Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

View Poll Results: Friction vs indexed shifting?

Voters
25. You may not vote on this poll
  • Friction

    14 56.00%
  • Indexed

    11 44.00%
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Senior Member Bolo Grubb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    1,749
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Friction vs indexed shifting?

    Friction vs indexed shifting? which do you prefer and why?

    My bike currently has bar-con friction. My uncle (who is a cyclist) says I should upgrade it to index shifting.

    My other bike is my fast race bike and it does have STI so I know what that is like.

    But for touring and commuting which do you think is better and why.

  2. #2
    Senior Member halfspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    SE Minnesota
    My Bikes
    are better than yours.
    Posts
    11,666
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Index rear, friction front.

  3. #3
    Senior Member bentbaggerlen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    714
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When I built up our last touring bike I could not find a set of 9-speed Shimano bar ends anyplace, or even a set of 8-speeds to use in friction mode untill I could get some. I tried new and used, E-bay, Gregs list etc. with out luck. What I did find was a N.O.S. pair of Sun Tour bar ends, and I installed them. Thinking I would just swap them out with a pair of indexed bar ends when I could get them.

    But I don't miss the indexing, so Im not going to bother. The old shifters work fine with the 9 speed so why bother.
    Bentbaggerlen
    "When the spirits are low, when the day appears dark, when work becomes monotonous, when hope hardly seems worth having, just mount a bicycle and go out for a spin down the road, without thought on anything but the ride you are taking." - Arthur Conan Doyle

  4. #4
    Quietly Desperate Kodama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Woodinville, WA
    Posts
    494
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Friction front and back. When I got my Atlantis built by Riv it came set indexed rear and friction front. That was cool and I rode with it for a while. Maybe it was the shipping, maybe cables stretch but pretty quickly I grew tired of the index not being perfect for each gear. So a switched to friction rear as well and now I always have perfect trim.
    "The true traveller is without goal, it is the absence of goals which creates the ultimate traveller."
    - Gao Xingjian 'Soul Mountain'

  5. #5
    ♋ ☮♂ ☭ ☯ -=(8)=-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    40205 'ViLLeBiLLie
    My Bikes
    Sngl Spd's, 70's- 80's vintage, D-tube Folder
    Posts
    7,906
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ye olde skool of friction !
    Less is always more !
    -ADVOCACY-☜ Radical VC = Car people on bikes. Just say "NO"

  6. #6
    Banned. KrisPistofferson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    POS Tennessee
    My Bikes
    Gary Fisher Simple City 8, Litespeed Obed
    Posts
    7,636
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've got index on my MTB/commuter, downtube friction on my touring bike. Well, it's actually index/friction, but I never use the index option, and I don't miss it. Even if I wanted to use it, it's a 6 speed shifter with an 8 speed cassette shoved on the back, so I doubt it'd work! I've never had a problem finding the gear friction-shifting, and I've found that I have less problem the more cogs are on the rear, I assume because they're closer together. I've owned bikes with STI, and it's fine, but I like stuff I can fix in my garage if anything goes awry, instead of having to make an LBS trip. So disc brakes and STI are really not my cup of tea.

  7. #7
    Macro Geek
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    My Bikes
    True North tourer (www.truenorthcycles.com), 2004; Miyata 1000, 1985
    Posts
    1,201
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Index... friction... no right answer. So much depends on your style of travel, destination(s), and mechanical savvy. My touring bike has STI brifters, and they are reliable for the kind of touring that I do (carrying credit card and one change of clothing), accurate and a pleasure to use. But I would want something more serviceable if I were heading out into the heart of darkness — in other words, more than a few hours away from a bicycle mechanic.

  8. #8
    Year-round cyclist
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Montréal (Québec)
    Posts
    3,023
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Friction front.

    On the rear, I have a slight preference for indexed. Indexed is better on the tandem or when travelling on gravel roads because I can't hear whether or not I am on gear.
    Michel Gagnon
    Montréal (Québec, Canada)

  9. #9
    Displaced Yooper GrodyGeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Great White North
    My Bikes
    Atlantis, Bridgestone, Trek, Cannondale, Osell
    Posts
    99
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I tend to use index, but see no strong preference. I like barcons best because they can do both in case index usually doesn't work. I think whatever you like is okay, there is no solid argument for either.
    Gordy
    just a modern guy, of course I've had it in the ear before

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •