Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Too heavy?

  1. #1
    Deluded...
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Old Lyme, CT
    My Bikes
    Jamis Trail XR
    Posts
    51
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Too heavy?

    One of the benefits of working in a warehouse is that I have access to a pretty big freight scale, which comes in handy when I feel like weighing my commuter bike. (using it to tour this summer) So as you can see in the picture, I stripped it to weigh it. Took off the panniers, the bottles, the GPS. Just racks, a rear fender, and toe clips (which came off today, SPD pedals went on). What you can't see is the digital screen above the scale that weighs the bike in at 36 lbs.

    What I want to know is... is 36 lbs. far too heavy for the bike, as you see it? I'm trying not to obsess about weight, but I can't help thinking that maybe this is too heavy. I don't know really, as I have nothing else to compare it to. I've done a few "shakedown" rides with loaded front and rear panniers, tent, sleeping pad water, etc... I didn't get to weigh the bike but I did a 15 mile cruise around town and it felt fine. Am I worrying too much?
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    Slow Rider bwgride's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    807
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My touring bike weights about 35 lbs with standard touring equipment installed (e.g. racks, mirror, etc.). That weight would not be a worry to me.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bay Area, Calif.
    Posts
    4,826
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't know how much your touring load or you weigh, but I doubt that the bike weight will matter much. Let's say that altogether you, the bike, bags, camping gear, food, water, etc. weigh in at 230 lbs. If you went all out to get a lighter bike you might be able to get it down to around 26 lbs. as equipped in your photo and that would get the total weight down to 220 lbs. On flat sections of your route that would have almost no impact and even on the steepest climbs it would only slow you down by about 4%. Unless you're participating in that 'touring race' in the other thread then I wouldn't think this is enough of a difference to worry about.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Thulsadoom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Gouverneur NY
    My Bikes
    2003 BIANCHI VIGORELLI, 2002 TREK 520, Schwinn Mesa WINTER BIKE
    Posts
    1,243
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My 25" Trek 520 weighs right around 36-37 pounds unloaded. I think I put about 30,000 miles on it before I weighed it. Don't worry about it.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Mine weighs in the upper 30's or very low 40's, depending on which racks I have mounted. The Surly Nice Racks are huge, nice, and heavy. It's built like a truck, geared like a truck, and hauls a load like one too.

  6. #6
    Professional Fuss-Budget Bacciagalupe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,358
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Weight doesn't matter that much, especially since you're going to put another 30-50+ pounds of gear onto the bike. Most touring bikes run around 25-30 pounds anyway.

    If you're really that worried, figure out some other way to save 5-10 pounds from your gear - e.g. lighter tent, lighter pots, and so forth.

  7. #7
    Deluded...
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Old Lyme, CT
    My Bikes
    Jamis Trail XR
    Posts
    51
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I appreciate all the responses! Thanks!

  8. #8
    Long Distance Cyclist Machka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    I ride where the thylacine roamed!
    My Bikes
    Lots
    Posts
    38,889
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I wouldn't worry about what the bicycle itself weighs ... I'd worry more about what the bicycle + loaded panniers weighs. The lighter the better.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    521
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i would say so for commuting. and i thought my bike was heavy at 29lbs!

    what sort of build up does that thing have?

  10. #10
    ah.... sure. kayakdiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Whidbey Island WA
    My Bikes
    Specialized.... schwinn..... enough to fill my needs..
    Posts
    4,106
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No
    Save 15% on your first order at Hammer Nutrition!!

    2010 Giant TCR SL 3
    2010 Novara Randonee

  11. #11
    The Rock Cycle eofelis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Western Colorado
    My Bikes
    Salsa Vaya Ti, Specialized Ruby, Gunnar Sport, Motobecane Fantom CXX, Jamis Dragon, Novara Randonee x2
    Posts
    1,647
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My tiny 42cm LHT weighs 30lbs with front and rear racks and fenders.
    Gunnar Sport
    Specialized Ruby
    Salsa Vaya Ti
    Novara Randonee x2
    Motobecane Fantom CXX
    Jamis Dragon

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    N. California
    Posts
    1,410
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My 54cm LHT weighs 32 lb with fenders, racks and bottle cages.

  13. #13
    Senior Member jurjan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands
    My Bikes
    Snel Safari / Batavus something or other
    Posts
    214
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My bike weighs about 18 / 19 kilo's, I wouldn't worry about weight that much.
    Pretty much the only time I have a 'problem' with its weight is when I take it on an airplane.
    18 kilo's doesn't leave much room for luggage when 25 kilo's is the limit.
    (so we either fly United or something like that, they have a two pieces of luggage of (I think) 25 kilo's each on their intercontinental flights, or we go to countries like Indonesia where you don't need to bring cookware and campinggear)
    have a nice day,
    Jurjan

  14. #14
    rhm
    rhm is offline
    multimodal commuter rhm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    NJ, NYC, LI
    My Bikes
    1945? Fothergill, 1948 Raleigh Record Ace, 1954 Drysdale, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1972 Fuji Finest, 1983 Trek 720, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
    Posts
    12,415
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    No, 36 lbs is too much for a bike that doesn't even have a front fender.

    Just kidding, of course.

  15. #15
    Senior Member lighthorse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    My Bikes
    LeMond Buenos Aires, Trek 7500, Scattante CFR, Burley Hudson
    Posts
    498
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Are you asking for input on how to reduce the weight you will have to pedal down the road? I think that most touring bikes run around 30-35 pounds without racks, panniers, etc so you are not far off the norm. My own personal inclination would be to remove the kickstand (I have never found a place that I needed one), remove the rear fender(the rear rack will keep the wet off of you), and maybe look at lighter tires. But that would only save a few pounds. My guess is that you will have more useless weight and bulk in the other stuff that are on your list. We all do.
    Good luck on your ride.
    Suntree, Fl.
    Burley Hudson (n+3)
    Scattante CFR (n+2)
    LeMond Buenos Aries (steel)(n+1)
    Trek 7500 (n)

    crazyguyonabike.com/lighthorse

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    537
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just for your comparison:

    My 2009 Trek 520 exactly as it came from the factory (with fenders, factory rear rack, front and rear reflectors and SPD pedals, but without cages, lights, front rack, pump or computer) weighed in at 28.43 pounds.

  17. #17
    Macro Geek
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    My Bikes
    True North tourer (www.truenorthcycles.com), 2004; Miyata 1000, 1985
    Posts
    1,181
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A few pounds one way or the other doesn't make a big difference on a tour, except, perhaps, when climbing steep hills. Your legs are doing more work to push against gravity!

    But let's say you really are planning trips to the Alps or Rockies, and you want to ease your load:

    1. Get a new bike. A lightweight titanium touring bike will set you back $2000 or more. Maybe much more.

    2. Ditch gear. Many of us take too much. It isn't hard to carry 5 or 10 pounds more than needed. Can you get by with two water bottles instead of three? Bring one book instead of two? How about not taking an extra tire and spare spokes? (I have never carried these items.) The nice thing about this approach is that it's free.

    3. Substitute lighter gear.
    Lightweight versions of tents, sleeping bags, jackets, cooking gear, racks, etc. are available, although these tend to be expensive. Carbon fibre water bottle holders that are almost light enough to float in air can be yours for about 30 bucks each... if you are so inclined!

    4. Lose weight. If two people are equally strong, and one weighs 200 lbs while the other weights 180, there isn't a difference when the former rides a 20 lb. bike and the latter rides a 40 pound bike. In both cases, you are still pushing 220 lbs up the slope.
    Last edited by acantor; 05-15-09 at 08:40 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •