Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-25-09, 09:41 PM   #1
Slice2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pacific Northwest
Bikes: 2006 Cannondale Six13 Team 1, 1984 Cannondale, 1979 Motobecane Team Champion, 1994 Fat City Yo' Eddy Team
Posts: 424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Brooks - To spring or not to spring?

Deciding on saddle for all-around transportation bike that will also be ridden long miles and camping/touring. I’m leaning towards a Champion Flyer, but some have told me that they’re too ‘springy’ and that I should go with a B17 instead. Owner comments?

Also, is there any functional benefit to the hammered rivets & skived leather edges on the Special models?

BTW, I weight 190 and the bike will be an LHT with 700x40 tires.
Slice2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-09, 10:22 PM   #2
Speedo
Senior Member
 
Speedo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Boston Area
Bikes: Univega Gran Turismo, Guerciotti, Bridgestone MB2, Bike Friday New World Tourist, Serotta Ti
Posts: 1,998
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slice2 View Post
Deciding on saddle for all-around transportation bike that will also be ridden long miles and camping/touring. I’m leaning towards a Champion Flyer, but some have told me that they’re too ‘springy’ and that I should go with a B17 instead. Owner comments?
I ride a Champion Special which I'm happy with. I've never ridden a Champion Flyer or other Brooks sprung saddle.

I would think that this comes down to riding position, a very upright position might benefit from a sprung saddle, or other saddle shock absorption. While for a more aero position there would be no benefit to the springs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slice2 View Post
Also, is there any functional benefit to the hammered rivets & skived leather edges on the Special models?
Absolutely, the big rivets look cool. What other function would you want?

My wife insists that back in the day, the unskived edges of her standard B17 bothered the inside of her thighs. She doesn't ride a Brooks now, and I didn't know her then, so I can't make an independent comment.

Speedo
Speedo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-09, 11:25 PM   #3
twodeadpoets 
Training Wheel Graduate
 
twodeadpoets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: San Juan/Gulf Islands
Bikes: Bridgestone Grand Velo, Evans Randonneur (custom), Moser 51.151, Surly LHT & Pacer, Kona/FreeRadical, Trek 730, Trek 510
Posts: 499
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
For my tourer I went from sprung (champion flyer special) to unsprung (B17 Ti champion flyer special). I'm just over 200# and love the setup. I loved my sprung and it helped me get acustom to a leather saddle but for me the unsprung is the way to go. I put the sprung on my xtracycle grocery getter.
__________________
"Ride Like an Orca!" ~tdp
"People who enjoy waving flags, don't deserve to have one" ~Banksy

twodeadpoets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-09, 11:36 PM   #4
Randochap
Recovering mentalist
 
Randochap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: On the Edge
Bikes: Too many
Posts: 2,810
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Just get a B-17. No functional difference between copper and steel rivets (I have a 31 y/o Pro w/ steel rivets) but hammered copper is beautiful.
Randochap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-09, 11:53 PM   #5
Slice2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pacific Northwest
Bikes: 2006 Cannondale Six13 Team 1, 1984 Cannondale, 1979 Motobecane Team Champion, 1994 Fat City Yo' Eddy Team
Posts: 424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by twodeadpoets View Post
For my tourer I went from sprung (champion flyer special) to unsprung (B17 Ti champion flyer special). I'm just over 200# and love the setup. I loved my sprung and it helped me get acustom to a leather saddle but for me the unsprung is the way to go. I put the sprung on my xtracycle grocery getter.
I'm curious what you specifically liked/disliked? Did you notice any reduction in comfort over rough road with the B17?

And is there some additional comfort to the skived edge of the Specials? (less chafing maybe?)
Slice2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 12:20 AM   #6
twodeadpoets 
Training Wheel Graduate
 
twodeadpoets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: San Juan/Gulf Islands
Bikes: Bridgestone Grand Velo, Evans Randonneur (custom), Moser 51.151, Surly LHT & Pacer, Kona/FreeRadical, Trek 730, Trek 510
Posts: 499
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The big "like" about the B-17 is the weight reduction and looks (I'm into aesthetics), while once broken-in there is no real comparative difference (for me) on asphalt between the two. However, there is on rougher bumpier roads. This is where the sprung does come in a little more handy. Riding on the road to my house I usually tend to float above the saddle while pedaling to avoid being thrown about on the saddle but almost the same can be said about the sprung. I think the only way to really appreciate the shock absorbing quality of a sprung Brooks saddle on gravelly roads, one would need one of their 1 ton models.

Personally I don't notice any difference between skived edges and non skived edges but the looks. Though someone lighter might notice a difference.

I hoped any of this is of use to you.

Cheers and good luck.
tdp
__________________
"Ride Like an Orca!" ~tdp
"People who enjoy waving flags, don't deserve to have one" ~Banksy

twodeadpoets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 01:20 AM   #7
fthomas 
Fred E Fenders
 
fthomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Again! Philippines & S. California
Bikes: Jamis Aurora Elite
Posts: 1,454
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Spring - it is so much more comfortable!
__________________
F Thomas

"Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance, you must keep moving."
Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
fthomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 01:59 AM   #8
xilios
Senior Member
 
xilios's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maastricht, NL
Bikes: Gazelle Playa
Posts: 584
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
We use sprung saddles, I just can't see how it would be more comfortable without them.

Last edited by xilios; 01-26-09 at 04:47 AM.
xilios is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 02:52 AM   #9
IceNine
El Duderino
 
IceNine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Madison, WI
Bikes: 84 Raleigh Portage, 83 Trek 620
Posts: 481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I have a Brooks Flyer and really like it a lot for long rides. I'm 235 pounds and do not find it too springy.
IceNine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 08:00 AM   #10
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Posts: 15,837
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by xilios View Post
We use sprung saddles, I just can't see how it would be more comfortable without them.
The sprung saddle can cause a bouncing that is linked to your pedaling. It's a kind of washboarding effect, and more pronounced at higher cadences. I find it uncomfortable, and I suspect it is inefficient too.

You can minimize the bouncing by pedaling with a very uniform stroke, i.e. pedaling all the way around the circle rather than just on the downstroke, provided your feet are firmly attached to the pedals with clips/cleats/&c, which also remedies the efficiency problem. I, personally, find that kind of pedaling very tiring; I've even given up on clips/cleats/etc despite pedaling with a quite high cadence. So I don't like the springs.

Another factor is how adept you are at unloading the saddle when you go over bumps -- that is, using the suspension built into your legs rather than in the bike. I do this instinctively, so again, for me, the springs have no particular benefit. If I needed another saddle right now, I'd get an unsprung one.

Bottom line: whether you will like the springs will depend largely on your riding style. Saddle choice is a very individual thing.

Edit: by the way, I weigh 165 or so.
rhm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 08:12 AM   #11
neilfein
Senior Member
 
neilfein's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Highland Park, NJ, USA
Bikes: "Hildy", a Novara Randonee touring bike; a 16-speed Bike Friday Tikit; and a Specialized Stumpjumper frame-based built-up MTB, now serving as the kid-carrier, grocery-getter.
Posts: 3,786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
For long miles, go for unsprung. You'll be quite happy.

You can't go wrong with a B-17 on a touring bike.

Edit: I tour on a Novara Randonee, 700x32, with a B-17.
__________________
Tour Journals, Blog, ride pix

My bands:
Uke On! - ukulele duo - Youtube channel

Ukulele Abyss - ukulele cover videos - Youtube channel

My celtic folk fusion band Baroque and Hungry's full-length studio album "Mended", available for download.

Artistic Differences - 8-track EP "Dreams of Bile and Blood" now available for download.
neilfein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 08:48 AM   #12
jcm
Gemutlichkeit
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 2,424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm sorry, but I have to say this:

The sprung Brooks saddles use a wire gauge of about .194" on the Flyer, 66, 67 and 73 models. Brothers and sisters - that's thick. Brooks springs are very stiff and are usually "felt" only on some fairly rough surfaces. They used to use .182" on the 73 because it had a third coil in front. They have since apparently standardized. That one did bounce a bit.

Lightweight riders are being launched by the leather, the tires, and cadence - not the springs. Test this by going back to your synthetic for ride or two. The suspension in the leather is amazing compared to any synthetic saddle. Heavy riders will derive the most benefit from springs as they are most likely to have an effect on them at all. The pogo-stick is something I have never experienced on any sprung Brooks, except when I installed Huffy - yes Huffy springs on one of my B-67's.

Their is little or no difference in ride quality between the 17 and the Flyer, as they are the same saddle top.
jcm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 09:09 AM   #13
xilios
Senior Member
 
xilios's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maastricht, NL
Bikes: Gazelle Playa
Posts: 584
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
[QUOTE=rhm;8249240]
You can minimize the bouncing by pedaling with a very uniform stroke, i.e. pedaling all the way around the circle rather than just on the downstroke, provided your feet are firmly attached to the pedals with clips/cleats/&c, which also remedies the efficiency problem. I, personally, find that kind of pedaling very tiring; I've even given up on clips/cleats/etc despite pedaling with a quite high cadence. So I don't like the springs.

Another factor is how adept you are at unloading the saddle when you go over bumps -- that is, using the suspension built into your legs rather than in the bike. I do this instinctively, so again, for me, the springs have no particular benefit. If I needed another saddle right now, I'd get an unsprung one.
QUOTE]

One only bounces when they ride with a high cadence on a low gear.
I always stand when going over a pothole etc. but when I mis one I'm glad for the springs
xilios is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 09:24 AM   #14
Doohickie 
You gonna eat that?
 
Doohickie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS
Posts: 14,460
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randochap View Post
Just get a B-17. No functional difference between copper and steel rivets (I have a 31 y/o Pro w/ steel rivets) but hammered copper is beautiful.
+1 all that. My 42-year-old B-72 has the steel rivets, no problem. Also, the B-72 is sprung and, in my opinion too much so. If I were to get another one, it would be a B-17.
__________________
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.



Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
Doohickie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 09:34 AM   #15
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Posts: 15,837
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by xilios View Post
One only bounces when they ride with a high cadence on a low gear.
...
Correct; I ride with a high cadence on a low gear, and would not recommend the sprung seat to anyone who rides that way.

By the way, you might edit your post, there's a "[/" missing from in front of the word "quote]", which is why my quote came out garbled. Cheers!
rhm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 10:53 AM   #16
Al Downie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cambridge UK
Bikes:
Posts: 440
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have 2x B17 and 1x Flyer, and the Flyer is gathering dust in the shed. The springs are so stiff that, for me, there's no discernable comfort benefit, but there's a whole lot of extra weight.
Al Downie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 12:30 PM   #17
Slice2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pacific Northwest
Bikes: 2006 Cannondale Six13 Team 1, 1984 Cannondale, 1979 Motobecane Team Champion, 1994 Fat City Yo' Eddy Team
Posts: 424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for all the great responses everyone!

I'm still leaning towards the Flyer, probably the Special. Weight is not an issue on this bike - it's all about comfort & function. And when the bike is loaded with groceries or camping gear, I may not be standing as much over the rough stuff. I'm a smooth rider with a quiet upper body so that won't contribute to any saddle bouncing.

I might offer to take a lightly-used one off somebody's hands, but I'd want my saddle to smell like new leather, not some stranger's arse.
Slice2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 01:04 PM   #18
Randochap
Recovering mentalist
 
Randochap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: On the Edge
Bikes: Too many
Posts: 2,810
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhm View Post
You can minimize the bouncing by pedaling with a very uniform stroke, i.e. pedaling all the way around the circle rather than just on the downstroke, provided your feet are firmly attached to the pedals with clips/cleats/&c, which also remedies the efficiency problem. I, personally, find that kind of pedaling very tiring; I've even given up on clips/cleats/etc despite pedaling with a quite high cadence. So I don't like the springs.
I'm not sure what you are arguing here. If you are arguing for efficiency, "giving up on" clips or clipless systems is not the way to achieve cycling efficiency (despite what someone with the initials "G.P." might tell you).

You could be the most efficient "round" pedaller on the planet and still be unable to eliminate the tendency to bounce on the sprung saddle, especially pedalling hard uphill.

I noticeably bounce more on my (unsprung) Brooks saddles than my firmer Selle Italia saddles, due to the sag in the leather "hammock" of the Brooks ... but this is what makes a Brooks so comfy over the long haul.

Sprung Brooks saddles should be restricted to more commuter-style, upright bikes where hitting a bump is transferred directly up the spine and unweighting is less easy to do. Sprung saddles are a bad choice on performance-oriented bikes.
Randochap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 01:15 PM   #19
Allen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 4,751
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Got a Champ Flyer, it's noticeably more comfortable than my B17 Imperial over rough roads.
Allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 01:48 PM   #20
roadfix
hello
 
roadfix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Bikes:
Posts: 18,588
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
With my body weight of 160 pounds the springs on my Conquest (sprung Professional/ATB saddle) becomes active only on big, sharp jolts, such as potholes. Otherwise, it rides like an unsprung Professional.
roadfix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 08:49 PM   #21
jcm
Gemutlichkeit
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 2,424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
"I noticeably bounce more on my (unsprung) Brooks saddles than my firmer Selle Italia saddles, due to the sag in the leather "hammock" of the Brooks ... but this is what makes a Brooks so comfy over the long haul.

Sprung Brooks saddles should be restricted to more commuter-style, upright bikes where hitting a bump is transferred directly up the spine and unweighting is less easy to do. Sprung saddles are a bad choice on performance-oriented bikes."


Agreed, but I would add touring as a good application for sprung saddles.
jcm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 10:19 PM   #22
oldmtngoat
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have both a sprung and unsprung Brooks. If my cadence gets over 100-102 on the sprung saddle, I start to notice a bit of bounce. If I go over about 110 on the unsprung saddle I may start to bounce. When my cadence is a more normal 95 or so I don’t notice a difference between the two saddles.
In terms of comfort I didn’t think there any difference. Then I went for a tour. After about 5 days in the sprung saddle, I realized my butt wasn’t sore. IMO, the difference was subtle unless I was spending many hours on the bike. Since then I spent more attention to the differences between the two saddles and concluded that the sprung saddle was indeed more comfortable for longer rides.
Hope my experience helps.
oldmtngoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 10:54 PM   #23
Slice2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pacific Northwest
Bikes: 2006 Cannondale Six13 Team 1, 1984 Cannondale, 1979 Motobecane Team Champion, 1994 Fat City Yo' Eddy Team
Posts: 424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
That settles it - you all have confirmed what I suspected...

I'm going sprung, baby!
Slice2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-09, 08:26 AM   #24
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Posts: 15,837
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randochap View Post
I'm not sure what you are arguing here.
Oh, I don't mean to argue, or at least not to sound argumentative! But I will reply to your remarks in a somewhat mixed up order....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randochap View Post
Sprung Brooks saddles should be restricted to more commuter-style, upright bikes where hitting a bump is transferred directly up the spine and unweighting is less easy to do. Sprung saddles are a bad choice on performance-oriented bikes.
I agree. Another way to put the same principle is that your bike (and the way it is set up) should suit your riding style: if you like your handlebar higher than your seat, you will get more benefit from a sprung saddle. If you ride with your handlebar lower than your seat, the springs are more likely to annoy you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randochap View Post
... If you are arguing for efficiency, "giving up on" clips or clipless systems is not the way to achieve cycling efficiency....
Agreed, again; it's best to set up your touring bike for the way you actually do ride, rather than the way you want to ride or wish you could ride. There's a trade-off between comfort, efficiency, and other aspects of riding; and it turns out that efficiency is not my highest goal. Leaving efficiency and theory aside, my experience (having used clips for the last 30 years or so, and clipless systems for the last 10) is that I rarely take advantage of the benefits clips/cleats offer. Talking about clips/cleats in this thread is not a complete non sequitur because they allow a much more even pedaling style that reduces the tendency to bounce in the saddle. But I find that style of pedaling very tiring, and even though I can do it, I don't. So I'm actually happiest on the bikes that have neither.

In sum, having determined that my riding style involves a low handlebar and a high cadence, I find a sprung saddle annoying.
rhm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-09, 01:05 PM   #25
bokerfest
Bicycle Student
 
bokerfest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Compton, CA
Bikes: 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker, 1980's Nishiki Rally, 2000 Trek 820
Posts: 159
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have the Flyer. I am positive that I would have been happy with the unsprung, even though I am happy with my springs.
JCM is right. It is a thick gauge on the springs which I like because just riding there is no bounce to the normal stroke. The only time I have been happy that I got the sprung instead of the no springs is when I am looking around enjoying the view and then BAM! I run over a pot hole. The springs have saved a lot of pain that would been felt if I did not have the springs. Then the con side of it, the springs cause more weight. I bet you will be happy with either choice and down the road you will be on another similar Brooks thread trying to defend the the product that you bought.
bokerfest is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:50 AM.