Building up an ultralight tourer
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 49
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Building up an ultralight tourer
I currently have a Surly LHT for my long tours, but was looking to build up an ultralight tourer for 3-5 day jaunts. Anyone have any recommendations on frames or complete bikes? I was thinking of using the Surly Pacer as I've certainly had good luck with the brand in the past, but I'm not really sure if it's the best frame for the job. I'll probably use a Carradice saddlebag and maybe a Tubus Fly rear rack (only if I can't squeeze/lash everything onto the saddlebag). Would the Pacer be up for the job, or are there more suitable frames?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 8,896
Bikes: Waterford RST-22, Bob Jackson World Tour, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Soma Saga, De Bernardi SL, Specialized Sequoia
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 196 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
My Bob Jackson World Tour weighed about 6 lbs. for the frame and fork with an uncut steerer tube and lots of bolts in the braze-ons for fenders, water bottles. Built up, it weighed only about 21.5 lbs. with a 9-speed DA/Ultegra group and Campy Centaur crank, Open Pro wheels, DA bar-end shifters, pedals and Nitto front rack -- but not including computer, seatbag, rear rack. That is pretty light for a touring bike. Using a Carradice bag should save weight compared to most panniers. Packing and component choice is very important if you want to keep it as light as possible.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,570
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
My Bob Jackson World Tour weighed about 6 lbs. for the frame and fork with an uncut steerer tube and lots of bolts in the braze-ons for fenders, water bottles. Built up, it weighed only about 21.5 lbs. with a 9-speed DA/Ultegra group and Campy Centaur crank, Open Pro wheels, DA bar-end shifters, pedals and Nitto front rack -- but not including computer, seatbag, rear rack. That is pretty light for a touring bike. Using a Carradice bag should save weight compared to most panniers. Packing and component choice is very important if you want to keep it as light as possible.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest/Chicago Area
Posts: 128
Bikes: 2009 Salsa Fargo; 2009 Scott CX Team; 2007 Trek 7.5FX; 2010 Specialized Rockhopper 29 Expert; 1990 GT Timberline; Custom Raleigh CrMo roadbike from forever ago
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Might want to look at the Jamis Endura series. I think I read where the frame has fender and rack mounts even though its carbon. Takes wide tires too.
#6
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
I'd build up a Soma Smoothie ES with a carbon fork. long reach brakes, relaxed geometry, long head tube IMO. Tange Prestige tubing.
and fairly inexpensive.
and fairly inexpensive.
#7
Senior Member
If you're going ultra light, don't fuss. Either carbon, or better still, titanium. Brooks Ti saddle and a Carradice Camper or a Nelson Longflap at minimum.
I've built up a CF bike as a randonnee bike, which means I am consistently doing long training day rides and then events. If I was going ultralight touring, I wouldn't hesitate to use it subjeect to a few small alterations (replacing the Topeak Dynapack with a Nelson or Camper, and the handlebars with alloy ones so I could fit a large handlebar bag to replace the small one on there now).
Machka's new Ti frame is an example of something that will provide light weight and longevity. It doesn't have braze-ons or eyelets, but then for ultra lightweight touring you don't really need them.
As to mechanicals, if you want to go really light, go fixed or singlespeed. I toured France in 2007 on a fixie and it was great fun, so it can be done, depending on terrain of course.
Ultralight touring interests me, but not Machka so much, so I'm not likely to do much of it in the foreseeable future.
I've built up a CF bike as a randonnee bike, which means I am consistently doing long training day rides and then events. If I was going ultralight touring, I wouldn't hesitate to use it subjeect to a few small alterations (replacing the Topeak Dynapack with a Nelson or Camper, and the handlebars with alloy ones so I could fit a large handlebar bag to replace the small one on there now).
Machka's new Ti frame is an example of something that will provide light weight and longevity. It doesn't have braze-ons or eyelets, but then for ultra lightweight touring you don't really need them.
As to mechanicals, if you want to go really light, go fixed or singlespeed. I toured France in 2007 on a fixie and it was great fun, so it can be done, depending on terrain of course.
Ultralight touring interests me, but not Machka so much, so I'm not likely to do much of it in the foreseeable future.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,941
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12191 Post(s)
Liked 1,495 Times
in
1,107 Posts
Depends on what you mean by ultralight. When we tour, I weigh the full panniers, the limit is 22 pounds.
With that for a limit there are no tents, of course. We stay in motels, B&Bs, inns. We stay mostly in places that serve breakfast.
Do you have an ultralight tent? I ask, because if you aren't saving a bunch of weight, is there really a point in doing it?
My bike is a Gunnar Sport, I suggest going with traditional sport geometry or a cross bike. I can't give you exact weights, but my frame
weighs 2-3 pounds less than a Surly. I used a surly fork for a few years, the thing was a beast, super stiff and weighed a ton.
With that for a limit there are no tents, of course. We stay in motels, B&Bs, inns. We stay mostly in places that serve breakfast.
Do you have an ultralight tent? I ask, because if you aren't saving a bunch of weight, is there really a point in doing it?
My bike is a Gunnar Sport, I suggest going with traditional sport geometry or a cross bike. I can't give you exact weights, but my frame
weighs 2-3 pounds less than a Surly. I used a surly fork for a few years, the thing was a beast, super stiff and weighed a ton.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Right where I'm supposed to be
Posts: 1,632
Bikes: Franklin Frames Custom, Rivendell Bombadil
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Liked 209 Times
in
127 Posts
True ultralight would just be a road bike and a light backpack, would it not? Otherwise you're just playing the retail gear game.
Maybe it's just me ..... but a lighter bike and gear does not equal a better experience.
If it's speed you're after ..... you'll never go fast enough.
If it's weight you're after ..... you'll never be light enough.
What I'm saying is dance with the partner you already got. The grass is always greener somewhere else, is it not? You can court the idea of a super nothing-weight bike that'll take you around the moon in 10 days ...... but what do you really gain? A loss of another grand or two?
No offense intended folks ......
Maybe it's just me ..... but a lighter bike and gear does not equal a better experience.
If it's speed you're after ..... you'll never go fast enough.
If it's weight you're after ..... you'll never be light enough.
What I'm saying is dance with the partner you already got. The grass is always greener somewhere else, is it not? You can court the idea of a super nothing-weight bike that'll take you around the moon in 10 days ...... but what do you really gain? A loss of another grand or two?
No offense intended folks ......
#11
Senior Member
I currently have a Surly LHT for my long tours, but was looking to build up an ultralight tourer for 3-5 day jaunts. Anyone have any recommendations on frames or complete bikes? I was thinking of using the Surly Pacer as I've certainly had good luck with the brand in the past, but I'm not really sure if it's the best frame for the job. I'll probably use a Carradice saddlebag and maybe a Tubus Fly rear rack (only if I can't squeeze/lash everything onto the saddlebag). Would the Pacer be up for the job, or are there more suitable frames?
#12
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 49
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If you're going ultra light, don't fuss. Either carbon, or better still, titanium. Brooks Ti saddle and a Carradice Camper or a Nelson Longflap at minimum.
I've built up a CF bike as a randonnee bike, which means I am consistently doing long training day rides and then events. If I was going ultralight touring, I wouldn't hesitate to use it subjeect to a few small alterations (replacing the Topeak Dynapack with a Nelson or Camper, and the handlebars with alloy ones so I could fit a large handlebar bag to replace the small one on there now).
Machka's new Ti frame is an example of something that will provide light weight and longevity. It doesn't have braze-ons or eyelets, but then for ultra lightweight touring you don't really need them.
As to mechanicals, if you want to go really light, go fixed or singlespeed. I toured France in 2007 on a fixie and it was great fun, so it can be done, depending on terrain of course.
Ultralight touring interests me, but not Machka so much, so I'm not likely to do much of it in the foreseeable future.
I've built up a CF bike as a randonnee bike, which means I am consistently doing long training day rides and then events. If I was going ultralight touring, I wouldn't hesitate to use it subjeect to a few small alterations (replacing the Topeak Dynapack with a Nelson or Camper, and the handlebars with alloy ones so I could fit a large handlebar bag to replace the small one on there now).
Machka's new Ti frame is an example of something that will provide light weight and longevity. It doesn't have braze-ons or eyelets, but then for ultra lightweight touring you don't really need them.
As to mechanicals, if you want to go really light, go fixed or singlespeed. I toured France in 2007 on a fixie and it was great fun, so it can be done, depending on terrain of course.
Ultralight touring interests me, but not Machka so much, so I'm not likely to do much of it in the foreseeable future.
Depends on what you mean by ultralight. When we tour, I weigh the full panniers, the limit is 22 pounds.
With that for a limit there are no tents, of course. We stay in motels, B&Bs, inns. We stay mostly in places that serve breakfast.
Do you have an ultralight tent? I ask, because if you aren't saving a bunch of weight, is there really a point in doing it?
My bike is a Gunnar Sport, I suggest going with traditional sport geometry or a cross bike. I can't give you exact weights, but my frame
weighs 2-3 pounds less than a Surly. I used a surly fork for a few years, the thing was a beast, super stiff and weighed a ton.
With that for a limit there are no tents, of course. We stay in motels, B&Bs, inns. We stay mostly in places that serve breakfast.
Do you have an ultralight tent? I ask, because if you aren't saving a bunch of weight, is there really a point in doing it?
My bike is a Gunnar Sport, I suggest going with traditional sport geometry or a cross bike. I can't give you exact weights, but my frame
weighs 2-3 pounds less than a Surly. I used a surly fork for a few years, the thing was a beast, super stiff and weighed a ton.
True ultralight would just be a road bike and a light backpack, would it not? Otherwise you're just playing the retail gear game.
Maybe it's just me ..... but a lighter bike and gear does not equal a better experience.
If it's speed you're after ..... you'll never go fast enough.
If it's weight you're after ..... you'll never be light enough.
What I'm saying is dance with the partner you already got. The grass is always greener somewhere else, is it not? You can court the idea of a super nothing-weight bike that'll take you around the moon in 10 days ...... but what do you really gain? A loss of another grand or two?
No offense intended folks ......
Maybe it's just me ..... but a lighter bike and gear does not equal a better experience.
If it's speed you're after ..... you'll never go fast enough.
If it's weight you're after ..... you'll never be light enough.
What I'm saying is dance with the partner you already got. The grass is always greener somewhere else, is it not? You can court the idea of a super nothing-weight bike that'll take you around the moon in 10 days ...... but what do you really gain? A loss of another grand or two?
No offense intended folks ......
Combos of saddlebags and handlebar bags work well on most bikes because they need minimal support and you can use a bike without eyelets. However, you're still touring so I think it's best to avoid super short wheelbase, tight tire clearance bikes. So look for a sport tourer, audax, randonneur type geometry that will be comfortable and give you the ability to run 28mm tires. Long days spent on 120psi 23mm tires are hard and on tour you never know when you'll need to go off road a bit.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 81 Times
in
64 Posts
Not knowing your BMI the easiest place to take weight off is the crap that gets put on the bike. I'd be shy about putting 30lbs on a 20lb. road bike with light wheels but 18lbs on a 25lb road bike with bomber wheels be lighter overall. All of which is kind of irrelevant if you're packing on an extra 30lbs of body fat.
#14
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
I have a tough time stuffing full ultralite camping kit with the gear i want to carry for bike touring into a handlebar bag and a carradice - i always seem to desire a skosh more room, need to strap something on top and wonder too what i'd do with the bag of groceries on the way to the campsite.
#15
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 49
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Nice build, Bekologist. The camping gear was my main concern, but I think a hammock and sleeping bag liner (It'll most likely be just a summer-only getup) should solve that problem. Plus, my touring diet usually consists of plain quinoa and peanut butter and jelly on a tortilla, so that's generally pretty compact
#16
One legged rider
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Moraga, CA
Posts: 1,390
Bikes: Kuota Kharma, Surly LHT, CAAD9, Bianchi fg/ss
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I saw a guy a while back, can't remember where, who instead of a handlebar bag had is sleeping bag/pad/tent rolled up or stuffed in a stuff sack and strapped under his handle bars. Seemed like it would work, then the rest of the gear on the back.
#17
Senior Member
There was a thread started a while back by a guy named Nun who had an awesome three season touring setup with just a handlebar bag and carradice saddle bag. He even has a video on youtube with him showing you what he has in all his bags. I think his total luggage weight was under 20 pounds and I think the bike was a Rivindel A. Homer Hilsen.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RatMudd
General Cycling Discussion
3
10-14-14 09:08 PM
sherpa41
Commuting
18
06-11-12 12:54 PM