Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    17
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Which would you choose?

    I would like to make one of my mountain bikes into a dedicated touring bike. I have two to choose from: An all original 1992 Trek Antelope 850 and an all original (except tires) 1984 Specialized Rockhopper. I just got the Trek for free. The Rockhopper I've had since 1986. Both bikes are in great shape. I don't know if the Rockhopper has any value other than it has been mine for a long time and is still a kick to ride. It does have great touring dimensions/geometry. The Trek is real nice too, it does not have the same long geometry as the Rockhopper. The Rockhopper has a wheel base of 44 inches with 18 chainstays. The Trek has a 42 inch wheel base with 17 inch chainstays. The Rockhopper has friction shifting on fifteen and the Trek is index shifting on 21. The Rockhopper has solid bolt on 36 spoke hubs and bull moose handle bars. The Trek has quick release on 32 spoke hubs. Obviously I am not as attached to the Trek and so it would be easier to make changes to it. The Rockhopper has always been a great bike and fun to ride.

    Can you help me make a decision? Which would you choose to make into a touring bike?
    Last edited by JBMCsr1; 02-09-08 at 03:03 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member wahoonc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    On the road-USA
    My Bikes
    Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
    Posts
    15,866
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JBMCsr1 View Post
    I would like to make one of my mountain bikes into a dedicated touring bike. I have two to choose from: An all original 1992 Trek Antelope 850 and an all original (except tires) 1984 Specialized Rockhopper. I just got the Trek for free. The Rockhopper I've had since 1986. Both bikes are in great shape. I don't know if the Rockhopper has any value other than it has been mine for a long time and is still a kick to ride. It does have great touring dimensions/geometry. The Trek is real nice too, it does not have the same long geometry as the Rockhopper. The Rockhopper has a wheel base of 44 inches with 18 chainstays. The Trek has a 42 inch wheel base with 17 inch chainstays. The Rockhopper has friction shifting on fifteen and the Trek is index shifting on 21. The Rockhopper has solid bolt on 36 spoke hubs and bull moose handle bars. The Trek has quick release on 32 spoke hubs. Obviously I am not as attached to the Trek and so it would be easier to make changes to it. The Rockhopper has always been a great bike and fun to ride.

    Can you help me make a decision? Which would you choose to make into touring bike?
    I would use the Rockhopper based on the geometry. I would consider a wheel upgrade to QR wheels, or possibly swap the drive train from the Trek to the RH. I think you will most likely find that the short stays on the Trek may cause a heel strike problem when you get panniers mounted.

    Aaron
    Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

    ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

    "Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
    RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
    _Nicodemus

    "Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
    Aluminum: barely a hundred
    Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
    _krazygluon

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •