Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-26-08, 08:08 AM   #1
jakereed
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 124
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Say it ain't so Trek!

I was just looking at the 2009 model of the Trek 520 and I'm a little disturbed by the available sizes listed for this year.
According to the geometry listed, the largest size is now 60cm, where previous years were 25 inches (63.5cm).

I have been planning on buying a Trek 520 for some time now, but now I fear the new models will be too small for my 6'5" height, unless I'm missing something.

I currently ride a Trek 7.3 FX which is 25" (63.5cm), and it fits me perfectly, and the next size down is far too small to be comfortable. I also don't like to have 9" of seat tube out to accommodate the smaller frame.

Oh well, the LHT still comes in 62cm I believe.
jakereed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-08, 11:54 AM   #2
Camel
Caffeinated.
 
Camel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Waltham, MA
Bikes: Waterford 1900, Quintana Roo Borrego, Trek 8700zx, Bianchi Pista Concept
Posts: 1,541
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Might perhaps be a good time to find a shop with last years model in your size at a reduced price...
Camel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-08, 07:19 PM   #3
CC Rider
Crossfit
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kenosha, Wi
Bikes: '05 Trek 520, Specialized Rockhopper, Litespeed Arenberg, Hurricane Force 4 Tri-bike
Posts: 57
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You may find that even the 25" 520 is too small for your 6'5" frame. I'm 5'9 and ride the 23" comfortably. Also, the Treks are renowned for their short headtubes, so unless you intend to ride with your handlebars much lower than your seat (assuming that your inseam is proportional to your upper body) you may be better off looking for a bike better suited to your height. LHT's have a little longer head tube and longish top tubes. That geometry might help you get into the more upright position typically adopted by touring cyclists. Obviously the most important aspect is which one you feel the most comfortable on over several hours in the saddle. Best of luck!
CC Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-08, 04:48 PM   #4
doctortalk121
user friendly
 
doctortalk121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 264
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
or time to shop for a c'dale?
i've had so much bad luck with their b'wheels
and customer service in waterloo
probably won't go back.

was thinking about buying one of there FX bikes earlier in the year
but found a cannondale quick and am quite happy with it.
doctortalk121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:52 AM.