Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: Trek 520?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Kansas
    My Bikes
    What is a bicycle?
    Posts
    64
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Trek 520?

    I am planning on getting a new touring bike and I was planning on getting a 2010 Surly Long Haul Trucker($1100), but the bike store has a 2008 Trek 520 in my size on sale for $800.

    How does the Trek 520 match up to the Surly LHT? Is it as good a bike, or should I stick with getting a new LHT? I've heard some complaints about the gearing, but that's replaceable. Are there any other problems with the Trek 520?

  2. #2
    on by skijor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Wisconsin
    My Bikes
    Trek 730, Waterford RS-33, Salsa Vaya, Vision R40
    Posts
    864
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Try these for starters
    http://www.bikeforums.net/search.php?searchid=245089

    vB 4.0 search is still messed up. This link worked yesterday. Four 520 vs LHT hits were listed, one of them was the same as raybo refers to in post #9. And note that since I've edited this, this is now post #0. wtf?!
    Last edited by skijor; 03-07-10 at 07:16 AM.

  3. #3
    Gouge Away kaliayev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    BFOH
    Posts
    1,059
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You will find many in both camps. I have a 520 and like it's ride better than the LHT. Also in my size the LHT does not come in 700c wheels. To some it is no big deal, but to me it was pretty much a deal killer from the start. Either though will serve you well. Buy which fits you best and the ride you prefer.

    BTW I bought a NOS 2004 frameset and built it up. Fun and speced to my prefs.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    537
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Trek updated the gearing on the 520 starting in 2009. You are correct in that the 2008 will probably need some changes. Ask the shop how much they would charge to update the 2008 gearing to match the 2009.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,155
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by smith-great View Post

    How does the Trek 520 match up to the Surly LHT? Is it as good a bike, or should I stick with getting a new LHT? I've heard some complaints about the gearing, but that's replaceable. Are there any other problems with the Trek 520?
    ride and decide, my $.02 is if you're riding unloaded most of the time the 520, if you're riding loaded down most of the time or want to ride with big tires the LHT. "as good as.." doesn't figure in, they're different and both good.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    6,992
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd decide based on fit, wheel size and price. If you ever want to do off-road touring, the LHT has it due to the wheels. Otherwise, whichever fits you best.

    I have a 520 with the crank changed out to MTB gearing - and I think it's great. If I had it to do over again, I would test ride both - but the LHT wasn't available when I was buying.
    ...

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Northern VT
    My Bikes
    recumbent & upright
    Posts
    1,497
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    IMHO- ride both [if you can] - then decide.
    For me, the 520 was a better balance of ride features [520 felt more like a road bike- LHT seemed more like a mtn bike], plus I liked the V brakes.
    ps- I did modify the gearing from a triple to a 26/39 double and the cassette to an 11-34. I also put replaced the left bar end with a down tube shifter so I could mount a mirracycle mirror in the bar end.
    Last edited by martianone; 03-06-10 at 04:52 AM.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,155
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by martianone View Post
    IMHO- ride both [if you can] - then decide.
    For me, the 520 was a better balance of ride features [520 felt more like a road bike- LHT seemed more like a mtn bike] .
    520 feels like a bike, LHT feels more like a tour bus, it comes into it's own with front panniers on low riders.

  9. #9
    Bike touring webrarian
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    My Bikes
    I tour on a Waterford Adventurecycle. It is a fabulous touring bike.
    Posts
    1,516
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Check this thread out: Surly LHT vs Trek 520

    It is on this same topic.
    Visit the on-line Bike Touring Archive at www.biketouringtips.com

  10. #10
    Junior Member L'Ardent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    In a small village, 100kms west of Quebec city, Canada
    My Bikes
    An old Raleigh that I use for everything and a Marinoni Sportivo
    Posts
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A Trek 520 for 800$, it's a bargain. Here in Canada the 2010 model of Trek 520 is around 1600$. I had a LHT for a couple of years, used it for commuting, never got to touring fully loaded. A comfortable bike but a bit on the heavy side for my taste. Sold it last fall and I'm shopping for a new bike... If I could get my hands on a Trek 520 at a fair price i'd go for it, looks like a winner to me.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Grim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Atlanta
    My Bikes
    Cannondale T700s and a few others
    Posts
    2,991
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I believe if you check the geometry the 520 is more of a "Sport Touring" frame. It has shorter chain stays then the LHT. The long chain stays are why the LHT has the "Truck " comments. The 520 will feel more sporty but the short stays may give you heel strike issues if you plan on full loaded touring. If so the LHT would be the better choice.
    You cant have a signature unless it fits in this box

  12. #12
    Senior Member TonyS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Springfield, MO
    My Bikes
    Trek 1200
    Posts
    300
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    LOL is N+1 on vacation today or something?! Get both! Clearly, you'll need one bike for road touring and one for off-road touring.

  13. #13
    on by skijor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Wisconsin
    My Bikes
    Trek 730, Waterford RS-33, Salsa Vaya, Vision R40
    Posts
    864
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    LHT chainstays are 18.1" = 45.974cm
    520's are 45.0cm

    If the OP has average size feet (e.g. 10 men's US) then this difference isn't a big deal.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    6,992
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Trek 520 is a fully-loaded-touring bike, not sport touring. True, the chainstays are one cm shorter than the LHT, but they are still 45cm, same as Bruce Gordon's large size tour bikes. I rode with a guy on a large 520, he was 6'3" with size 13 feet, Lone Peak P500 panniers, stock trek rack - not an issue for him.
    ...

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    6,992
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyS View Post
    LOL is N+1 on vacation today or something?! Get both! Clearly, you'll need one bike for road touring and one for off-road touring.
    Dude, I like the way you think.
    ...

  16. #16
    More Energy than Sense aroundoz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    155 miles north of Spokane
    My Bikes
    Thorn Sherpa, Co-Motion Custom Road, Salsa Fargo, Mercian King of Mercia and Motobecane Fantom Pro 29er
    Posts
    710
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have had both. Some things to think about:

    The LHT will have a longer HT and if you are tall, this will help in getting your bars higher without having to use a crazy angle stem.
    The LHT will accommodate much larger tires so if you plan on doing dirt roads or trails, that would be a deal killer for me for the 520.
    The LHT has a slacker seat tube angle at least in the larger sizes. May be an issue if you have long thighs and use a B17.
    The LHT has a much prettier fork!

    I found the 520 fun to ride unloaded and it was a great shoulder season road bike when there was a lot of gravel on the roads. If you plan on staying mostly on the pavement, $800 is a bargain.

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Kansas
    My Bikes
    What is a bicycle?
    Posts
    64
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for all of your advice.

    The 2008 Trek 520 with MTB gears arrived home today (from the local Surly dealer). So far it seems like a great bike. It fits well and was out on the roads this afternoon.
    Since I am a woman, heel strike shouldn't be a problem.

    How ironic; I was flat out told by the local Trek store that the 520 is not even made in my size (43/45 cm). They recommended the Specialized Tri-Cross or a Cannondale instead, neither of which fit me. The local Surly store didn't have any LHT's in my size to try out, but they did have the 2008 Trek 520 and were willing to order a LHT if I wanted it instead.

  18. #18
    ah.... sure. kayakdiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Whidbey Island WA
    My Bikes
    Specialized.... schwinn..... enough to fill my needs..
    Posts
    4,109
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by smith-great View Post
    Thanks for all of your advice.

    The 2008 Trek 520 with MTB gears arrived home today (from the local Surly dealer). So far it seems like a great bike. It fits well and was out on the roads this afternoon.
    Since I am a woman, heel strike shouldn't be a problem.

    How ironic; I was flat out told by the local Trek store that the 520 is not even made in my size (43/45 cm). They recommended the Specialized Tri-Cross or a Cannondale instead, neither of which fit me. The local Surly store didn't have any LHT's in my size to try out, but they did have the 2008 Trek 520 and were willing to order a LHT if I wanted it instead.
    Congratulations on the new ride... Pictures or it didn't happen
    Save 15% on your first order at Hammer Nutrition!!

    2010 Giant TCR SL 3
    2010 Novara Randonee

  19. #19
    Senior Member BengeBoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Seattle, Washington, USA
    My Bikes
    2009 Chris Boedeker custom, 1988 Tommasini Prestige, 2007 Bill Davidson custom, 1985 Univega Gran Turismo; 1988 Specialized Stumpjumper
    Posts
    6,923
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Congrats on the new bike. The 520 is a fine touring bike; you should have a lot of fun with it.

  20. #20
    Senior Member DVC45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    My Bikes
    Schwinn Paramount '91, Downtube Nova and I want more! :)
    Posts
    3,537
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ' just finished building mine.

    Congrats to both of us!
    "Cycling is for pleasure not penance"

  21. #21
    Senior Member capejohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Fairhaven, Massachusetts
    My Bikes
    Novara Randonee, Felt Z45, Marin Belvedere Commuter
    Posts
    1,672
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by smith-great View Post
    Thanks for all of your advice.

    The 2008 Trek 520 with MTB gears arrived home today (from the local Surly dealer). So far it seems like a great bike. It fits well and was out on the roads this afternoon.
    Since I am a woman, heel strike shouldn't be a problem.

    How ironic; I was flat out told by the local Trek store that the 520 is not even made in my size (43/45 cm).

    They recommended the Specialized Tri-Cross or a Cannondale instead, neither of which fit me. The local Surly store didn't have any LHT's in my size to try out, but they did have the 2008 Trek 520 and were willing to order a LHT if I wanted it instead.

    I see you have made your decision. I was going to post that I would buy the 520 because of all the good things I have read from people on tour at crazyguy. The LHT is fine too, but a lot can be done with that saved cash.
    Bike riding Northern gentleman.

  22. #22
    Senior Member HC203's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Baltimore,MD
    My Bikes
    Madone 08,Trek520,Bianchi Pista,Raleigh Tandem,Cdale SuperV
    Posts
    783
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Trek 520 is a tank, great for loaded touring. Swap out that stock Trek seat for a Brooks, get some fenders, etc. Love the bar end shifters. I do have trouble keeping up with the group on the rare occassion when I use it for group rides. I bought a new third ring as the stock granny isn't really a bailout gear. Huffing over any of the Shenandoah Mt passes was difficult.
    Got mine new for $600.00 and change, a tad small but I can get down in the drops comfortably.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  23. #23
    Cycle Year Round CB HI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Honolulu, HI
    Posts
    11,102
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Even if I did not want the Trek 520 for touring, at $800 I would grab it for commuting.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •