Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    dirtbag psycho d's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SLO town
    My Bikes
    Giant full suspension, Surly LHT, something Italian soon!
    Posts
    119
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    front or back panniers first

    Hola. i am in the process of setting up my LHT for some serious touring. Right now i have almost enough for either front or back panniers and rack. i will probably be getting Tubus racks and Ortlieb panniers (maybe Arkels up front). Though i plan on getting both, which would make most sense to get first, especially in reguards to the handling. i will not tour until its fully rigged, but want to be able to grocery shop etc with my bike now without always having to schlep my backpack along. Does it even matter??? Thanks.
    Ashe.
    d

  2. #2
    no one cares -holiday76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NYCadelphOrnia
    Posts
    5,251
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd personally get the rear stuff first just because it holds more. I've also done a lot of loaded long tours with a rear rack only and found it to be sufficient space.

  3. #3
    Senior Member 82times's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Eau Claire, WI
    Posts
    84
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Agreed. Get the rear setup first. Much less effect on handling, plus more room for groceries/luggage/commuting stuff in the interim.

  4. #4
    Oldbie
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    15
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Pros and cons either way.

    Rears first:
    1. Most people will tell you this is the Only Correct Way
    2. Better balance with just one bag
    3. More drag
    4. Worse handling than fronts only

    Low-mounted fronts only:
    1. Makes bike *more* stable, not less so
    2. Can easily jump bike over holes by lifting up on bars; much harder to lift loaded rear bags
    3. Less aerodynamic drag, and some shielding of legs by bags => cleaner airflow
    4. Smaller bags and less luggage = lighter bike
    5. Most people will tell you you're wrong despite having never tried it themselves - what do they know?!?
    6. You will need to use two bags, not one

    I personally hate rear panniers but they are sometimes necessary to carry the required volume of stuff, and pretty well de riguer offroad where one needs more manoeuvrability, and thus to minimise inertia at the fork.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The bike feels significantly different with front only vs. rear only. I tried front only commuting for a week and decided to go back to rear only. My personal observations:

    Front only:
    - Very stable ride, bike felt nicely balanced.
    - More cumbersome to access panniers.
    - Being down so low the panniers hit things more often
    - Riding on loose surfaces was sketchier. Front wheel tended to wash out more.
    - I thought there was more wind resistance but that could have been my imagination

    Rear only:
    - Unbalanced ride. Front end more wobbly. I tend to lean forward more to compensate.
    - Easy to access stuff, nice rack platform to set stuff on.
    - Can safely carry heavier loads on rear racks
    - Panniers more out of the way when carrying bike up/down stairs

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    7,277
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Another vote for rear. FWIW, I really like my Arkel T-28 front panniers but think the GT-54's are overkill in the pocket department - would go for the T-42's if i did it over. or Lone Peaks.
    ...

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Montréal, QC (Canada)
    My Bikes
    2008 Surly LHT complete & 1988-ish fuglyfixed Specialized RockHopper
    Posts
    409
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by valygrl View Post
    would go for the T-42's if i did it over. or Lone Peaks.
    Arkel Dolphins are sweet.

  8. #8
    Every lane is a bike lane Chris L's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia - passionfruit capital of the universe!
    Posts
    9,622
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Go the rear first. I tour almost exclusively with rear only panniers and it works fine. It holds the volume I need, and I don't have any handling issues beyond the initial adaptation to having a loaded bike (which lasts all of about 500 metres, and would probably be just as bad with front only panniers anyway).
    "I am never going to flirt with idleness again" - Roy Keane
    "We invite everyone to question the entire culture we take for granted." - Manic Street Preachers.
    My blog.
    My bike tours. Japan tour page under construction.

  9. #9
    F*** Corporate Beer daveIT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Anchorage
    My Bikes
    On-OneIROOlympiaYetiLeMondZanella
    Posts
    330
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I got fronts first because the rears weren't in stock at the time. I still used them on the rear rack and just strapped a bunch to the front rack in dry bags. I have Ortlieb Sport Packer Plus and Back Packer Plus on my LHT.

    Check out Wayne at http://thetouringstore.com. He has Ortlieb and Lone Peak.
    shutup&ride

  10. #10
    See You Down The Road
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    132
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I went:

    Handle-bar bag

    Rear bags

    ..with the weight on the back your steering is pretty close to regular,with the weight up front only your steering changes quite a bit....it gets weighty while the back end is still as light as before.

    Load up the back....and carry things you need more often in a handle bar bag
    Last edited by Burningman; 05-16-08 at 07:37 AM.

  11. #11
    SRS
    SRS is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    107
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Re: panniers. It's a non issue for me. I use the same panniers front and rear - Ortlieb Bike Packer Plus.

    Racks - I generally use only the rear panniers when my space needs are small.

  12. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i agree. i went from VA to Cali and started with all four but then mailed the two front home when i got to Kentucky because i didn't need them. i would go with just the back two from now on.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    My Bikes
    Specialized Tricross Sport 2009, Giant Yukon FX3
    Posts
    1,467
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think I'm starting to decide that handlebar bag + rear panniers is better than rear panniers alone. And it's fantastic being able to take off a jacket and tuck it away without having to stop.

    One thing I do find disconcerting about the handlebar bag is not being able to see the leading edge of the tyre, for kerb hopping.

    Steve

  14. #14
    Oldbie
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    15
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    IMO bar bags suck! Yes, they're convenient but that's the end of their good points. On the other hand, bar bags:
    1. make it difficult to draft closely behind people as you cannot see your wheel
    2. make it hard to avoid holes as you cannot see your wheel
    3. get in the way of most headlights
    4. prevent top mounted brake levers being used
    5. obstruct STI cables unless these are unnaturally long
    6. make carrying the bike up stairs or hillsides more annoying
    7. are a magnet for thieves as they're easy to remove and typically filled with expen$ive stuff
    8. make handling worse if there's any significant weight in them, and the longer your stem, the worse it gets

    If you really want to ditch the jacket, there's a better way: Rivendell sell a couple of small front racks to which things can be bungeed: http://www.rivbike.com/products/list/bags_and_racks (3 pages)
    Admittedly, being made by Nitto, these are not cheap. Riv also have bags to fit them - some have D-rings for attaching clothes, i.e., http://www.rivbike.com/products/list...product=20-127. Also, some of the typical bar bag problems are reduced when they're off the bars, plus the racks give somewhere to fit lights too.

    Wallingford probably have something from Gilles Berthoud that'll do the same job: www.wallbike.com
    Last edited by satanas; 05-19-08 at 03:45 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •