Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 40
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    65
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Talk me out of buying a LHT

    Well, I ended up spending darn near two hours at the bike shop today talking to two of the sales people about touring bikes, and I'm pretty sure I'm going to go with the LHT. It was a toss up between that, the Trek 520, or two Cannondales which were of course priced about 3 and 700$ higher. Out of my price range, so I didn't really look at them.

    I'm still a beginner with off-trail riding, and I didn't want to shell out 2k for a fancy touring bike. Its going to be used for cummuting, basic around-town use, and metrics. So I need something that can handle heavy constant use, and say, "thank you sir, may I please have another?"

    So far the surly wins out over the rest because a) the 520 is out of stock in my size, and apparently trek is backordered on them so who knows when I'd even be able to test ride it, b) the geometry is better, c) I like steel over aluminum (cheaper and more easily repaired - one of my buddies is a master welder AND i'm a bit tubby so I just feel more 'secure' on steel), the gears feel really comfortable.

    Now, the biggest complaint I've heard about the LHT is the rear wheel is small compared to a lot of other touring bikes to make room for fenders. What else?

    The only real issue I saw was the bar shifters - I'm going to have to swap them out for something else methinks. They felt a little clunky.

    So do your worst guys - tell me what you hate about the LHT. Once i see what the gripes are I'll be able to decide Thanks!!
    When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments. Here was a machine of precision and balance for the convenience of man. And (unlike subsequent inventions for man's convenience) the more he used it, the fitter his body became. Here, for once, was a product of man's brain that was entirely beneficial to those who used it, and of no harm or irritation to others. Progress should have stopped when man invented the bicycle.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Jawn P's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Kent, Ohio
    My Bikes
    Waterford 1200, Redline Monocog, Redline Conquest Pro, Surly Long Haul Trucker, and a Sunday BMX bike!
    Posts
    211
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just got my LHT, yesterday and I love it. No real gripes yet besides my constrictor clamp's bolt breaking when I went to tighten it up.

    Get it!

  3. #3
    enginerd jeff^d's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Redlands, CA
    My Bikes
    Surly Steamroller, Kona Unit, Trek 520
    Posts
    265
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was deciding between a 520 and LHT. Went with the 520 because I found an older model on clearance. I also didn't like how the LHT had 26" wheels on some sizes. But they're both great bikes, you really can't go wrong with either. Price and availability would be my deciding factors.

    Personally, I'd never swap the bar shifters out. They work great and are virtually unbreakable.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    8,434
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by wiggles View Post
    Now, the biggest complaint I've heard about the LHT is the rear wheel is small compared to a lot of other touring bikes to make room for fenders.
    The rear wheel is a different size? Really? In diameter or width?

    (They do use 26 inch wheels on the smaller frames and 700c wheels on the larger frames.)

    Quote Originally Posted by wiggles View Post
    The only real issue I saw was the bar shifters - I'm going to have to swap them out for something else methinks. They felt a little clunky.
    I'd suggest trying these for a bit before you change them (unless the shop will do it as part of the purchase).
    Last edited by njkayaker; 07-18-08 at 01:27 PM.

  5. #5
    Je pose, donc je suis.
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Back. Here.
    Posts
    2,898
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post
    The rear wheel is a different size? Really? In diameter or width?
    The smaller sizes (52" and under) are built around 26" wheels. The larger sizes have 700C wheels. It's so that a 'reasonable' seat tube angle can be had on the smaller models. Or so they say. See www.surlybikes.com for details.
    A lot of people like 26" wheels for touring, though.
    Last edited by Pedaleur; 07-18-08 at 01:31 PM. Reason: Accidentally put a jackass cybersquatting URL in. Fixed now.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    65
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post
    The rear wheel is a different size? Really? In diameter or width?

    (They do use 26 inch wheels on the smaller frames and 700c wheels on the larger frames.)


    I'd suggest trying these for a bit before you change them (unless the shop will do it as part of the purchase).
    I'm just not a fan of bar shifters, they always felt so imprecise to me. Maybe they'll grow on me? Hahaha.

    You guys aren't doing a very good job of talking me out of it so far :-P

    Maybe this is the right bike then? w00t!
    When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments. Here was a machine of precision and balance for the convenience of man. And (unlike subsequent inventions for man's convenience) the more he used it, the fitter his body became. Here, for once, was a product of man's brain that was entirely beneficial to those who used it, and of no harm or irritation to others. Progress should have stopped when man invented the bicycle.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    5,117
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Smaller wheel is a big advantage if you are that size. First it is a stronger wheel, easier to get parts for both in NA and globally, rolls easier (arguably and assuming same grade of components). People are spending the big bucks for Thorns with 26" wheels in all sizes. In euro a lot of custom touring bikes come in 26". Cutting edge, most of us wish it was an option in the larger sizes.

    Only reason not to buy the LHT is that you don't need such a heavy clunker for the kind of riding you propose. It's a Long Haul truck. Nothing you say about use requires that. Also if you are in the 26" size, you would have to be one hell of a doughball before you would need to have any concerns about breaking any bike. You need to be 250-300 pounds, and an agressive rider/Jackass for that to be a concern.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    65
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peterpan1 View Post
    Smaller wheel is a big advantage if you are that size. First it is a stronger wheel, easier to get parts for both in NA and globally, rolls easier (arguably and assuming same grade of components). People are spending the big bucks for Thorns with 26" wheels in all sizes. In euro a lot of custom touring bikes come in 26". Cutting edge, most of us wish it was an option in the larger sizes.

    Only reason not to buy the LHT is that you don't need such a heavy clunker for the kind of riding you propose. It's a Long Haul truck. Nothing you say about use requires that. Also if you are in the 26" size, you would have to be one hell of a doughball before you would need to have any concerns about breaking any bike. You need to be 250-300 pounds, and an agressive rider/Jackass for that to be a concern.
    Agreed - I am also trying to get a bike I can use as a stepping stone upwards for longer rides. I'd like to get involved with touring but right now all I have is a trek MTB - not very distance friendly at all. I liked the fact that touring bikes can be used for what I need and be comfortable to do basically anything I want with.
    When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments. Here was a machine of precision and balance for the convenience of man. And (unlike subsequent inventions for man's convenience) the more he used it, the fitter his body became. Here, for once, was a product of man's brain that was entirely beneficial to those who used it, and of no harm or irritation to others. Progress should have stopped when man invented the bicycle.

  9. #9
    likes bikes. eAspenwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    h-town, tx
    Posts
    281
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i've had my lht for a few months with about 1100 miles on it. i can't think of any real complaints. just a well-priced solid tourer. i also was skeptical about the bar-ends at first, but love em now.

  10. #10
    Mad bike riding scientist cyccommute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Denver, CO
    My Bikes
    Some silver ones, a black one, a red one, an orange one and a couple of titanium ones
    Posts
    15,461
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by wiggles View Post
    Well, I ended up spending darn near two hours at the bike shop today talking to two of the sales people about touring bikes, and I'm pretty sure I'm going to go with the LHT. It was a toss up between that, the Trek 520, or two Cannondales which were of course priced about 3 and 700$ higher. Out of my price range, so I didn't really look at them.

    I'm still a beginner with off-trail riding, and I didn't want to shell out 2k for a fancy touring bike. Its going to be used for cummuting, basic around-town use, and metrics. So I need something that can handle heavy constant use, and say, "thank you sir, may I please have another?"

    So far the surly wins out over the rest because a) the 520 is out of stock in my size, and apparently trek is backordered on them so who knows when I'd even be able to test ride it, b) the geometry is better, c) I like steel over aluminum (cheaper and more easily repaired - one of my buddies is a master welder AND i'm a bit tubby so I just feel more 'secure' on steel), the gears feel really comfortable.

    Now, the biggest complaint I've heard about the LHT is the rear wheel is small compared to a lot of other touring bikes to make room for fenders. What else?

    The only real issue I saw was the bar shifters - I'm going to have to swap them out for something else methinks. They felt a little clunky.

    So do your worst guys - tell me what you hate about the LHT. Once i see what the gripes are I'll be able to decide Thanks!!
    Go for the 'Dales! There's less to change out (the spec on a T2 or T800 is very good) and the bikes will last you for 20 years (as will any touring bike). Over the long run that extra $300 is nothing.
    Stuart Black
    Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
    Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
    Days of Wineless Roads. Bed and Breakfasting along the KATY
    Twisting Down the Alley. Misadventures in tornado alley.
    An Good Ol' Fashion Appalachian Butt Whoopin'.

  11. #11
    apocryphal sobriquet J.C. Koto's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Star City, NE
    My Bikes
    2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker "Bichael Velosteem"
    Posts
    756
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Don't get the LHT -- It totally *SUCKS*

    First of all, it's a steel frame with loose geometry. The thing is like riding a lay-z-boy down the road. A bike shouldn't be that comfy to ride, especially for long distances.

    Second, the geometry is all messed up. Why did they put 26" wheels on the smaller bikes when a road bike *needs* 700c?! Doubleyou-tee-eff? Why should cyclists not have to suffer all that toe overlap?

    Third, who needs that kind of tire clearance on a road bike. Seriously?! Aren't 28mm tires enough?!

    Fourth, what's with all that low gearing?! Sure, they think people are riding with a load, but how about HTFU?!

    All right, I'll stop now. It pained me to go that far. Get the Surly, Wiggles! It's a *fantastic* bike, and I think you'll just absolutely love it! No wheels are small -- everything is proportional. The 54cm and below have 26 inch wheels, and the 56cm and above have 700c. It's all about proportions. And the fine people at Surly *really* did right on this call... I have a 52cm with the 26ers, and the bike fits me like a custom. Perhaps I'm just lucky...

    Another nice thing about the LHT is all of the frame bosses. Don't like bar-end shifters? Well, it has down-tube bosses, should you like to go that way. You can have STI if you want it, but give it a week or two first. I'm in love with the bar-ends in friction mode. Dead-simple, reliable, and always perfectly in gear. I've had mine for three weeks exactly now, and already have 500 miles on it.

    If you don't want a decent bike for the money, then just get something else. Otherwise get the LHT. Save up if you have to... I did. It took me about one year...

  12. #12
    Still learning.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Il.
    My Bikes
    Surly LHT
    Posts
    121
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jawn P View Post
    I just got my LHT, yesterday and I love it. No real gripes yet besides my constrictor clamp's bolt breaking when I went to tighten it up.

    Get it!
    I had the same problem with my new one.

  13. #13
    SNARKY MEMBER CardiacKid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    South Austin
    Posts
    2,829
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Nobody gets LHTs anymore because they are too popular.
    Signed
    Yogi Berra

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Iowa City, IA
    My Bikes
    2008 Surly LHT, 2008 Trek 7.2fx
    Posts
    433
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CardiacKid View Post
    Nobody gets LHTs anymore because they are too popular.
    Signed
    Yogi Berra
    I just picked up mine today. If you are going to get one, I would try to get on it fast before the price increase goes into effect. Not sure when that's happening, but probably sooner than later.

  15. #15
    DRF aka Thrifty Bill wrk101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The NC Mountains
    My Bikes
    Too many to list, all vintage
    Posts
    19,382
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    If you don't like the bar end shifters, you are probably better off with a Novara Randonee. High end brifters can set you back a lot of $$$$. Catch the REI sale this fall, or the spring 20% off coupon, and the deal is very, very hard to beat.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    415
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i don't know if the LHT is the same way but i've ridden some cross checks and their frames are not stiff enough around the bottom bracket. the two i've ridden both flexed extremely badly.

  17. #17
    Senior Member BigBlueToe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Central Coast, CA
    My Bikes
    Surly LHT, Specialized Rockhopper, Nashbar Touring (old), Specialized Stumpjumper (older), Nishiki Tourer (model unknown)
    Posts
    3,388
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just finished a two-week tour on the Northern Tier on my LHT. It performed flawlessly and I'd heartily recommend it. However, I bought a frame and built it up, so I can't comment on the components that come with a complete model. The ride was comfortable, it tracked like it was on rails, there was never any shimmy, no matter how fast I got going. I had no heel strike at all (with a Tubus rear rack, Ortlieb Classic Roller panniers, and size 14 feet.) There was plenty of room for 32cm Schwalbe tires and fenders.

    I say try the bar end shifters. When you get used to them they make a lot of sense.

    I love my LHT!

  18. #18
    More Energy than Sense aroundoz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    155 miles north of Spokane
    My Bikes
    Thorn Sherpa, Co-Motion Custom Road, Salsa Fargo, Mercian King of Mercia and Motobecane Fantom Pro 29er
    Posts
    710
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have owned both the 520 and LHT and they are great bikes. I found the 520 to be faster/easier to pedal especially when it was unloaded. Surly designed the LHT with very long chain stays and a very low BB which is great for touring but feels like a tank otherwise IMO. If I felt like going for a 30-50 mile unloaded ride, I would be on the 520 since it performs like a pretty decent road bike and I am guessing that is due to the shorter chain stays and better tubing. My turn side pedal on the LHT touched the ground several times when cornering due to the low BB but you learn fast to stop pedaling when going into a turn and to keep your turn side pedal up. The LHT will come with a longer head tube which might get your bars higher but the complete bike comes with a cut steerer which is a shame. I don't know what size you are getting but I had the 62cm and it did not fit into a bike box with the rear wheel on. If you are tall and planning on air travel, it might be something to consider. Having said that, the LHT comes with a real crowned fork which for some folks, like myself, means a lot.

    BTW, like others have said, give the bar ends a go. You might be surprised.

  19. #19
    "I'm the Man in Black" Hot Rod Lincoln's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Gardendale, AL
    My Bikes
    IndyFab 29er SS, Surly CrossCheck, Titus Moto-lite, Specialized Enduro
    Posts
    286
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Get a Cross Check...same company. IMHO a little better geometry and a little quicker handling. I weigh 275lbs and got one. No problems with about 1000 miles on it...no flexing at the bottom bracket as suggested. The only thing I did other than stock was to get wheels built to handle my weight. Also, put a rear rack and fenders on it for touring...front rack will come later but so far no problems
    Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you,
    Jesus Christ and the American GI. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.

    Put your flame suits on

    http://greatlordhumongous.blogspot.com/

  20. #20
    la rapet drewcifer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    FL
    My Bikes
    80s specialized expedition, soma rush
    Posts
    295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    its an absolutely spectacular bike in every way. you simply cant beat it. the drive train and wheels are fabulous, you wouldnt need to change a thing. You probably will want to make some adjustments in the cockpit with a different saddle and maybe bars (they throw on cheap ones because htey know a lot of people will change them anyway). but this is normal.

    its a bike that can do anything and everything while being smart, elegant, and a joy to ride. and the pricepoint is great too.

    go for it!
    they're just natural feelings like, walking off, to ride my bike

  21. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    5,117
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    "The only thing I did other than stock was to get wheels built to handle my weight."

    That's a good point. Though if you have a good local bike shop, they will swap that in for you, or even just a good run around the wheels that come with it by a tech will likely see you through.

    "Agreed - I am also trying to get a bike I can use as a stepping stone upwards for longer rides. I'd like to get involved with touring but right now all I have is a trek MTB - not very distance friendly at all. I liked the fact that touring bikes can be used for what I need and be comfortable to do basically anything I want with. "

    That is why people buy them! Some MTBs can make good long distance bikes, but by the time you are done you will need a new MTB, so might as well just get an LHT and save the trouble.

  22. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    somewhere over a tropical rainbow
    My Bikes
    Too Many
    Posts
    37
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've nicknamed my Surly LHT 'Shirley' and I think the wife's a bit jealous!

    She's just got a ho hum mega dollar Ti MTB with bling bling XTR parts to ride with. Yawn.

  23. #23
    bragi bragi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    seattle, WA
    My Bikes
    LHT
    Posts
    2,830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Like virtually everyone else in the universe, I have the LHT, and, as stated, it's a great bike, if you like big, heavy, steel bikes with thick tires, that track well and are fairly tough (which I do, in fact, like a lot). It is quite heavy, though, and therefore a bit sluggish; you'll never break any speed records on that thing, that's for sure. Maybe you should take a look at a Bianchi Volpe. It's lighter, faster, and sportier, has comparable components, is about the same price, and most of the ones I've seen are equipped with road bike-type shifters. For most uses, the LHT is honestly a bit more of a tank than most people need. (However, if anyone tried to take mine away, I would have to kill them.)

    And, like others, I'd advise you to give bar-end shifters a long second look. I didn't like them at first, but now I really appreciate them, especially in friction mode. They're a lot more elegant and reliable than STI, once you get used to them, especially if you're riding long distances.
    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

  24. #24
    Hello zebede's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Suncoast, Florida
    My Bikes
    BF Tikit, Dahon Speed TR, Mezzo I4
    Posts
    521
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Why I DID NOT buy a Surley.


    10. No local bike to test ride

    9. Fuji Touring bike complete for two hundred dollars more than Shirley LHT Frame only.

    8. Everybody doin it (herd affect)

    7 As the former fed chairman would say "over exuberance without an underlying connection with reality)

    6. My size frame is (54cm) has 26" wheels, and I wanted 700c.

    5. Frame geometry similar to "many" similar priced bikes.

    4. Frame construction is nothing to write home about neither is my Fuji, (aka Windsor clone). The LHT Windsor and Fuji are all 4130 dbl butted cro mo. Let me start a rumor, The Windsor and LHT are made in the same factory in Tiawan.

    3. I gave away all my "trukin" songs on 8 track in 1979. (six days on the road and I'm gonna see my baby tonite.

    2. Who wants to buy a bike with the name Shirley uh I mean Surley.

    AND the number one reason U should not buy a Long Haul Trucker (besides not driving an eighteen wheeler for a living).

    1.Color choices booger green, mold green or robins egg (aka baby powder blue) (what is with these people?).

  25. #25
    More Energy than Sense aroundoz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    155 miles north of Spokane
    My Bikes
    Thorn Sherpa, Co-Motion Custom Road, Salsa Fargo, Mercian King of Mercia and Motobecane Fantom Pro 29er
    Posts
    710
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by zebede View Post

    AND the number one reason U should not buy a Long Haul Trucker (besides not driving an eighteen wheeler for a living).

    1.Color choices booger green, mold green or robins egg (aka baby powder blue) (what is with these people?).
    A lot of people, and myself included, love the Surly colors. Especially the booger green. I think it's great that Surly is choosing colors for their bikes that are not that common. Trek and Bianchi must have liked them to since they copied the green or at least came close to it.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •