Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-15-10, 01:27 PM   #1
mijome07
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
mijome07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: So Cal
Bikes:
Posts: 1,552
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Anyone see the new 2010 Motobecane Gran Turismo?

$700 shipped.

mijome07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-10, 03:20 PM   #2
sonatageek
Senior Member
 
sonatageek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cleveland,Ohio
Bikes:
Posts: 2,766
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
The lack of front fork eyelets is strange.
sonatageek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-10, 03:45 PM   #3
Blues Frog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 550
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
In the photo I think I see a threaded hole in the fork almost 1/2 of the way up to the brakes? Wing Nut
Blues Frog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-10, 04:50 PM   #4
mijome07
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
mijome07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: So Cal
Bikes:
Posts: 1,552
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatageek View Post
The lack of front fork eyelets is strange.
I agree.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wing Nut View Post
In the photo I think I see a threaded hole in the fork almost 1/2 of the way up to the brakes? Wing Nut
Those are braze-ons.
mijome07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-10, 05:30 PM   #5
BengeBoy 
Senior Member
 
BengeBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Bikes: 2014 Pivot Mach 5.7 MTB, 2009 Chris Boedeker custom, 1988 Tommasini Prestige, 2007 Bill Davidson custom; 1988 Specialized Stumpjumper
Posts: 6,941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I clicked through to BD's website and they have a whole gallery of photos there -- I couldn't see front fork eyelets on those photos, either. Seems odd. If they're out to copy the Surly LHT they should have paid closer attention.

Also, the geometry chart says the chainstays are 440mm (17.3 inches). Seems short to me for a fully loaded touring bike.

Otherwise, nice effort, great price if the wheels are any good.
BengeBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-10, 05:39 PM   #6
kayakdiver
ah.... sure.
 
kayakdiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Whidbey Island WA
Bikes: Specialized.... schwinn..... enough to fill my needs..
Posts: 4,107
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Wouldn't want to depend on that rack for any long tour... but that's just me.
kayakdiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-10, 05:40 PM   #7
BengeBoy 
Senior Member
 
BengeBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Bikes: 2014 Pivot Mach 5.7 MTB, 2009 Chris Boedeker custom, 1988 Tommasini Prestige, 2007 Bill Davidson custom; 1988 Specialized Stumpjumper
Posts: 6,941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kayakdiver View Post
Wouldn't want to depend on that rack for any long tour... but that's just me.

Good point.
BengeBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-10, 06:31 PM   #8
mijome07
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
mijome07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: So Cal
Bikes:
Posts: 1,552
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yeah, that rear rack would be replaced quick-style.
mijome07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-10, 07:18 PM   #9
Standalone 
babylon by bike
 
Standalone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Haven, CT, USA
Bikes: Road, Cargo, Tandem, Etc.
Posts: 3,109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
no front fender eyelets isn't just strange, it's bizarre. the windsor has 'em...
__________________
The bicycle, the bicycle surely, should always be the vehicle of novelists and poets. Christopher Morley
Standalone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-10, 09:03 PM   #10
robow
Senior Member
 
robow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 2,728
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Other than the front fork snafu, that's a lot of bike for the buck. Both Axiom and Old Man Mountain make front racks that would easily work.
robow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-10, 02:09 PM   #11
helmut
Senior Member
 
helmut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 435
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It's not much different from the Tourist. Replaced the STIs with bar ends and a fork with no eyelets. Same threaded headset, same chainstay length. Looks like they've added an XT RD. I'd buy the tourist, sell the STIs for bar ends, and XT and still be ahead a little.
helmut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-10, 02:12 PM   #12
robow
Senior Member
 
robow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 2,728
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
The crankset is different than the Tourist, geared lower and a nicer Sugino.
robow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-10, 09:16 PM   #13
dokydoky
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 120
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Lugged fork is a nice touch too, and the paint color and silver decals remind me of my Miyata 1000!
dokydoky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-10, 09:25 PM   #14
DukeArcher 
Senior Member
 
DukeArcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Bikes: Thorn Nomad S+S, Trek 520 - 2007 (out on loan), and a crap Repco MTB
Posts: 604
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BengeBoy View Post
If they're out to copy the Surly LHT they should have paid closer attention.
Why would you think they are copying the Surly?
__________________
Sparsely updated blog
DukeArcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-10, 09:55 PM   #15
BengeBoy 
Senior Member
 
BengeBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Bikes: 2014 Pivot Mach 5.7 MTB, 2009 Chris Boedeker custom, 1988 Tommasini Prestige, 2007 Bill Davidson custom; 1988 Specialized Stumpjumper
Posts: 6,941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DukeArcher View Post
Why would you think they are copying the Surly?
Everything they do is a copy of something. I just figured they were trying to copy Surly. Maybe I was wrong.
BengeBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-10, 06:00 AM   #16
Jason88
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Bikesdirect confirmed that the bike shipped does not have fender eyelets. This has to be a design/oversight screw-up. The only front rack I am aware of that might fit is the overpriced Nitto front platform rack, which apparently won't hold panniers. So now BD has the Windsor, which really isn't geared low enough for touring, and the Motobecane, which has is geared lower but doesn't have fender eyelets to properly mount a front rack. They need to hire someone who can spec a bike correctly the first time. I won't hold my breath.
Jason88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-10, 04:55 AM   #17
cs1
Senior Member
 
cs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Clev Oh
Bikes: Specialized, Schwinn
Posts: 6,682
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by robow View Post
The crankset is different than the Tourist, geared lower and a nicer Sugino.
Those Sugino cranks are over $100 new. That's a lot of crank for a $700 bike. Seems like it's more of an all around road bike than a true touring bike. Still, it's a heck of a deal.
cs1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-10, 06:25 AM   #18
Jason88
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Bikesdirect informed me via email on 06-24-10 that "Apparently the fork was speced incorrectly and this will be changed for the next production run this winter." This might be a good time to offer suggestions as to other spec changes. For instance, I'd like to see it geared even lower. A slightly longer chain stay would be nice. An option for a non-drop bar would be ok with me with me. Cut out the seat and the pedals and either drop the price accordingly or add an upgrade in lieu thereof.

You think they'd take an offer of $400 each for the remaining bikes? At that price you could customize the bike to suit your purpose.
Jason88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-10, 07:39 AM   #19
NoGaBiker
But wait... I AM the man.
 
NoGaBiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: No Ga.
Bikes: Merlin Extralight DA, 1982 Peugeot CFX-10 Campy NR, 7 Cruisers kept at beach, Raleigh Passage 4.0 hybrid, Marin Commuter with racks and bags
Posts: 641
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason88 View Post
You think they'd take an offer of $400 each for the remaining bikes? At that price you could customize the bike to suit your purpose.
They probably would take that, but are you prepared to buy the 500 bikes they probably have remaining?
NoGaBiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-10, 07:50 AM   #20
indyfabz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 9,601
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 491 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BengeBoy View Post
Also, the geometry chart says the chainstays are 440mm (17.3 inches). Seems short to me for a fully loaded touring bike.
So my guess that, from the photo posted on a similar thread, the chainstays looked short was correct. Be warry if you have large feet and racks that do not allow for a lot of fore-aft pannier adjustment.
indyfabz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-10, 04:19 AM   #21
cs1
Senior Member
 
cs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Clev Oh
Bikes: Specialized, Schwinn
Posts: 6,682
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mijome07 View Post
$700 shipped.

After looking at the Moto real close the lack of front eyelets are a mistake. But, the bike looks great for us ludites who still want a do everything steel frame bike. Component choice is a little eclectic but still nice. If it was my bike all I'd change is the saddle to a Brooks and just ride it. I don't tour so the lack of eyelets only impedes adding fenders.
cs1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-10, 11:38 AM   #22
jeffpoulin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 2,178
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Looks like it would make an okay rando bike, or a good credit card touring bike, or a commuter, or a bike for fun day rides. Not a real touring bike, but it doesn't look too bad to me for other uses.
jeffpoulin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-10, 11:59 AM   #23
MitchL
Senior Member
 
MitchL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Maine
Bikes:
Posts: 149
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I had read on a post somewhere else in the forums that bikesdirect purchased the rights to use the name Motobecane (and the others brands they sell) but the bikes don't actually have anything to do with the real company. You may want to look into if furthere before purchasing from that site.
MitchL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-10, 12:12 PM   #24
staehpj1 
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Bikes:
Posts: 8,865
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffpoulin View Post
Looks like it would make an okay rando bike, or a good credit card touring bike, or a commuter, or a bike for fun day rides. Not a real touring bike, but it doesn't look too bad to me for other uses.
It looks like a Windsor Tourist with some upgrades. Better crank (and therefore more suitable gearing) and apparently better wheels are nice touches. I'd rather have the Windsor Tourist's STI brifters though.

As far as whether it is a "real touring bike"... I used my Windsor Tourist for loaded touring on the Trans America (4200+ miles) and a couple other longish tours including a month in the Sierras and found it completely adequate.
staehpj1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-10, 12:39 PM   #25
jeffpoulin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 2,178
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by staehpj1 View Post
It looks like a Windsor Tourist with some upgrades. Better crank (and therefore more suitable gearing) and apparently better wheels are nice touches. I'd rather have the Windsor Tourist's STI brifters though.

As far as whether it is a "real touring bike"... I used my Windsor Tourist for loaded touring on the Trans America (4200+ miles) and a couple other longish tours including a month in the Sierras and found it completely adequate.
Fair enough, but at least the windsor tourist has fork eyelets. Without them, you're looking at a handlebar bag and all the other weight in the back. It's doable, but not ideal. Certainly not something you'd expect from a bike designed for touring.
jeffpoulin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:19 PM.