Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    My Bikes
    2008 ANT Custom 29er, 2005 Independent Fabrications Club Racer, 2004 Specialized Langster S-Works, 2001 Litespeed Tuscany, 2004 Titus Racer-X
    Posts
    185
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Touring Bottom Bracket Touring Length

    I am going to use a Sugino XD2 600 crankset on my touring bike. The bike will have a 135mm spacing in the back and will have 700cc wheels mounted with an XTR cassette.

    According to Rivendell's website to use this crank on a road bike I need a spindle length of 107 or 110, and to use it on a mountain bike I should use a spindle length of 113 or 115.

    So, which should I use? It's a mountain bike spacing in the back, and I'm going to run a mountain cassette so I guess either 113 or 115. I'd just like to know for sure.

  2. #2
    hello roadfix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    thank you for asking
    Posts
    18,502
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Go with the longer spindle to keep your chainline in check.....
    .cinelli.olympic.surly.long.haul.trucker.kona.ku.surly.steamroller.
    .litespeed.classic.litespeed.firenze.bianchi.pista.dean.colonel.plus.more.

  3. #3
    Senior Member late's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Southern Maine
    Posts
    8,251
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If there is one thing I find really annoying about Shimano, Sram, and that Campy fellow.... is that no one will make a great 7 (or even 8) speed
    system so you can have a low Q. I have a terrific titanium bottom bracket ( about a 107 or 108) that the fixie guys would just drool over. It'd fit their bikes perfectly. And it would provide better pedalling than the newer and wider systems. And stronger wheels, and more longevity in gears and cranks, and a microspcopic increase in pedalling smoothness.

    With all those advantages, you'd think somebody would make
    a gear system that was better instead of more.

    You could shim the rear to get the equivalent of 130mm, and use a slightly narrower spindle, but I don't have the experience to get specific, or even to know if it's possible. I wonder if I could take a
    LHT and cold set it to a narrower standard?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •