Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Touring frame?

  1. #1
    oldhomeplace
    Guest

    Touring frame?

    Hi, found this frame on the net. Not sure if it is a touring frame or not (guy has it set up as singlespeed). Can anyone help? Supposedly it is a Fuji Champion though googling has not helped me.

    thanks!
    Hannah
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    jcm
    jcm is offline
    Gemutlichkeit
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,424
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My aged and untrained eyes tell me it is a mountain-type frame. How high is the BB from the ground? Around 12"? I think tour frames will have a lower BB. My Trek 520 is at 10-1/2" for low center of gravity. Also I don't see any hardpoints for bombs and other armaments. A dedicated tour frame will be loaded with 'em. Yours could be a racing type. Maybe they don't have hardpoints - why would they?

    Now, that doesn't mean that a mtb won't have them either - my old 830 has more hardpoints than my 520. Go figure?? Alot of old rigid mtb frames have them and they make great expedition/tour bikes.

    How 'bout it guys - what is it?

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    5,117
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I can't really tell from looking at the detail in the picture. I looks more stretched out and relaxed than any hardtail I have. The head angle and seat angle look really low, like as low as 70 degrees. Hard to ride singeltrack on that.

    What tire and frame size are we talking here?

  4. #4
    going downhill fast maximusvt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    VT
    My Bikes
    1995 Trek Mountain Track, 1976 Schwinn Continental
    Posts
    248
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't know but looking at the wheels, the spokes and yeah, the lack of braze-ons or anything, makes me think it is a racing type bike.
    I did some touring with a guy who bought a 'really sweet bike' off the internet, kind of on a whim. Problem was, it was a really sweet racing bike, the tires were so thin I was amazed that he didn't pop one of em on the tour. They had big chips and dents in them by the time we were done.
    Also, there were no braze-ons so he had to jerry-rig up his bike with a rack and panniers. Riding behind him watching that stuff sway in the breeze like a flag was a hoot!!
    I was on a cheap mtb that worked great and the slick tires on it held up way better. going offroad looking for campsites, he was definitely at a disadvantage.
    I would keep lookin!

    EDIT:
    to the OP: why did I leave the plow in the field? THAT oldhomeplace?
    ...and don't forget to stretch!

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Paragon, In
    My Bikes
    Giant OCR Touring/Schwinn Moab3
    Posts
    218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No eyelets or braze ons that I can see. Chainstays look short too. I would keep looking.
    '94 Schwinn Moab 3
    '03 Giant OCR Touring
    '06 Surly LHT
    '01 Giant Yukon
    I choose the way to go, but the road won't set me free

  6. #6
    oldhomeplace
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by maximusvt
    I don't know but looking at the wheels, the spokes and yeah, the lack of braze-ons or anything, makes me think it is a racing type bike.
    I did some touring with a guy who bought a 'really sweet bike' off the internet, kind of on a whim. Problem was, it was a really sweet racing bike, the tires were so thin I was amazed that he didn't pop one of em on the tour. They had big chips and dents in them by the time we were done.
    Also, there were no braze-ons so he had to jerry-rig up his bike with a rack and panniers. Riding behind him watching that stuff sway in the breeze like a flag was a hoot!!
    I was on a cheap mtb that worked great and the slick tires on it held up way better. going offroad looking for campsites, he was definitely at a disadvantage.
    I would keep lookin!

    EDIT:
    to the OP: why did I leave the plow in the field? THAT oldhomeplace?
    The one and the same!
    Thanks for the info folks, I think the fab orange color blew me over initially, but you've brought me to my senses. Plus I just found a hot Peugeot PR10 which is what I really wanted. Thanks!

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    248
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Um...maybe me eyes work slightly differently, but:

    700c wheels, too slack angles and horizontal dropouts say no to mtb
    Seems to have braze-ons for mudguard/rack on rear dropouts
    Chainstays look longish to me, around 45cm perhaps, they just look shorter because of the slack seat tube.

    It looks very much like a 40's/50's type bike with those kind of angles, but have Fuji been around that long?(doubtful)

    It's all pretty bizarre, I'll tell you that much.

  8. #8
    Banned wagathon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,728
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would say yes based on the space between the tire and the seattube--indicating a long chainstay and wheelbase--but a mtb frame has that characteristic too. The seattube angle does seem pretty slack--less than 72 degrees, which would be less than ~70-80s era tour bikes. Seems like a pretty nice-looking fork for something as old as the 40-50s but not like a mtb fork either.
    Last edited by wagathon; 09-23-06 at 09:54 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •