Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-02-14, 07:20 PM   #126
DVC45
Senior Member
 
DVC45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 3,851
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Today, I start saving.

Some details here 2015 Trek 520 Disc | Buckingham Bikes
DVC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-14, 05:54 PM   #127
Lanovran
Senior Member
 
Lanovran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Bikes: 2013 Trek 520, 2014 Trek Stache 8, 1985 Nishiki Team Issue, 2014 Dahon Vigor P9, State Vice 2.0
Posts: 472
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Looks like the non-disc version of the 520 will still be going strong as well, and in that gorgeous "deep evergreen" color!

Attached Images
File Type: jpg 520green.jpg (83.8 KB, 320 views)
Lanovran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-14, 07:00 PM   #128
KFC
Alpha Bean
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Reston Virginia
Bikes: Trek 520, GT Flat Bar road Bike
Posts: 43
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I sure love mine. It's a 2010 metallic 'Root Beer',and I have put 19,400 miles on it. I ride it in all conditions and all road surfaces. I wore out the original wheels at 18,000 miles and replaced them with a Mavic A-719 set. I'am on my third cassette and chain, and recently replaced the crank assembly. The frame still looks and rides like new. It been a great investment. It is comfortable, stable, durable and very forgiving. Steel is real!
KFC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-14, 07:17 PM   #129
TrekCommuter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Bikes: 7.2 FX
Posts: 158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Does anyone know what year the frames stopped being manufactured in the US? I would really like to find a USA made Trek 520 at some point.
TrekCommuter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-14, 08:10 PM   #130
DVC45
Senior Member
 
DVC45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 3,851
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrekCommuter View Post
Does anyone know what year the frames stopped being manufactured in the US? I would really like to find a USA made Trek 520 at some point.
2003, I think.
DVC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-14, 08:25 PM   #131
TrekCommuter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Bikes: 7.2 FX
Posts: 158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks! Now to find one...seems hard to do. Especially in 54 or 56 CM.
TrekCommuter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-14, 05:32 PM   #132
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Mint 1991.

I have a mint 1991 520 with under 5 miles on her. Hoping I can figure outhow to post pics.
amarok54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-14, 06:26 PM   #133
Marc40a
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: North Shore, MA
Bikes: Jamis Aurora, Rivendell Sam Hillborne, Surly ECR, Serotta CSI
Posts: 199
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by crankin360 View Post
Rode my first 520 today. It was a 2008, 58cm frame. I found it to be too small and have confirmed I need a 60cm.

I have read alot of impressions of this bike. Coming from a racing style bike, I enjoyed the stability as opposed to the twitchy feel of a racing bike. Barcons were not too bad, would take some getting used to.

It would be interesting to ride a newer 520 and get a feel for the lower gearing.

The hunt continues!

Can I ask your height and inseam? I'm curious as to how a 520 fits. I'm ride a 57cm bike with a non sloping top tube and was wondering if I'd go up or down a cm on a 520.
Marc40a is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-14, 07:30 PM   #134
crankin360
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I am 6'1" and have a 33 1/2" inseam. Originally, after riding a 58cm, I thought the 58cm was too small. Then I rode a friends 60cm and I did not have any top tube clearance. So I went with a 58cm and swapped out the handlebar stem.
crankin360 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-14, 07:08 AM   #135
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CAM02235.jpg (98.4 KB, 293 views)
amarok54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-14, 07:10 AM   #136
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CAM02222.jpg (98.6 KB, 280 views)
amarok54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-14, 07:11 AM   #137
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CAM02190.jpg (100.6 KB, 263 views)
amarok54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-14, 07:15 AM   #138
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CAM02151 (1).jpg (95.2 KB, 262 views)
amarok54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-14, 07:16 AM   #139
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CAM02151.jpg (95.2 KB, 116 views)
File Type: jpg CAM02184.jpg (99.2 KB, 266 views)
amarok54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-14, 07:17 AM   #140
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CAM02147.jpg (91.1 KB, 258 views)
amarok54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-14, 08:04 AM   #141
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CAM02142.jpg (98.1 KB, 255 views)
amarok54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-14, 08:05 AM   #142
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CAM02141.jpg (97.1 KB, 246 views)
amarok54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-14, 08:10 AM   #143
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CAM02147.jpg (91.1 KB, 241 views)
amarok54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-14, 08:26 AM   #144
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Still having problems posting pics,sorry about that folks. This is an all original 1991 520 in pristine condition. It's such a nice example that I don't want to ride it which seems crazy! Been thinking of letting the bike go to someone who would ride her.
amarok54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-14, 08:46 AM   #145
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CAM02235.jpg (98.4 KB, 124 views)
File Type: jpg CAM02194.jpg (96.9 KB, 248 views)
amarok54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-14, 08:48 AM   #146
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CAM02145.jpg (90.9 KB, 268 views)
amarok54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-14, 11:20 PM   #147
MAK
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Delaware
Bikes: Yes, I have bikes.
Posts: 1,147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
I've decided to replace the cranks on my 2004 520. I'd be going from a 105 crankset that's 52-39-28 (the small ring was replaced) to either the Deore M590 at 48-36-26 or the Deore XT M770 at either 48-36-26 or 44-32-22. Everything is 9 speed.

The M590 is standard on current 520s. Are those of you who ride with the 590's satisfied or would you recommend an upgrade to the 770? There's a slight weight difference and supposedly the 770 is a bit stiffer. I believe that the 770 comes with a tad better bottom bracket too. The price difference is +/- $100.00.

Also is the 3.2 gear inch difference in the 26 v. 22 small ring minor or significant? BTW...I'm not a fan of hills.

You opinions please.
Thank you.
MAK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-14, 12:29 AM   #148
digibud
Senior Member
 
digibud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Further North than U
Bikes: Spec Roubaix, three Fisher Montare, two Pugs
Posts: 1,987
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by amarok54 View Post
I have a mint 1991 520 with under 5 miles on her. Hoping I can figure outhow to post pics.
what size is it? beautiful bike
digibud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-14, 12:37 AM   #149
digibud
Senior Member
 
digibud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Further North than U
Bikes: Spec Roubaix, three Fisher Montare, two Pugs
Posts: 1,987
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAK View Post
Also is the 3.2 gear inch difference in the 26 v. 22 small ring minor or significant? BTW...I'm not a fan of hills.
Under the right circumstances a small difference can be huge but whether it's meaningful to you...dunno. If you found yourself on a long hill that you could barely climb in a 26 ring but could just make it on a 22...it could be a big deal. Or you may be able to do the 26 at 40rpm straining your knee when the 22 allowed you to spin. If you ride lightly loaded on major highways that don't get over 6% then it's probably meaningless. If you ride heavily loaded and aren't in great shape and tackle steeper inclines then that difference can indeed be a big deal. For touring, most folks could care less about the high gear and the low end can hardly be too low. It's not uncommon for tourers to set up for an 18" gear. That's pretty darned low but many find it useful. If your 22 up front was mated to a 28 in the rear then yeah...really necessary. If you have a 36 in back then maybe it's overkill. You really can only know this by experience but for touring look to get a low gear from 18-22" or so and you'll at least be in a reasonable ballpark.
digibud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-14, 12:47 AM   #150
MAK
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Delaware
Bikes: Yes, I have bikes.
Posts: 1,147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by digibud View Post
Under the right circumstances a small difference can be huge but whether it's meaningful to you...dunno. If you found yourself on a long hill that you could barely climb in a 26 ring but could just make it on a 22...it could be a big deal. Or you may be able to do the 26 at 40rpm straining your knee when the 22 allowed you to spin. If you ride lightly loaded on major highways that don't get over 6% then it's probably meaningless. If you ride heavily loaded and aren't in great shape and tackle steeper inclines then that difference can indeed be a big deal. For touring, most folks could care less about the high gear and the low end can hardly be too low. It's not uncommon for tourers to set up for an 18" gear. That's pretty darned low but many find it useful. If your 22 up front was mated to a 28 in the rear then yeah...really necessary. If you have a 36 in back then maybe it's overkill. You really can only know this by experience but for touring look to get a low gear from 18-22" or so and you'll at least be in a reasonable ballpark.
Yes I do have a 36 rear so the gear inches would be 17.6" v. 20.8" both pretty low.

Thanks for your response.
MAK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:20 PM.


 
  • Ask a Question
    get answers from real people!
Click to start entering your question.
I HAVE A QUESTION