Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    I'm Carbon Curious 531phile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Earthquake Central
    My Bikes
    Enough
    Posts
    2,196
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    LHT sizing question.

    On the surly website there's two measurements for the top tube:

    Actual (center to center) and effective.

    What is Effective Top tube measurement? which measurement is more important?

    I thought effective top tube measurement was the length from the center of the seat to the center of the handlebars where your hands would normally rest.

    Quote Originally Posted by avner View Post
    I loled. Twice. Then I cried. Then I rubbed one out and cried again, but thanks for sharing.

  2. #2
    I'm Carbon Curious 531phile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Earthquake Central
    My Bikes
    Enough
    Posts
    2,196
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't know if I should get a 42cm or 46cm frame. I'm 5'4 with 27.5inseam and larger torso. I feel comfortable on my lemond buenos aires. 49cm (c-c) 51cm (c-c).

    The LHT has sloping topt tube right? Is effective top tube the (virtual) measurement if the bike WOULD have a flat horizontal top tube? If this is the case, then I'm a monkey in the middle since the 42cm has an effective top tube of 50.5 and the 46cm is 51.5. I personally like 51cm? What do I do?

    thanks

    Quote Originally Posted by avner View Post
    I loled. Twice. Then I cried. Then I rubbed one out and cried again, but thanks for sharing.

  3. #3
    Banned. Bekologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    A land that time forgot
    My Bikes
    the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
    Posts
    18,012
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    its got a slightly sloping top tube, so the effective is the one you want to consider versus the actual length of the toptube.

  4. #4
    Slow Rider bwgride's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    797
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 531phile
    I don't know if I should get a 42cm or 46cm frame. I'm 5'4 with 27.5inseam and larger torso. I feel comfortable on my lemond buenos aires. 49cm (c-c) 51cm (c-c).

    The LHT has sloping topt tube right? Is effective top tube the (virtual) measurement if the bike WOULD have a flat horizontal top tube? If this is the case, then I'm a monkey in the middle since the 42cm has an effective top tube of 50.5 and the 46cm is 51.5. I personally like 51cm? What do I do?

    thanks
    I have a 52cm LHT and there is little to no slope on the top tube. However, with smaller frames there does appear to be slope to the top tube as evidenced by these pictures of a 42cm frame:

    http://surlyville.net/owners-17.html

    The top tube length can be adjusted more easily than stand over height with differing length stems. Given this, I would focus first on stand over height. If your inseam is 27.5, then you should have an inch or two extra measured from crotch to floor, say 29 inches.

    Maybe the 46cm frame would be the better fit.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    can i semi-hijack this thread? I'm also thinking about getting a LHT and i'm 6 feet tall with 34.5 inches to my pubic bone. i was entertaining the thought of getting the 60cm bike, but am wondering if it might be too big for me. any thoughts? I've been to a few local bike stores and none have a 60 cm frame lying around for me to check out.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    My Bikes
    2008 Turner Spot, Berg Ti Cross, 2011 Karate Monkey
    Posts
    150
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jimfinity
    can i semi-hijack this thread? I'm also thinking about getting a LHT and i'm 6 feet tall with 34.5 inches to my pubic bone. i was entertaining the thought of getting the 60cm bike, but am wondering if it might be too big for me. any thoughts? I've been to a few local bike stores and none have a 60 cm frame lying around for me to check out.
    My feeling is that this 60 cm would be too long. I'm 6'1", and recently had a professional road bike fitting. The fitter put me onto bike with a 57.5 cm effective top tube and a 56 cm seat tube (C-T). Keep in mind, I get a lot of my height from the shoulders and up (ie longer neck). The fitter recognized my proportions and fit accordingly. The result is a very comfy ride. In the LHT, the effective top tube on the 58cm size is 58.7cm - that's 12mm longer than my current ride. For a tourer, not sure I'd like to be stretched out more ! The 60 cm would be massively long for me, and I'm an 1" taller than you. Keep remembering the end goal - you want even weight distribution on your butt and arms (too short - butt issues, too long: upper body/neck issues). If you merely adjust stem length, you'll start to affect the bike's handling (stem too short - unresponsive; stem too long - more twitchy). Remember, the LHT is a tourer - you're going to want to look around on those long rides in the country, so don't stretch yourself so much that all you can do is stare at asphault w/o getting stiff neck.

    BOTTOM LINE: I HIGHLY recommend you try a 58cm LHT before buying the 60.... you really need to make sure, and again appologive for feeding the threadjack (hopefully this is helpful to others too).

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    1,294
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Professional road bike fitting is just that....professional road bike fitting. Works great for riding in the peleton....but the LHT is a touring bike, a different animal altogether.

    Most bike shops know MTBs and road bikes, but little about touring bikes.

    It's quite possible to ride a different size frame touring than club riding. Or not.

    Buying a frame without a test ride? I wouldn't do it.

  8. #8
    Slow Rider bwgride's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    797
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jimfinity
    can i semi-hijack this thread? I'm also thinking about getting a LHT and i'm 6 feet tall with 34.5 inches to my pubic bone. i was entertaining the thought of getting the 60cm bike, but am wondering if it might be too big for me. any thoughts? I've been to a few local bike stores and none have a 60 cm frame lying around for me to check out.
    My measurement is 31.5 to the bone while wearing my bike shoes. I have the 52cm LHT and Surly advertises a stand-over height of 30.5 with the tire they used. I use a continental top touring and with that tire my bike's stand-over height is 30.25. Overall this frame seems to be a good fit for me.

    Does the 34.5 represent your measurement with or without bike shoes? The 62cm frame has an advertised stand-over of 34.1 -- that's cutting it close for you (unless your shoes give you another inch). Given that close fit, I'd probably go 60cm frame with stand-over of 33.5.

    TruckerMike recommends the 58cm so you are not stretched out on the bike. I like an upright riding position, so I ride mountain bikes with short-reach stems and high-rise bars. Before I bought the LHT, my most comfortable frame had an effective top tube length 2 inches longer than the LHT. It seems the LHT frame, as a tourer, already has a top tube that is shorter than many by comparison to help with the more upright positioning. The difference in effective top tube between 58cm and 60cm frame is .5 inch. The difference between then in stand-over height is .7 inch. Seems not much difference between the two frames.

    I think TruckerMike and I agree the 62cm frame may be too large, but personally I would opt for the 60cm frame.

    For more comparisons and fit suggestions, a good place to post this question is the Surly LHT group:

    http://groups.google.com/group/SurlyLHT/topics?hl=en

    I'm sure there are folks in the group with size 58, 60, and 62 who could give you measurements and thoughts.

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i'm not interested in the 62cm, i think that would be way too huge. I'm just debating between the 58 and the 60. The height i gave (34.5 inches) to my pubic bone is without shoes, if that helps at all.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    My Bikes
    2008 Turner Spot, Berg Ti Cross, 2011 Karate Monkey
    Posts
    150
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tacomee
    Professional road bike fitting is just that....professional road bike fitting. Works great for riding in the peleton....but the LHT is a touring bike, a different animal altogether.

    Most bike shops know MTBs and road bikes, but little about touring bikes.

    It's quite possible to ride a different size frame touring than club riding. Or not.

    Buying a frame without a test ride? I wouldn't do it.
    In this case, i was buying a rando bike, not a road/peleton bike and the fitter knew this and had done lots of this type. He even said he'd fit me differently on a pure road bike.

    The poster has given us inseam, but the torso and arm length are also really important to determining the best size. The idea with LHT's is long rides, and I think the fit is more important that ever. So again, try the 58cm before you buy. A half inch in the right place actually can make a huge difference to the bike's handling or your comfort, so don't try to force it to work/fit.

    A cheap bike that doesn't fit isn't a good deal........

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    5,117
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    jimfinity =, I'm 6'1", and I take the 58. I'm 33 in stand over, so on that basis you could probably go the extra size, but it probably isn't going to feel generous in standover, not what you would buy for falling off the bike on trails. However, I would expect you to be shorter in the torso. Do your wingtip measurement, and if you find yourself much shorter than 72 inches, then I think you are probably going to find the 60 long for TT length

    Try these guys and the French Fit calculator:

    http://www.competitivecyclist.com/za...LCULATOR_INTRO

    That may not be perfect, but it should get you on the right frame, or at least give you food for thought. I use program for frame fit, and then do all the additional fitting by feel.

  12. #12
    Senior Member halfspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    SE Minnesota
    My Bikes
    are better than yours.
    Posts
    9,664
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jimfinity
    i'm not interested in the 62cm, i think that would be way too huge. I'm just debating between the 58 and the 60. The height i gave (34.5 inches) to my pubic bone is without shoes, if that helps at all.
    I'm about your height and a cm higher in the inseam and to be honest, I would think long and hard before buying any LHT. They're just too long for the fit I like. I think I'd have to drop down to a 58 and use a big stack of spacers on the steerer.

  13. #13
    Senior Member eibeinaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Tokyo, Japan
    My Bikes
    Surly LHT
    Posts
    152
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jimfinity
    can i semi-hijack this thread? I'm also thinking about getting a LHT and i'm 6 feet tall with 34.5 inches to my pubic bone. i was entertaining the thought of getting the 60cm bike, but am wondering if it might be too big for me. any thoughts? I've been to a few local bike stores and none have a 60 cm frame lying around for me to check out.
    You have exactly the same dimensions as me,and the 58cm fits absolutely perfectly. I like a bigger fit too, but 60cm would have been too big. 72" wingtip measurement. I use a 110mm stem.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Durham,NC.
    My Bikes
    Heron Wayfarer/ 2004 Giant Cypress SX
    Posts
    305
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not a chance! I'm 6 feet tall and have a 33" inseam and my 58 LHT is too small. I'm going for a 60.

    Richard

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    My Bikes
    2008 Turner Spot, Berg Ti Cross, 2011 Karate Monkey
    Posts
    150
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jens5
    Not a chance! I'm 6 feet tall and have a 33" inseam and my 58 LHT is too small. I'm going for a 60.

    Richard
    Richard - can you elaborate? Are you using drop bars or flat bar ? Do you use a short stem? Why does the 58 feel small" - knee too close to handlebar? Toe strike? Too many headset spacers or lots of post showing ?

    I mean, with a 586mm effective top tube, and a 33" inseam/6' tall, you should have a long enough LHT cockpit with the 58 frame, drop bars and an appropriate stem.

    For contrast, I'm 6'1", with a 34.25" inseam (to pubic bone), 71" wingspan, and have a sport touring frame (575mm effective top tube), that fits great. So I've got 11mm less top tube length, yet have longer legs that you, and don't have any issues with frame being too small. I'm not even doing full-on touring, but just long distance cycling. For touring I'd want to be more upright, and less stretched out so I could look around more easily. My point is that the 60" LHT would stretch me out a lot and for long days in the saddle and touring, I'm not sure that's what most would be after.
    Last edited by TruckerMike; 03-24-07 at 01:49 PM.

  16. #16
    momsaysrideabike
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    46
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i'm also hijacking this thread....

    i have a similar problem,
    i just tried out the randonee and i like the sizing, but i want to get a LHT,
    im trying to choose between a 54, 56 or 58 for the LHT. my randonee is a 55

    here are the numbers

    Item, RANDONEE, [LHT 54, LHT 56, LHT 58] all in cm

    Seat Tube CT 58.5 [ 54 56 58]
    Top Tube CC 55.4 [55 56.4 58]
    Stand Over 83.8 [79.3 81.2 83.0]
    Wheel Base 103 [106,3 105,5 106.6]
    Head Tube Angle 72 [ 71 72 72]
    Seat Tube 73 [ 73 73 72.5]

  17. #17
    I'm Carbon Curious 531phile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Earthquake Central
    My Bikes
    Enough
    Posts
    2,196
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've been quizzically raped.

    Quote Originally Posted by avner View Post
    I loled. Twice. Then I cried. Then I rubbed one out and cried again, but thanks for sharing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •