Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-26-07, 09:01 PM   #1
Sinksand
Member
Thread Starter
 
Sinksand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Roseville, CA
Bikes: Trek 820
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Specialized Tricross for Touring?

I've had this bike recommended to me by several shops as an excellent bike for both commuting and touring. Does anyone have experience with the bike? Has anyone used it on a tour? Does it seems like it would make a good long distance bike based on specs?

http://specialized.com/bc/SBCBkModel.jsp?spid=22307
Sinksand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-07, 12:01 AM   #2
InTheRain
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Puget Sound
Bikes: 2007 Rocky Mountain Sherpa 30 (bionx), 2015 Cannondale Synapse Carbon Ultegra
Posts: 1,707
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
I rode the tricross.. it was also recommended to me. But the more I lean toward loaded touring I have to stay away from the tricross. Nice bike, yes... but for touring... I don't think so. I don't think you can put racks on the carbon fork. And if you can... I'm sure they would not recommend carrying much weight on the fork. That gearing is not made for "loaded" touring.

As far as a long distance bike.. yeah.. as long as someone else is carrying most of your gear. I'd ride it on a fully supported tour! It's much more specifically designed for cyclocross than it is for touring. I'd imagine commuting wouldn't be too bad if you just had to mount a rack and rear panniers, or maybe get away with a midsize saddlebag.

Nice lookin' bike.. but not a touring bike. If you want a touring bike, you won't have any problem commuting. And for the bottom of the line tricross price, you can get a pretty nice touring bike.
InTheRain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-07, 08:35 AM   #3
dannwilliams 
It's as easy as riding a
 
dannwilliams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: River Falls, WI
Bikes: '14 Salsa Colossal, '89 GT Timberline
Posts: 793
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
I was told the fork has a "lifetime guarantee" when I looked at it. Changing the rear cluster would not be a big deal to get better gearing. It picqued my curiosity! very nice looking bike!
__________________
"It doesn't get easier, you just go faster."
dannwilliams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-07, 09:02 AM   #4
teamcompi
Senior Member
 
teamcompi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston B.C.
Bikes:
Posts: 271
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I was thinking of one of these for a Rando bike, but even for that Iwould switch it out to a triple. Not a good choice for a touring bike due to the fork and gearing as mentioned.
teamcompi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-07, 12:37 AM   #5
Sinksand
Member
Thread Starter
 
Sinksand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Roseville, CA
Bikes: Trek 820
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The Tricross Sport does come standard with a triple. Maybe last year it didn't. Is the gearing suitable for touring?
Sinksand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-07, 12:53 AM   #6
ken cummings
Senior Member
 
ken cummings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: northern California
Bikes: Bruce Gordon BLT, Cannondale parts bike, Ecodyne recumbent trike, Counterpoint Opus 2, miyata 1000
Posts: 5,601
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Their middle of the range tricross bike costs more then a Bruce Gordon Basic Loader Tourer (BLT) purpose-built for fully loaded touring. All of the tricross top tubes look a bit odd, a marketing thing? I crawled through the Specialized site and could not find their tricross gearing. Please check out www.bgcycles.com
ken cummings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-07, 09:08 AM   #7
tajsss
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Bikes:
Posts: 293
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I do not have a Tricross yet but have looked at them a lot and plan on getting one eventually. The 07 low end model has a 50-39-30 with a 11/34 cassette. That is plenty low for touring. When I get one I will probably swp the the 30 for a 26 or something on the front for even lower gearing. I plan to use one for light touring and commuting. I don't see why it would be a problem. I'm going to give it a shot because I can't afford several bikes and I want something faster for when I'm not touring. I can put on some skinny tires and still go on group rides without much trouble.
tajsss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-07, 09:57 AM   #8
teamcompi
Senior Member
 
teamcompi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston B.C.
Bikes:
Posts: 271
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I was surprised what sinksand said about the triple on the tricross....in Canada this model did not exist last year, I think it would make a nice touring bike.

Last edited by teamcompi; 03-03-07 at 10:58 AM.
teamcompi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-07, 08:26 PM   #9
Sinksand
Member
Thread Starter
 
Sinksand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Roseville, CA
Bikes: Trek 820
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've been doing a little more comparing, and the Tricross actually has longer chainstays and a longer wheelbase than the Bianchi Volpe, which is constantly recommended as an excellent touring bike. The carbon fork is a concern, but only if it is loaded with a rack and panniers. For people looking to tour with about 20lbs of gear or less, it seems like a viable choice. Am I still missing something important that would make this bike a poor choice for touring?
Sinksand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-07, 02:00 AM   #10
teamcompi
Senior Member
 
teamcompi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston B.C.
Bikes:
Posts: 271
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I am not sure if this would be the bike I would choose to ride down the Continental divide or to the tip of SA but I think it would be fine if not a great bike to go cross country with an average amount of gear. They make the fork to take a low rider, you have to assume that it will take it. I think this may be a nice ride. The wheels on the lowest model seem fine as the bike goes up in cost the wheels loose spokes, the tricross sport should be fine for ratios and spoke count. I will be checking back to see what others have to say. What about the expert as a rando bike for me...any comment?
teamcompi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-07, 09:17 AM   #11
flipped4bikes
ROM 6:23
 
flipped4bikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Coastal Maine
Bikes: Specialized Tricross Comp, Lemond Tourmalet, Bridgestone MB-5
Posts: 1,713
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have the '06 Tricross Comp. I credit card toured with it in Nova Scotia. Nothing huge, but I had Arkel T-42 rear panniers and a Tail Rider on OMM Sherpa rack. It worked great! I have yet to put a front rack or panniers, but looking to give it a go this summer.

The bike is extremely stable, and out of the box, was more than able to shoulder the load. No camping gear, but the panniers were full of clothing and gear. It has compact gearing, and really didn't lament for lowering gearing on this trip. However, more hills, heavier load, I would probably want to go lower.

The reason I used a Sherpa rack instead of a Red Rock is because of the frame. I had a real problem mounting a Blackburn rack on the rear chainstay eyelets. One eyelet was misaligned and the rack doesn't center over the tire. I'm being anal, but I had to bend the rack to get it to fit, and it still was off center. So I went with the Sherpa with its axle mounting design. Voila, rack mount was centered and no bending required.

I thought the defect in my frame was just limited to mine, but I noticed in another BF member's pix that his Tricross had the same issue. He didn't particularly care, but I did.

I recommend the Tricross as a do-it-all bike: commuting, road riding, club rides, some off-road, and touring for a weekend to a week long. I wouldn't want to use it for a transcontinental, fully-loaded tour. BTW the '07 Comp comes with a triple, so it's better geared for heavy touring.
flipped4bikes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-07, 05:58 PM   #12
Niles H.
eternalvoyage
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 2,360
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
This bike (the Tricross Sport) caught my eye last week at a local bike shop. I've looked at it a few times now. Nice looking bike. Triple crank. Mounts for racks front and rear (no need for clamps on the carbon fork...). Something different from the usual cylindrical tubing look.

Haven't ridden it yet, but it's a very nice bike. Specialized would not make a weak frame, especially for a cross bike. I see nothing wrong with it for long tours. They didn't put the rack mounts on for nothing -- they're meant to be used, and to be used for racks and loads.

If you fall in love with it, why go with 'sensible shoes'? Makes for a dull life.
Niles H. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-07, 06:07 PM   #13
Niles H.
eternalvoyage
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 2,360
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I liked the long chainstays too.

Frankly, it looks like a great bike (cross, touring, commuting, all-round bike) from an excellent company.
Niles H. is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:05 PM.