Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    The Randonnee Shop
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    19
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Brooks B17 Standard or Narrow... what's the difference?

    I am going to buy a Brooks B17 for my touring bike, but I'm not sure what the difference is between the "standard" and "narrow" other than one is wider than the other. Does anyone have experience riding one or the other?

    In case it matters, my saddle is approximately level with my handlebar height.

    Thanks
    -Pete


    edit:
    * B-17 Narrow: Size: 152 X 280mm
    * B-17 Standard: Size: 170 X 280mm
    http://www.wallbike.com/brooks/standardsaddles.html
    Last edited by pschmitt; 02-06-07 at 10:49 PM.

  2. #2
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Fort Wayne, Indiana
    My Bikes
    84 Trek 660 Suntour Superbe; 87 Giant Rincon Shimano XT; 07 Mercian Vincitore Campy Veloce
    Posts
    4,766
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You need to measure the distance between your sit bones, those boney pertrusions on each side of your butt cheek. Then give that measurement to the person selling the Brooks and they should be able to tell you which saddle will fit you best.

  3. #3
    Crawlin' up, flyin' down bikingshearer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
    My Bikes
    1967 Paramount, 1982-ish Ron Cooper,1986 De Rosa Professional, 1978 Eisentraut "A," 1961 BianchiCompetizione, 1994 Trek 520, 199? Burley Bossa Nova
    Posts
    3,051
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by pschmitt
    I am going to buy a Brooks B17 for my touring bike, but I'm not sure what the difference is between the "standard" and "narrow" other than one is wider than the other. Does anyone have experience riding one or the other?

    In case it matters, my saddle is approximately level with my handlebar height.

    Thanks
    -Pete
    That is the entire difference. Check the Wallingford website to find out how much of a difference it is.
    "I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney

  4. #4
    jcm
    jcm is offline
    Gemutlichkeit
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,424
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Get a cardboard box. Cut off the four flaps. Stack them. Sit on them with your knees slightly higher than you hip joints. Stay there for about 20 minutes (watch the news, although I doubt anyone can actually get twenty minutes of news).

    When you get up, you'll have a perfect indentation of your ischial tuberosities, the sitbones. Measure center-to-center. If you can more or less place that dimension in a centered spot on the saddle, go for that saddle. If your sitbones get within, say, 3/4" of the edge radius, then it's a crap-shoot as to whether you will get a comfortable form out of it. My 17's are very much at the edge of that criteria as my ischials are a bit on the wide side. For me, a 67 is best for long rides.

    You don't want to be sitting on the steel horse-shoe frame that supports the rear of the saddle. Ya just can't form that...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •