Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    69
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Older Trek touring models 510, 710 & 910

    Any comments about the performance and long term viability of these early vintage Trek touring bikes in comparison to their later 520, 620 & 720 offerings and today's 520?

  2. #2
    Bicycle Repair Man !!! Sixty Fiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    YEG
    My Bikes
    See my sig...
    Posts
    25,972
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Those early Treks have some of the nicest frames you will ever see... my '82 750 is a simply gorgeous bike.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    1,294
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Oh, no watch out for the Old Trek Cult!! Don't get suckered into spending $2,000 for a 30 year old, 30 pound bike.

    I'm just joking of course-- there's nothing wrong with older Treks, riding them, or spending obsene amounts on them. They are good bikes, part of American culture and part of lost youth for some of us. I love old Treks.

    But honestly, a shiny new 520 is better bike, often cheaper in the long run. But if you want to go vintage, don't let that stop you. Have fun. Old bikes are full of joy.

  4. #4
    Bicycle Repair Man !!! Sixty Fiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    YEG
    My Bikes
    See my sig...
    Posts
    25,972
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    The 520 is just as nice as those vintage lugged steel Treks which says a lot as to how nice a bike it is.

    And who is paying $2000.00 for vintage Treks these days ?

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    1,294
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm a fan of lugged steel, but there's noth wrong with welded steel. The current Trek 520 is a really nice bike for the money. The frame isn't as pretty, but it's a lot stiffer than the older ones.

    And $2000 isn't much for a classic bike rebuild-- it can be done cheaper of course, these projects always cost a lot more than you think (ask my wife)

    Depending on the model, if I was holding an old Trek touring frame, I'd hold out of $400.... so I could buy a new Surly frame. I've had a lot of heart break with old frames-- it can be a kind of crap shoot.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    69
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So there seems to be some preference for the pre-1984 Treks, why is that? Was the 750 a touring bike?

  7. #7
    Senior Member Bolo Grubb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    1,749
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I like my old trek (a 1984 Trek 720). I paid $300 for mine when I bought it from the original owner a few years ago. All Ihad to do was air up the tires.

    Then just because I could I upgraded it into my current commuter with an internal hub. Still thinking about taking it on a tour with the internal hub set up, but I would change out the rear baskets for panniers.

    Vintage Trek: Conversion to Nexus 8 (Pics!)

  8. #8
    Senior Member foamy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    The Land of Pleasant Living
    My Bikes
    Trek 630 Jamis Quest Bilenky Tourlite and various others
    Posts
    768
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That's a nice conversion and a nice looking bike, but then, I've always been partial to Treks, new or old.
    None.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •