Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    8 versus 9 speed for touring

    I was hoping to hear some opinions on 8 versus 9 speed for a touring bike. I am seriously considering having a touring bike built and the LBS has recommended that an 8 speed shifter is best. Their rational is that the thinner chain for a 9 speed is subject to stretching. I have never read about this concern. When I look at the trek 520 or the Cannondales I see that they are 9 speed.

    Anyway I would be interested in hear some opinions. I am aiming to have a bike with a range of approx 20 to 100 gear inches and my feeling is that the additional increments in the lower range would be beneficial. The area that I ride has a lot of hills and unfortunaltely my knees are not getting any younger.

    Thank for your opinions

  2. #2
    Senior Member halfspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    SE Minnesota
    My Bikes
    are better than yours.
    Posts
    12,276
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Eight speed parts are much cheaper and slightly more durable. For the most part 8 and 9 speed components are interchangeable so if you need to make a field replacement at a shop that only has one or the other, you can get by.

    The advantage of nine speed is that you can have your gearing a bit closer spaced which allows you to keep a more consistent cadence.

    I run 8.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland, Oregon and SE Asia
    My Bikes
    Spec Roubaix Expert Disc, Jamis Quest Elite, Jamis Dragon Pro, Cannondale Rize, Stumpjumper M5 Comp
    Posts
    917
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    All my bikes are 7-speed so 8 would be a luxury. I think 8-speed is a good compromise of strength and versatility, and with 24-36-48 in the front and a "P" cassette (12-32) in the back you are all set with 20 to 108 GI. That ought to cover all the bases and the gaps aren't too wide between gears.
    Last edited by mtnroads; 03-10-06 at 10:12 PM.

  4. #4
    this bike is an aqueduct Matthew A Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    My Bikes
    Villin custom touring, Medici Pro Pista, KHS Alite1000, Windsor fixed commuter
    Posts
    1,073
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    8 is fine. Just get a biggish cassette, at least up around a 30 if yr doing loaded stuff.
    Villin custom touring | Raleigh XXIX | Medici Pro Pista | 1978 Schwinn Stingray

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    SW Washington, USA
    Posts
    373
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's unanimous.

    9 and 10-speed use narrower components and are possibly not as rugged. But they're bling, so the new bikes use 'em. I wouldn't think "chain stretch" is any worse, but certainly the gears would wear faster; all around, 9-speed uses closer tolerances which would have a greater chance to go haywire in tough conditions.

    7 and 8-speed are cheaper, still easy to get.

    I tour on 6 and 7-speed. Tight gear ranges and single-step shifting aren't that important for touring; racers need 'em to keep up with the wheel in front of them. On tour, you just downshift to the best gear and enjoy the view. You want a good range, but the most important gears are the highest and lowest.

    -- Mark

  6. #6
    hello roadfix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    thank you for asking
    Posts
    18,501
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My commuter and tourer are 7 & 8 speeds, respectively, and I love them and will continue to use them. My mtb's are 9 speed. But if I were to start from scratch building a new tourer with new components, I'll probably go 9 speed.....as I'm not too tough on equipment and they tend to last a long time, regardless. Some 9 speed components might be more expensive initially, but I don't wear them out frequently, therefore cost is not a factor when equipping a new tourer with 9 speed....
    Last edited by roadfix; 03-11-06 at 10:19 AM.
    .cinelli.olympic.surly.long.haul.trucker.kona.ku.surly.steamroller.
    .litespeed.classic.litespeed.firenze.bianchi.pista.dean.colonel.plus.more.

  7. #7
    Touring senior
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Didsbury, Alberta, Canada - near Calgary
    My Bikes
    Cannondale touring bike
    Posts
    117
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Chains don't stretch -- they wear. I doubt a 9 speed would wear faster than an 8. (I have a 9 speed on a Cannondale touring bike - T800)

  8. #8
    More Energy than Sense aroundoz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    155 miles north of Spokane
    My Bikes
    Thorn Sherpa, Co-Motion Custom Road, Salsa Fargo, Mercian King of Mercia and Motobecane Fantom Pro 29er
    Posts
    710
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I get really tired of hearing from bike shops that 8 speed will soon be obsolete, cassettes hard to find..... We have been hearing that for years about 7 speed and they are still out there and easy to find.

    I just like eight speed because for touring, I like bigger jumps between gears. Personal preference. I have heard the chain argument, that 8 speed chains are stronger, but like stated above, I doubt that's true. 8 speed chains and cassettes are definitely less expensive.

  9. #9
    just 5 more miles 5 more's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Vancouver Island
    Posts
    86
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I also use 8 speed on my Miyata. I made one cassett out of 3 to get the gearing I liked. Still experimenting with this. The whole set up has standed very well after 1500 km. Was thinking of STI shifters until the idea of being stuck in Nowhere, Canada with a broken STI and since I'm oldschool down tubes were the final choice. My philosophy is KISS (keep it simply stupid).

  10. #10
    Senior Member onbike 1939's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Fife Scotland
    My Bikes
    Airnimal Chameleon; Ellis Briggs; Moulton TSR27 Moulton Esprit
    Posts
    1,977
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've toured with 9 speed and for loaded touring found that the increments in gearing were too small to allow for the inertia caused by the weight of luggage. This meant changing two at a time up and down. As long as you have a good range i.e. for me with bad knees this means 17-95 inches, then 8 is fine.
    Last edited by onbike 1939; 03-12-06 at 06:02 AM. Reason: error

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    898
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well if you go with 9 speed, get a 12-34 cassette and you'll have all the gears you need. When pulling weight, you want a good range of gears to allow for a comfortable cadence. I use a 12-32 8 speed on my tourer with a 52-38 double, and it work fine for me. Of course I am not into hauling exess weight either on a tour; lite is my motto.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •