Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Jamis Aurora Elite (2009) Gearing Question

    I am considering purchasing a 2009 Jamis Aurora Elite. Due to being overweight, I really struggle with the hills and therefore like a really easy pedalling granny gear.

    So, if I wanted to lower the gearing on this bike, what all would I have to change?

    Derailleurs - Shimano Ultegra GS rear & 105 front, 28.6mm clamp
    Shiftlevers - Shimano 105 Dual Control STI, 30-speed
    Cassette - Shimano CS-5600, 10-speed, 12-27
    Crankset - FSA Gossamer Triple, 50/39/30,

    http://www.jamisbikes.com/usa/thebik...lite_spec.html

    Of course, I could always just go with the base Aurora model.

  2. #2
    ah.... sure. kayakdiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Whidbey Island WA
    My Bikes
    Specialized.... schwinn..... enough to fill my needs..
    Posts
    4,106
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Least expensive and simple would be to install a mountain crankset. Going as low as a 22 small ring would make it a billy goat. Should be able to find an LX Shimano crank for $150 or less. The swap is simple and the only other thing needed would be to shorten your chain.

    You could go with a mountain Derailleur and cassette as well but.... I would go with the crank first and see if you really need lower gearing after trying the mountain crank.

    my 2 cents...
    Save 15% on your first order at Hammer Nutrition!!

    2010 Giant TCR SL 3
    2010 Novara Randonee

  3. #3
    Galveston County Texas 10 Wheels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    In The Wind
    My Bikes
    GTO
    Posts
    25,914
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Go with the Aurora Model and change the 50/39/30 crank to a 50/39/24.

    I rode a 50/39/30 cross country and wished I that change the small ring to a 24T.
    [SIZE=1][B]What I like about Texas[/B]
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGukLuXzH1E

    Set F1re To The Ra1n ( NY Night Rain Ride)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7jfcWEkSrI

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    45
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I agree, I have changed to a 24T on my triple. It makes hills 20% easier for about $20. By far the biggest bang for the buck.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    54
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bfree View Post
    I agree, I have changed to a 24T on my triple. It makes hills 20% easier for about $20. By far the biggest bang for the buck.
    I agree that this is a good solution, I did the same on my touring bike. But be aware that if you do this your rear derailleur probably won't allow you to use all the ring/cog combos. It won't be able to take up enough of the slack in the chain if you go into the small ring and smallest cogs. This isn't really a problem, when you're in the small ring you'll usually be in the big cogs anyway, but it's something to be aware of.

    Chris

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •