A good saddle for wide hips (already tried the B-17)
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 170
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A good saddle for wide hips (already tried the B-17)
Hey all, I have the B-17 and don't really like it. I'm not fat at all but I do have wide hips. Is there a Brooks out there that is especially good for this physique?
Thanks
p.s. I've readjusted my b-17 countless times and it's still not as comfy as I think a saddle can/should be.
Thanks
p.s. I've readjusted my b-17 countless times and it's still not as comfy as I think a saddle can/should be.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,697
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
The B33, and the B73 are the widest of the Brooks saddles. I have a B33 on my work bike, and can say it is also the most comfortable of the Brooks line I've ridden (B66, B67, B17 are the ones I have to compare).
In comparison to the B-17 the 33 and the 73 will be heavy, they are well sprung to say the least. If you are an upright rider, either would be worth looking over.
The B33
It has a different nose spring than the B73 and the triple, thread, rear, springs actually have more flex than the single springs of the B73
The B73
In comparison to the B-17 the 33 and the 73 will be heavy, they are well sprung to say the least. If you are an upright rider, either would be worth looking over.
The B33
It has a different nose spring than the B73 and the triple, thread, rear, springs actually have more flex than the single springs of the B73
The B73
Last edited by Allen; 04-15-07 at 11:30 PM.
#3
Membership Not Required
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855
Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
14 Posts
gqsmoothie,
What type of bike and riding style? On most of my upright bikes it is the B66/67 on my fixie I plan on using the Champion Flyer (sprung version of the B17) On my current "tour" bike I have a Wright which is similar to the B17 but very well broken in (almost to the point of needing replacement) When the time comes it will probably get the Champion Flyer too. I had one bike with a B72 on it, but didn't ride it enough to form an opinion. Perhaps the Conquest might be a better choice for you? I would get one from Wallbike and give it a try.
Aaron
What type of bike and riding style? On most of my upright bikes it is the B66/67 on my fixie I plan on using the Champion Flyer (sprung version of the B17) On my current "tour" bike I have a Wright which is similar to the B17 but very well broken in (almost to the point of needing replacement) When the time comes it will probably get the Champion Flyer too. I had one bike with a B72 on it, but didn't ride it enough to form an opinion. Perhaps the Conquest might be a better choice for you? I would get one from Wallbike and give it a try.
Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
#4
Patria O Muerte!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Jerusalem,Israel
Posts: 315
Bikes: Pinarello road bike, Marin Kentfield city bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gqsmoothie
Hey all, I have the B-17 and don't really like it. I'm not fat at all but I do have wide hips. Is there a Brooks out there that is especially good for this physique?
Thanks
p.s. I've readjusted my b-17 countless times and it's still not as comfy as I think a saddle can/should be.
Thanks
p.s. I've readjusted my b-17 countless times and it's still not as comfy as I think a saddle can/should be.
How about the women's models? Brooks make most of their saddles in a women's version, which is wider than its male counterpart.
#5
Gemutlichkeit
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,423
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
It's not your hip width, it's your ischial width - those pointy sitbones down under. Get a B67 or the new unsprung B68 if you're afraid of a few ounces. Most humans seem to have an area about as big around as a quarter or a fifty-cent piece that surrounds the ischials as padding. The most comfortable fit will have those pads inside the steel frame that runs around the rear of the saddle. You can't form steel, just the leather.
This is a B67:
This is a B67:
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 170
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The B33 looks like it might work for me. It is 235mm wide rather than 170mm for the B17. Does having the springs require much or any maintenance or adjusting? Also, will the b33 attach to the seatpost the same way as the B17 does?
Thanks
Thanks
#7
Gemutlichkeit
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,423
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by gqsmoothie
The B33 looks like it might work for me. It is 235mm wide rather than 170mm for the B17. Does having the springs require much or any maintenance or adjusting? Also, will the b33 attach to the seatpost the same way as the B17 does?
Thanks
Thanks
Better to try a B67 at 210mm wide. That's over 1-1/2" wider than a 17. Being a 1-rail type, it will mount to any modern 'micro-adjust' seat post clamp without the need for any adapter, just like a 17. If your bike was purchased in the last fifteen years from a bike shop, it will likely be ready to go. If it's a Wal-Mart type, well, you might have the tapered post. You can use this saddle for an upright posture or a somewhat forward leaning one as well. I very much doubt that you are so far out of the physical norm for human anatomy that you can't be very happy with it.
Order it from Wallbike.com for a 6-month return policy. Good people there.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 372
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just this morning I emailed wallbike about my B17 problems. My sit bones are wide enough that I contact the arc of rivets on both sides. It only happened once the saddle started to really break in. New, the saddle was great. I am considering the new B68, which is an unsprung 210 mm saddle.
I attached a photo of my saddle, showing where my indents are. FYI, I am 6'7" with a medium build and a 35-36" waist.
I attached a photo of my saddle, showing where my indents are. FYI, I am 6'7" with a medium build and a 35-36" waist.
Last edited by ronsmithjunior; 04-18-07 at 10:50 AM.
#9
Gemutlichkeit
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,423
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by ronsmithjunior
Just this morning I emailed wallbike about my B17 problems. My sit bones are wide enough that I contact the arc of rivets on both sides. It only happened once the saddle started to really break in. New, the saddle was great. I am considering the new B68, which is an unsprung 210 mm saddle.
I attached a photo of my saddle, showing where my indents are. FYI, I am 6'7" with a medium build and a 35-36" waist.
I attached a photo of my saddle, showing where my indents are. FYI, I am 6'7" with a medium build and a 35-36" waist.
EDIT: Be aware that it's not just your ischials that need to fit inside the frame rail. Each bone has a fleshy padded area the size of a quarter, or larger, that surrounds it. All that has to be inside the frame or you'll be trying to break-in steel.
#10
Senior Member
Originally Posted by ronsmithjunior
Just this morning I emailed wallbike about my B17 problems. My sit bones are wide enough that I contact the arc of rivets on both sides. It only happened once the saddle started to really break in. New, the saddle was great. I am considering the new B68, which is an unsprung 210 mm saddle.
I attached a photo of my saddle, showing where my indents are. FYI, I am 6'7" with a medium build and a 35-36" waist.
I attached a photo of my saddle, showing where my indents are. FYI, I am 6'7" with a medium build and a 35-36" waist.
I had the same problem and they told me I was sitting on the saddle wrong. No I did not get a new one.
__________________
George
George
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 372
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by George
I had the same problem and they told me I was sitting on the saddle wrong. No I did not get a new one.
Going in a different direction, on my other road bike I have a Specialized Dolce, which is a woman's mountain bike saddle. It is wide, has a cut out, and is very comfortable for rides around the neighborhood. I haven't tested it on longer rides, but I'd say it does have potential.
#12
Senior Member
i've had a B-68 since christmas, my pelvis is pretty wide.
at first i didn't think it was that much of an improvement over a B-17,
i swapped it between my winter bike (cross check) and mud bike (Trek 6500),
riding the winter bike about 3/4 of my 500 km winter distance. the b-68
was on the mud bike the most, recently moved it back to the now summerized
cross check- fiddled with the saddle height, tilt and fore/aft seat adjustment- got it
in a good spot, the seat is comfortable, think i like the B-68 better than B-17.
Perhaps the B-68 just needed a little breaking in.
at first i didn't think it was that much of an improvement over a B-17,
i swapped it between my winter bike (cross check) and mud bike (Trek 6500),
riding the winter bike about 3/4 of my 500 km winter distance. the b-68
was on the mud bike the most, recently moved it back to the now summerized
cross check- fiddled with the saddle height, tilt and fore/aft seat adjustment- got it
in a good spot, the seat is comfortable, think i like the B-68 better than B-17.
Perhaps the B-68 just needed a little breaking in.
#13
Gemutlichkeit
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,423
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by martianone
i've had a B-68 since christmas, my pelvis is pretty wide.
at first i didn't think it was that much of an improvement over a B-17,
i swapped it between my winter bike (cross check) and mud bike (Trek 6500),
riding the winter bike about 3/4 of my 500 km winter distance. the b-68
was on the mud bike the most, recently moved it back to the now summerized
cross check- fiddled with the saddle height, tilt and fore/aft seat adjustment- got it
in a good spot, the seat is comfortable, think i like the B-68 better than B-17.
Perhaps the B-68 just needed a little breaking in.
at first i didn't think it was that much of an improvement over a B-17,
i swapped it between my winter bike (cross check) and mud bike (Trek 6500),
riding the winter bike about 3/4 of my 500 km winter distance. the b-68
was on the mud bike the most, recently moved it back to the now summerized
cross check- fiddled with the saddle height, tilt and fore/aft seat adjustment- got it
in a good spot, the seat is comfortable, think i like the B-68 better than B-17.
Perhaps the B-68 just needed a little breaking in.