Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-07-06, 11:25 PM   #1
Miles2go
Zen Master
Thread Starter
 
Miles2go's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On the water in Western Washington
Bikes: More than a few.
Posts: 859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
New low $ bike based on 26" wheels

While this bike isn't billed as a touring specific bike, in many ways it looks like something to consider for those looking for a realatively low dollar 26" wheeled tourer.

* * * Diamondback Transporter * * *





Here are my observations and input based on our touring experience...

On the good side:
Fenders/mudguards included.
Looks like a 48T big ring, nice.
Mid-fork rack mount, nice. Hard to find these days on inexpensive bikes.
Three bottle mounts, nice! Rare for a non-tour specific bike.
Priced between $400-$700

Not so good:
Chainstays listed at 43cm. Not a problem for some but depending on rear rack/panniers and shoe size, heal strike might be an issue. My wife's tourer has 43cm stays.

Small chain ring looks on the large size. Easy fix and cheaper to deal with than swapping out an entire crankset like you might need to do with other low $ tourers.

Sizes limited to 55cm, 56.5cm and 58cm VTT (Virtual Top Tube measurements). I've found with touring bikes that Nancy and I are less critical of the frame sizes. If I have a frame made for me it's almost always a 57-58cm VTT but my second-hand Thorn Nomad is smaller than that and I'm perfectly fine with it. Nancy took my 58cm commuter to use as her tourer until she could decide what she wanted to buy. She likes it so much that she won't let me have it back and it's 3-4cm larger than her ideal frame size.

Only 32 spokes per wheel rather than 36. We've been using 32 spoke mtb wheels for years, carrying very heavy loads and I've never needed to replace a spoke or even do any retruing. How they're built is more important. 26" wheels are stronger than 700c wheels are.

Single eyelets at the dropouts. Not a deal killer but it's more conveinent to have separate mount points for the racks and fenders.

So if you're limited to $700 or less, this might be something to consider but double check the chainstay length and be prepared to work around that issue if need be.

Anyone know of any other new entries in this price range that compare favorably to the Transporter?

Cheers
__________________
Ron - Washington
The Loaded Touring Bike - Photo Gallery
Since 2005 - Worldwide - No Ads - Just Inspiration

Last edited by Miles2go; 10-07-06 at 11:31 PM.
Miles2go is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-06, 12:46 PM   #2
rnagaoka
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Bikes: 1984 Raleigh Kodiak Touring, 1992 Scott MTB, 2004 Fuji Touring
Posts: 275
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It's great they put 3 water bottle mounts and lowrider brazeons! Whoever designed this must be a tourist. Also, the frame is chromoly. Kona makes the Smoke which looks like a similar ride to the Diamondback, but only 2 water bottles and no mid-fork brazeons. (For $400 you really can't complain.)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2K6_SMOKE_650.jpg (77.0 KB, 16 views)
rnagaoka is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:46 AM.