Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Your Opinion Please about the value of Coupled bikes for airline travel

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Your Opinion Please about the value of Coupled bikes for airline travel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-10, 06:11 AM
  #26  
...into the blue...
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 434

Bikes: Thorn Nomad 2, LHT, Jamis Quest, ....

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NeilGunton
I ordered S&S couplings on my new Co-Motion Americano primarily because it would make it a little easier to fit the bike into a regular size car (think rental car or taxi). In this case, the time to break down and reconstruct the bike is really not very long at all - you're not doing the full packing job, but rather simply undoing the couplings and detaching the cables, and you're done. A couple of minutes at each end. To me, being able to break it down further for airlines is just an added bonus, but not the main point (as many people seem to look at it).

Neil
Very interesting point, though I think I'd want to try it, or see someone else w/ a 60cm LHT try it, before springing for the cash.

Presumably the couplers could make use of the standard cardboard box easier, Hardy says above. My bike *barely* fits into the 92" normal box. I have to take the handlebars off completely (not just twist them), which can be a real pain to put back together completely.

Hmm.
quester is offline  
Old 01-05-10, 06:13 AM
  #27  
...into the blue...
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 434

Bikes: Thorn Nomad 2, LHT, Jamis Quest, ....

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FlowerBlossom
I'm considering getting a custom bike with s&s couplers, for the simple fact that if I decide I need it for a trip, I can rest easy that the bike will be less likely to be damaged. I would need 3-4 trips on the bike to rationalize the cost (couplers+suitcase), which seems like a reasonable number of trips to me.
This is under the assumption that you need the bike with you on the plane. W/ a cardboard box you can fedex your bike anywhere in the US for $75 or so. This is as compared to the $50 you would be charged by most airlines (not southwest!) even for the 62" S&S box.
quester is offline  
Old 01-05-10, 07:33 AM
  #28  
imi
aka Timi
 
imi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,239

Bikes: Bianchi Lupo (touring) Bianchi Volpe (commuter), Miyata On Off Road Runner

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 160 Post(s)
Liked 130 Times in 99 Posts
I would love to see real life pictures of say a 60cm S&S LHT (or similar) packed in 62" box, with fenders? racks? tools? water bottles? pump? kitchen sink? Do you have to remove the chainrings?

A nifty racing bike (or computer generated pictures) are one thing, but how much of a real world touring bike can you stuff in a suitcase?


Last edited by imi; 01-05-10 at 07:46 AM.
imi is offline  
Old 01-05-10, 09:53 AM
  #29  
Bike touring webrarian
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,071

Bikes: I tour on a Waterford Adventurecycle. It is a fabulous touring bike.

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 53 Posts
Originally Posted by imi
I would love to see real life pictures of say a 60cm S&S LHT (or similar) packed in 62" box, with fenders? racks? tools? water bottles? pump? kitchen sink? Do you have to remove the chainrings?
I posted pictures of putting my S&S coupled Waterford Adventure cycle into its hard case for traveling on this thread: https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...-in-a-suitcase

The only thing I put in the bike box is the bike and tools. The rest: fenders, racks, panniers, gear, etc, goes in another (large) suitcase.

I showed both cases and how I put the bike together in my recent Switzerland journal.

I've flown with my S&S coupled bike at least a dozen times and have certainly paid for their cost in saved baggage expenses. But, in addition, the hard case completely protects the bike from baggage handlers "excess exuberance," hides the fact that it is a bicycle, and makes it easier to move around than a partially assembled bike in a cardboard box.

This doesn't count the benefits of the couplers with transporting the bike in a car trunk, which I do all the time.

I would most definitely get S&S couplers on another touring bike, if I had to buy one.

Ray
raybo is offline  
Old 01-05-10, 12:13 PM
  #30  
imi
aka Timi
 
imi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,239

Bikes: Bianchi Lupo (touring) Bianchi Volpe (commuter), Miyata On Off Road Runner

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 160 Post(s)
Liked 130 Times in 99 Posts
Thanks Ray... guess I'll have to leave the kitchen sink :/

I see you take the fork off. Pardon my ignorance never having had a threadless fork, but does this require much in the way of tools and expertise? (I have read up on it, but park tools makes everything sound so simple).

Airlines seem to veering towards the "one bag" rule (even to/from N.America). Maybe Forest Gump knew what he was doing, haha

Seems like every step I take forward they're waiting in the bushes (next to the check-in counter) ready to ambush me

Last edited by imi; 01-05-10 at 12:36 PM.
imi is offline  
Old 01-05-10, 01:53 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,435

Bikes: IF steel deluxe 29er tourer

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by quester
Very interesting point, though I think I'd want to try it, or see someone else w/ a 60cm LHT try it, before springing for the cash.

Presumably the couplers could make use of the standard cardboard box easier, Hardy says above. My bike *barely* fits into the 92" normal box. I have to take the handlebars off completely (not just twist them), which can be a real pain to put back together completely.

Hmm.
My 62 cm S&S equipped Americano Co-Pilot fits fine in the trunk (boot) of a largeish sedan, but not an econobox. When packed in the case, the handlebars must come off.

Last edited by Cyclesafe; 01-05-10 at 01:57 PM.
Cyclesafe is offline  
Old 01-05-10, 01:55 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,435

Bikes: IF steel deluxe 29er tourer

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by imi
I would love to see real life pictures of say a 60cm S&S LHT (or similar) packed in 62" box, with fenders? racks? tools? water bottles? pump? kitchen sink? Do you have to remove the chainrings?

A nifty racing bike (or computer generated pictures) are one thing, but how much of a real world touring bike can you stuff in a suitcase?

https://www.crazyguyonabike.com/doc/?...oc_id=5654&v=V

No racks, but fenders are possible.
Cyclesafe is offline  
Old 01-05-10, 02:21 PM
  #33  
Back after a long absence
 
joelpalmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 603

Bikes: 1974 Schwinn Speedster 3-speed, Raleigh Super Course

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Cyclesafe
Technically airlines charge extra for bicycles no matter how small you pack them. So strictly speaking there is no financial advantage to getting the couplers.
That's actually a reason I went with couplers - it lets me (theoretically) pack my bike into a suitcase looking container which should hopefully dodge any question about "what's in that box". On the practical side, I was building my touring rig up from the frame and figured it was worth getting the couplers cut into it before the rest of the build. It's doubtful that I would have gone to the effort of getting them if the bike had been built up. Also, I have yet to actually use the couplers for air travel, and the one time I tried to pack the bike (borrowed a case from the shop that did the work) I couldn't get it to fit, but that says more about the wisdom of trying to do your first S&S breakdown at 11 pm the night before you fly than anything else.
joelpalmer is offline  
Old 01-05-10, 02:27 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 537
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Does anybody know what the weight penalty is for the couplers?
John Nelson is offline  
Old 01-05-10, 02:43 PM
  #35  
GATC
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: south Puget Sound
Posts: 8,728
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 464 Post(s)
Liked 49 Times in 27 Posts
Originally Posted by John Nelson
Does anybody know what the weight penalty is for the couplers?
https://www.sandsmachine.com/spec_cm.htm
HardyWeinberg is offline  
Old 01-05-10, 03:01 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Cyclesafe
My 62 cm S&S equipped Americano Co-Pilot fits fine in the trunk (boot) of a largeish sedan, but not an econobox.
My regular (non-folding or coupled) 60cm Cannondale does fit in the trunk/boot of every econobox (like Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla) I've tried once I pop the wheels off. That only takes a few seconds and is much faster than folding my folder or undoing even a single S&S. So I fail to see the advantage in going with any non-standard bike just for getting it into a trunk. I usually find it's easier to take the wheels off the Cannondale and fit it into the trunk than it would be to lower the back seat of the car.

Now for getting under the airline 62" rule there's clearly a need for either couplers or a folder and my Bike Friday has paid for itself several times over in saved oversize baggage costs.
prathmann is offline  
Old 01-13-10, 10:43 AM
  #37  
Crushing it All the Time
 
ironpuppy13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 267
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
just mail the bike (and all of your luggage for that matter) to where ever your going. it'll cut way down on your traveling costs. I've done it once and it is hilarious to travel without any luggage.
ironpuppy13 is offline  
Old 01-17-10, 01:48 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 799
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I had S & S couplers put on my steel Lemond bike about 6 years ago. This November I had to have Bilenkly Cycle Works put my baby to sleep. I have cycled in the rain many times and I did not have frame saver applied inside the tubing. I noticed a spot rusted through the steel below the coupler on the down tube. They told me they did not want to re-weld the frame as they did not trust the integrity of the steel. I did get my money's worth by the second year of travel. It was checked by TSA most of the time. I even put a note inside taped to the top of the suitcase that there were not any CO2 cartridges or any bike lubricants inside. Once they had me paged so I could shut the case after they searched the contents. I usually took the handlebars off and packed them with my regular luggage. My bike was never damaged in transit. I am retired now so I do not have a need to fly domestically for business or pleasure. I'd rather drive. I don't know if I would do it again, especially with all the new baggage rules. I did take the bike on many business trips in addition to cycling tours because I did not have to pay extra for baggage.
outashape is offline  
Old 01-17-10, 09:10 AM
  #39  
imi
aka Timi
 
imi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,239

Bikes: Bianchi Lupo (touring) Bianchi Volpe (commuter), Miyata On Off Road Runner

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 160 Post(s)
Liked 130 Times in 99 Posts
Seems like a number of airlines have changed their baggage policies from the beginning of the year... extra charge for second checked baggage for example... wouldn't surprise me if they all follow suit... gah!

I'm considering a 26" compact S&S tourer in order to cram as much other stuff in a standard 62" (158cm) box with it as possible up to the 50lb (23kg) limit...

Last edited by imi; 01-17-10 at 09:14 AM.
imi is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LuckySailor
Touring
19
11-13-16 06:43 AM
redbagsrambler
Touring
10
09-06-16 11:48 AM
Squeezebox
Touring
8
01-12-16 03:50 AM
Walter S
Touring
24
01-17-13 10:40 PM
Tandem Tom
Touring
13
10-12-12 09:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.