Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Member Sinksand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Roseville, CA
    My Bikes
    Trek 820
    Posts
    25
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Specialized Tricross for Touring?

    I've had this bike recommended to me by several shops as an excellent bike for both commuting and touring. Does anyone have experience with the bike? Has anyone used it on a tour? Does it seems like it would make a good long distance bike based on specs?

    http://specialized.com/bc/SBCBkModel.jsp?spid=22307

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Puget Sound
    My Bikes
    2007 Rocky Mountain Sherpa 30
    Posts
    998
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I rode the tricross.. it was also recommended to me. But the more I lean toward loaded touring I have to stay away from the tricross. Nice bike, yes... but for touring... I don't think so. I don't think you can put racks on the carbon fork. And if you can... I'm sure they would not recommend carrying much weight on the fork. That gearing is not made for "loaded" touring.

    As far as a long distance bike.. yeah.. as long as someone else is carrying most of your gear. I'd ride it on a fully supported tour! It's much more specifically designed for cyclocross than it is for touring. I'd imagine commuting wouldn't be too bad if you just had to mount a rack and rear panniers, or maybe get away with a midsize saddlebag.

    Nice lookin' bike.. but not a touring bike. If you want a touring bike, you won't have any problem commuting. And for the bottom of the line tricross price, you can get a pretty nice touring bike.

  3. #3
    It's as easy as riding a dannwilliams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    River Falls, WI
    My Bikes
    '14 Salsa Colossal, '03 Iron Horse Intrepid, '06 Surly Long Haul Trucker, '89 GT Timberline
    Posts
    676
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was told the fork has a "lifetime guarantee" when I looked at it. Changing the rear cluster would not be a big deal to get better gearing. It picqued my curiosity! very nice looking bike!
    "It doesn't get easier, you just go faster."

  4. #4
    Senior Member teamcompi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Houston B.C.
    Posts
    271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was thinking of one of these for a Rando bike, but even for that Iwould switch it out to a triple. Not a good choice for a touring bike due to the fork and gearing as mentioned.

  5. #5
    Member Sinksand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Roseville, CA
    My Bikes
    Trek 820
    Posts
    25
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Tricross Sport does come standard with a triple. Maybe last year it didn't. Is the gearing suitable for touring?

  6. #6
    Senior Member ken cummings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    northern California
    My Bikes
    Bruce Gordon BLT, Cannondale parts bike, Ecodyne recumbent trike, Counterpoint Opus 2, miyata 1000
    Posts
    5,605
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Their middle of the range tricross bike costs more then a Bruce Gordon Basic Loader Tourer (BLT) purpose-built for fully loaded touring. All of the tricross top tubes look a bit odd, a marketing thing? I crawled through the Specialized site and could not find their tricross gearing. Please check out www.bgcycles.com
    This space open

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    293
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I do not have a Tricross yet but have looked at them a lot and plan on getting one eventually. The 07 low end model has a 50-39-30 with a 11/34 cassette. That is plenty low for touring. When I get one I will probably swp the the 30 for a 26 or something on the front for even lower gearing. I plan to use one for light touring and commuting. I don't see why it would be a problem. I'm going to give it a shot because I can't afford several bikes and I want something faster for when I'm not touring. I can put on some skinny tires and still go on group rides without much trouble.

  8. #8
    Senior Member teamcompi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Houston B.C.
    Posts
    271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was surprised what sinksand said about the triple on the tricross....in Canada this model did not exist last year, I think it would make a nice touring bike.
    Last edited by teamcompi; 03-03-07 at 09:58 AM.

  9. #9
    Member Sinksand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Roseville, CA
    My Bikes
    Trek 820
    Posts
    25
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've been doing a little more comparing, and the Tricross actually has longer chainstays and a longer wheelbase than the Bianchi Volpe, which is constantly recommended as an excellent touring bike. The carbon fork is a concern, but only if it is loaded with a rack and panniers. For people looking to tour with about 20lbs of gear or less, it seems like a viable choice. Am I still missing something important that would make this bike a poor choice for touring?

  10. #10
    Senior Member teamcompi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Houston B.C.
    Posts
    271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am not sure if this would be the bike I would choose to ride down the Continental divide or to the tip of SA but I think it would be fine if not a great bike to go cross country with an average amount of gear. They make the fork to take a low rider, you have to assume that it will take it. I think this may be a nice ride. The wheels on the lowest model seem fine as the bike goes up in cost the wheels loose spokes, the tricross sport should be fine for ratios and spoke count. I will be checking back to see what others have to say. What about the expert as a rando bike for me...any comment?

  11. #11
    ROM 6:23 flipped4bikes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Coastal Maine
    My Bikes
    Specialized Tricross Comp, Lemond Tourmalet, Bridgestone MB-5
    Posts
    1,713
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have the '06 Tricross Comp. I credit card toured with it in Nova Scotia. Nothing huge, but I had Arkel T-42 rear panniers and a Tail Rider on OMM Sherpa rack. It worked great! I have yet to put a front rack or panniers, but looking to give it a go this summer.

    The bike is extremely stable, and out of the box, was more than able to shoulder the load. No camping gear, but the panniers were full of clothing and gear. It has compact gearing, and really didn't lament for lowering gearing on this trip. However, more hills, heavier load, I would probably want to go lower.

    The reason I used a Sherpa rack instead of a Red Rock is because of the frame. I had a real problem mounting a Blackburn rack on the rear chainstay eyelets. One eyelet was misaligned and the rack doesn't center over the tire. I'm being anal, but I had to bend the rack to get it to fit, and it still was off center. So I went with the Sherpa with its axle mounting design. Voila, rack mount was centered and no bending required.

    I thought the defect in my frame was just limited to mine, but I noticed in another BF member's pix that his Tricross had the same issue. He didn't particularly care, but I did.

    I recommend the Tricross as a do-it-all bike: commuting, road riding, club rides, some off-road, and touring for a weekend to a week long. I wouldn't want to use it for a transcontinental, fully-loaded tour. BTW the '07 Comp comes with a triple, so it's better geared for heavy touring.
    Every time we let a vehicle pass there is a little bit of compromise. But compromise allows the city to function and allows cyclists to function in the city. The trick is not to eliminate compromise but to learn how to work safely within it.

    --Robert Hurst

  12. #12
    eternalvoyage
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,422
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This bike (the Tricross Sport) caught my eye last week at a local bike shop. I've looked at it a few times now. Nice looking bike. Triple crank. Mounts for racks front and rear (no need for clamps on the carbon fork...). Something different from the usual cylindrical tubing look.

    Haven't ridden it yet, but it's a very nice bike. Specialized would not make a weak frame, especially for a cross bike. I see nothing wrong with it for long tours. They didn't put the rack mounts on for nothing -- they're meant to be used, and to be used for racks and loads.

    If you fall in love with it, why go with 'sensible shoes'? Makes for a dull life.

  13. #13
    eternalvoyage
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,422
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I liked the long chainstays too.

    Frankly, it looks like a great bike (cross, touring, commuting, all-round bike) from an excellent company.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •