ortlieb handlebar bag for my wife off the equivelant of Craigs list, and they dont last long, people jump at them.

sounds like you have the right attitude to using what you have and making the bike useable, you'll have as much fun on a 8 speed repurposed bike as on a brand new 2000 dollar bike....

ps, 32's on dirt and gravel can be fine if you have moderate bike handling skills, especially if the bike's load isnt too much, and if you go the hotel route, it wont be, or shouldnt be in any case.

have fun thinking up build ideas, I understand the fun factor of doing this, as much as the trip. It keeps us out of the poolhalls....
djb is offline  
Old 07-20-17, 08:25 AM
  #48  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: The Dirty South
Posts: 106

Bikes: 1986 Bianichi Sport SX (Orchid), 1988 Bianchi Super Leggera (Celeste), 1989 Bianchi Giro (stripped of paint and waiting for a refurb), 1996 Cannondale F500 (Red), 2010 Cannondale SystemSix (Red/Black)

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by djb
as someone mentioned, but seeing the photo probably confirms it, the short chainstays will mean that a rack will need to be one that sets back a good amount to avoid possible heel strike on bags.
Given that you may end up only using hotels, you wont have that much weight in the panniers, so the rack wont be all that important for sturdiness, ie any middling rack with longer horizontal bits/supports that go from rack to the frame will do. * you will have to use p clamps to attach these bits to the frame, no biggee as they dont take much weight, the bolts at the eyelets do.

there are light bags made by Arkel called Dry Lites, very light, look them up, about $100 Can. a pair, no matter what panniers you use, remember that you can always sell good panniers used fairly easily afterwards.

same with a handlebar bag or whatever, not hard to sell.
or frame bags.

example, recently I have bought nearly new Ortlieb panniers and an Ortlieb handlebar bag for my wife off the equivelant of Craigs list, and they dont last long, people jump at them.

sounds like you have the right attitude to using what you have and making the bike useable, you'll have as much fun on a 8 speed repurposed bike as on a brand new 2000 dollar bike....

ps, 32's on dirt and gravel can be fine if you have moderate bike handling skills, especially if the bike's load isnt too much, and if you go the hotel route, it wont be, or shouldnt be in any case.

have fun thinking up build ideas, I understand the fun factor of doing this, as much as the trip. It keeps us out of the poolhalls....
Yes, I am really taking the point about the rear rack to heart. I will definitely look for a rack that sticks out a bit more so that I can avoid the heal strikes. That would annoy the crap out of me and kill what little efficiency I have in my pedal stroke.

I'm not Peter Sagan, but I am an above average bike handler I would say...so perhaps the 32s will work. I definitely hate gravel on 23s. Of course, I don't typically ride on gravel, but you hit patches on those country roads. On this trip, if I can help it, there will be no unpaved roads at all...but 32s will be nice just in case.

In terms of the build, I am just hoping I can get a fairly upright position. I think I have the legs and lungs to go as far as anyone on a bike. My problem is a bulging disc in my neck. That is what has always kept me in the 25-35 mile range. It's not too bad if I am on the flats, but if I am climbing, and my upper back gets tight from pulling on the hoods, a massive headache ensues. Some NSAIDs are all that's needed to keep all that in check. So I am expecting to just take Aleve from start to finish on this trip to keep the problem at bay.
Zerokreap is offline  
Old 07-20-17, 08:41 AM
  #49  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,077
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 760 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by elcruxio
I wonder why squeezy hasn't gone towards the 1x11 direction? That way you eliminate the front mech completely. No more sloppy shifting.
Because doubles with brifters are not sloppy. IMHO Maybe it's the bar ends more than the deraileur?
Plenty of times I've seen someone having troubles shifting a triple. When I asked about it they said it shifted perfectly. Not what I saw or experienced. You can do whatever you want.
But do drop the insulting tone.

Last edited by Squeezebox; 07-20-17 at 08:44 AM.
Squeezebox is offline  
Old 07-20-17, 08:50 AM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
jefnvk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207

Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama

Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by Zerokreap
Yes, I am really taking the point about the rear rack to heart. I will definitely look for a rack that sticks out a bit more so that I can avoid the heal strikes. That would annoy the crap out of me and kill what little efficiency I have in my pedal stroke.

I'm not Peter Sagan, but I am an above average bike handler I would say...so perhaps the 32s will work. I definitely hate gravel on 23s. Of course, I don't typically ride on gravel, but you hit patches on those country roads. On this trip, if I can help it, there will be no unpaved roads at all...but 32s will be nice just in case.
I like my Axiom Journey (non adjustable height version), it keeps my bags a bit further back. Decently priced too.

32s can handle quite a bit of crap, they are what I regularly ride on the local broken pavement/gravel trail. We did a few miles in stuff like this on 32s, when I didn't know how to read a map. No real issues whatsoever, except for a girlfriend less than pleased she was riding through mud!


Last edited by jefnvk; 07-20-17 at 09:10 AM.
jefnvk is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.