Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Senior Member mattyknacks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sheepshead Bay
    My Bikes
    2008 Trek 520
    Posts
    358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    I think I want a trek 520 when I lose some weight

    I have decided to buy myself a Trek 520 when I become light enough to ride one without killing it. Can someone offer suggestions as to what weight I should be for that bike. Also, can someone tell what approx size frame I would need? I have only ridden mountain bikes and and dont know what cm size I need. I am 6' tall with a 32 inch inseam clothes wise.

    Thanks,

    Matty in Brooklyn

  2. #2
    Senior Member late's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Southern Maine
    Posts
    8,290
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I doubt you would kill it, with the possible exception of the wheels. But since I upgrade the wheels of every bike I buy... I don't see that as a big deal.

    Surly is coming out with a complete LHT soon. You might find that a bit nicer, and a bit more rugged.

  3. #3
    Senior Member mattyknacks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sheepshead Bay
    My Bikes
    2008 Trek 520
    Posts
    358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Is Surly considered a better bike in the touring community? Being green, the Trek is the one I have heard the most about.

    Matty in Brooklyn

  4. #4
    Senior Member greenstork's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    584
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I own neither a trek 520 nor a Surly Long Haul Trucker. It's been my observation on this forum that the Surly seems to be held in higher regard. My LBS agrees that the Surly seems to be a step above the Trek. One big advantage of the Surly also, is the ability to buy the frameset and build up the bike with all of the components you want, rather than accepting everything Trek has spec'd on the bike.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Nigeyy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    817
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not that I'm an expert or anything and for full disclosure I do not own either bike, but I'd say a Trek 520 is just as good as a Surly LHT. Surly's are very good bikes but they are not anything special (honestly, not trying to inflame anybody, just my opinion I think they are good frames!). Notably I think Surly's done an excellent marketing job on them for a Taiwanese frame, and has been helped with little or no direct competitors in that pricepoint. Where Surly's come ahead -or behind depending on your point of view -is that they used to only be frame only, and people built them up (insert the word expensive here if you choose to purchase all your own components and pay a bike shop for a build) compared to the stock Trek 520 componentry which isn't always what you might want. A counter argument to this is that it's not hard to spend $200-$300 more to obtain an LHT with the specs you want compared to a Trek 520 price, and you can "upgrade" the Trek to quite a few components even with less than $200-$300.

    From the posts on the board, it looks like Surly is now going to market a built up LHT, so we should see if it loses any of its cachet with this. Which one would I buy? Probably an LHT -but that's purely because I have spare parts and do my own bike build, thus considerably helping build costs. If I was a relative new comer to cycling or didn't have parts or the ability to do my own build, I'd lean towards a Trek 520.

  6. #6
    Grumpy Old Bugga europa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Adelaide, AUSTRALIA
    My Bikes
    Europa, Hillbrick, Road Chief, Repco Superlite (Ol' Rusty)
    Posts
    3,227
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've got the 2007 Trek520 and she is an excellent bike. I'm 6' tall, goodness knows what my instep is but I'm riding the 23" frame. I also weight about 230lbs and haven't noticed it sagging under my weight.

    Wheels? Bontrager Mavericks - 36 spokes. Colletted nipples. DeoreLX hubs. You don't need to upgrade them.
    Nor do you need to upgrade anything else.
    The Surly LHT is not available as a built up bike either, you buy the frame and build it up yourself (or the shop does it then sells it), so the comparisons above can only relate to the frame. If Surly do bring out a full bike, they'll have to provide an Ultregra and DeoreLX components mix to match the Trek. The Trek has an excellent frame, lugged for front and rear carriers and has Trek's lifetime guarantee.

    I had the bar end shifters replaced with Ultregra Brifters and travel agents for the V-brake - the result is silky, fast shifting in all gears and the most powerful and easy to modulate brakes I've ever used.

    I use my Trek as an all-rounder, not just as a long distance, heavy weight tourer. She is light, she is fast, she handles dirt, mud and bitumen with aplomb. You can toss her around while playing boy racer and you can just sit back and cruise. A very capable and comfortable bike.

    Richard
    I had a good bike ... so I FIXED it

  7. #7
    Infamous Member chipcom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    My Bikes
    Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
    Posts
    24,373
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Both are good bikes - this spring the Surly IS available as a complete bike.
    http://www.surlybikes.com/lht_comp.html

    I think the Surly is better suited for loaded touring 'out-of-the'box'. It is geared better with 48-36-26 chainrings and an 11-34 cassette. The 520 has higher-end Shimano components, but I've yet to see that as a distinct advantage for touring.

    Unless you are like 500lbs, I don't think you need to lose weight to ride and enjoy either.
    Last edited by chipcom; 01-23-07 at 07:19 AM.
    "Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey

  8. #8
    Senior Member brianmcg123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    456
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by europa
    The Surly LHT is not available as a built up bike either, you buy the frame and build it up yourself (or the shop does it then sells it), so the comparisons above can only relate to the frame. If Surly do bring out a full bike, they'll have to provide an Ultregra and DeoreLX components mix to match the Trek. The Trek has an excellent frame, lugged for front and rear carriers and has Trek's lifetime guarantee.


    Richard

    LHT can come either as a Frame and Fork or built up.

    http://www.surlybikes.com/lht_comp.html

    I went the frame and fork route as I had some stuff from another bike and I wanted to buy stuff that wasn't specd on the built up one.
    Everyone's a roadie, they just might not know it yet.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    47
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I agree with the other posts. The wheels on the Trek are likely to be more than adequate. A 36 spoke wheel is plenty strong.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    47
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I agree with the other posts. The frame strength isn't an issue. A 36 spoke wheel is very strong. I know people who weigh much more than 200 pounds, riding a traditional steel road bike for years with no broken spokes or frame problems. I'd suggest getting the bike and using it to get out and exercise, exercise, exercise!

  11. #11
    George Krpan
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westlake Village, California
    Posts
    1,072
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The complete LHT will be $300 cheaper than the Trek 520.
    The components on the LHT are just fine. The components on the Trek are spendier but offer no advantage. The Treks 52/42/30 crank is actually a disadvantage.
    That'll incite the Trek nerds.

    Getting the bike will help you to lose weight.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    320
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Nigeyy
    Not that I'm an expert or anything and for full disclosure I do not own either bike, but I'd say a Trek 520 is just as good as a Surly LHT. Surly's are very good bikes but they are not anything special (honestly, not trying to inflame anybody, just my opinion I think they are good frames!). Notably I think Surly's done an excellent marketing job on them for a Taiwanese frame, and has been helped with little or no direct competitors in that pricepoint. Where Surly's come ahead -or behind depending on your point of view -is that they used to only be frame only, and people built them up (insert the word expensive here if you choose to purchase all your own components and pay a bike shop for a build) compared to the stock Trek 520 componentry which isn't always what you might want. A counter argument to this is that it's not hard to spend $200-$300 more to obtain an LHT with the specs you want compared to a Trek 520 price, and you can "upgrade" the Trek to quite a few components even with less than $200-$300.

    From the posts on the board, it looks like Surly is now going to market a built up LHT, so we should see if it loses any of its cachet with this. Which one would I buy? Probably an LHT -but that's purely because I have spare parts and do my own bike build, thus considerably helping build costs. If I was a relative new comer to cycling or didn't have parts or the ability to do my own build, I'd lean towards a Trek 520.
    I agree here. I just bought a surly frame (long haul trucker) because I had some parts to build it up. If I had been looking for a complete bike, I would have chosen the 520. They're both tanks and should last a long time.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •