Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

View Poll Results: Friction vs indexed shifting?

Voters
25. You may not vote on this poll
  • Friction

    14 56.00%
  • Indexed

    11 44.00%
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Senior Member Bolo Grubb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    1,749
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Friction vs indexed shifting?

    Friction vs indexed shifting? which do you prefer and why?

    My bike currently has bar-con friction. My uncle (who is a cyclist) says I should upgrade it to index shifting.

    My other bike is my fast race bike and it does have STI so I know what that is like.

    But for touring and commuting which do you think is better and why.

  2. #2
    Senior Member halfspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    SE Minnesota
    My Bikes
    are better than yours.
    Posts
    10,379
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Index rear, friction front.

  3. #3
    Senior Member bentbaggerlen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    714
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When I built up our last touring bike I could not find a set of 9-speed Shimano bar ends anyplace, or even a set of 8-speeds to use in friction mode untill I could get some. I tried new and used, E-bay, Gregs list etc. with out luck. What I did find was a N.O.S. pair of Sun Tour bar ends, and I installed them. Thinking I would just swap them out with a pair of indexed bar ends when I could get them.

    But I don't miss the indexing, so Im not going to bother. The old shifters work fine with the 9 speed so why bother.
    Bentbaggerlen
    "When the spirits are low, when the day appears dark, when work becomes monotonous, when hope hardly seems worth having, just mount a bicycle and go out for a spin down the road, without thought on anything but the ride you are taking." - Arthur Conan Doyle

  4. #4
    Quietly Desperate Kodama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Woodinville, WA
    Posts
    494
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Friction front and back. When I got my Atlantis built by Riv it came set indexed rear and friction front. That was cool and I rode with it for a while. Maybe it was the shipping, maybe cables stretch but pretty quickly I grew tired of the index not being perfect for each gear. So a switched to friction rear as well and now I always have perfect trim.
    "The true traveller is without goal, it is the absence of goals which creates the ultimate traveller."
    - Gao Xingjian 'Soul Mountain'

  5. #5
    ♋ ☮♂ ☭ ☯ -=(8)=-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    40205 'ViLLeBiLLie
    My Bikes
    Sngl Spd's, 70's- 80's vintage, D-tube Folder
    Posts
    7,753
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ye olde skool of friction !
    Less is always more !

  6. #6
    Immoderator KrisPistofferson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    POS Tennessee
    My Bikes
    Gary Fisher Simple City 8, Litespeed Obed
    Posts
    7,596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've got index on my MTB/commuter, downtube friction on my touring bike. Well, it's actually index/friction, but I never use the index option, and I don't miss it. Even if I wanted to use it, it's a 6 speed shifter with an 8 speed cassette shoved on the back, so I doubt it'd work! I've never had a problem finding the gear friction-shifting, and I've found that I have less problem the more cogs are on the rear, I assume because they're closer together. I've owned bikes with STI, and it's fine, but I like stuff I can fix in my garage if anything goes awry, instead of having to make an LBS trip. So disc brakes and STI are really not my cup of tea.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bikeforums
    Your rights end where another poster's feelings begin.

  7. #7
    Macro Geek
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    My Bikes
    True North tourer (www.truenorthcycles.com), 2004; Miyata 1000, 1985
    Posts
    1,177
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Index... friction... no right answer. So much depends on your style of travel, destination(s), and mechanical savvy. My touring bike has STI brifters, and they are reliable for the kind of touring that I do (carrying credit card and one change of clothing), accurate and a pleasure to use. But I would want something more serviceable if I were heading out into the heart of darkness — in other words, more than a few hours away from a bicycle mechanic.

  8. #8
    Year-round cyclist
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Montréal (Québec)
    Posts
    3,023
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Friction front.

    On the rear, I have a slight preference for indexed. Indexed is better on the tandem or when travelling on gravel roads because I can't hear whether or not I am on gear.
    Michel Gagnon
    Montréal (Québec, Canada)

  9. #9
    Displaced Yooper GrodyGeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Great White North
    My Bikes
    Atlantis, Bridgestone, Trek, Cannondale, Osell
    Posts
    99
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I tend to use index, but see no strong preference. I like barcons best because they can do both in case index usually doesn't work. I think whatever you like is okay, there is no solid argument for either.
    Gordy
    just a modern guy, of course I've had it in the ear before

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •