Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-29-05, 01:06 PM   #1
squire
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 29
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Spokes?

Which is harder on spokes, loaded bike or trailer?...........Sam
squire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-05, 05:08 PM   #2
natelutkjohn
Cheesmonger Extraordinair
 
natelutkjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 417
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I guess I can't say for sure, but I would bet a beer that the loaded bike is tougher on the spokes.
natelutkjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-05, 07:20 PM   #3
FarHorizon
Senior Curmudgeon
 
FarHorizon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Directly above the center of the earth
Bikes: Varies by day
Posts: 3,856
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by natelutkjohn
I guess I can't say for sure, but I would bet a beer that the loaded bike is tougher on the spokes.
I agree - the spokes aren't supporting the weight of the trailer - it rides on its own wheels. More weight supported by the wheel = greater stress on the spokes.
FarHorizon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-05, 10:52 PM   #4
mtnroads
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon and SE Asia
Bikes: Waterford ST-22, Jamis Quest Elite, Jamis Dragon Pro
Posts: 933
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I have read that BOB-type trailers do exert some lateral forces on the rear wheel, forces that they are not really designed to take, however probably not as hard on the spokes as the weight of loaded panniers.

Last edited by mtnroads; 11-30-05 at 11:00 PM.
mtnroads is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-05, 11:28 PM   #5
cyccommute 
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Bikes: Some silver ones, a black one, a red one, an orange one and a couple of titanium ones
Posts: 18,060
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtnroads
I have read that BOB-type trailers do exert some lateral forces on the rear wheel, forces that they are not really designed to take, however probably not as hard on the spokes as the weight of loaded panniers.
I'm going to do some major hand waving and guessing but I'd say that a pannier loaded bike is a bit harder in the spokes than a trailer. On the other hand, I'd suspect that the trailer is harder on the frame than panniers are. (I have ridden with both panniers and trailers.)

For panniers, the loads tend to be more vertical with strong lateral forces as the bike corners. This would make compression of the rims higher (although adding a touring load of around 50 lbs isn't that much more weight to add). As the rims flex more and the spokes loosen, movement of the spoke head in the hub would lead to spoke fatigue and failure more quickly.

With a trailer, the wheels aren't compressed as much and the lateral forces are different since the frame will spread the force of the load into the frame rather than the wheels. That's why I think that the trailer would be harder on the frame. Now, instead of flexing the wheels, you are putting a lot of lateral force on the rear triangle. I think it would take a long time for the frame to fail but it could eventually.

One of the other problems I have with trailers and Old Man Mountain type racks, is that you are depending on a pretty small diameter piece of metal to take a lot of stress. I have an Old Man Mountain that I no longer use because it never felt right and eventually the skewer bent even though I never rode with a load on the rack. And, yes, I kept the skewer tight.
__________________
Stuart Black
New! Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
New! Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Days of Wineless Roads. Bed and Breakfasting along the KATY
Twisting Down the Alley. Misadventures in tornado alley.
An Good Ol' Fashion Appalachian Butt Whoopin'.
cyccommute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-05, 09:21 PM   #6
Michel Gagnon
Year-round cyclist
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Montréal (Québec)
Bikes:
Posts: 3,023
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It depends. the easiest on the wheels is a two-wheel trailer.

A single-wheel trailer (a.k.a. BOB trailer) is very hard on a bike with a lightweight rear triangle but doesn't put too much stress on a bike with a very rigid rear triangle. The BOB seems to sway at high speed but not at very low speed. IOW you won't break spokes while climbing but you may break some while going downhill.

Panniers make the bike wobbly if you have a weak triangle and narrow rear wheel. To illustrate my point, I recently replaced the 126-mm-wide rear wheel of my commuter with a modern 135-mm one (I spread the frame). What was a flexible frame, even wobbly with loaded rear panniers suddenly became a relatively rigid frame. With panniers you may break spokes going uphill, especially if you stand on pedals and/or have a swinging rack.

I have read quite a few cross-country ride reports on Crazyguyonabike and other web sites and when groups cross the country, most of the people who break spokes – sometimes many spokes – are those who ride with a BOB trailer. But then, one may wonder whether they carry more stuff because the trailer contains more, or whether they chose a trailer because they have a racing frame that can't accept racks.
Michel Gagnon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-05, 03:54 PM   #7
twilkins9076
TWilkins
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Springfield, MO
Bikes:
Posts: 352
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
At the risk of side tracking the thread...my apologies up front....you guys are saying that the lateral forces of a trailer are hard on frames, and I'm wondering if that is enough of a concern to change my mind about what I was thinking of doing. I want to take a week long tour next spring, and I have a carbon fiber bike. Obviously no braze-ons for attaching a rack, so I was think that a BOB was really the only option I had since the burley trailers hitch uses the frame. I know that would not be wise, but figured that since the BOB attaches to the QR, it would minimize stress to the carbon fiber frame.

Would you guys use a BOB on a CF frame?
twilkins9076 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-05, 06:06 PM   #8
roadfix
hello
 
roadfix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Bikes:
Posts: 18,588
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by twilkins9076
I know that would not be wise, but figured that since the BOB attaches to the QR, it would minimize stress to the carbon fiber frame.

Would you guys use a BOB on a CF frame?
It's the twisting forces of loaded single-wheeled trailers that are hard on spokes and rear triangles, especially noticable when pedalling out of the saddle. Depending on the mounting system, a two-wheeled trailer would be a lot less stressful on your CF frame.

Last edited by roadfix; 12-02-05 at 06:33 PM.
roadfix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-05, 06:27 PM   #9
supcom
You need a new bike
 
supcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Bikes:
Posts: 5,433
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by twilkins9076
At the risk of side tracking the thread...my apologies up front....you guys are saying that the lateral forces of a trailer are hard on frames, and I'm wondering if that is enough of a concern to change my mind about what I was thinking of doing. I want to take a week long tour next spring, and I have a carbon fiber bike. Obviously no braze-ons for attaching a rack, so I was think that a BOB was really the only option I had since the burley trailers hitch uses the frame. I know that would not be wise, but figured that since the BOB attaches to the QR, it would minimize stress to the carbon fiber frame.

Would you guys use a BOB on a CF frame?
I suggest you have your LBS ask the manufacturer's rep if they recommend using your bike to tow a BOB and if they will warrant the frame if it's damaged while towing the trailer.

If the answer is no to either question, then use another bike.
supcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-05, 08:07 PM   #10
Rogerinchrist
Senior Member
 
Rogerinchrist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Plymouth,WI
Bikes: TREK-520 & 830
Posts: 724
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fixer
It's the twisting forces of loaded single-wheeled trailers that are hard on spokes and rear triangles, especially noticable when pedalling out of the saddle. Depending on the mounting system, a two-wheeled trailer would be a lot less stressful on your CF frame.
My experience with a older Burly (with the metal spring hitch) agrees here. Don't think the newer rubber hitch will flex as much, but it does "give" a bit even when pulling up hill, loaded, out o' the saddle! Plus it'll twist when you rock the bike from side to side, where a single wheeled trailer or panniers will excert forces side to side, which does happen even when riding the flats.
Rogerinchrist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-05, 04:40 AM   #11
teamCTA
ChainRingTransitAuthority
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by squire
Which is harder on spokes, loaded bike or trailer?...........Sam
I use a BikeR Evolution trailer to transport about 65lbs of tools on a regular basis. I have busted a few spokes, but from my experience would say the a trailer, especially a 2 wheeler really only applies additional lateral stress to the rear wheel. And only when corner at high-speeds while braking hard. If you want to take a tight turn at high speeds while braking, you can feel the trailer trying to push the rear of the bike out. Since the hitch is mounted at the center of the wheel, this has to be transfered to the wheel. I would say the greatest stress that heavily loaded trailer puts on the rear wheel is wind-up under hard pedaling. I have wound-up my rear wheel to the point of having the rear derailleur hit the spokes when pulling a very heavy trailer up steep hills.

my 2cents,
teamCTA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-05, 04:56 AM   #12
CdCf
Videre non videri
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike
Posts: 3,208
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Do remember that the lateral load isn't just taken up by one side of the rear triangle, but both sides. Such a structure is probably pretty strong.
For the most part, you're probably riding along with very little load on the frame.
CdCf is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:25 AM.