Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sacramento CA
    My Bikes
    Surly Cross Check (building), Old Steel Univega (converting to Fixie) old Schwinn Cruiser
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Touring/Utility Build questions

    Hey Everyone,
    Im in the process of building a bike and need some advice on drivetrain components. Most of my riding will be on roads and the bike trail near my house (and some dirt), but i also want to be able to load up the panniers and do some light touring. I have been round and round trying to decide to go with a compact double or a triple setup (9sp?). the think the Compact would be fine for most of my riding im just concerned about touring (although i could always have lower geared cassette) and durability off road.
    I have been looking at Shimano 105/ultegra stuff and possibly XT if i go with the 9 speed triple.
    Any advice?

    My frame is the Surly Cross Check
    Ultegra/Open Pro Wheels

    Todd

  2. #2
    Dismember Lou627's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Queens
    My Bikes
    LHT/72 Schwinn Letour SS
    Posts
    229
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    why not get the triple? Dont see any reason not to except saving a small amount of weight. I still havent used my granny gear on my new bike but Im sure Ill be thankful I have it.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    152
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    FWIW, my preference is agains triples. Too much shifting up front, more likely for chain to fall off, etc. With a compact crank and mtb cassette and rear derailluer, you can have pretty low gears -- probably adequate for everything except heavily loaded touring on steep grades. OTOH, triples are so prevalent these days that you can't go all that wrong if you go that way either. Comes down to personal preference and riding style more than anything.

  4. #4
    SNARKY MEMBER CardiacKid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    South Austin
    Posts
    2,829
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think they have made great strides in improving the shifting of triples in the last couple of years. You should test ride one. I think you will be impressed, especially on the 105/Deore models and above.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    N. California
    Posts
    1,410
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There is no downside to getting an XT drive train for this type of bike. I have/had recent bikes with 105, LX, XT, XTR and Ultegra components with doubles, compact doubles and triples and can report that, properly adjusted, they all work extremely well and are reliable.

  6. #6
    Senior Member BigBlueToe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Central Coast, CA
    My Bikes
    Surly LHT, Specialized Rockhopper, Nashbar Touring (old), Specialized Stumpjumper (older), Nishiki Tourer (model unknown)
    Posts
    3,388
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you're going to tour with a load you'll want the triple. If you're not going to tour, or if you're going to do a supported tour where someone else carries your load, the double may be what you want.

    I toured with an old 10-speed in the 70s. It worked, but I'm sure glad I had my 27-speed on my recent tour in the mountains.

    When I ride my touring bike locally I almost never use the granny. I could do fine with a double if I never went touring.

    I want to buy another bike for local rides, centuries, etc. It would be light and have a double. My wife wants new siding for the house and pavers for the back patio. Guess who's not getting a new bike this year?

  7. #7
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    103
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i toured the oregon coastal range (there were some hills, to say the least) a couple of weeks ago, fully loaded, with a compact double. i can say that it worked fine for my touring bike. a bunch of old, complainers itt.
    Last edited by Jaron; 08-02-08 at 12:07 PM.

  8. #8
    bragi bragi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    seattle, WA
    My Bikes
    LHT
    Posts
    2,829
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ***** View Post
    i toured the oregon coastal range (there were some hills, to say the least) a couple of weeks ago, fully loaded, with a compact double. i can say that it worked fine for my touring bike. a bunch of old, complainers itt.
    I don't know what you're trying to say. I get that you think compact doubles are good enough for any purpose on a tour, but what does "a bunch of old, complainers itt" mean?
    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

  9. #9
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    103
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    basically i am saying that people that complain about that kind of **** are either old and stuck in their ways, or out of shape. itt = in this thread.

  10. #10
    bragi bragi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    seattle, WA
    My Bikes
    LHT
    Posts
    2,829
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ***** View Post
    basically i am saying that people that complain about that kind of **** are either old and stuck in their ways, or out of shape. itt = in this thread.
    Thank you for clarifying. It's not nice to insult people just because they like more chain rings than you do, by the way.
    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

  11. #11
    ah.... sure. kayakdiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Whidbey Island WA
    My Bikes
    Specialized.... schwinn..... enough to fill my needs..
    Posts
    4,106
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ***** View Post
    basically i am saying that people that complain about that kind of **** are either old and stuck in their ways, or out of shape. itt = in this thread.
    Well I don't think I'm any of the above but I still like a tripple on my touring bike.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    152
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    One of the reasons I dislike triples on a road bike is that the STI indexing shifting is difficult to adjust. If I were to run a triple, I would consider swapping the left brake-shifter for a simple brake and using a bar-end or down-tube friction shifter for the front derailluer. Perhaps you're already considering running something other than STI, which makes a lot of sense on a touring bike -- simpler, more durable, less likely to fail, less expensive to replace, etc.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Heck I would like to have one with 4 rings on it.

  14. #14
    Senior Member staehpj1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Parkville, Md
    Posts
    7,552
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by northboundtrain View Post
    One of the reasons I dislike triples on a road bike is that the STI indexing shifting is difficult to adjust.
    I have found it to be pretty easy with the components I have tried it with. I guess it will vary with different cranks and dérailleurs. It works fine with the Sugino XD600 and Tiagra components. It also seems to work fine on another bike with the same crank and Tiagra STI shifter, but an old (probably pre STI) 105 front dérailleur.

    FWIW: I really like STI on all my bikes touring or otherwise.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    San Diego
    My Bikes
    IF steel deluxe 29er tourer
    Posts
    1,426
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I also find shifting with a triple sometimes a bit touchy, but nearly everyone will be better off with a triple when touring.

    One intriging alternative (suggested by the OP) is to go with a compact double and a 11-21 road cassette, which gives you roughly the gear ratios of a standard triple with a 12-25 road cassette, and then when touring loaded use a 12-27 cassette. This is by no means touring bike gearing, but it gives you a low equivalent to a 32 tooth front ring (standard MTB) with a 32 tooth cog in the back (think 11-32 MTB cassette). IOW's, think mountain bike without the small ring in front. In this way you have simpler shifting up front and gives you some flexibility in the back for touring or for just plain getting old. This way you can be a poser too.

  16. #16
    Professional Fuss-Budget Bacciagalupe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,308
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you're going to tour - especially CA / Pacific coast or Sierras - get a triple and go low. When I rode down Route 1, I spent a great deal of time in my lowest gears.

    One option to consider is getting a crankset that can be set up as either a double, compact double or triple; the stock cranks on the Surly Cross-Check do this. One less thing to swap out if you start as a double & change your mind.

    I'd also go for bar-end shifters. It's very easy to adjust the triple on the fly, very robust, and less of an inconvenience than STI if some aspect of the shifters happen to break.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •