Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    cyclocross touring

    I am planning a self contained cross country trip starting in late march and am trying to get different perspectives on the type of bike I should be purchasing.
    I am debating between 1) the standard touring bikes (loading them up with panniers) and 2) taking advice from a bike store associate and getting a cyclo cross bike that I could keep light and tow a BOB trailer behind it. This second option gives me a more versatile bike for when I am done.
    Does this sounds like a reasonable plan? I have not read anything bad about the trailers yet, so if anyone has a experience I should know about, please let me know.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Newspaperguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    2,206
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What kind of versatility do you want? If you're looking for a general duty bike for after your tour, a touring bike and a cyclocross bike are both good choices. If you want, you can take some of the racks off your touring bike after the tour and then use the bike for almost everything except racing.

    My personal preference is to have the gear on my bike when I'm touring, but some around here are fond of trailers instead. It's up to you which system you prefer.
    Life is good.

  3. #3
    Professional Fuss-Budget Bacciagalupe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,203
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yep, you can definitely go for the cross bike, if that's what you prefer.

    People have, and still do, tour extensively on cross bikes, even with panniers. Most cross bikes are made for general use, although some (usually the more expensive ones) are specialized for cyclocross racing. You can even use panniers on them, as long as you don't have enormous feet.

    The main thing to watch out for is that the gearing is low enough. Most LBS's will swap out parts like that at no cost, as long as you specify what you want when you buy it.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Washington D.C.
    My Bikes
    Soma Double Cross, Giant TCR, Rivendell Sam Hillbourne, Redline Conquest
    Posts
    43
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Though I agree with the npg up there that touring bikes themselves are pretty versatile, I myself found myself at the point you are at and chose the cyclocross path. I had a lingering interest in actually racing cyclocross at some point so that made up my mind (for the record, I did follow that interest and have raced the last 4 'cross season ... love it!). There are several good steel cyclocross bikes that make for pretty comfortable touring rigs. I have the Soma Double Cross (http://www.somafab.com/frames.html), which I love, but Surly also makes a Cross Check (http://www.surlybikes.com/crosscheck.html) that gets good reviews. I am sure there are others. A steel cross bike is not ideal for racing, but I have a lot of fun on mine and I don't fare to poorly in my Cat 3 races. If you are not racing on your 'cross bike they still are good all around bikes and will serve you well in almost any capacity. Quick note about fit: I ended up giving myself more stand over than I would normally mostly because I was thinking about racing. If I had it to do again I would probably go one size bigger. The trouble with fitting your bike in this situation is that for cyclcross racing the traditional recomendation is a healthy 1 to 2 inches of standover. Touring is just the opposite, usually you are supposed to get the biggest bike you can standover at all. So, be mindful of that and think about what you are going to be doing with the bike and you should be all set.

    Regarding panniers vs. trailers that is a personal taste question. For my part, I use panniers in back and a large handlebar bag up front. I pack light and the bike handles it like a champ. In this formation I have toured self-contained for up to a month.

    Good luck and enjoy!
    Last edited by Belgian Cobbles; 01-12-09 at 03:31 PM.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    51
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just want to add that a cross bike usually has a higher bottom bracket hence a higher center of gravity. Not ideal if your bike is loaded with gear. The advantages of a touring frame are it's lower bottom bracket and longer wheelbase making the bike more stable when loaded.

    If your going to be pulling a trailer, getting a cross bike would be a good choice. Cross bikes have a shorter wheelbase which makes the handling more agile; a good thing when your darting in and out of traffic. Also, most cross frames are designed to accept wider tires which makes the ride less harsh and the higher bottom bracket gives better clearance in snow and mud.

  6. #6
    Senior Member BengeBoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Seattle, Washington, USA
    My Bikes
    2009 Chris Boedeker custom, 1988 Tommasini Prestige, 2007 Bill Davidson custom, 1985 Univega Gran Turismo; 1988 Specialized Stumpjumper
    Posts
    6,923
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you look around online, you'll see plenty of people have toured on 'cross bikes -- Bianchi Volpe, Surly Crosscheck, Specialized Tricross, etc.

    Seems to me from shopping around that the category "cross bikes" covers a pretty wide territory.

    Some considerations to think about:

    - Length of chainstays. Some cross bikes are closer to 16 inches, some a bit over 17 inches. If you have big feet and big panniers and are worried about your heels hitting your panniers you should check this out.

    - Getting low enough gearing. Some 'cross bikes have triples, some have doubles.

    - Carbon fork vs. steel fork; ease of mounting panniers up front.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Taos, NM
    My Bikes
    2009 Custom TI Frame Road Bike, all 2007 Campy Record, Campy Euros Wheelset
    Posts
    552
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    you spoke of using a bob trailer - check out
    extrawheel.com

    wonderful trailer... I highly recommend it.
    2009 Custom TI Frame Road Bike, all 2007 Campy Record, Campy Euros Wheelset
    2009 Custom TI Frame touring Bike. S&S couplers, XTR Drivetrain. LOW granny.
    2009 Performance Bicycles TI (by Lynsky) road frame, 7900 DA, 7950 DA Compact Crank, Light Niobium Rim Wheels

  8. #8
    Senior Member adaminlc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Las Cruces, NM
    My Bikes
    2007 Surly Cross Check, 199? Novara Alpine
    Posts
    328
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I like to use my modified instep kids trailer. I ride a cyclocross bike because I like to be able to ride around some at the end of the day or on days off. This gets harder when you are tied to a bike that is holding all your gear. I do find riding with a trailer harder than riding with racks and panniers, however.
    I like fat tires and I cannot lie...

  9. #9
    Soma Lover
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Logan, UT
    My Bikes
    one bike for every day of the week
    Posts
    765
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Belgian Cobbles View Post
    I have the Soma Double Cross which I love
    My Double Cross is my favorite bike as well. Given its faster wheels and the light duty rack generally mounted on it, I'm hesitant to carry more than 25 lbs. in rear panniers the back plus another 10-ish in a handlebar bag. That's enough to get me by for an overnight trip to a B&B or condo and it's a kick in the pants to ride. I think I'll be riding it to my 30 year high school reunion 50 miles from here and see if there's anybody else who hasn't put on more than 15 lbs. since then.

    I also own a Jamis Aurora touring bike which is a little nimbler and lighter duty than a Surly LHT or Trek 520. With faster wheels and lighter duty rack it really wouldn't be giving up more than a 1/4 mph to the Soma and could actually be pushed for cyclocross duty. Given the way it's currently set up I figure I'd trust it with up to 50 lbs. on the back and another 25 lbs. up front but would never push it past 40/20. 60 lbs. is enough gear to carry me through a week long backpacking trip.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    415
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have toured and am planning a longer tour this summer on my cross bike. I plan on picking up a touring front fork and running a full rack set up. the bike handles quite well with heavy rear panniers.

  11. #11
    .
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Hillsboro, Oregon
    My Bikes
    2013 Soma ES, 89 Trek 950
    Posts
    3,604
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There are a number of cyclocross bikes out there with carbon forks with low rider rack mounts. The Tricross comes to mind. I have a Tricross and a Trek 520 and for short tours, I'd use the Tricross, but for a cross country tour or anything longer than a week or two, I'd take the 520. Many people have done many month tours on cyclocross bikes though. Whichever one is more comfortable.
    Demented internet tail wagging imbicile.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •