Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 21 of 21
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    370
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Did I just screw up ?

    I finally pulled the trigger on a used touring bike this morning. It's a 1992 Bridgestone XO-2 hybrid that is supposedly the precursor of the Rivendell Atlantis, only to find out it has shorter than ideal chainstays,425. I was so excited to find a bike like that comes with 26" wheels in my size,in great shape, that I forgot to check the frame geo.
    With size 12 1/2 shoes, I guess that's going to knock out rear panniers...
    Anyway to work around this, or am I locked into using a trailer ?

  2. #2
    This user is a pipebomb brotherdan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    My Bikes
    Bianchi Volpe 2001, GT ZR3000 2001, Raleigh One Way 2007
    Posts
    401
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just get a longer rear rack. I use the Jandd expedition rack on my Bianchi Volpe, which has the same geometry on the chainstain, if I remember correctly. And I also wear size 12-13 shoes. I think Tubus and a few other rack builders also have longer rear racks that can help you to tour with bikes with shorter chainstays.
    Bikes belong in the motor city

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    6,993
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah, Tubus Logo has a far-back mounting position, and there is some hardware available at thetouringstore.com that extends the rack mount points farther back. I would start with a tubus logo or a jannd expedition 2 rack, get the panniers, and experiment from there. Also, look for panniers with moveable hooks (Arkel is one) so you can tweak the bag's position even more.

    I didn't know bridgestone & riv. were related, that's kind of interesting.

    ...

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    370
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by brotherdan View Post
    Just get a longer rear rack. I use the Jandd expedition rack on my Bianchi Volpe, which has the same geometry on the chainstain, if I remember correctly. And I also wear size 12-13 shoes. I think Tubus and a few other rack builders also have longer rear racks that can help you to tour with bikes with shorter chainstays.
    So how does that affect the handling. The bottom bracket height might be a tad higher than ideal too.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    370
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by valygrl View Post
    Yeah, Tubus Logo has a far-back mounting position, and there is some hardware available at thetouringstore.com that extends the rack mount points farther back. I would start with a tubus logo or a jannd expedition 2 rack, get the panniers, and experiment from there. Also, look for panniers with moveable hooks (Arkel is one) so you can tweak the bag's position even more.

    I didn't know bridgestone & riv. were related, that's kind of interesting.

    Thanks.
    Yea, Grant Peterson was the head guy in the US for Bridgestone pre-Rivendell.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Frisco, CO
    My Bikes
    '93 Bridgestone MB-3, '88 Marinoni road bike, '00 Marinoni Piuma, '01 Riv A/R
    Posts
    1,058
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Part of it depends on the shoes, good cycling shoes are cut very close to the heel to minimize chainstay interference. Sandals (even SPD ones) might not be an option, and flat pedals and sneakers are even less likely to be an option.

    Ortlieb panniers have movable mounting points so you can shift the panniers front and back.

    Smaller panniers or careful packing so that the panniers aren't bulging where your heels pass through might help. Shifting some of the load to a seat bag or rack top bag might help you use smaller panniers.

  7. #7
    Senior Member reiffert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    134
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    And the interference might be exacerbated by larger bags, so just buy smaller ones. That would help lessen the weight dist. from moving a big bag back further.

  8. #8
    Slow Rider bwgride's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    797
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 1-track-mind View Post
    So how does that affect the handling. The bottom bracket height might be a tad higher than ideal too.
    I used the Tubus Logo because one of my touring bikes had a short chainstay. I wear size 12 shoes and found my large panniers sat far enough rear that I did not strike them. I've not noticed any problems with handling after several years of use.

  9. #9
    This user is a pipebomb brotherdan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    My Bikes
    Bianchi Volpe 2001, GT ZR3000 2001, Raleigh One Way 2007
    Posts
    401
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm quite happy with the handling, but the Volpe is the only touring bike that I've ever owned. So I don't have much perspective. I know conventional wisdom says that this setup is less than ideal. But it clearly works.
    Bikes belong in the motor city

  10. #10
    ...into the blue...
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    My Bikes
    Thorn Nomad 2, LHT, Jamis Quest, ....
    Posts
    436
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 1-track-mind View Post
    So how does that affect the handling. The bottom bracket height might be a tad higher than ideal too.
    The Tubus logo does let you put the panniers a bit lower than most racks, which might help the handling a bit.

  11. #11
    Senior Member staehpj1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Parkville, Md
    Posts
    7,255
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 1-track-mind View Post
    I finally pulled the trigger on a used touring bike this morning. It's a 1992 Bridgestone XO-2 hybrid that is supposedly the precursor of the Rivendell Atlantis, only to find out it has shorter than ideal chainstays,425. I was so excited to find a bike like that comes with 26" wheels in my size,in great shape, that I forgot to check the frame geo.
    With size 12 1/2 shoes, I guess that's going to knock out rear panniers...
    Anyway to work around this, or am I locked into using a trailer ?
    I wouldn't assume that it will be a problem, 425 isn't all that short.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    370
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks. Hopefully it will work out. I'll definitely go with the Tubus Logo.
    If not, well I already have a bob with suspension.
    The interesting thing about this bike is that you can run 26" or 700 wheels.
    It's coming with 26x1.5 tires. I think this will be a good bike for me cuz i have a hard time staying on paved roads.
    I know I'll have to switch the crankset and maybe the rear cassette.
    It's coming with shimanoCX:50x40x30 and has 130 in the rear with a 7 speed 13-28.
    Any suggestions ?

  13. #13
    Senior Member late's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Southern Maine
    Posts
    8,235
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have an XO2 in the garage. It has long chainstays. I doubt you will have any problems hitting the panniers. But if you do, as others have pointed out, there are racks that can accomodate you.
    We are as gods, we might as well get good at it.
    Stewart Brand

  14. #14
    Senior Member late's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Southern Maine
    Posts
    8,235
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 1-track-mind View Post
    I know I'll have to switch the crankset and maybe the rear cassette.
    It's coming with shimanoCX:50x40x30 and has 130 in the rear with a 7 speed 13-28.
    Any suggestions ?
    You can just put on new rings that are smaller, might be a little cheaper.
    If the drive train has some miles on it, might as well also get a new chain and cassette while you're at it.

    You could also look at larger tires. Those tires are nice but you will want larger from time to time.

    http://www.schwalbetires.com/marathon_supreme
    We are as gods, we might as well get good at it.
    Stewart Brand

  15. #15
    nun
    nun is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    My Bikes
    Rivendell Quickbeam, Rivendell Rambouillet, Rivendell Atlantis, Circle A town bike, De Rosa Neo Primato, Cervelo RS
    Posts
    2,315
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 1-track-mind View Post
    I finally pulled the trigger on a used touring bike this morning. It's a 1992 Bridgestone XO-2 hybrid that is supposedly the precursor of the Rivendell Atlantis, only to find out it has shorter than ideal chainstays,425. I was so excited to find a bike like that comes with 26" wheels in my size,in great shape, that I forgot to check the frame geo.
    With size 12 1/2 shoes, I guess that's going to knock out rear panniers...
    Anyway to work around this, or am I locked into using a trailer ?
    No you didn't screw up, the XO-2 is a nice bike. If you are worried about clipping your heels use small
    front panniers on the back.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    370
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by late View Post
    You can just put on new rings that are smaller, might be a little cheaper.
    If the drive train has some miles on it, might as well also get a new chain and cassette while you're at it.

    You could also look at larger tires. Those tires are nice but you will want larger from time to time.

    http://www.schwalbetires.com/marathon_supreme
    The description was "hardly used" and the pics supported that, so the drivetrain should be in good shape.
    It was suggested that I drop down to two rings, so that's an option.
    The wheels are Ritchey Vantage Sport 32H.
    By larger do you mean wider or moving up to 700s ?

  17. #17
    Senior Member staehpj1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Parkville, Md
    Posts
    7,255
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 1-track-mind View Post
    It was suggested that I drop down to two rings, so that's an option.
    Why would you do that on a touring bike?

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    370
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well, I hardly ever get into my big ring while touring, so I'm not sure I need it.
    Don't doubles shift smoother than triples ?
    I was thinking something like 36-38x22-24 would be adequate.

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    N. California
    Posts
    1,412
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    "...Don't doubles shift smoother than triples ?..."

    No. Triples shift just fine in my experience. I think some people end up with mismatched front derailleur/chainring combinations in search of the perfect touring gear range but a good, compatible combination shifts as well as any double.

  20. #20
    Thawing Member Aloyzius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Salt Lake City Utah
    My Bikes
    Surly Long Haul Trucker, Soma ES, Bianchi Eros, 85 Raleigh Marathon, and a couple clunkers
    Posts
    343
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That's the buyer's guilt and paranoia talking, I think. I don't know half as much as most of the guys on this forum, but I think you scored. Most of us would kill for a Bridgestone touring bike.

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    370
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Aloyzius View Post
    That's the buyer's guilt and paranoia talking, I think.
    I hope you are right. After considering virtually every bike under the sun for a year and a half, I can't believe I zoned out on the most critical geo measurement of all for a touring bike. I guess I was just mesmerized by the green color.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •