Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Carbon Frame for "Loaded" Touring?

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Carbon Frame for "Loaded" Touring?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-04, 02:25 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,250
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Carbon Frame for "Loaded" Touring?

Carbon frame bikes seem popular with folks who race road bikes, or like to look like someone who races road bikes.

But, most of the road bikes that I have seen that are designed for "heavy", or "loaded" touring seem to hve steel frames, and the Cannondale touring road bikes also appear popular.

Has anyone on the forum done "loaded" touring (tours with a rider/gear/contents total of well over 200 pounds) on a road bike with a carbon main frame?

If you have NOT done so, do you know a rider who has done so?

Why, when steel frames are so UNpopular with the "racing" crowd, do steel frames remain so well liked by the riders who do loaded touring?
alanbikehouston is offline  
Old 10-25-04, 08:09 PM
  #2  
Steel is Real.
 
markw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lakeside, CA
Posts: 967
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
One word. Durable. Carbon is used in racing because it's light and doesn't have to carry the load. Carbon won't handle the abuse that steel will.
markw is offline  
Old 10-25-04, 09:31 PM
  #3  
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 28

Bikes: 2003 Rocky Mountain Stratos

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Also, from what I understand, if you were to break a steel frame (unlikely) you could have it welded back together most anywhere. If you broke a carbon frame ... well, I guess you could try duct tape.
Disaster Monkey is offline  
Old 10-26-04, 09:54 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 3,602
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Liked 97 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by Disaster Monkey
Also, from what I understand, if you were to break a steel frame (unlikely) you could have it welded back together most anywhere. If you broke a carbon frame ... well, I guess you could try duct tape.
thats bull. welding a steel bike would be sketchy as hell. would you load 50 pounds of cargo plus yourself and go 40 mph down a mountain on a frame that some hack welded together with a blowtorch? ****, I would trust the duct-taped carbon frame first.

and markw, carbon is actually stronger then steel. the reason its so light is that it is stronger so less can be used. theres no reason why, from an engineering standpoint, that carbon couldn't be made strong enough to tour with.

there is one thing you'd have to overcome though, is the problem of delamination from scratching it. when deep scratches in the carbon actually tear the carbon "weave" it weakens the carbon a lot. this means that it would be difficult to attach things like racks and whatnot to the frame. You'd need a lot of "braze-ons" and custom racks, probably, becuase I wouldn't clamp anything on a carbon frame.

This problem could be overcome, and I think that if it was, then carbon would be a good material to tour on, stiff enough to bear the weight of a load, but still smooth with the vibration damping of carbon.
Phatman is offline  
Old 10-26-04, 11:03 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Field repairs with carbon are (according to some) pretty easy. Just take some epoxy resin and a carbon ribbon or patch.
MichaelW is offline  
Old 10-26-04, 11:11 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
late's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,941
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12192 Post(s)
Liked 1,496 Times in 1,108 Posts
Nobody makes a carbon touring frame. That tells me all I need to know.
late is offline  
Old 10-26-04, 11:20 AM
  #7  
DEADBEEF
 
khuon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 12,234

Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
A carbon frame can be made strong enough for touring. Consider that there are several CF tandem manufacturers. The reason we haven't seen CF tourers so far is more a marketting and public perception thing than a technological one.
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
khuon is offline  
Old 10-26-04, 11:26 AM
  #8  
hello
 
roadfix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 18,694
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 193 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times in 52 Posts
If you must use a carbon racing frame, use a two-wheeled trailer.
roadfix is offline  
Old 10-26-04, 12:35 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 7,143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Phatman
thats bull. welding a steel bike would be sketchy as hell. would you load 50 pounds of cargo plus yourself and go 40 mph down a mountain on a frame that some hack welded together with a blowtorch? ****, I would trust the duct-taped carbon frame first.

and markw, carbon is actually stronger then steel. the reason its so light is that it is stronger so less can be used. theres no reason why, from an engineering standpoint, that carbon couldn't be made strong enough to tour with.

there is one thing you'd have to overcome though, is the problem of delamination from scratching it. when deep scratches in the carbon actually tear the carbon "weave" it weakens the carbon a lot. this means that it would be difficult to attach things like racks and whatnot to the frame. You'd need a lot of "braze-ons" and custom racks, probably, becuase I wouldn't clamp anything on a carbon frame.

This problem could be overcome, and I think that if it was, then carbon would be a good material to tour on, stiff enough to bear the weight of a load, but still smooth with the vibration damping of carbon.
What about comfort? Is there a carbon frame that offers the comfort of a low Reynolds chromoly? You could probably use it for light touring but there really is no reason to use Lance's bike for touring anymore than you would buy a Trek 520 for racing.
Dahon.Steve is offline  
Old 10-26-04, 03:20 PM
  #10  
Macro Geek
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 1,362

Bikes: True North tourer (www.truenorthcycles.com), 2004; Miyata 1000, 1985

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 7 Posts
My touring bicycle has a foco steel frame and a carbon fork. The bike has been through one major tour and lots of local runs to the grocery store. The fork has a few surface scratches, but that's par for the course. The bike is a pleasure to ride, and the fork is holding up fine.

The bike was designed and built by Hugh Black of True North Cycles, who hand- crafts bikes from steel, aluminum, titanium, and carbon. See: https://www.truenorthcycles.com. His touring bicycles are stunning.

Alan
acantor is offline  
Old 10-26-04, 11:00 PM
  #11  
Steel is Real.
 
markw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lakeside, CA
Posts: 967
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Again, the carbon will not handle the abuse. A good scratch in carbon can cause catastrophic failure. Strong as steel, yes, as durable, no. Don't get me wrong, I've ridden Trek 5200's and those are NICE, however, I've also seen carbon parts fail. And no I wouldn't want a hack to weld a steel frame either. It will just give me warm fuzzies to know that if I missed a scratch or gouge in the paint of my steel frame it's probably not going to break. But if I picked something up and gouged a carbon chainstay without realizing it, it could and probably would fail under a touring load.
markw is offline  
Old 11-01-04, 02:57 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pleasant View UT
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have seen a carbon frame brake near the botom braket from pulling a lightly loaded trailer.
Rico is offline  
Old 11-01-04, 03:32 PM
  #13  
Pedalpower
 
clayface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Why should anyone worry about the lightness of a bike/frame when 20, maybe 30, kilos are hanging from the racks?
I guess loaded tourers are made of steel because this material has been tested over decades.
Do you consider 12/13 kilos of frame and components a heavy bike? Come on...
clayface is offline  
Old 11-01-04, 06:34 PM
  #14  
Macro Geek
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 1,362

Bikes: True North tourer (www.truenorthcycles.com), 2004; Miyata 1000, 1985

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by clayface
Why should anyone worry about the lightness of a bike/frame when 20, maybe 30, kilos are hanging from the racks?

...

Do you consider 12/13 kilos of frame and components a heavy bike? Come on...
You have a good point. Bicycles, even steel bicycles, are lighter today than they were, say 15 or 20 years ago. My 1985 Miyata 1000 weighs about 28 lbs (13 kg). I have never weighed my foco steel 2004 True North touring bike, but I am guessing it weighs 7 lbs (3 kg) less. The True North's fork is carbon, but had it been steel, my new bike would still be 20% lighter than my old one.
acantor is offline  
Old 11-01-04, 09:27 PM
  #15  
Steel is Real.
 
markw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lakeside, CA
Posts: 967
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I was impressed by how light my Surly LHT felt. I was expecting a heavier frame. It's just 5lb 7oz in 62cm. I'm guessing it will build into about a 23-25lb bike.
markw is offline  
Old 11-07-04, 06:03 AM
  #16  
Caffeinated.
 
Camel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Waltham, MA
Posts: 1,541

Bikes: Waterford 1900, Quintana Roo Borrego, Trek 8700zx, Bianchi Pista Concept

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Have you considered different geometry? If I had to have carbon fiber to tour on, I'd use a modified MTB, rather than a road bike. My first touring bike was going to be my Trek MTB(8700zx)-it's carbon fiber, bonded to aluminum w/a chromo fork. I found a great deal on a used raleigh road tourer and used that instead.
Camel is offline  
Old 11-07-04, 03:54 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
SteelCommuter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 223
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Phatman
thats bull. welding a steel bike would be sketchy as hell. would you load 50 pounds of cargo plus yourself and go 40 mph down a mountain on a frame that some hack welded together with a blowtorch? ****, I would trust the duct-taped carbon frame first.

and markw, carbon is actually stronger then steel. the reason its so light is that it is stronger so less can be used. theres no reason why, from an engineering standpoint, that carbon couldn't be made strong enough to tour with.

there is one thing you'd have to overcome though, is the problem of delamination from scratching it. when deep scratches in the carbon actually tear the carbon "weave" it weakens the carbon a lot. this means that it would be difficult to attach things like racks and whatnot to the frame. You'd need a lot of "braze-ons" and custom racks, probably, becuase I wouldn't clamp anything on a carbon frame.

This problem could be overcome, and I think that if it was, then carbon would be a good material to tour on, stiff enough to bear the weight of a load, but still smooth with the vibration damping of carbon.

Look, before you respond so quickly and authoratively, think about it. I have an expensive steel touring bike. If my frame developed a small crack after a crash, the steel tubing would hold up long enough for me to find a qualified welder who could fix the bike. People all around the world can weld steel. Since my bike is lugged, if I had the luxury to do so, I could have the tube replaced. Despite all the techno-plastic hype of carbon, if it fails at all, it will fail catastrophically. Not over a duration of time, right away. And you may decide to duct tape your cracked carbon frame, but would I trust it the same way I would trust steel while riding through Chile, or West Bengal, or the dusty rural roads of Vietnam? No way.

Additionally, if I was a frame manufacturer designing and building loaded touring bikes, and somebody wanted a carbon frame, absolutely demanded it, unless I was paid an exorbitant sum I would not warranty it. Steel is the only material manufacturers have enough confidence in that they will offer 25 year warranties. If I was a customer doing loaded touring (not credit card touring) that kind of thing would deter me from buying carbon.

There are many attributes to consider when choosing the best frame material for a given kind of cycling, and there are good reasons why experienced builders do not use carbon for touring frames. You give an excellent one yourself, in your reference to the effect of a scratch in the carbon material. Perhaps the plastics industry will develop something that accomodates all the needs of a loaded touring bike, but until they do, it would be unwise to use carbon frames for touring, and unwise to suggest to someone that they can.
SteelCommuter is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.