Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-20-09, 11:41 PM   #1
clayborne
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
clayborne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 95
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My dream bike is no dream at all- Waterford build gone wrong

I have a few major issues i would love for you guys to pick apart about my new build.

First up is fit. The top tube is 54 and i feel stretched out even with a 100mm rise stem. I love the bike but i cant tell whether to give up on it or not. I got the bike used an it is in prime condition and i know when i leave for my victoria to southern cal trip i am going to put some wear on it. Should i just sell it now. ( the bike is their relaxed cross bike, i thought i could use it as my daily rider after my trip).

Second up is saddle. My B17 doesnt fit in my thomson. Is my brooks pro too skinny?

3rd I am running a compact da 2x10 with a 11-27 in rear and a 42 53 in front. Not very compact but getting 3X10 means getting a whole new group essentially because my cranks and shifters are double. My cranks are the 2004 ultegra self extracting ones so i can just swap out an arm.

i have an old beater frame laying around that fits me like a glove. i think i might switch back to that but then i am running caliper brakes and can only run 28c tires. Oh what to do.

I should say i am riding vic to santa barbara in 5 weeks and plan on doing a medium load, ultra light tent and stove, a little food here and their, and light on the clothes.I plan to carry 50pnds. i am 24, 165, and in plow horse shape but i want it to be fun.
clayborne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-09, 06:09 AM   #2
tarwheel 
Senior Member
 
tarwheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Bikes: Waterford RST-22, Bob Jackson World Tour, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Soma Saga, De Bernardi SL, Specialized Sequoia
Posts: 8,479
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Go to a good bike shop that does fittings and pay them to get it right. Unless the frame is just the wrong size for you, it's probably just a matter of using the correct stem, seatpost and adjustments. In my experience, a Thomson is the wrong post for a Brooks saddle unless your frame has a very relaxed seat tube angle (eg, 72), which I doubt. You need a seatpost with a lot of setback to use a Brooks saddle on most frames.

Alternatively, post the dimensions of your old "beater" bike that fits like a glove -- eg, top tube, seat tube, and head tube lengths measured center-center. If you know the STA, post that as well as the distance from center of the bottom bracket to the top of your saddle. It may be that the Waterford is just the wrong size for you.
tarwheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-09, 06:09 AM   #3
jgsatl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 121
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
why not a shorter stem?
jgsatl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-09, 06:11 AM   #4
jgsatl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 121
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
and maybe it's just the narrow saddles that have issue? i'm using a flyer (springy!) on my thompson setback and it works very well.
jgsatl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-09, 10:07 AM   #5
clayborne
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
clayborne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 95
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I went from a thomson layback to an upright, went from a 120 to 100 stem. The bike is threaded which makes it kinda tough to get fitted on. The Waterford is 54 tt with a 50 st (but because its cyclocross the stand over is about the same as a 53 or 54. I found a Fuji in the street that is 43.5 tt and 52 st. which i ride with a 120 or 110 stem.
clayborne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-09, 10:09 AM   #6
clayborne
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
clayborne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 95
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
and its the rails of the b17 which are set about 2mm too wide for the tomson or any "road" post.
clayborne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-09, 04:17 PM   #7
jgsatl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 121
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
do i have a mtn. thomson? didn't know there were differences.....interesting.
jgsatl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-09, 06:21 PM   #8
Bacciagalupe
Professional Fuss-Budget
 
Bacciagalupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 6,438
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Unless you are a very strong rider, and/or do not plan to take the coastal route, that gearing will be insufficient. There are some killer hills near Big Sur and other areas.

Fortunately 28c's should actually be OK as long as you stick to the road. Since you have a few weeks, you have time to experiment with lower PSI tires. So if the beater bike has low gearing and is in decent shape, that may be a better choice.
Bacciagalupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-09, 07:21 PM   #9
Randochap
Recovering mentalist
 
Randochap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: On the Edge
Bikes: Too many
Posts: 2,810
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by clayborne View Post
and its the rails of the b17 which are set about 2mm too wide for the tomson or any "road" post.

My B-17 fits Campag Centaur post no problem.

Here's some sizing/fitting info.
Randochap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-09, 11:36 PM   #10
mtnroads
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon and SE Asia
Bikes: Waterford ST-22, Jamis Quest Elite, Jamis Dragon Pro
Posts: 933
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I had a Brooks on my Thompson post in my T2000 for a couple of test rides. Are you sure it doesn't fit? I understand you want to shorten up the cockpit with the straight-up seat post and shorter stem, but sometimes you're fighting a losing battle. Also, being too stretched out on a Brooks can pull you forward onto the horn of the saddle (happened to me) leading to perineal problems.
mtnroads is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-09, 12:12 AM   #11
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by clayborn
I got the bike used
you used a very misleading thread title dontchya think? was the bike built for your identical twin?

Last edited by Bekologist; 05-22-09 at 12:16 AM.
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-09, 12:14 AM   #12
Ziemas
Senior Member
 
Ziemas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riga, Latvia
Bikes:
Posts: 10,082
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bekologist View Post
you used a very misleading thread title dontchya think? was the bike built for your identical twin?
+1

The title makes it sound like it's a problem with Waterford, which it is clearly is not.
Ziemas is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-09, 06:35 AM   #13
Torrilin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Bikes:
Posts: 1,522
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by clayborne View Post
I went from a thomson layback to an upright, went from a 120 to 100 stem. The bike is threaded which makes it kinda tough to get fitted on. The Waterford is 54 tt with a 50 st (but because its cyclocross the stand over is about the same as a 53 or 54. I found a Fuji in the street that is 43.5 tt and 52 st. which i ride with a 120 or 110 stem.
Wait, what? Your comfy bike has a 43.5cm top tube, and you thought a bike with a 10.5cm longer top tube would work? That's more than 4" of difference. If the Fuji feels very small and cramped, it *might* make sense, but that's still jumping something like 4 sizes of bike at once.

That is not a dream bike, and this is why people say to buy bikes by the top tube length.
Torrilin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-09, 10:03 AM   #14
zzzwillzzz
shut up and ride
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: noho
Bikes: supersix hi-mod,burley duet tandem,woodrup track,cannondale cross,specialized road
Posts: 1,947
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by clayborne View Post
I am running a compact da 2x10 with a 11-27 in rear and a 42 53 in front. Not very compact ...
??? are you running a compact or not? 53/42 is not a compact and no one uses a 42 anymore, even racers
zzzwillzzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-09, 11:14 AM   #15
tashi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Victoria
Bikes:
Posts: 1,182
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Gearing-wise, you can get pretty low gears (how low, I don't know, check sheldonbrown.com's gear calculator) with a mountain 11-32 (or 34) cogstack on the back, and your crank should be able to run a 38 tooth little ring. I haven't done an extended trip like this, but I did haul all of mine and my wife's stuff in a BOB trailer around Galiano and Pender Islands (steep hills, particularly on Galiano) with my race bike and this gearing combo. Rear derailleur capacity may be an issue, but that's pretty easy to sort out with a cheap mountain derailleur.

Fit: This is the most important thing about any bike. Since you're in Victoria, (I assume by your trip route) I can recommend Scott at Oak Bay Bikes as a good bike fitter. Pay for the fit-kit and you'll know exactly how a bike should come together in order to fit you well. This costs some money, but you avoid the "trial and error" costs of trying to sort it out on your own. Since you have a frame that you're comfortable on, you've got a good starting point. Measure the top tube length, stem length, and reach, and you will be able to figure out what you have to do to replicate that position on your new bike.

Bike fit can be tricky, but it's important, so professional, in-person advice can be very valuable. Even if it means selling your frame and starting over it's worthwhile to ride a bike that fits.
tashi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-09, 11:44 AM   #16
stachemaster
rawthentic menergy
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes: 2005 johnny coast cycles #4 track, 1971 peugeot px-10 road, gt performer 1986 PINK bmx, 1966 raleigh rodeo 3-speed STICK SHIFT 20", 1960s rollfast tandem, 1970s raleigh fixed
Posts: 183
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Apart from being 10cm too large, in addition to getting a new stem, you should get bars with shorter reach and drop measurements so you are not as far forward.
stachemaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-09, 01:55 PM   #17
CCrew
Older than dirt
 
CCrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winchester, VA
Bikes: Too darn many.. latest count is 11
Posts: 5,343
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by stachemaster View Post
Apart from being 10cm too large, in addition to getting a new stem, you should get bars with shorter reach and drop measurements so you are not as far forward.
+1. and drop to a 50/34 compact in the front. Gearing's too high for loaded touring.
CCrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-09, 03:46 PM   #18
positron
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 1,273
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torrilin View Post
Wait, what? Your comfy bike has a 43.5cm top tube, and you thought a bike with a 10.5cm longer top tube would work? That's more than 4" of difference. If the Fuji feels very small and cramped, it *might* make sense, but that's still jumping something like 4 sizes of bike at once.

That is not a dream bike, and this is why people say to buy bikes by the top tube length.
uh, pretty sure that was a typo and he meant 53.5cm...

I dont think anyone even makes a 43cm tt bike...
positron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-09, 04:18 PM   #19
CCrew
Older than dirt
 
CCrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winchester, VA
Bikes: Too darn many.. latest count is 11
Posts: 5,343
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by positron View Post
I dont think anyone even makes a 43cm tt bike...
Salsa did in 44cm

http://www.salsacycles.com/elgogo.html
CCrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-09, 09:17 PM   #20
Randochap
Recovering mentalist
 
Randochap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: On the Edge
Bikes: Too many
Posts: 2,810
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziemas View Post
+1

the title makes it sound like it's a problem with waterford, which it is clearly is not.
+2
Randochap is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:13 AM.